Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Free IncogVPN BETA - WireGuard / IKEv2 - Ad Blocking, No Logging, DNS over Tor, No Bullshit - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Free IncogVPN BETA - WireGuard / IKEv2 - Ad Blocking, No Logging, DNS over Tor, No Bullshit

135

Comments

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member
    edited February 2023

    @kait said:

    @zutomayo said: Why not OpenVPN?

    What is wrong with Wireguard?

    OpenVPN is suited better for bypassing firewalls.
    Their TCP proto is very nice.

    However, @MannDude can take a look at https://github.com/mullvad/udp-over-tcp
    You can make Wireguard mask better.

    Thanked by 1kait
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @hyperblast said:
    NL works great!

    used it the whole day. rock solid. speed perfect. NL works fine.

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member
    edited February 2023

    does anyone mind sharing NL vpn server hostname/ip?
    I don't want to claim a slot because I'm unlikely to use it a long run.
    I just want to check a few things

    thanks

  • kaitkait Member

    @treesmokah said: does anyone mind sharing NL vpn server hostname/ip?

    23.137.250.9 if my investigation skills are useful.

  • NanjaNanja Member

    @kait said:

    @treesmokah said: does anyone mind sharing NL vpn server hostname/ip?

    23.137.250.9 if my investigation skills are useful.

    Maybe the IP's they give aren't same for everyone. That is different from one the one I was assigned.

  • kaitkait Member

    @Nanja said:

    @kait said:

    @treesmokah said: does anyone mind sharing NL vpn server hostname/ip?

    23.137.250.9 if my investigation skills are useful.

    Maybe the IP's they give aren't same for everyone. That is different from one the one I was assigned.

    Maybe its that one or the .6 I think. I am bored.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    now .nl location fucked up.

  • MannDudeMannDude Host Rep, Veteran
    edited February 2023

    @treesmokah said:
    does anyone mind sharing NL vpn server hostname/ip?
    I don't want to claim a slot because I'm unlikely to use it a long run.
    I just want to check a few things

    thanks

    More than one is in use per location. PM me and I can give you a more specific answer.

  • diherdiher Member
    edited February 2023

    tested from Indonesia , home network.

    ISP:
    PT Kingpolah Network Solutions

    https://ibb.co/18XH1pP

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member

    @MannDude said:

    @treesmokah said:
    does anyone mind sharing NL vpn server hostname/ip?
    I don't want to claim a slot because I'm unlikely to use it a long run.
    I just want to check a few things

    thanks

    More than one is in use per location. PM me and I can give you a more specific answer.

    No need anymore, 1 was enough for me(was dm'ed to me).
    Thanks anyways.

  • JerryHouJerryHou Member

    Grabbed one. Thanks for the goodie.

    Thanked by 1MannDude
  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited February 2023

    @maxwell said: Peering from the German Telekom is pretty bad to the NL Server.... getting like 60mbit with the US one its maxed out....

    Worldstreams peering with DTAG is the worst connection you'll ever see imho :(

    You get better peerings to Australia or the US than WS NL from DTAG (on the route via Amsterdam, haven't seen a route via Frankfurt yet). ymmv.

    (At least as long you don't pay for their premium-network upgrade at about $99/month/server....)

    Edit: sorry for offtopic. The service and beta tests offered by MannDude looks great.

    I'm just so frustrated about the DTAG<->WS routes that I always jump when I see someone mentioning it. And WS network is great in general, just not in peering with DTAG where you can go down to bits per second throughput...

    Thanked by 1MannDude
  • BBTNBBTN Member

    Direct connection (Telefonica, Germany)
    261.15 Mbps / 42.93 Mbps, 5ms
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/14365846550

    IncogNET VPN NL
    41.72 Mbps / 40.54 Mbps, 30ms
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/14365860771

  • MannDudeMannDude Host Rep, Veteran
    edited February 2023

    @BBTN said:
    Direct connection (Telefonica, Germany)
    261.15 Mbps / 42.93 Mbps, 5ms
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/14365846550

    IncogNET VPN NL
    41.72 Mbps / 40.54 Mbps, 30ms
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/14365860771

    I'd expect better speeds from Germany, even if this is capped at 100Mbps. Luxembourg may serve you better when it's ready.

  • alt_alt_ Member

    @MannDude said:

    @BBTN said:
    Direct connection (Telefonica, Germany)
    261.15 Mbps / 42.93 Mbps, 5ms
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/14365846550

    IncogNET VPN NL
    41.72 Mbps / 40.54 Mbps, 30ms
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/14365860771

    I'd expect better speeds from Germany, even if this is capped at 10Mbps. Luxembourg may serve you better when it's ready.

    Would like to wait for NYC location opening.

  • MannDudeMannDude Host Rep, Veteran

    @alt_ said:

    @MannDude said:

    @BBTN said:
    Direct connection (Telefonica, Germany)
    261.15 Mbps / 42.93 Mbps, 5ms
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/14365846550

    IncogNET VPN NL
    41.72 Mbps / 40.54 Mbps, 30ms
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/14365860771

    I'd expect better speeds from Germany, even if this is capped at 10Mbps. Luxembourg may serve you better when it's ready.

    Would like to wait for NYC location opening.

    Maybe later today :)

    Thanked by 1alt_
  • MannDudeMannDude Host Rep, Veteran

    So far, what I'm discovering is, I may have over estimated resource needs for this. The Idaho server has 150 peers added to it, 10 currently active.

    Resource wise, I'm not seeing RAM really ever go above 200MB and CPU load is always at 0.05 or less.

    I'll probably remove all of the profiles that haven't connected and re-open the Idaho beta so I can get a better picture of what heavier usage of the service may look like.

    That's the last 48 hours. Much less than I, or likely most of you, may have imagined.

    Question: Any interest in being able to spin up multiple configurations for the same location with your own dedicated IP? For example, you get a NY VPN with your own dedicated IP, and you can great, say, 5 WG profiles on your own private network? Can enable internal networking so your different devices can communicate over 10.1.2.0/24 or whatever is assigned to you.

    Thanked by 1greentea
  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member
    edited February 2023

    @MannDude said: Question: Any interest in being able to spin up multiple configurations for the same location with your own dedicated IP? For example, you get a NY VPN with your own dedicated IP, and you can great, say, 5 WG profiles on your own private network? Can enable internal networking so your different devices can communicate over 10.1.2.0/24 or whatever is assigned to you.

    Would be nice if It had port forwarding. Similar to what OVPN offers.
    Dedicated IP + Open Ports, can be useful for a "reverse proxy" etc.
    However you would either have to develop a system that does not directly link dedicated IP back to the customer, or utilize some really nice law so even American IP's are dmca "ignored"(just like with "classic" vpn providers).

  • BBTNBBTN Member

    @MannDude said:

    IncogNET VPN NL
    41.72 Mbps / 40.54 Mbps, 30ms
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/14365860771

    I'd expect better speeds from Germany, even if this is capped at 100Mbps. Luxembourg may serve you better when it's ready.

    Usually Worldstream works great for me.

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member

    @treesmokah said: However you would either have to develop a system that does not directly link dedicated IP back to the customer

    Cyberghost claims to have done that.

    @treesmokah said: or utilize some really nice law so even American IP's are dmca "ignored"(just like with "classic" vpn providers).

    OVPN for example forwards abuse reports back to the customer, but not DMCA from what I remember.

  • MrMonkeyMrMonkey Member

    From AT&T Internet, Texas:

    Direct Connection to SpeedTest server (HostSailor Ltd, Naaldwijk)
    DL 105| UL 152

    Through NL to the same SpeedTest server
    DL 38.3| UL 28.8 Mbit

    I was late to the 'beta', but got this.

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member

    @treesmokah said:

    @kait said:

    @zutomayo said: Why not OpenVPN?

    What is wrong with Wireguard?

    OpenVPN is suited better for bypassing firewalls.

    In what way? They both make outgoing connections to well known ports. Then it becomes DPI targeted specifically to block it, just like anything.

    Their TCP proto is very nice.

    You're doing it wrong.

  • MannDudeMannDude Host Rep, Veteran

    NEW YORK TEST: https://portal.incognet.io/cart.php?a=add&pid=115

    Thanked by 1greentea
  • MrMonkeyMrMonkey Member

    @MannDude said:
    NEW YORK TEST: https://portal.incognet.io/cart.php?a=add&pid=115

    Not quite full port speed, but up there.

    Through NY:
    DL|UL
    78.1|71.4
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/a/9070701569

    Direct Connection:
    164 | 124
    https://www.speedtest.net/result/a/9070703555

  • MannDudeMannDude Host Rep, Veteran

    Remember that I'm capping speeds at 100Mbps on these, so you'll never see more than that. :)

    Has anyone had any issues with ad blocking being too aggressive? Less than 10% of requests have been blocked, but I didn't want to be too aggressive with the blocklists.

    I may do these with different DNS settings:

    • Option 1: Blocks nothing by default
    • Option 2: Blocks all known ads/trackers from public blocklists
    • Option 3: Same as option 2 + additional blocking of known malware/scam/phishing sites
    • Option 4: Same as option 3 + with adult sites blocked / family safety filter.

    The way things are set now, things are set with option 2 from above.

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member
    edited February 2023

    @TimboJones said: In what way? They both make outgoing connections to well known ports. Then it becomes DPI targeted specifically to block it, just like anything.

    OpenVPN has many built in obfuscation methods, they only work with TCP, many networks have udp blocked entirely.
    Its slowly changing, but still - udp is well suited for bypassing firewalls, tcp is even better due to its use literally everywhere, blocking it will disconnect you from many services.

    Due to wide TCP use, you can made certain packets to look like something commonly used.

  • r4h156r4h156 Member

    Speedtests from Philadelphia-area Verizon Fios (AS701) connection:

    To Intermax Networks - Coeur d'Alene, ID:
    Direct: 81 ms, 505.45 Mbps down, 330.14 Mbps up
    Through Idaho VPN: 80 ms, 95.97 Mbps down, 93.18 Mbps up

    To 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam:
    Direct: 92 ms, 498.77 Mbps down, 242.69 Mbps up
    Through Netherlands VPN: 96 ms, 43.65 Mbps down, 66.35 Mbps up

    To Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY:
    Direct: 8 ms, 450.36 Mbps down, 512.11 Mbps up
    Through New York VPN: 12 ms, 95.86 Mbps down, 90.05 Mbps up

    The speed through the Netherlands VPN is quite slow. Using Mullvad's Amsterdam servers for comparison, to the same 31173 Amsterdam speedtest server:
    Through 31173: 97 ms, 305.32 Mbps down, 137.46 Mbps up
    Through DataPacket: 92 ms, 323.28 Mbps down, 257.89 Mbps up
    Through xtom: 96 ms, 285.33 Mbps down, 184.57 Mbps up

    In case it's helpful, here's a traceroute to the Netherlands VPN server:

    Tracing route to netherlands-eu.beta.incogvpn.com [23.137.250.5]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     4 ms     3 ms     3 ms  192.168.1.1
  2     6 ms     6 ms     6 ms  [local Verizon facility - removed for privacy]
  3    12 ms     9 ms    10 ms  B3363.PHLAPA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [100.41.6.200]
  4     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  5     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  6    12 ms    15 ms    13 ms  0.ae1.GW12.IAD8.ALTER.NET [140.222.234.27]
  7    13 ms     *       13 ms  63.88.105.94
  8   100 ms    98 ms    98 ms  193.251.133.137
  9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 10    95 ms    97 ms    95 ms  109.236.95.109
 11    97 ms    96 ms    98 ms  109.236.95.225
 12    96 ms    94 ms   101 ms  netherlands-eu.beta.incogvpn.com [23.137.250.5]
  • TheOnlyDKTheOnlyDK Member

    Location - Vancouver 1Gbps up/down

    CDA not provisioned, can't test.

    NL VPN: 14.16D/22.60U 156ms ping https://www.speedtest.net/result/14367101868
    NL Direct: 289.07D/102.03U 147ms ping

    NY VPN: 96.24D/85.87U 64ms ping
    NY Direct: 782.24D/172.93U 72ms ping
    Much better than NL, everything feels snappy.

  • alt_alt_ Member

    Test from Ontario:
    https://speedtest.net/result/i/5493908656

  • UltrapassionUltrapassion Member

    From China - China Unicom 1000Mbps Down/40Mbps UP

    Netherlands:

    New York:

    New York better than Netherlands :D

Sign In or Register to comment.