I'm looking for two cheap yearly VPSes on the west coast of the US. Prefer one in SJC and one in LA, but works if both are in LA.

.de domains for 1.99€ on registration.

(Quote)

Not complaining, you get what you pay for and they are dirt cheap but they are also insanely oversold. I knew this since I already have other vps's with them, just wanted another idler.

Some time ago I got a "cheap" board with intel N100 integrated which idles at around 8-10W.

* handle domains, SSL, cron, FTP/SFTP, databases and logs

Agree. As a consequence of the price hikes I started to use hourly paid containers to keep my idle infra ultra cheap.

If it's still too much, checkout @hosthatch, you'll get a little more memory and NVMe while still being really performant and affordable. You can also check out @AlexBarakov AlphaVPS Cheap VPS, really

If something seems too good to be true, probably is. What sucks is the RAM and CPU are fine, but look at the comparison to my even cheaper box from Onidel:

(Quote)

(Quote)

So I purchased one of their "EPYC 1G" cheapies (1 vC, 1 GB mem., 10 GB SSD, unlimited traffic on "fair share" 10 Gb/s) for € 1.49/mo. Note that you can get it even

It's for my own personal domains so I really don't need the reseller management. Mostly just the custom nameservers part. A dedicated IP would be great if they still exist.

my issue wasn't cheap my issue was that no one else seemed to accept just 1u regardless of cost, which is understandable

Sorry, I don't know a decent and cheap colo provider in NL but I do know that Ralph and any company he's involved in is a terrible "solution".

About three years ago, I transferred my domains to Bunny, and so far it's worked without any problems. I'm currently using their DNS and CDN services, and I'm very happy with them so far.

Hello,

Realistic quotes only. I already use Hetzner Storage Boxes for cheap offsite; this is for US local disk and a real uplink.

Gcore for me was simple: it was free and beyond decent as I could park 10+ domains on it without worry and not need to think of going beyond my query allocation tier.

Now it's > @xvps said: