Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


** CHRISTMAS OFFER ** 2GB RAM, 1CPU, 30 GB NVMe, KVM - 18€/year *** 4,6,8,16 GB RAM *** - Page 7
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

** CHRISTMAS OFFER ** 2GB RAM, 1CPU, 30 GB NVMe, KVM - 18€/year *** 4,6,8,16 GB RAM ***

123457

Comments

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @stoned said: Why?

    so you dont bother to throttle or forget to do it and get the boot.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • stonedstoned Member
    edited December 2021

    @Maounique said:

    @stoned said: Why?

    so you dont bother to throttle or forget to do it and get the boot.

    Oh yeah, on my part, I get the logic, sure.

    I mean on the part of the provider. Why not just provide 2 unlimited instead of 4 with limits? Perhaps it's just if they want to configure it like that? Leave the option to the consumer? I apologize in advance if my questions seem ignorant.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @stoned said:
    I mean on the part of the provider. Why not just provide 2 unlimited instead of 4 with limits? Perhaps it's just if they want to configure it like that? Leave the option to the consumer? I apologize in advance if my questions seem ignorant.

    2 unlimited cores => you can use 2 cores 24 hours per day.
    4 cores with limits => you can use 2 cores 22 hours per day and 4 cores 2 hours per day.
    This means, you get 2 extra cores for 2 hours per day.

    I used to prefer unlimited resources and permanent throttle.
    Recently I found the value in fair share with clearly published limits (even if the published limits are slightly lower than the actually enforced limits, such as VirMach's 33% limit).
    A permanent throttle would translate to significant steal that performs badly on smaller plans.
    I still consider the refusal to publish a limit as a red flag, except on storage servers where CPU does not matter.

    Thanked by 2stoned nick_
  • @naranjatech allow doble account https://clients.naranja.tech ? thankz

  • @markz said:
    @naranjatech allow doble account https://clients.naranja.tech ? thankz

    No multi-/double-accounts like with almost any other provider who utilized anti-fraud technics.

    Thanked by 1markz
  • No multi-/double-accounts like with almost any other provider who utilized anti-fraud technics.

    thankz

  • @markz said:
    @naranjatech allow doble account https://clients.naranja.tech ? thankz

    Why multiple accounts? What's the use case?

  • @plumberg said:

    @markz said:
    @naranjatech allow doble account https://clients.naranja.tech ? thankz

    Why multiple accounts? What's the use case?

    no. sign up my client.

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • @markz said: no. sign up my client.

    Your client should order that himself if he is buying shit.
    or you should order it yourself if you are just selling your services.

  • don't see a reason or any use case to have multiple accounts.

  • dT_TbdT_Tb Member
    edited December 2021

    For those interested, the flash sale code is still working. For how many left, I don't know.

    Was surprised that when I tried and got one.

    Edit: Grammar

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • Contemplating on letting go of the OP deal.

  • @painfreepc said:
    don't see a reason or any use case to have multiple accounts.

    Personal vs Business account

  • stonedstoned Member
    edited December 2021

    @dT_Tb said:
    Contemplating on letting go of the OP deal.

    Why is there such a difference in disk speeds in 4K and 64K between the two servers? The 120 GB disk seems faster than the 150GB in your case.

    I have the 150GB plan. I just ran a test curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -igr and got disk speeds higher than ones you listed. I wonder why. I'm still learning.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-03                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon 27 Dec 2021 09:52:36 PM MST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2449.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 2.0 GiB
    Disk       : 7.8 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 389.43 MB/s  (97.3k) | 5.19 GB/s    (81.0k)
    Write      | 390.46 MB/s  (97.6k) | 5.21 GB/s    (81.5k)
    Total      | 779.90 MB/s (194.9k) | 10.40 GB/s  (162.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 7.91 GB/s    (15.4k) | 8.56 GB/s     (8.3k)
    Write      | 8.33 GB/s    (16.2k) | 9.13 GB/s     (8.9k)
    Total      | 16.25 GB/s   (31.7k) | 17.69 GB/s   (17.2k)
    
  • @stoned said:

    @dT_Tb said:
    Contemplating on letting go of the OP deal.

    Why is there such a difference in disk speeds in 4K and 64K between the two servers? The 120 GB disk seems faster than the 150GB in your case.

    Its virtual machine, you will not get same resources. The values are highly dependant on the server load.

    Thanked by 1stoned
  • @stoned said:

    @dT_Tb said:
    Contemplating on letting go of the OP deal.

    Why is there such a difference in disk speeds in 4K and 64K between the two servers? The 120 GB disk seems faster than the 150GB in your case.

    I have the 150GB plan. I just ran a test curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -igr and got disk speeds higher than ones you listed. I wonder why. I'm still learning.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-03                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon 27 Dec 2021 09:52:36 PM MST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2449.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 2.0 GiB
    Disk       : 7.8 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 389.43 MB/s  (97.3k) | 5.19 GB/s    (81.0k)
    Write      | 390.46 MB/s  (97.6k) | 5.21 GB/s    (81.5k)
    Total      | 779.90 MB/s (194.9k) | 10.40 GB/s  (162.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 7.91 GB/s    (15.4k) | 8.56 GB/s     (8.3k)
    Write      | 8.33 GB/s    (16.2k) | 9.13 GB/s     (8.9k)
    Total      | 16.25 GB/s   (31.7k) | 17.69 GB/s   (17.2k)
    

    I ran them literally at the same time. I assume both VPS are on the same node, possible that IO will prioritize one over the other.

    Now look at this one:

    As for the performance you're getting, @chocolateshirt basically sums it up.

  • somewhere you said you dmca ignored hosting, but your terms on website say copyrighted content is prohibited. confused to buy or not.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • @bdspice said:
    somewhere you said you dmca ignored hosting, but your terms on website say copyrighted content is prohibited. confused to buy or not.

    The Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a 1998 United States copyright law. ;)

    Thanked by 2bdspice tux
  • @bdspice said:
    somewhere you said you dmca ignored hosting, but your terms on website say copyrighted content is prohibited. confused to buy or not.

    adding copyright content rules to the tos is most likely always just doubling down on existing laws.

    yet it's usually simple and doesn't depend on the tos at all. if the provider is going to receive letters that might bring them in trouble with the laws or at least force them to react and cause work that way, they probably won't want to deal with that in the long run and might show you the door.

    doesn't matter if they ignore or say they kinde don't care about illegal stuff beforehand. won't make it legal anyway...

    Thanked by 3TODO bdspice webcraft
  • painfreepcpainfreepc Member
    edited December 2021

    @bdspice said:
    somewhere you said you dmca ignored hosting, but your terms on website say copyrighted content is prohibited. confused to buy or not.

    that needs to be in the TOS, no matter what they really do,
    what if someone is doing somthing really stupid, they need the TOS to fall back on.

    naranja is a great provider, please don't start BS here.

    Thanked by 2bdspice TODO
  • anyone manage to install windows 11 on the 60GB/4GB VPS?

  • https://clients.naranja.tech is now not accessible for me. Anyone the same? And my VPS is also not accessible.

    My hetrixtools.com is reporting downtime regularly these three days...

  • @kend said: https://clients.naranja.tech is now not accessible for me. Anyone the same? And my VPS is also not accessible.

    The client interface is also down for me. My VPS are up though.

  • @icebeer871 said:

    @kend said: https://clients.naranja.tech is now not accessible for me. Anyone the same? And my VPS is also not accessible.

    The client interface is also down for me. My VPS are up though.

    Actually, at first was Hetrixtools informed my that my VPS was down. Then I logged in to the client area, was successful. I checked a few things, and was intending to restart my VPS, then I realized the client area was down.

  • Client Area up, just very slow to respond, for me.

  • Everything works flawlessly for me.

  • naranjatechnaranjatech Member, Patron Provider

    @AlwaysSkint said:
    Client Area up, just very slow to respond, for me.

    We we're doing some quick changes to the admin panel... Sorry for the inconvenience.

    Thanked by 1AlwaysSkint
  • kendkend Member
    edited December 2021

    @fendix said:
    Everything works flawlessly for me.

    Because it's now back up again.

    My VPS is just back up again as well. Hetrixtools recorded another 24min down time. This is becoming really regular these days. I'll upload a pic of my Hetrixtools records of downtimes.

    https://imgur.com/a/Zkcqmw0

  • naranjatechnaranjatech Member, Patron Provider

    @kend said:

    @fendix said:
    Everything works flawlessly for me.

    Because it's now back up again.

    My VPS is just back up again as well. Hetrixtools recorded another 24min down time. This is becoming really regular these days. I'll upload a pic of my Hetrixtools records of downtimes.

    https://imgur.com/a/Zkcqmw0

    Please open a ticket!

  • @naranjatech said:

    @kend said:

    @fendix said:
    Everything works flawlessly for me.

    Because it's now back up again.

    My VPS is just back up again as well. Hetrixtools recorded another 24min down time. This is becoming really regular these days. I'll upload a pic of my Hetrixtools records of downtimes.

    https://imgur.com/a/Zkcqmw0

    Please open a ticket!

    I'm going to now. Thank you!

    Thanked by 1naranjatech
Sign In or Register to comment.