Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

1,99€ dedicated server ?

1596062646581

Comments

  • So, for the fun of it, anyone who managed to get one, are you my neighbour?

    I am in lucky rack 13, block K.

  • @bohdans Hi neighbour, just different rack and block ;)

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited December 2014

    Come on @kcaj tell them the whole story how you did it; with ten simultaneous iperf streams to ping.online.net -- which is less than 1ms away and is on a 10 Gbps connection itself. That means all of the natural limits are not in place (such as the ping to remote host, or their connection speed, or the upstream provider interconnect busyness, or heck, even the HDD speeds of servers uploading and downloading files). You can play dumb and say "but I only used my 1 Gbps port" as much as you want, but the problem was that you ended up using perhaps 99.99% of it continuously, something which will never happen in real life due to the limits mentioned above: the real usage is more likely to be up to 70-80-90%. No wonder (and I am glad) that their automated systems watch for and shoot down that abnormal 99.9% usage, since it's a sure sign of either something like a local DDoS or some other artificial and maybe malicious usage pattern.

  • Maounique said: I hope nobody really believes ALL those thousands of boxes are wired in the same 1 Gbps switch.

    That isn't what I was saying.

    rm_ said: Come on @kcaj tell them the whole story how you did it; with ten simultaneous iperf streams to ping.online.net -- which is less than 1ms away and is on a 10 Gbps connection itself. That means all of the natural limits are not in place (such as the ping to remote host, or their connection speed, or the upstream provider interconnect busyness, or heck, even the HDD speeds of servers uploading and downloading files). You can play dumb and say "but I only used my 1 Gbps port" as much as you want, but the problem was that you ended up using perhaps 99.99% of it continuously, something which will never happen in real life due to the limits mentioned above: the real usage is more likely to be up to 70-80-90%. No wonder (and I am glad) that their automated systems watch for and shoot down that abnormal 99.9% usage, since it's a sure sign of either something like a local DDoS or some other artificial and maybe malicious usage pattern.

    I'd hope a server with a 1Gb/s uplink were able to manage 10 simultaneous connections at 100Mb/s each without taking a switch out. Anybody who wants to see this for themselves can run iperf with enough connections to see ~600Mb/s and things start to creek. Doesn't need to be their internal server either as @rm has specified.

    Thanked by 1comXyz
  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited December 2014

    kcaj said: manage 10 simultaneous connections at 100Mb/s each

    Thing is, these weren't just 100 Mb each, they were "as much as they can" each.

    Yeah I am not sure how/why this would crash the switch (and I doubt that it really did), more likely what would happen is just an automated lock-out of the port, or depends on how it's all designed, maybe of a number of ports.

    kcaj said: Anybody who wants to see this for themselves can run iperf with enough connections

    "LET kids with their 2 EUR servers explore limits of a dedicated provider's infrastructure", Season 1 Ep. 02

    Thanked by 1zimbo
  • You're paying 1,99 and you expect that? You're being delusional.

  • DarudeSandstorm said: You're paying 1,99 and you expect that? You're being delusional.

    A port that can be saturated without causing problems. Whether that be 10Mb/s, 100Mb/s or 1000Mb/s.

  • Anyone here who have managed to route small IPv6 blocks from /48 to multiple servers ?

  • @Sady said:
    Anyone here who have managed to route small IPv6 blocks from /48 to multiple servers ?

    You can request /64 from your /48 via control panel.

  • what nameservers to use for ipv6 delegation at online.net?Als to setup ptr records.I use cloudflare but it doesnt support that.

  • Hmm... They called me as I'm cancelling 2 kidechires... Now I'm tempted to cancel these cancellations...

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    shivoham said: what nameservers to use for ipv6 delegation at online.net?

    If you don't have your own, you can sign up at http://dns.he.net/, it's free and supports IPv6 PTR zones.

  • @DalComp said:
    Hmm... They called me as I'm cancelling 2 kidechires... Now I'm tempted to cancel these cancellations...

    Yea, it's time to cancel the cancellation of your cancellations if you have no use with the servers

    Thanked by 1DalComp
  • @DalComp said:
    Hmm... They called me as I'm cancelling 2 kidechires... Now I'm tempted to cancel these cancellations...

    I'm wondering if you can "give" me your account (transferring the whole account). Though I only need one kidechire at the moment for dev learning. :/

  • last_wizard4 said: Though I only need one kidechire at the moment for dev learning. :/

    Couldn't you learn the same way using your own computer and (if needed) a virtual machine?

    Thanked by 1rm_
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @ben78 said:

    Get a SH atom laptop.

  • @ben78 said:

    the only good reason i can think of to use online virtual machine/dedicated server is because their home internet suck and slow, so installing/compiling/reinstalling/etc are limited with their own computer..

  • @ben78 said:

    Just enough using 'outsourcing' features in online.net!

  • @DalComp said:
    Hmm... They called me as I'm cancelling 2 kidechires... Now I'm tempted to cancel these cancellations...

    Same thing happened with me... I still dunno what to use them for.. Other than crashing routers and turning them into DNS servers.

  • ben78ben78 Member
    edited December 2014

    jonnathon said: Same thing happened with me... I still dunno what to use them for.. Other than crashing routers and turning them into DNS servers.

    So basically they call and say 'guys please don't cancel'?

    ... and they don't want those boxes to change owner.. weird, isn't it?

  • @ben78 said:
    So basically they call and say 'guys please don't cancel'?

    No, they just asked if there was a problem and if I have input for the service. I am simply moved by the effort they took to call an oversea client with just €1,99 machines.

  • DalComp said:

    No, they just asked if there was a problem and if I have input for the service. I am simply moved by the effort they took to call an oversea client with just €1,99 machines.

    Ok, interesting to know, thanks.

    That might be the goal of those 1.99 servers though, getting the brand more known abroad - and it is probably working as we are speaking about them, and might consider them for a bigger box in the future.

  • trexostrexos Member
    edited December 2014

    @DalComp said:
    No, they just asked if there was a problem and if I have input for the service. I am simply moved by the effort they took to call an oversea client with just €1,99 machines.

    How was their English?


    btw looks like I'm getting back my money for the windows licence :) The support told me that first I have to pay the invoice, because they can't/aren't allowed to change an invoice. But they'll refund me afterwards :)

  • DalCompDalComp Member
    edited December 2014

    @ben78 said:
    That might be the goal of those 1.99 servers though, getting the brand more known abroad - and it is probably working as we are speaking about them, and might consider them for a bigger box in the future.

    In that case then it works on me. I was already considering to get their avoton in a month or two, and now I am even more convinced to do so.

    trexos said: How was their English?

    Good and understandable. Better than mine.

  • root@sd-39569:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : CentaurHauls
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : VIA Nano processor U2250 (1.6GHz Capable)
    stepping : 3
    cpu MHz : 1596.004
    cache size : 1024 KB
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc up rep_good nopl pni monitor vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr rng rng_en ace ace_en ace2 phe phe_en lahf_lm
    bogomips : 3192.00
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 128
    address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

  • love my little box ;)

    Thanked by 1comXyz
  • What panel it is?

  • darknessends said: What panel it is?

    Looks like transmission-daemon.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    My Tor box is still picking up. CPU usage some 7-10% by Tor, I will see when it is maxed out how much can do.

  • Is there a chance to order second ip on kimsufi?

Sign In or Register to comment.