Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
25% Recurring Discount on NVMe VPS
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
CloudLinux
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

America Turns 250: Good With Your Hands? Become Synteq's PP

1234579

Comments

  • forestforest Member
    edited July 9

    @forest said:
    Two quick questions:

    1. Are Tor exit relays permitted? They are completely legal, but do affect IP reputation.
    2. Your AUP states "Cryptocurrency mining, blockchain node operation, or any computationally intensive transactional processing is strictly prohibited". Does this include non-mining blockchain nodes that are not computationally intensive?

    Whether or not I get tagged, I am still curious about these two questions. :P

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    Update has been pushed and confirmed. CLI features should be live.

    New invites (+36):
    @DataRecovery @Saragoldfarb @QuenFea @tototo @pwned @rpqu @nghialele @zGato @Xrmaddness @MannDude @lothos @Void @YassGames @victory7 @stupidgenius @Smigit @mandala @HuiW @LowkeyS @unsafetypin @corbpie @bdl @smallpancakes @cainyxues @nekomikoreimu @truemagic @ebietsy @lothos @giang @Fubuki @victory7 @Frobsy @DanSummer @Headfirst @dosai

    ...and @forest

    All please DM me e-mails to send invites. Especially you @zGato.

    @forest to answer:
    1. Not explicitly banned, though I don't think we're best for it. We are going to hold account-holder responsible to our AUP/TOS and $5 VM popping constantly for violations will just get suspended/booted. I much more highly recommend @MannDude IncogNET who is setup to handle that better.

    1. "Computationally intensive" is the key phrase. I just call it out because people, very often, see "don't hammer the CPU 24/7" and then still decide to run phpcoin miners and get banned.
  • forestforest Member

    @crunchbits said: 1. Not explicitly banned, though I don't think we're best for it. We are going to hold account-holder responsible to our AUP/TOS and $5 VM popping constantly for violations will just get suspended/booted. I much more highly recommend @MannDude IncogNET who is setup to handle that better.

    Totally understand!

    @crunchbits said: "Computationally intensive" is the key phrase. I just call it out because people, very often, see "don't hammer the CPU 24/7" and then still decide to run phpcoin miners and get banned.

    Thanks! I only ask because I know there are some providers that say "no mining" and then get mad when a non-mining Monero node is hosted because it's "blockchain technology".

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @forest said:

    @crunchbits said: "Computationally intensive" is the key phrase. I just call it out because people, very often, see "don't hammer the CPU 24/7" and then still decide to run phpcoin miners and get banned.

    Thanks! I only ask because I know there are some providers that say "no mining" and then get mad when a non-mining Monero node is hosted because it's "blockchain technology".

    Of course. Running a simple node would look like any other application, no specific rules against actually using your hardware. Just view it as 'resource abuse' lens. Dedicated server? Don't care.

  • deafcondeafcon Member

    Looking forward to checking out the CLI over the weekend.

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @crunchbits can you make me the new CEO instead

    Thanked by 2nghialele Murv
  • @beanman109 said:
    @crunchbits can you make me the new CEO instead

    When i get to 18yo i voted for beanman109 in my country.

    Thanked by 2beanman109 Murv
  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @beanman109 said:
    @crunchbits can you make me the new CEO instead

    trying to take my job? @skorupion make sure his accounts are closed.

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @crunchbits said:

    @beanman109 said:
    @crunchbits can you make me the new CEO instead

    trying to take my job? @skorupion make sure his accounts are closed.

  • dedicadosdedicados Member
    edited July 10

    Mmm trying panel on cell phone and already set a password for a new VPs order, the. Added PayPal and when ready to pay it shows

    “Value error, Provide a password or an SSH public key”

    No chance to
    Change it so started over and now it gives me:

    “Network error. Check your connection and try again.”

    Charge was already done , received PayPal msg

    Checking dashboard the invoice there pending but “ Awaiting crypto payment”

  • forestforest Member
    edited July 10

    Two quick things (not really related to the QA testing, just quick observations):

    1. https://synteq.com/about seems to require WebGL, which some browsers disable for security. The entire page is replaced with the text "Application error: a client-side exception has occurred while loading synteq.com (see the browser console for more information).".
    2. It appears cryptocurrency is not a payment method when I click "Add Payment Method". Is there a way you can accept crypto so that I can purchase a VPS to test things out? Right now the account balance is $0 and I need to top it up to do things, but it only shows credit card, bank transfer, or PayPal.
    Thanked by 1rpqu
  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    Don't pay us yet. We add credit after the customer invite is accepted.

    Thanked by 2lala_th nghialele
  • lala_thlala_th Member

    @crunchbits said:
    Don't pay us yet. We add credit after the customer invite is accepted.

    I have already pmed you about my invite, but there has been an answer since the 4th.

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @lala_th said:

    @crunchbits said:
    Don't pay us yet. We add credit after the customer invite is accepted.

    I have already pmed you about my invite, but there has been an answer since the 4th.

    have you checked your email?

    Thanked by 1lala_th
  • forestforest Member
    edited July 10

    @crunchbits said:
    Don't pay us yet. We add credit after the customer invite is accepted.

    Ah alright. I accepted the invite already (looking through the panel now).

    Edit: I see $30 in there now!

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @crunchbits said:
    Don't pay us yet. We add credit after the customer invite is accepted.

    Shouldn't have let the cat out.

    Nice way to get some more $$$ for more fumos

    Thanked by 1forest
  • forestforest Member
    edited July 10

    Just some preliminary notes from the order page prior to any purchases:

    • On https://cloud.synteq.com/order/vps?from=type, the slider visually implies continuously-variable choices, so it's visually-unsettling to see it jump through discrete values. For certain parameters it's obvious that there are no in-between choices (such as number of vCPUs), but it would be useful for other options, such as RAM and disk space, to support finer-grained choices.

    • Moving the Cores, RAM, or Storage sliders causes a flood of requests for each value that it passes over in a POST request to /public/vps/availability. The requests should only be sent after the slider has come to a stop for a second or two, or the availability limitations should be sent to the client and any issues with the chosen configuration being unavailable should be determined client-side.

    • A lot of repeated requests (e.g. to /auth/me, /public/vps/headroom, /public/vps/availability) would be better off being sent over a WebSocket connection, with individual GET, POST, and OPTIONS requests only being used as fallback.

    • The "Double click to type" indicator is confusing. I tried double-clicking several times on the slider and nothing happened. It took a few tries until I figured out that I had to double-click the number itself above the slider. Additionally, I can't select anything that's not a preset value. For example, I double click on the number to choose bandwidth and I set "50", and it changes to 40. This is problematic because each increment doubles the total bandwidth (e.g. if 40 TB is not enough and I need 50, I can't select that and have no choice but to choose 40 or 80).

    • The SVG graphics for the Linux distribution choser don't seem to load from the AWS S3 bucket. They are being blocked by Firefox's "OpaqueResponseBlocking" feature (this is a problem with CORS). Still, probably a good idea to host those SVGs locally.

    • When I select "My Project > Metal" and the press "+ Order Server", it redirects me to the "Order new" page that is not specific to dedicated servers, offering me all products including VPSes. This is unlike when I press "+ Deploy" on "My Project > Cloud" which brings me directly to the page relevant for VPS hosting.

    • Going to "New VDS Performance" will not allow me to pass. It keeps asking me to choose a plan to continue but does not actually show any plans:

    no plans

    @crunchbits said: As a thank-you, anyone who submits a meaningful review per our instructions within the given time frame will receive a lifetime Portal Pioneer VM.

    What's the timeframe to be eligible? Should I be trying to do every test today or can I take my time over the next couple of days in order to explore more functionality?

  • XrmaddnessXrmaddness Member
    edited July 10

    Something is off with the pricing calculation for resizing.

    Before:

    In Resize:

    Is it possible it's not keeping the cores dedicated and reverting to shared?

    EDIT:
    Figured it out. Resizing drops the block storage?

    EDIT 2:
    Also wanted to add that, outside of the resize window and the "VPS - Dedicated" in the Cloud list, there doesn't appear to be any indication that this VPS has dedicated/pinned cores? Some way to show that vs shared seems like a good idea.

    Additionally, there's no option for port speed in the configuration. Is that intentional?

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • ebietsyebietsy Member

    @crunchbits said:
    Update has been pushed and confirmed. CLI features should be live.

    New invites (+36):
    @DataRecovery @Saragoldfarb @QuenFea @tototo @pwned @rpqu @nghialele @zGato @Xrmaddness @MannDude @lothos @Void @YassGames @victory7 @stupidgenius @Smigit @mandala @HuiW @LowkeyS @unsafetypin @corbpie @bdl @smallpancakes @cainyxues @nekomikoreimu @truemagic @ebietsy @lothos @giang @Fubuki @victory7 @Frobsy @DanSummer @Headfirst @dosai

    ...and @forest

    All please DM me e-mails to send invites. Especially you @zGato.

    @forest to answer:
    1. Not explicitly banned, though I don't think we're best for it. We are going to hold account-holder responsible to our AUP/TOS and $5 VM popping constantly for violations will just get suspended/booted. I much more highly recommend @MannDude IncogNET who is setup to handle that better.

    1. "Computationally intensive" is the key phrase. I just call it out because people, very often, see "don't hammer the CPU 24/7" and then still decide to run phpcoin miners and get banned.

    thank you mr crankbis

    Thanked by 2nghialele Murv
  • @crunchbits said:
    Update has been pushed and confirmed. CLI features should be live.

    New invites (+36):
    @DataRecovery @Saragoldfarb @QuenFea @tototo @pwned @rpqu @nghialele @zGato @Xrmaddness @MannDude @lothos @Void @YassGames @victory7 @stupidgenius @Smigit @mandala @HuiW @LowkeyS @unsafetypin @corbpie @bdl @smallpancakes @cainyxues @nekomikoreimu @truemagic @ebietsy @lothos @giang @Fubuki @victory7 @Frobsy @DanSummer @Headfirst @dosai

    ...and @forest

    All please DM me e-mails to send invites. Especially you @zGato.

    @forest to answer:
    1. Not explicitly banned, though I don't think we're best for it. We are going to hold account-holder responsible to our AUP/TOS and $5 VM popping constantly for violations will just get suspended/booted. I much more highly recommend @MannDude IncogNET who is setup to handle that better.

    1. "Computationally intensive" is the key phrase. I just call it out because people, very often, see "don't hammer the CPU 24/7" and then still decide to run phpcoin miners and get banned.

    Thank you very much for the invitation!

    Thanked by 1bdl
  • Is this still going? if so, count me in!

  • openidopenid Member

    interested

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @Xrmaddness @forest via ticket or bug reports please. Going to be missed here.

  • forestforest Member

    @crunchbits said:
    @Xrmaddness @forest via ticket or bug reports please. Going to be missed here.

    Got it, thanks! Will send that way for subsequent reports. :)

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • zGatozGato Member

    @crunchbits said:

    All please DM me e-mails to send invites. Especially you @zGato.

    what did I do :'(

    sent pm!

  • rpqurpqu Member

    First of all, when loading the / @crunchbits
    Assets such as 1,2 is suboptimal. The worst offender is the 8.3MB footer
    For example:

    $ optipng call-to-action.png
    ** Processing: call-to-action.png
    4056x2096 pixels, 4x8 bits/pixel, RGB+alpha
    Reducing image to 3x8 bits/pixel, RGB
    Input IDAT size = 8322907 bytes
    Input file size = 8347348 bytes

    Trying:
    zc = 9 zm = 8 zs = 0 f = 0 IDAT size = 7050418
    zc = 9 zm = 8 zs = 0 f = 5 IDAT size = 4972166
    zc = 9 zm = 8 zs = 1 f = 5 IDAT size = 4882041

    Selecting parameters:
    zc = 9 zm = 8 zs = 1 f = 5 IDAT size = 4882041

    Output IDAT size = 4882041 bytes (3440866 bytes decrease)
    Output file size = 4882098 bytes (3465250 bytes = 41.51% decrease)


    This image isn't suited for png.
    $convert call-to-action.png -quality 90 call-to-action.jpg
    551932 call-to-action.jpg
    93.4% file size reduction without great lost of fidelity. Or just use svg replacement

    Vital stats: 39 images, sorted by transferred size

    • 10/39: 1.26KB
    • 20/39: 2.59KB
    • 30/39: 10.51KB
    • 34/39: 60.19KB
    • 37/39: 228.43KB
    • 38/39: 608.45KB
    • 39/39: 8.35MB

    Therefore, 12.7s load time could be 100% attributed to unoptimized footer image.

    Thanked by 2Smigit crunchbits
  • FubukiFubuki Member

    the UI looks nice. anyhow, i noticed that

    https://cloud.synteq.com/order/vds-performance?from=type
    https://cloud.synteq.com/order/metal?from=type

    does not show what config other then the location being locked to Dallas, TX and the only thing you can do is "Add block storage" with a number from 1-32 but everything else works fine. i guess it was left that way or just a WIP. Other then that It looks normal

    Thanked by 1benha
  • benhabenha Member

    @Fubuki said:
    the UI looks nice. anyhow, i noticed that

    https://cloud.synteq.com/order/vds-performance?from=type
    https://cloud.synteq.com/order/metal?from=type

    does not show what config other then the location being locked to Dallas, TX and the only thing you can do is "Add block storage" with a number from 1-32 but everything else works fine. i guess it was left that way or just a WIP. Other then that It looks normal

    Hi Fubuki, really appreciate the feedback (and UI compliment)

    Since it's came up a few times from a few different users, will add a note here;

    This is a temporary, and intentional "bug" (albeit, ugly). Right now, we technically "have stock" for both of these product lines, but have disabled the plans through the beta testing period. Hence, the half-baked appearance. In a production environment, we'd never have plans disabled (and if we did, /order/{plan_type} would be a disabled route)

    Thanked by 1Fubuki
  • FubukiFubuki Member

    running a YABS test to see how fast the bandwidth is for the vps atm. looks to be running on Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8260 CPU @ 2.40GHz for the Shared CPU type

  • FubukiFubuki Member

    @benha said:

    @Fubuki said:
    the UI looks nice. anyhow, i noticed that

    https://cloud.synteq.com/order/vds-performance?from=type
    https://cloud.synteq.com/order/metal?from=type

    does not show what config other then the location being locked to Dallas, TX and the only thing you can do is "Add block storage" with a number from 1-32 but everything else works fine. i guess it was left that way or just a WIP. Other then that It looks normal

    Hi Fubuki, really appreciate the feedback (and UI compliment)

    Since it's came up a few times from a few different users, will add a note here;

    This is a temporary, and intentional "bug" (albeit, ugly). Right now, we technically "have stock" for both of these product lines, but have disabled the plans through the beta testing period. Hence, the half-baked appearance. In a production environment, we'd never have plans disabled (and if we did, /order/{plan_type} would be a disabled route)

    I see. I will keep a note on that. I can wait when those are available after the beta test. I do have a few questions though

    1. is there going to be hourly billing soon?
    2. do the credits expire during the beta testing period or does it stay there?

    I think that's all i have for now

    Thanked by 1benha
Sign In or Register to comment.