Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Clientexec 5 vs WHMCS

Hello everyone,

Which one is more functional and why ?

Please post your opinions . Each and every one's view is greatly appreciated

Thank you

Comments

  • kyakykyaky Member
    edited March 2014

    what about Blesta? any comparison amongst these three?

  • marcmmarcm Member

    If you're really bored and would like to struggle with something, while keeping busy all the time, get Clientexec.

    image

  • I've quickly discovered no billing system is good. You just need to test them all and see which best fits your business needs.

    We use Blesta as we didn't want to board the WHMCS exploit/patch/exploit/patch train-ride. Blesta is a real PITA to use and doesn't fit fully with our business needs. We have customised Blesta to provide more functionality in places where we need it (Our SolusVM implementation is the most feature complete available for Blesta at the moment AFAIK and we have some additional changes made to the way invoicing and orders are handled.)

  • marcmmarcm Member

    Virtovo said: I've quickly discovered no billing system is good.

    I completely agree. HostBill would have been a nice tool for providers if the developers wouldn't have decided to go all gaga-googoo and become greedy. Their plan is pretty obvious though: sell to less customers while making more money from each one of them while driving support costs down at the same time. They also wanted to focus more on development. That's all good an fine, however I don't think they're doing it right. Meh, who cares, we'll just have to work with what's available for now.

Sign In or Register to comment.