Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


rectified.net - let the drama begin - Page 4
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

rectified.net - let the drama begin

124

Comments

  • LeeLee Veteran

    AnthonySmith said: nope, no proof of anything, its not a court here, but if someone was making something up to this degree about me on the no1 result on google for reviews I would chip in for sure.

    Neither should anyone try and make it that way by doing this.

    AnthonySmith said: Maybe we should just start saying "Sharktech review" on every post until there is some clarification.

    Why does Sharktech need to clarify anything more than they have with their statement on the matter? If anyone should offer more information it is @rectified.

  • @hzr said:

     Sharktech Filling 2 Positions | Chinese Sales Representative | Senior Systems Administrator 
    > 
    >  Senior System Administrator 
    > 
    > Chinese Sales Representative
    > 

    Should we, uhm, "provide our valuable insight and context"?
    If I were in the shoes of a prospective employee, I'd certainly like to know about what transpired here…

  • There's going to be a reason that all of the VPS plans are showing out of stock. I was able to login to WHMCS without issue, but I have nothing left there to see what's going on with the services.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    WSS said: This makes no sense for being able to physically confiscate others' hardware if it's just a resold rack, unless Rectified isn't even on the hardware located there.

    maybe this is my low English grasp level, but I dont understand what you mean.
    Are you implying he could have had coloed hardware only if he was physically present there to rack it and listen to it humming?

  • @Lee said:

    AnthonySmith said: Maybe we should just start saying "Sharktech review" on every post until there is some clarification.

    Why does Sharktech need to clarify anything more than they have with their statement on the matter? If anyone should offer more information it is @rectified.

    Because sharktech doesn't want to look like a thug and asshole?

    I agree with @AnthonySmith's proposition.

  • WSSWSS Member
    edited December 2017

    @Maounique said:
    maybe this is my low English grasp level, but I dont understand what you mean.
    Are you implying he could have had coloed hardware only if he was physically present there to rack it and listen to it humming?

    No. I'm suggesting that when it was racked, it was racked under the SharkTech moniker, rather than as a client, which it should have been, even as the former-SA's wife.. to not do so would be an err on both parties' part, and anyone working remotely as a "Sr SA" to send hardware to be mounted without having direct access to the NOC to have their hardware dealt with directly does not beget someone who is actually capable of their job.

    That's like buying a car and putting it in your employers' name. If they decide it's theirs- who is to prove otherwise without the proper paperwork in place?

    The way I am seeing this is that Rectified was colo'd at SharkTech as part of a perk of working with them, and they were then fired and their hardware taken when SharkTech didn't get their way. Of course this is ALSO purely speculation, but having the hardware withheld with no statement as to reason beyond "seeking legal means" smells like someone is pissed and is doing their best to fuck their former-employee. The fact that they did an aggressive takeover attempt, and then took the hardware? I don't trust them. Either party.

  • LeeLee Veteran

    bsdguy said: Because sharktech doesn't want to look like a thug and asshole?

    And there we go...

  • @Lee said:

    bsdguy said: Because sharktech doesn't want to look like a thug and asshole?

    And there we go...

    Get the torches ready; I've got a meeting early in the morning.

    Thanked by 1Lee
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    WSS said: I'm suggesting that when it was racked, it was racked under the SharkTech moniker, rather than as a client, which it should have been, even as the former-SA's wife.

    It still makes no sense, we have some coloed hardware in 3 datacenters, they are all our hardware, it does not become DCs property no matter who runs the company (interestingly enough, Prometeus di Daniela Agro IS officially owned by Uncle's wife and a family business).
    As I see it, the guy could have not racked himself the gear as he was never there, nor sneak some hardware in the racks unauthorized for the same reason, thus, the seizing of his assets unilaterally by the DC make even less sense from the legal point of view.

    Thanked by 1WSS
  • @Maounique said:
    As I see it, the guy could have not racked himself the gear as he was never there, nor sneak some hardware in the racks unauthorized for the same reason, thus, the seizing of his assets unilaterally by the DC make even less sense from the legal point of view.

    See? We agree on some things. The deeper I look into this, the less I buy the few statements made.

    Thanked by 1Kris
  • Got fired, couldn't pay the bill due to side biz running on slim profits plus working regular job (we know how the industry is) and DC took possession of hardware for overdue bill? just sayin'

  • WSSWSS Member
    edited December 2017

    @doughmanes said:
    Got fired, couldn't pay the bill due to side biz running on slim profits plus working regular job (we know how the industry is) and DC took possession of hardware for overdue bill? just sayin'

    No.

    This right here is what I believe have most of us doubting the legitimacy of withholding the equipment:

    @sharktech wrote:
    A few hours later, the employee changed his mind, deciding to quit Sharktech and cancel the company transfer. At this time, Rectified resources are on hold pending deeper forensic investigation and legal consultations.

  • @doughmanes said: Got fired, couldn't pay the bill due to side biz running on slim profits plus working regular job (we know how the industry is) and DC took possession of hardware for overdue bill? just sayin'

    Pretty sure billing wasn't the issue. Was paid up until Feb 2018 yet they still took it off.

  • I give up. @Lee's argumentative power is just overwhelming...

  • Rectified made a FB post

  • I wonder how long SharkTech knew how long this was going on.

    Sharktech just finished updating their data centers and uplinks & hardware quite recently from their newsletter blasts, and as soon as they finished with that the head sysadmin is in deep shite for having a side business, seemingly strong armed into giving it up.

    Was originally leaning towards they found a cabinet or a bunch of servers where they shouldn't have been, but even SharkTech mentioned "we thought it was his wife's reseller account" - Really?

    He screwed up big time going near his own business and working on it during company hours, but the whole "we totally thought his wife was running the reseller account" seems a little flimsy at best. It's not even like he tried to hide the name, maybe she was just the CC holder.

    I personally just don't believe SharkTech guys thought his wife alone was doing the web hosting, but more of a him working on the job issue. Interesting it came up right after the DC upgrades though.

    Thanked by 1hostdare
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    Good job, LE investigators uncover more and more of this story.
    While not so interesting as the CC saga, it should do int he off-season.

  • @doughmanes said:
    Rectified made a FB post

    For those lazy they posted this 41 minutes ago:

    We have reached a preliminary agreement with Sharktech and their counsel is preparing a document to complete the acquisition. We're hoping to have that signed and servers back on tomorrow.

    This is a really crappy situation for the clients.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    And the guy, although:
    1. he was not innocent in this;
    2. there is no guarantee they will actually release the hardware, who knows if they don't claim further damages and continue to keep the hw hostage, after all, moving people off them takes time and money.

  • Sounds like they got this rectified after all.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    Ouch. Seems a lot of assumptions about intent and about details that none of us know. I can say for sure that I sympathize with the story told on both sides. There will be details we will not know, and should not know. Frankly, at this point, every public statement without a lawyer behind it is a liability.

    The most logical conclusion from the data we've been given is that we cannot, currently and objectively, know who is most ethical between the two parties. This seems to be a battle that is not for us to fight.

    Some great advice does come from this: always make sure your employers know what you do that could be called a conflict of interest. Make sure that you can prove that they knew and approved. Always give your employer the time they pay you for.

  • @jarland Does that mean you're going to stop posting nudes in exchange for Taylor Swift rips?

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @WSS said:
    @jarland Does that mean you're going to stop posting nudes in exchange for Taylor Swift rips?

    This was agreed on in my offer letter.

  • @jarland said:

    @WSS said:
    @jarland Does that mean you're going to stop posting nudes in exchange for Taylor Swift rips?

    This was agreed on in my offer letter.

    Which offer?

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @WSS said:

    @jarland said:

    @WSS said:
    @jarland Does that mean you're going to stop posting nudes in exchange for Taylor Swift rips?

    This was agreed on in my offer letter.

    Which offer?

    Were you not aware that I work for pornhub now?

  • @jarland said:

    @WSS said:

    @jarland said:

    @WSS said:
    @jarland Does that mean you're going to stop posting nudes in exchange for Taylor Swift rips?

    This was agreed on in my offer letter.

    Which offer?

    Were you not aware that I work for pornhub now?

    Fuck.. and I just paid for your damn Patreon!

  • Pornhub? Lots of DC and core router porn? Sounds great, link please.

  • @jarland said:

    Were you not aware that I work for pornhub now?

    Hurry up and grab mXXXroute.com while it's still available.

    Thanked by 3WSS Maounique MasonR
  • @nyvpsuser said:

    @jarland said:

    Were you not aware that I work for pornhub now?

    Hurry up and grab mXXXroute.com while it's still available.

    He'd start MXXXshared and give up shortly thereafter since it's so much work..

  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    @Lee said:

    AnthonySmith said: nope, no proof of anything, its not a court here, but if someone was making something up to this degree about me on the no1 result on google for reviews I would chip in for sure.

    Neither should anyone try and make it that way by doing this.

    AnthonySmith said: Maybe we should just start saying "Sharktech review" on every post until there is some clarification.

    Why does Sharktech need to clarify anything more than they have with their statement on the matter? If anyone should offer more information it is @rectified.

    Fair enough, seems no harm done though, this is already number 1 for shark tech anything on google.

    Thanked by 1Lee
Sign In or Register to comment.