Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Anyone who needs Korean VPS? - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Anyone who needs Korean VPS?

2

Comments

  • amamiya_yukoamamiya_yuko Member

    @praveen said:
    Interested if i can get 512 mb ~ 5$ per month

    Me too.It has good ping from China Telecom.

    --- 218.54.45.45 ping statistics ---

    213 packets transmitted, 213 packets received, 0% packet loss

    round-trip min/avg/max = 82.928/84.159/85.399 ms

    Thanked by 1Relip
  • ttsaonttsaon Member

    yes. I need korea vps if you provide more traffic?

  • kijinkijin Member

    Long-time lurker here, just signed up.

    Question: Are there going to be any restrictions on how the 500GB/1TB traffic can be used?

    Many IDCs in KR limit "international traffic" to 3-5% of the monthly total and charge hefty overage fees if you go over that. Some even have separate meters for domestic and international traffic. So if you use all of your traffic allowance on communications to the US or Europe, you might get yourself and/or your ISP in trouble.

  • StarryStarry Member, Host Rep

    @Relip said:
    Jylee how about 218.54.45.45? This is the official homepage ip of the DC that I mentioned on the post.

    $ export PATH=/data/local/bin:$PATH:.
    $ ping 218.54.45.45
    PING 218.54.45.45 (218.54.45.45) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 218.54.45.45: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=159 ms
    64 bytes from 218.54.45.45: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=158 ms
    64 bytes from 218.54.45.45: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=199 ms
    64 bytes from 218.54.45.45: icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=157 ms
    64 bytes from 218.54.45.45: icmp_seq=5 ttl=45 time=184 ms
    64 bytes from 218.54.45.45: icmp_seq=6 ttl=45 time=163 ms
    64 bytes from 218.54.45.45: icmp_seq=7 ttl=45 time=188 ms
    64 bytes from 218.54.45.45: icmp_seq=8 ttl=45 time=202 ms
    ^C
    --- 218.54.45.45 ping statistics ---
    9 packets transmitted, 8 received, 11% packet loss, time 8012ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 157.769/176.864/202.715/17.874 ms
    $

    From China Unicom

  • fanfan Veteran

    @Relip said:
    Jylee how about 218.54.45.45? This is the official homepage ip of the DC that I mentioned on the post.

    |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
    | WinMTR statistics |
    | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
    |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
    | 192.168.1.1 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
    | 110.180.36.1 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 12 |
    | 59.48.229.33 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
    | 59.48.229.73 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
    | 202.97.72.225 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 16 |
    | 202.97.34.150 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 38 | 38 | 39 | 39 |
    | 202.97.33.10 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 38 | 38 | 39 | 39 |
    | 202.97.35.102 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 57 | 57 | 57 | 57 |
    | 202.97.35.238 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 106 | 123 | 133 | 106 |
    | 202.97.5.42 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 76 | 76 | 77 | 77 |
    | 58.229.14.233 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 151 | 153 | 157 | 151 |
    | 118.221.7.33 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 78 | 79 | 81 | 80 |
    | 1.255.23.90 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 83 | 83 | 85 | 83 |
    | 58.229.55.238 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 158 | 159 | 162 | 158 |
    | 58.229.52.178 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 82 | 82 | 84 | 83 |
    | 58.229.55.30 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 164 | 169 | 172 | 164 |
    | 172.16.1.2 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 81 | 84 | 88 | 86 |
    | 218.54.45.7 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 95 | 95 | 96 | 96 |
    | 218.54.45.45 - 0 | 6 | 6 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 102 |
    |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
    WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider

    From China Telecom, not the best but acceptable latency to Korea, will definitely get one if the $7 package comes with > 500gb of bandwidth. Also which provider you are going to be with for your Japanese location?

  • RelipRelip Member
    edited July 2013

    @kijin said:
    Long-time lurker here, just signed up.

    Question: Are there going to be any restrictions on how the 500GB/1TB traffic can be used?

    Many IDCs in KR limit "international traffic" to 3-5% of the monthly total and charge hefty overage fees if you go over that. Some even have separate meters for domestic and international traffic. So if you use all of your traffic allowance on communications to the US or Europe, you might get yourself and/or your ISP in trouble.

    Yes, you're right! But the DC I'll contract with was built for international purposes. So there is no restriction of using international traffic, that's what I heard from DC.

    @fan said:
    From China Telecom, not the best but acceptable latency to Korea, will definitely get one if the $7 package comes with > 500gb of bandwidth. Also which provider you are going to be with for your Japanese location?

    We don't have any plan for providing Japanese location. What I meant on the post was that you can write support ticket in Japanese. Sorry for my ambiguous sentences.

  • AstroProfundisAstroProfundis Member

    I'm interested in that.

    Thanked by 1Relip
  • MagiobiwanMagiobiwan Member

    Will you have IPv6?

  • MuZoMuZo Member
    edited July 2013

    @Magiobiwan
    "Unfortunately, IPv6 is not available in Korea since IPv6 support is not available even in famous IDCs."

    Thanked by 1Relip
  • WilliamWilliam Member

    hm, you beat SKs cloud by pricing but not by BW quality (but they have annoying NAT)... interested.
    (SK Cloud does not need any ID either, any CC is fine for signup, not even an address is required...)

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    SK Cloud does not need any ID either, any CC is fine for signup

    Maybe you mean KT Cloud?

  • WilliamWilliam Member
    edited July 2013

    Eh, yea, KT, not SK.

  • lybxlpsvlybxlpsv Member
    edited July 2013

    Nice ping from indonesia.
    Got 100ms. "Reply from 218.54.45.45: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=48"

    Thanked by 1Relip
  • RelipRelip Member
    edited July 2013

    @William said:
    hm, you beat SKs cloud by pricing but not by BW quality (but they have annoying NAT)... interested.
    (SK Cloud does not need any ID either, any CC is fine for signup, not even an address is required...)

    Yes you're right. KT has grate international routing but the price is ridiculous. If I use KT line for this, I should double or maybe triple the price, so I can't offer VPS here. And they charge differently for international traffic as @kijin said. Anyway, Thanks!

  • FrankweiFrankwei Member

    I'll buy one as long as it fast. :)

    Thanked by 1Relip
  • WilliamWilliam Member

    Not really, the cloud instance starts at like 25$ with 512(?)MB RAM and 1TB traffic, only the NAT is annoying.

  • finlandvpsfinlandvps Member

    @william - they NAT outgoing connections or incoming as well?

  • RelipRelip Member

    @William I was talking about Colo! :)

    @finlandvps Yes, they assign private IP to the cloud instance.

  • WilliamWilliam Member

    Yes, this in itself is not so bad (you get used to it by Amazon) but the firewall where you can only forward SINGLE ports (no ranges) is extremely annoying.

  • DewlanceVPSDewlanceVPS Member, Patron Provider

    @Relip When you will launch your site?

    Please give me your site url so i can bookmark your website.

  • WellGroundedWellGrounded Member

    I'm interested if there's a $24/year plan.

  • RelipRelip Member

    @DewlanceVPS Someday in Aug/Sep. We don't have a name and domain for now. I'll let you know!

    @WellGrounded Yes, we are planning to have that plan for 128MB VM.

  • chrispchrisp Member

    @WellGrounded said:
    I'm interested if there's a $24/year plan.

    @Relip said:
    WellGrounded Yes, we are planning to have that plan for 128MB VM.

    Shut up and take my money! I'm in, where can I preorder?!

    But honestly, I would definitely pick one of those ;)

    Thanked by 1Relip
  • fanfan Veteran

    @Relip said:
    DewlanceVPS Someday in Aug/Sep. We don't have a name and domain for now. I'll let you know!

    WellGrounded Yes, we are planning to have that plan for 128MB VM.

    Count me in. xD

    Thanked by 1Relip
  • WellGroundedWellGrounded Member

    Please PM me when the plan is ready to go! Thanks

    Thanked by 1Relip
  • the_pfythe_pfy Member

    Will you guys allow isa/tap on the VMs?

  • DalCompDalComp Member
    edited July 2013

    From Indonesia. Mobile provider with USB stick modem, so deduct first hop?

    Maybe good enough to watch Running Man? :D

    C:\Users\Dal>ping 218.54.45.45

Pinging 218.54.45.45 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 218.54.45.45: bytes=32 time=209ms TTL=39
Reply from 218.54.45.45: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=39
Reply from 218.54.45.45: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=39
Reply from 218.54.45.45: bytes=32 time=229ms TTL=39

Ping statistics for 218.54.45.45:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 207ms, Maximum = 229ms, Average = 213ms

C:\Users\Dal>tracert 218.54.45.45

Tracing route to 218.54.45.45 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    86 ms    52 ms    62 ms  172.19.129.96
  2    63 ms    46 ms    58 ms  172.19.128.149
  3    62 ms    60 ms    47 ms  172.19.128.254
  4    65 ms    55 ms    56 ms  10.8.11.93
  5    55 ms    58 ms    39 ms  10.8.11.145
  6    55 ms    55 ms    66 ms  202.152.194.254
  7    79 ms    60 ms    60 ms  202.152.207.105
  8   104 ms    83 ms    61 ms  202.152.207.33
  9    94 ms    73 ms    80 ms  IP-121-73.MCS.napinfo.net [119.110.121.73]
 10   237 ms    93 ms   104 ms  IP-112-230.MCS.napinfo.net [119.110.112.230]
 11   103 ms    68 ms    78 ms  203.208.190.65
 12    89 ms    82 ms    68 ms  ge-2-0-0-0.sngtp-dr2.ix.singtel.com [203.208.149
.190]
 13     *      239 ms    74 ms  ge-4-0-1-0.sngc3-cr2.ix.singtel.com [203.208.172
.165]
 14   198 ms   182 ms   190 ms  203.208.166.14
 15   212 ms   272 ms   209 ms  58.229.92.217
 16   176 ms   169 ms     *     118.221.7.41
 17   215 ms   207 ms   211 ms  58.229.9.74
 18   255 ms   202 ms   198 ms  58.229.52.78
 19   213 ms   199 ms   201 ms  58.229.52.174
 20   211 ms   202 ms   208 ms  116.120.104.210
 21     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 22   246 ms   208 ms   208 ms  218.54.45.7
 23   219 ms   203 ms   228 ms  218.54.45.45

Trace complete.
    Thanked by 1Relip
  • RelipRelip Member
    edited July 2013

    @the_pfy said:
    Will you guys allow isa/tap on the VMs?

    As far as I know, ISATAP needs IPv6 address, but as I said on the post, we can't provide you a IPv6 address. Sorry.

  • the_pfythe_pfy Member

    Doh, i didn't mean isa/tap i mean tun/tap to allow VPN connections

  • finlandvpsfinlandvps Member

    @relip - do you allow VPN for VPN providers? Meaning, do you allow people to setup VPN service for providing VPN for their customers - where nothing is logged?

Sign In or Register to comment.