Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › KVM-EPYC-2GB only £12/year! 2GB DDR4 / 2 cores / 35GB NVME | CDN77 Germany + Some company news - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

KVM-EPYC-2GB only £12/year! 2GB DDR4 / 2 cores / 35GB NVME | CDN77 Germany + Some company news

245678

Comments

  • suusuu Member

    VPS ID #1292 thank you
    I'd prefer additional disk space

  • doublekillz495doublekillz495 Member

    I just spent £12 last week just enough to get a Ryzen 1C1G20G2T setup and it's so sad..
    Can I change to the current package?

    Thanked by 1Deepak_leb
  • hnhydashuhnhydashu Member

    VPS ID #1293, thank you
    I'd prefer additional disk space

  • CodeHatCodeHat Member

    I‘d like an additional core for my VPS with id #1294.

  • adef_1adef_1 Member

    Guys, are your VPS able to communicate via UDP? It seems like mine is failing.

  • niceghostniceghost Member

    @niceghost said:
    VPS ID: 1283

    Hello, I'd prefer additional disk space
    Thank you!

  • rcy026rcy026 Member

    ID 1295, extra disk space please.

  • AhuiAhui Member

    Hello, German VPS creates a custom MAC address , due to your restrictions on customizing MAC. Only the internal network is connected, but the public network is not connected

  • JamChoiJamChoi Member

    waiting for #ticket-0675

  • pixia1234pixia1234 Member
    edited March 28

    Hey there. Can I customize the cpus and the ram space. I will pay more of course.

  • hostarishostaris Member, Patron Provider

    @pixia1234 said:
    Hey there. Can I customize the cpus and the ram space. I will pay more of course.

    Open a ticket to discuss pricing

  • airinfairinf Member

    vps id 1297
    and I'd prefer additional disk space，thanks

  • ElonBezosElonBezos Member

    KVM-EPYC-2GB

    • 2GB DDR4 RAM
    • 3 vCores (AMD Epyc 7401P) (1vCore as a bonus)
    • 35GB NVMe SSD
    • 1 IPv4 + /64 IPv6
    • 4TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
    • CDN77 DDoS Protection + XDP L7 filters
    • Automatic snapshots

    When you can get the above for only £12/year, that's unbelievable! I'd love to change my single core ryzen box (from you also) with this offer later when it gets expired.

  • RayUresRayUres Member

    ID: 1296
    extra vcpu please.
    (and a little bit extra traffic? ;-) )

  • 88xrzs88xrzs Member

    1298
    Want double traffic
    Thanks

  • MultiMulti Member

    1299

    If it's still possible I would love to exchange the additional vCPU for the 50GB SSD. Thank you very much.

  • 88xrzs88xrzs Member
    edited March 28 
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 870 Mbits/sec   | 508 Mbits/sec   | 16.8 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (10G)       | 884 Mbits/sec   | 644 Mbits/sec   | 12.4 ms
Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | 883 Mbits/sec   | 430 Mbits/sec   | 34.5 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 807 Mbits/sec   | 314 Mbits/sec   | 95.5 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 448 Mbits/sec   | 285 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 690 Mbits/sec   | 278 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 802 Mbits/sec   | 488 Mbits/sec   | 87.4 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 674 Mbits/sec   | 259 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms

    Isn't it 1Gbps? Why is the downlink speed so slow?

  • notdennisnotdennis Member

    @88xrzs said:
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 870 Mbits/sec | 508 Mbits/sec | 16.8 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (10G) | 884 Mbits/sec | 644 Mbits/sec | 12.4 ms
    Telia | Helsinki, FI (10G) | 883 Mbits/sec | 430 Mbits/sec | 34.5 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 807 Mbits/sec | 314 Mbits/sec | 95.5 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 448 Mbits/sec | 285 Mbits/sec | 168 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 690 Mbits/sec | 278 Mbits/sec | 150 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 802 Mbits/sec | 488 Mbits/sec | 87.4 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 674 Mbits/sec | 259 Mbits/sec | 152 ms

    Isn't it 1Gbps? Why is the downlink speed so slow?

    the hell do you mean downlink? its 500mbps, still usable and p fast, it could also be the influx of new users onto the node

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited March 28

    @88xrzs said:

        iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 870 Mbits/sec   | 508 Mbits/sec   | 16.8 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (10G)       | 884 Mbits/sec   | 644 Mbits/sec   | 12.4 ms
    Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | 883 Mbits/sec   | 430 Mbits/sec   | 34.5 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 807 Mbits/sec   | 314 Mbits/sec   | 95.5 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 448 Mbits/sec   | 285 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 690 Mbits/sec   | 278 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 802 Mbits/sec   | 488 Mbits/sec   | 87.4 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 674 Mbits/sec   | 259 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms

    Isn't it 1Gbps? Why is the downlink speed so slow?

    data port is SHARED ..... shared with other VPS on the host server
    one more time, data port is shared

    so many folks assume as if they are getting dedicated data port

  • 88xrzs88xrzs Member

    @dev_vps said:

    @88xrzs said:

        iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 870 Mbits/sec   | 508 Mbits/sec   | 16.8 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (10G)       | 884 Mbits/sec   | 644 Mbits/sec   | 12.4 ms
    Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | 883 Mbits/sec   | 430 Mbits/sec   | 34.5 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 807 Mbits/sec   | 314 Mbits/sec   | 95.5 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 448 Mbits/sec   | 285 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 690 Mbits/sec   | 278 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 802 Mbits/sec   | 488 Mbits/sec   | 87.4 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 674 Mbits/sec   | 259 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms

    Isn't it 1Gbps? Why is the downlink speed so slow?

    data port is SHARED ..... shared with other VPS on the host server
    one more time, data port is shared

    so many folks assume as if they are getting dedicated data port

    I know it’s shared, but the internet speed is obviously slower than other businesses.

  • hostarishostaris Member, Patron Provider

    @88xrzs said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @88xrzs said:

        iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 870 Mbits/sec   | 508 Mbits/sec   | 16.8 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (10G)       | 884 Mbits/sec   | 644 Mbits/sec   | 12.4 ms
    Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | 883 Mbits/sec   | 430 Mbits/sec   | 34.5 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 807 Mbits/sec   | 314 Mbits/sec   | 95.5 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 448 Mbits/sec   | 285 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 690 Mbits/sec   | 278 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 802 Mbits/sec   | 488 Mbits/sec   | 87.4 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 674 Mbits/sec   | 259 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms

    Isn't it 1Gbps? Why is the downlink speed so slow?

    data port is SHARED ..... shared with other VPS on the host server
    one more time, data port is shared

    so many folks assume as if they are getting dedicated data port

    I know it’s shared, but the internet speed is obviously slower than other businesses.

    The servers from YABS are known to sometimes be congested. If you run other benchmarks you will find you can reach around 870Mbit/s.

  • KhadeercasinoKhadeercasino Member

    Fab

  • doublekillz495doublekillz495 Member

    I just spent £12 last week to participate in your last campaign only to end up with a Ryzen1C1G20G2T setup, and now you're putting out £12 Eypc2C2G35G4T package, which is ridiculous!

    Now I want a refund or a replacement configuration for your new £12 package!

    I am disappointed and feel cheated by your lack of planning for the promotion.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited March 28

    @88xrzs said:

    @dev_vps said:

    data port is SHARED ..... shared with other VPS on the host server
    one more time, data port is shared

    so many folks assume as if they are getting dedicated data port

    I know it’s shared, but the internet speed is obviously slower than other businesses.

    if 3 VPS are downloading at the same time, what speed would you expect?

    Go with 10g data port, if you want 1gig or more download speed

    Thanked by 1ElonBezos
  • 88xrzs88xrzs Member

    @hostaris said:

    @88xrzs said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @88xrzs said:

        iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 870 Mbits/sec   | 508 Mbits/sec   | 16.8 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (10G)       | 884 Mbits/sec   | 644 Mbits/sec   | 12.4 ms
    Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | 883 Mbits/sec   | 430 Mbits/sec   | 34.5 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 807 Mbits/sec   | 314 Mbits/sec   | 95.5 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 448 Mbits/sec   | 285 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 690 Mbits/sec   | 278 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 802 Mbits/sec   | 488 Mbits/sec   | 87.4 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 674 Mbits/sec   | 259 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms

    Isn't it 1Gbps? Why is the downlink speed so slow?

    data port is SHARED ..... shared with other VPS on the host server
    one more time, data port is shared

    so many folks assume as if they are getting dedicated data port

    I know it’s shared, but the internet speed is obviously slower than other businesses.

    The servers from YABS are known to sometimes be congested. If you run other benchmarks you will find you can reach around 870Mbit/s.

        root@NC1:~# iperf3 -c 23.153.232.x
    Connecting to host 23.153.232.x, port 5201
    [  5] local 202.61.197.x port 50724 connected to 23.153.232.x port 5201
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
    [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  74.8 MBytes   627 Mbits/sec  2204   3.23 MBytes
    [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  93.8 MBytes   786 Mbits/sec    0   3.53 MBytes
    [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  91.2 MBytes   765 Mbits/sec  145   2.13 MBytes
    [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  68.8 MBytes   577 Mbits/sec  4386   1.72 MBytes
    [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  87.5 MBytes   734 Mbits/sec  143   1.83 MBytes
    [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  80.0 MBytes   671 Mbits/sec    0   2.17 MBytes
    [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  82.5 MBytes   642 Mbits/sec   82   2.17 MBytes
    [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  82.5 MBytes   692 Mbits/sec  189   2.05 MBytes
    [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  88.8 MBytes   724 Mbits/sec  304   2.03 MBytes
    [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  95.0 MBytes   797 Mbits/sec    0   2.28 MBytes
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
    [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   845 MBytes   709 Mbits/sec  7453             sender
    [  5]   0.00-10.01  sec   833 MBytes   698 Mbits/sec                  receiver

    root@NC1:~# iperf3 -c 23.153.232.x -R
    Connecting to host 23.153.232.x, port 5201
    Reverse mode, remote host 23.153.232.x is sending
    [  5] local 202.61.197.x port 33416 connected to 23.153.232.x port 5201
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
    [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  96.3 MBytes   807 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   107 MBytes   899 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   104 MBytes   875 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   107 MBytes   896 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   107 MBytes   896 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   105 MBytes   879 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   105 MBytes   877 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   104 MBytes   876 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   106 MBytes   893 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   105 MBytes   884 Mbits/sec
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
    [  5]   0.00-10.01  sec  1.03 GBytes   879 Mbits/sec  1497             sender
    [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.02 GBytes   878 Mbits/sec                  receiver

    Using netcup 2.5Gbps German server for testing, the downlink is indeed slow, and the uplink has no problem. No offense intended, just want to solve the problem.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited March 28

    @88xrzs said:

    Using netcup 2.5Gbps German server for testing, the downlink is indeed slow, and the uplink has no problem. No offense intended, just want to solve the problem.

    There is no problem to solve.
    shared data port is just that, SHARED

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @88xrzs said:

    Using netcup 2.5Gbps German server for testing, the downlink is indeed slow, and the uplink has no problem. No offense intended, just want to solve the problem.

    You can take Ferrari car to the highway, if there is traffic (lanes are shared by other drivers), you will be driving slow

    Early Sunday morning, things will be lot better even with Honda Civic car.

    Thanked by 6lovelyserver ElonBezos yoursunny PineappleM solarman anubhavhirani
  • 88xrzs88xrzs Member

    @dev_vps said:

    @88xrzs said:

    Using netcup 2.5Gbps German server for testing, the downlink is indeed slow, and the uplink has no problem. No offense intended, just want to solve the problem.

    You can take Ferrari car to the highway, if there is traffic (lanes are shared by other drivers), you will be driving slow

    Early Sunday morning, things will be lot better even with Honda Civic car.

    Interesting metaphor, I know what you mean.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited March 28

    @88xrzs said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @88xrzs said:

    Using netcup 2.5Gbps German server for testing, the downlink is indeed slow, and the uplink has no problem. No offense intended, just want to solve the problem.

    You can take Ferrari car to the highway, if there is traffic (lanes are shared by other drivers), you will be driving slow

    Early Sunday morning, things will be lot better even with Honda Civic car.

    Interesting metaphor, I know what you mean.

    I teach AP calculus as volunteer work.
    I am used to give real life examples to illustrate a concept.

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • hostarishostaris Member, Patron Provider
    edited March 28

    @88xrzs said:

    @hostaris said:

    @88xrzs said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @88xrzs said:

        iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 870 Mbits/sec   | 508 Mbits/sec   | 16.8 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (10G)       | 884 Mbits/sec   | 644 Mbits/sec   | 12.4 ms
    Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | 883 Mbits/sec   | 430 Mbits/sec   | 34.5 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 807 Mbits/sec   | 314 Mbits/sec   | 95.5 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 448 Mbits/sec   | 285 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 690 Mbits/sec   | 278 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 802 Mbits/sec   | 488 Mbits/sec   | 87.4 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 674 Mbits/sec   | 259 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms

    Isn't it 1Gbps? Why is the downlink speed so slow?

    data port is SHARED ..... shared with other VPS on the host server
    one more time, data port is shared

    so many folks assume as if they are getting dedicated data port

    I know it’s shared, but the internet speed is obviously slower than other businesses.

    The servers from YABS are known to sometimes be congested. If you run other benchmarks you will find you can reach around 870Mbit/s.

        root@NC1:~# iperf3 -c 23.153.232.x
    Connecting to host 23.153.232.x, port 5201
    [  5] local 202.61.197.x port 50724 connected to 23.153.232.x port 5201
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
    [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  74.8 MBytes   627 Mbits/sec  2204   3.23 MBytes
    [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  93.8 MBytes   786 Mbits/sec    0   3.53 MBytes
    [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  91.2 MBytes   765 Mbits/sec  145   2.13 MBytes
    [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  68.8 MBytes   577 Mbits/sec  4386   1.72 MBytes
    [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  87.5 MBytes   734 Mbits/sec  143   1.83 MBytes
    [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  80.0 MBytes   671 Mbits/sec    0   2.17 MBytes
    [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  82.5 MBytes   642 Mbits/sec   82   2.17 MBytes
    [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  82.5 MBytes   692 Mbits/sec  189   2.05 MBytes
    [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  88.8 MBytes   724 Mbits/sec  304   2.03 MBytes
    [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  95.0 MBytes   797 Mbits/sec    0   2.28 MBytes
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
    [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   845 MBytes   709 Mbits/sec  7453             sender
    [  5]   0.00-10.01  sec   833 MBytes   698 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    
    root@NC1:~# iperf3 -c 23.153.232.x -R
    Connecting to host 23.153.232.x, port 5201
    Reverse mode, remote host 23.153.232.x is sending
    [  5] local 202.61.197.x port 33416 connected to 23.153.232.x port 5201
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
    [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  96.3 MBytes   807 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   107 MBytes   899 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   104 MBytes   875 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   107 MBytes   896 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   107 MBytes   896 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   105 MBytes   879 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   105 MBytes   877 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   104 MBytes   876 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   106 MBytes   893 Mbits/sec
    [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   105 MBytes   884 Mbits/sec
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
    [  5]   0.00-10.01  sec  1.03 GBytes   879 Mbits/sec  1497             sender
    [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.02 GBytes   878 Mbits/sec                  receiver

    Using netcup 2.5Gbps German server for testing, the downlink is indeed slow, and the uplink has no problem. No offense intended, just want to solve the problem.

    Add -P4 to that iperf test and watch the magic happen

    A few speedtests I've also ran

     London, UK       19.83 ms    0.0%    837.01 Mbps    858.93 Mbps    M247 Ltd - London 
 Manchester, UK   25.02 ms    N/A     785.13 Mbps    871.79 Mbps    Vodafone UK - Manchester 
 Dublin, IE       30.40 ms    0.0%    906.12 Mbps    875.17 Mbps    Three Ireland - Dublin 
 Amsterdam, NL    11.74 ms    0.0%    878.15 Mbps    880.00 Mbps    Melbicom - Amsterdam 
 Eygelshoen, NL   12.82 ms    0.0%    871.31 Mbps    628.87 Mbps    SkyLink Data Center BV - Eygelshoven 
 Paris, FR        13.70 ms    N/A     849.35 Mbps    570.54 Mbps    ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Sign In or Register to comment.