Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Anyone interested in a LowEndChallenge?

lawllawl Member
edited May 2012 in General

Okay, so I had a crazy idea.
I provide some UltraLowEnd OVZ Boxes. Say we start with 10MB ram or something.
Now you have to setup a blog or something on that box.
BUT there are a few things.
No outbound traffic. So you can't simply wget stuff, but have to get a little bit more creative to get things on the box.
You might have a restricted envorinment. So maybe like no python/perl whatever preinstalled. Maybe only gcc or something. No netcat too?
And some other things.

Then i thought we could lower the RAM over time and who's blog runns for the longest time wins.

Now my questions: Would anyone even be interested to participate?
Any more ideas for restrictions to make it more fun?

«1

Comments

  • yomeroyomero Member

    And where the heck I will get the 10MB ones

  • lawllawl Member

    @yomero
    I'll provide them for free during the contest.

  • SpencerSpencer Member

    When you SSH into a server it uses bandwidth. It shows up in solusvm. So you would have to add a little outbound.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    2.6.18 or 2.6.32

  • lawllawl Member
    edited May 2012

    @PytoHost
    What i meant is like a NAT, so you can accept connections, but not connect other hosts.

    @Francisco
    No idea. I've never setup OVZ, but i figured it can't be that hard since i don't really need to provide a professional service. but what i heard 2.6.18 is more stable. So i'd probably go with that.

    I just want to know if anyone's even interested before i set any details in stone.

  • bretonbreton Member

    Sounds crazy and has no sense. Well, count me in!

    Thanked by 2Infinity netomx
  • rds100rds100 Member

    "640kb ought to be enough for anybody"

    Anyone remembers those 4k demos from back then? Amazing what one could do with just 4k of code...

    Thanked by 1djvdorp
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    2.6.32 would give accurate ram so people would have more wiggle.

    Thanked by 2Infinity maxexcloo
  • rds100rds100 Member

    What features should the blog have?

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    If the goal is an ultra-low-memory setup, then wouldn't KVM be better? People can't customize the OvZ kernel.

    Thanked by 1Jeffrey
  • 10 mb ... you need that much for os ram.

  • NateN34NateN34 Member
    edited May 2012

    Sounds cool, but can Nginx even run off 5-10 megabytes or RAM?

  • lawllawl Member
    edited May 2012

    @Francisco
    Then .32 it -is- will be.

    @rds100
    No idea yet. You tell me!

    @raindog308
    True dat. But the thing is, i don't have a dedi. So i wanted to setup OVZ in KVM since it's just to play around anyways. And i think KVM in KVM will not work? Think it would be just qemu software emulation?

    @BassHost
    Are you kidding me? If it's OVZ you can easily get it down to 6mb, probably down to 4. that means 6mb to play around.

    @NateN34
    Yet it can, but you need the OS, your shell, the blog itself in there too. So i hope no nginx, that'd be too easy :D

  • SpencerSpencer Member

    @lawl said: True dat. But the thing is, i don't have a dedi. So i wanted to setup OVZ in KVM since it's just to play around anyways. And i think KVM in KVM will not work? Think it would be just qemu software emulation?

    You really do need a dedi. Myself or other hosts could prob give you a cheap dedi to run this on

  • vedranvedran Veteran

    Who needs nginx when you can make your own webserver

    Thanked by 1rds100
  • lawllawl Member

    @vedran
    That's the spirit.
    You can hack this in a few lines of C with a blog in it, since it doesn't need to be HTTP compilant anyways. Just grab the GET and serve the blog.

  • You can run a web server completely off Shell now-a-days anyway.

  • LAWL....what's the prize?

    Thanked by 1NanoG6
  • @quirkyquark said: LAWL....what's the prize?

    A 5MB VPS.

  • Mon5t3rMon5t3r Member

    @lawl said: And i think KVM in KVM will not work?

    see here.. http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/54114#Comment_54114

  • lawllawl Member

    @Mon5t3r is that possible on any of the listed hosts here, was far as i understand it still depends if the host is patched?

  • Didn't we had such a competition already? I remeber @KuJoe creating some really low end plans (16MB) some time ago. Correct me if I'm complete wrong.

  • yomeroyomero Member

    @HerrMaulwurf said: creating some really low end plans (16MB)

    There is a 32/64 one.

  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Host Rep

    haha great fun idea, count me in.

  • yomeroyomero Member

    Well, and what happened with the project of @sleddog?

    Seems more funny

  • KuJoeKuJoe Member, Host Rep

    @HerrMaulwurf said: Didn't we had such a competition already?

    There was a lot of talk in the thread but no takers. I'd still love to sponsor a <16MB blog though. :)

  • BlueVMBlueVM Member
    edited May 2012

    I might be willing throw in (16 MB VPS)x25 for 30 days for this challenge.

  • MrDOSMrDOS Member

    I'm in! Sounds like a good times.

  • jcalebjcaleb Member

    will gcc run on small memory?

  • MrDOSMrDOS Member

    @jcaleb: Compile elsewhere, then copy and paste the base64-encoded binary to the target ;)

    ...that sounds incredibly painful...

Sign In or Register to comment.