New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
MD27 sold out
Remaining inventory for now. Prices are increasing fast now again, price pressure globally is a few euros increase per day for all of the servers.
@PulsedMedia LOL, its ok, I already got a bigger one from you, so no complaints. :-)
@PulsedMedia
I am waiting when Windows Server OS is available for the host server.
Just install Proxmox on it and create a vm with windows on it. Then you have windows
True.
But Hyper V server is better in some use cases. It provides better performance for VPS running Windows.
Can't you simply install it somewhere else, make a raw disk image and copy it with ssh and dd to the disk (and then if necessary resize the partitions)?
(Of course that's not as easy as with a simple template or ISO install, but it's possible.)
I can install Windows OS on any machine, but provider TOS should support that OS.
Many providers explicitly prohibit installing non Linux based OS
And the more important point, there is no control panel to start, stop, reboot, etc.
Oh, didn't knew that, have never seen something like that, but I can't find something about OS restrictions in @PulsedMedia's TOS.
But I (even if I will only install Linux) wouldn't buy from a provider who restricts customers in their choice of software.
With regards to @PulsedMedia , the non availability of control panel is the main issue for my use case.
It may not an issue for other folks.
Examples
RackNerd, NDTN, and many more
PS - these providers support Linux OS on promotions. For Windows VPS, usually the promotions are different and more expensive
We don't have such restrictions. Just what we can support out of the box, and level of self support.
But lack of control panel makes it very challenging, to say the least, to install Windows Server OS on the machine.
Do you support loading ISO (even by usb) and providing server access over IPMI?
No, and we will not support any of that.
v6 still not supported ye?
Something to analyze about.
I don't understand?
It is entirely up to you to analyze these numbers.
Whether it is a positive thing or a negative thing, whether it has any impact, if any, on your use case, it is all you to decide.
You're not making yourself very clear.
That's enough performance for many use cases
That is exactly why I said, whether it is a positive thing or a negative thing, it needs to be analyzed in the context of use case.
I am a data engineer specializing in AI/ML, my way of looking at numbers and use case may not be applicable for others.
It is possible to run ML models with this computing power.
It's a broad field.
If you mean that it's possible to get more power for less money, yes indeed it is.
But here resources are dedicated and guaranteed, including storage.
So, in my opinion, it's good value for money.
Bro I bought this to stream porn, I don't give a hoot about running machine learning.
If I wanted to run compute heavy work, I'd just book time on my company's 245kW farm.
@PulsedMedia Apologies if asked before, but is IPv6 on the table in the near future?
Sorry for the off topic
Has the dc been completed by now?
I thought you taught mathematics, I must be imagining things
I very much doubt it, PMs answer usually involves talking about routers, the cost of routers etc, cost involved vs people who want ipv6. yoursunny then shows up to tell PM they're wrong, then someone might talk about ASICs, sunny will then be accused of being affiliated with the CCP and the whole thread gets derailed.
No, there's no business case for it.
Use a tunnel if you need IPv6.
He's just trolling, trying to cause FUD.
It happened elsewhere too.
lol, something along those lines.
But yeah, there's no business case for it.
IPv4 is a must have.
If you have IPv4 you can have IPv6 with tunnel broker too.
If you have IPv6, you still need IPv4.
If you have IPv6 every single network process and effort is more than doubled, causing a major time suck.
If you have IPv6, maybe 0.5% of traffic flows through it and maybe 0.5% of users actually use it.
If you have IPv6, approximately 80% of users will have issues due to it.
If you have IPv6, approximately 100% will encounter high service costs due to it.
Refer to the last line in this post
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3937099/#Comment_3937099
Here is a concept based high school calculus problem, that can be solved orally but most students find challenging
PS - if you know someone who is preparing for IIT JEE, pls feel free to share the problem with him/her.
Sorry bro I just finished going from rationals to real numbers by building it using Cauchy sequences. I'm not there yet in the math timeline 🙏.