[NL] Black Friday to Cyber Monday deals || NVME & Storage VPS plans || at least 60%+ OFF!

prenhost

Don't Buy their VPS, lost of Repo Issue in Centos7,

homeos

@prenhost said:
Don't Buy their VPS, lost of Repo Issue in Centos7,

isn't it EOL?

emperor

@prenhost said: Don't Buy their VPS, lost of Repo Issue in Centos7,

I hope you are provider, we need juicy drama when you start selling...

let_rocks

@homeos said:

@prenhost said:
Don't Buy their VPS, lost of Repo Issue in Centos7,

isn't it EOL?

Maintenance updates until June 30th, 2024
https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product

gongyi

HDD-2G HDD Storage VPS , so bad ... poor cpu , poor fio Disk Speed Tests

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Yet-Another-Bench-Script

v2022-11-22

https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Sun 04 Dec 2022 07:47:16 AM CST

Basic System Information:

Uptime : 9 days, 8 hours, 0 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
CPU cores : 1 @ 3300.022 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 1.9 GiB
Swap : 255.0 MiB
Disk : 1007.6 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-16-amd64

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	4.11 MB/s (1.0k)	34.65 MB/s (541)
Write	4.14 MB/s (1.0k)	35.04 MB/s (547)
Total	8.26 MB/s (2.0k)	69.70 MB/s (1.0k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	73.80 MB/s (144)	80.49 MB/s (78)
Write	77.72 MB/s (151)	85.85 MB/s (83)
Total	151.52 MB/s (295)	166.34 MB/s (161)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

Provider	Location (Link)	Send Speed	Recv Speed	Ping
Clouvider	London, UK (10G)	937 Mbits/sec	860 Mbits/sec	8.46 ms
Scaleway	Paris, FR (10G)	927 Mbits/sec	808 Mbits/sec	10.3 ms
NovoServe	North Holland, NL (40G)	930 Mbits/sec	932 Mbits/sec	2.08 ms
Uztelecom	Tashkent, UZ (10G)	427 Mbits/sec	425 Mbits/sec	82.9 ms
Clouvider	NYC, NY, US (10G)	305 Mbits/sec	264 Mbits/sec	80.5 ms
Clouvider	Dallas, TX, US (10G)	238 Mbits/sec	193 Mbits/sec	125 ms
Clouvider	Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)	462 Mbits/sec	224 Mbits/sec	153 ms

Running GB5 benchmark test... cue elevator music
** Aborting YABS. Cleaning up files...

wuck

@gongyi said: Running GB5 benchmark test... cue elevator music ** Aborting YABS. Cleaning up files...

Thats a solid GB5 score

donko

@LiteServer cpu perfomance is really bad today on node NL-DRN-KVMHDD-33, i have a insane high IO wait and while only serving few images with nginx

pls ban torrent abusers

Kuma

@donko said:
@LiteServer cpu perfomance is really bad today on node NL-DRN-KVMHDD-33, i have a insane high IO wait and while only serving few images with nginx

pls ban torrent abusers

Maybe you have been divided into "IO abuse" groups, you can run some test scripts to confirm.

LiteServer

@donko said:
@LiteServer cpu perfomance is really bad today on node NL-DRN-KVMHDD-33, i have a insane high IO wait and while only serving few images with nginx

pls ban torrent abusers

Please create a ticket so we can review this. Things should be fairly normal now most of the customers that where initially slowing down our nodes have been rate-limited to be nicer for the HDD arrays. So it might be possible your VPS got rate limited too, but a ticket will clear that up :-).

wii747

My storage VPS keeps going going down for around a minute. Data from hetrixtools

Start Time End Time Down
8 Dec 06:30 8 Dec 06:31 1min
7 Dec 22:00 7 Dec 22:01 1min
7 Dec 21:12 7 Dec 21:13 1min
7 Dec 18:16 7 Dec 18:17 1min
7 Dec 15:12 7 Dec 15:13 1min
3 Dec 14:51 3 Dec 14:52 1min
2 Dec 17:14 2 Dec 17:15 1min

Anyone else having the same issue?

@LiteServer can this be looked into?

DP

@wii747 said: @LiteServer can this be looked into?

Why don't you create a support ticket with them?

tsoft

I am very happy so far, on ssd
No issues, run CPU intensive tasks

sometimes CPU 100 for 1 day )

donko

@LiteServer said:
Please create a ticket so we can review this. Things should be fairly normal now most of the customers that where initially slowing down our nodes have been rate-limited to be nicer for the HDD arrays. So it might be possible your VPS got rate limited too, but a ticket will clear that up :-).

support replied me:

Your VPS appear to rate limited by our techs due to ongoing I/O abuse.
You were generating way too many IOPS, causing high load on our node and performance degradation for other customers.

while i only store backups (rsync, ftp) which runs 1 time per day and i serve few images with nginx

https://prnt.sc/L6tvP1R-60TS

my disk storage hasn't been changed much over the time so cannot say i write 1TB daily...

why sells storage vps if cant handle those simpliest tasks

TeoM

@donko said:

@LiteServer said:
Please create a ticket so we can review this. Things should be fairly normal now most of the customers that where initially slowing down our nodes have been rate-limited to be nicer for the HDD arrays. So it might be possible your VPS got rate limited too, but a ticket will clear that up :-).

support replied me:

Your VPS appear to rate limited by our techs due to ongoing I/O abuse.
You were generating way too many IOPS, causing high load on our node and performance degradation for other customers.

while i only store backups (rsync, ftp) which runs 1 time per day and i serve few images with nginx

https://prnt.sc/L6tvP1R-60TS

my disk storage hasn't been changed much over the time so cannot say i write 1TB daily...

why sells storage vps if cant handle those simpliest tasks

Can you tell us the tool that you use in the screenshot ?

DP

@TeoM said: Can you tell us the tool that you use in the screenshot ?

HetrixTools.

LiteServer

@donko said:

@LiteServer said:
Please create a ticket so we can review this. Things should be fairly normal now most of the customers that where initially slowing down our nodes have been rate-limited to be nicer for the HDD arrays. So it might be possible your VPS got rate limited too, but a ticket will clear that up :-).

support replied me:

Your VPS appear to rate limited by our techs due to ongoing I/O abuse.
You were generating way too many IOPS, causing high load on our node and performance degradation for other customers.

while i only store backups (rsync, ftp) which runs 1 time per day and i serve few images with nginx

https://prnt.sc/L6tvP1R-60TS

my disk storage hasn't been changed much over the time so cannot say i write 1TB daily...

why sells storage vps if cant handle those simpliest tasks

Usually torrent/P2P things trigger our monitoring and rate limit policy.
You can contact our support department and explain your usage in details, then we'll review your IO rate limits another time.

tsoft

Review after around 2 months - everything works great on nvme

treesmokah

@prenhost said:
Don't Buy their VPS, lost of Repo Issue in Centos7,

Why do you host your company infra on it if its so bad?

@emperor said:

@prenhost said: Don't Buy their VPS, lost of Repo Issue in Centos7,

I hope you are provider, we need juicy drama when you start selling...

Yes, he is.

Pawan

Awesome provider, vps is working well 👍

kait

@Pawan said:
Awesome provider, vps is working well 👍

Can't wait to snipe a recurring discount myself someday. LiteServer is super amazing.

AiAi

I have a HDD-1G plan,the performance has been very stable.

khyze

@kait said:

@Pawan said:
Awesome provider, vps is working well 👍

Can't wait to snipe a recurring discount myself someday. LiteServer is super amazing.

Me too, hopefully. I didn’t know about this provider - even though I live in the Netherlands.

kait

@khyze said:

@kait said:

@Pawan said:
Awesome provider, vps is working well 👍

Can't wait to snipe a recurring discount myself someday. LiteServer is super amazing.

Me too, hopefully. I didn’t know about this provider - even though I live in the Netherlands.

Same, only came to my attention a couple of months ago because the infrastructure group has a lot of tor nodes. Their support helped me a lot with information while not being a customer yet. Feel super welcome to their platform already.

DediRoot

rock solid hosting provider

NVME-8G

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Yet-Another-Bench-Script

v2022-12-29

https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Thu 19 Jan 2023 03:57:20 PM CET

Basic System Information:

Uptime : 5 days, 9 hours, 1 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
CPU cores : 4 @ 2449.998 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 7.8 GiB
Swap : 255.0 MiB
Disk : 157.2 GiB
Distro : Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS
Kernel : 5.4.0-137-generic

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	264.74 MB/s (66.1k)	3.74 GB/s (58.5k)
Write	265.44 MB/s (66.3k)	3.76 GB/s (58.8k)
Total	530.18 MB/s (132.5k)	7.51 GB/s (117.4k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	6.17 GB/s (12.0k)	6.50 GB/s (6.3k)
Write	6.49 GB/s (12.6k)	6.93 GB/s (6.7k)
Total	12.67 GB/s (24.7k)	13.44 GB/s (13.1k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

Provider	Location (Link)	Send Speed	Recv Speed	Ping
Clouvider	London, UK (10G)	877 Mbits/sec	703 Mbits/sec	7.13 ms
Scaleway	Paris, FR (10G)	883 Mbits/sec	646 Mbits/sec	11.0 ms
NovoServe	North Holland, NL (40G)	865 Mbits/sec	858 Mbits/sec	2.27 ms
Uztelecom	Tashkent, UZ (10G)	732 Mbits/sec	288 Mbits/sec	89.0 ms
Clouvider	NYC, NY, US (10G)	608 Mbits/sec	286 Mbits/sec	82.2 ms
Clouvider	Dallas, TX, US (10G)	656 Mbits/sec	251 Mbits/sec	115 ms
Clouvider	Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)	584 Mbits/sec	136 Mbits/sec	150 ms

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

Test | Value
|
Single Core | 926
Multi Core | 3259
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19974911

HDD-12G

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Yet-Another-Bench-Script

v2022-12-29

https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

Thu Jan 19 16:03:16 CET 2023

Basic System Information:

Uptime : 30 days, 19 hours, 38 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC 7571 32-Core Processor
CPU cores : 4 @ 2200.000 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 11.5 GiB
Swap : 255.0 MiB
Disk : 5.9 TiB
Distro : AlmaLinux 8.7 (Stone Smilodon)
Kernel : 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8.x86_64

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size	4k (IOPS)	64k (IOPS)
Read	12.03 MB/s (3.0k)	149.17 MB/s (2.3k)
Write	12.03 MB/s (3.0k)	149.96 MB/s (2.3k)
Total	24.07 MB/s (6.0k)	299.14 MB/s (4.6k)
Block Size	512k (IOPS)	1m (IOPS)
------	--- ----	---- ----
Read	277.33 MB/s (541)	514.98 MB/s (502)
Write	292.07 MB/s (570)	549.28 MB/s (536)
Total	569.41 MB/s (1.1k)	1.06 GB/s (1.0k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

Provider	Location (Link)	Send Speed	Recv Speed	Ping
Clouvider	London, UK (10G)	910 Mbits/sec	715 Mbits/sec	6.93 ms
Scaleway	Paris, FR (10G)	890 Mbits/sec	652 Mbits/sec	12.2 ms
NovoServe	North Holland, NL (40G)	busy	690 Mbits/sec	4.21 ms
Uztelecom	Tashkent, UZ (10G)	639 Mbits/sec	375 Mbits/sec	87.5 ms
Clouvider	NYC, NY, US (10G)	794 Mbits/sec	313 Mbits/sec	77.6 ms
Clouvider	Dallas, TX, US (10G)	685 Mbits/sec	257 Mbits/sec	125 ms
Clouvider	Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)	606 Mbits/sec	388 Mbits/sec	158 ms

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):

Provider	Location (Link)	Send Speed	Recv Speed	Ping
Clouvider	London, UK (10G)	808 Mbits/sec	594 Mbits/sec	6.87 ms
Scaleway	Paris, FR (10G)	859 Mbits/sec	615 Mbits/sec	16.3 ms
NovoServe	North Holland, NL (40G)	849 Mbits/sec	627 Mbits/sec	4.07 ms
Uztelecom	Tashkent, UZ (10G)	797 Mbits/sec	220 Mbits/sec	81.0 ms
Clouvider	NYC, NY, US (10G)	598 Mbits/sec	339 Mbits/sec	74.6 ms
Clouvider	Dallas, TX, US (10G)	411 Mbits/sec	204 Mbits/sec	204 ms
Clouvider	Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)	570 Mbits/sec	62.1 Mbits/sec	153 ms

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

Test | Value
|
Single Core | 525
Multi Core | 1665
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19975136

amaalex

@LiteServer
Possible to get the #NVME-4G deal still? Already have one I bought earlier and happy with the awesome service so wanted to get another one. Please let me know.

klarheit

@Mumbly said:

@LiteServer said:
for IPV6 please open a ticket so that we can take a look at your IPv6.

I found what caused issue.

In case someone experience the same IPv6 issue with the newest Debian installations (older works fine) when adding some IPv6 address via control panel, there's a solution.

Debian template use deprecated ifconfig. Ask them to disable IPv6 autoconfiguration and then use iproute2 (the ip command) instead of ifconfig.

Sorry. Could you please tell me the commands?
I'm still stuck.
I tried ip -6 addr add ... then ip -6 route ....
But ping6 google.com still returned Destination unreachable.

Mumbly

@klarheit said:
Sorry. Could you please tell me the commands?
I'm still stuck.
I tried ip -6 addr add ... then ip -6 route ....
But ping6 google.com still returned Destination unreachable.

Replace old deprecated "up /sbin/ifconfig eth0 inet6 add..." with "up ip addr add"...
/etc/network/interfaces should look something like that:

# The primary network interface
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 5.255.xxx.3xxx
netmask 255.255.255.0

gateway 5.255.xxx.xxx
iface eth0 inet6 static
        accept_ra 0
        address 2a04:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001
        netmask 64
        gateway 2a04:xxxx:xxx::1
   up ip addr add 2a04:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0:0:0:abcd/64 dev eth0
   up ip addr add 2a04:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0:0:0:babe/64 dev eth0 
   up ip -6 route add 2a04:xxxx:xxx::1 dev eth0
   up ip -6 route add default via 2a04:xxxx:xxx::1

klarheit

@Mumbly
Thank you for your reply.
I broke the network because I am not familiar with it . After I reinstalled debian11 (previously debian10), and then finally got the ipv6 address...

noisycode

I regret that I only bought 4 and cancelled one of them.