New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
i would chargeback yesterday.
I believe in miracles, not ruining me financially
It's highly unfair. Others can steal your CPU but you can't steal it from someone else.
you can always go to wallmart
Hi, dear lowendlurker.
Looks like now is fixed? Can you confirm?
Also this is a cheapest VPS server, we can't guarantee that will have always good performance. Since it have low resources and the low pricing also attracts some "abusive clients"
If this still happening, try to request to move to other node.
Kind Regards,
Ava.hosting
Hello, it is usable, as expected now.
Thank you a lot for your efforts!
Dont think I have ever seen steals that high even lowend wise
No, the problem is that the virtual CPU is spending 47.7% of it's time waiting for the host CPU to allocate cycles to it (as indicated by 47.7 st) in spite of the low idle load, which indicates that the host is either massively overprovisioned, or has some abusive VMs that are constantly slamming their CPU and preventing other VMs from using their fair share of compute time on the host CPU.
At least now I know not to renew it.
A few percent steal is normal on shared/oversold nodes — under ~5% I wouldn't worry. Consistent double-digit steal means the node's packed and you're fighting neighbors for CPU. Worth running
vmstat 1over a few hours at different times to see if it spikes during peak. If it's always high, that's a node problem, not yours.I still don't get what you expect from an €11-a-year VPS. People who complain about these servers being slow shouldn't even think about opening a support ticket or whining. (just my opinion
)
They should not sell such crap, it's misleading (just my opinion)
Now after rebuilding, the network is broken anyway. Done with it finally.
worth your time as "Patron Provider" and re-read the thread again and the provider response and the op comments
and you will see that he already open a ticket, just 3-5 comments from you "worth time" you will see that people already would be okay with 5-7 cpu steal in this vps prices
please stop joks
No, this is not an okay st% rate, whatever node you are on, its' oversold or someone on the node is abusing the resources, in cases like this if it's a clear abusive behavior the host should rate limit / cpu limit the offender.
wdym? Any cpu steal is haram, even on 11€/y.
I completely agree, but such a low price can never justify a “decent” service (in my opinion).
There are too many costs involved; selling a service for $11 a year means you’re literally breaking even, if not losing money.
In any case, everyone is free to choose their own business model.> @Neoon said:
What is your business so I can make sure not to make a purchase?
This information is listed in their profile
Whatever you sell, its your decision.
However, if what your sell, its barely usable, because of CPU steal, packet loss or whatever, its your task to fix it.
No matter, how cheap it is.
So Far, I have barely seen any CPU steal on my cheap idlers, despite paying low price.
I don't need much CPU, I need the CPU to process things fast, without delay.
What could be the reason for this?
You're blaming users for a provider's failure. They should stand behind what they sell and ensure it can actually be utilized. By telling users that they shouldn't expect a usable service and shouldn't submit a support ticket, you're saying that provider doesn't need to do that. From my perspective, that means it is possible you would act the same to your own users.
If sharing an opinion counts as "attacking" someone, then my bad, though that definitely wasn't my intention.
That said, I completely agree that the provider is to blame here.
They are selling service XYZ on paper, but delivering something entirely different.
It honestly feels like one of those social media ads promising you'll get rich quick with a €500 investment.
I didn't say you were attacking anyone, I said you were blaming them. It seems like what you're trying to say is "you should have known better than to buy that garbage", which I agree with to an extent. I just really don't like the tendency for people here to use the cost of a service to excuse providers from the need to provide said service. Hosts need to get roasted when they don't meet their obligations.