Reject provider tags when the provider does not own the ASN

Comments

• b311ion Member

  October 7

  @Levi said:

  @b311ion said:

  @RAVNIX said:

  @b311ion said:
  Okay, why am I getting bombarded with notifications from this thread?🙂
  I do not remember clicking anything.🤔

  Did you press the star?

  Okay, thank you! I forgot about the star thing. I rechecked it, and it was starred for some reason; it might have been a mistake on my part.

  Not mistake, you just have very fat fingers. As my-self.

  
• hyperblast Member

  October 7

  @MannDude said:
  I think just having a registered, verifiable business is enough.

  Let the community dig into ownership details to sniff out potential previous fraudsters and deadpoolers.

  I do like that LowEndSpirit allows community voting for new providers before allowing them to advertise there. Could be done here.

  here it becomes a war...
• Andreix Host Rep, Veteran

  October 7

  @MikeA said:

  @zed said:
  what about if we just reject provider tags when the provider is a shitbag

  Biloh should just implement AI grading for providers and have AI ban providers who don't meet the strict AI generated criteria for successful hosts.

  So more or less scale down the LET revenue to ~$1-2k?!

  Thanked by 1Rubben
• DediRock Member, Patron Provider

  October 7

  @ehab said:
  you cannot reject this smile

  @DediRock

  

  lol @ehab thanks.

  Thanked by 1ehab
• DediRock Member, Patron Provider

  October 7 edited October 7

  @allthemtings said:

  @ehab said:
  you cannot reject this smile

  @DediRock

  

  hell yeah mr rock with his mega cock @DediRock

  Ha noted @allthemtings thank you!

  Thanked by 1allthemtings
• Rubben Member

  October 7

  @gsea4 said:

  @MikeA said:

  @Levi said:

  @rustelekom said:

  @Levi said:
  Should 1-man operations be banned?

  No, because the success of a business does not depend on how many employees work for the company.

  It depends. What if 1-man operation stops due to owner death? 2 owbers can cover each other.

  It's a good point but it's one more reason out of the 50 reasons to maintain your own backups if you have any data that's actually important, right? Personally I don't plan on dying anytime soon as I'm only 32, and am a healthy adult with a lifestyle that doesn't depend on dangerous things or drugs/alcohol.

  There's also people that would probably like that multiple people don't have access to their data. It's the second reason why I haven't hired anyone (besides the fact that I simply don't need to), even with safeguards in place, it's another person that has access to client data. Unless you employ people you know in person, in real life, there's always a risk for something malicious (intentionally or not) even if tiny.

  You still have @Rubben as your backup CEO right ? Haven't seen him lately

  a polish femboy is keeping me quite busy nowadays
• DeadlyChemist Member

  October 7

  I keep a notice to myself (with exceptions)

  Only use providers with owned hardware
  Only use providers woth actual office
  Only use peociders with actual asn/network
  Only use providers at least X years in business
  Chexk rewievs...
  Open a support ticket and ask sometho g stupid
  Call the hotline, after you get connected, just say "ah sorry wrong number" (notice the time? Do they have shitty bots?)
  And bunch more...

  If right now a host would offer me any server on earth for 1 year free i would skip unless the ruccuring price is so.ething im willing to pay

  Migrating is shit, and unless it's yet another backup location, im not willing to gamble