Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
25% Recurring Discount on NVMe VPS
Try EnsoVPN - Reliable VPN - 1-Day Free Trial
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
CloudLinux
Try EnsoVPN - Fast & Private VPN - 1-Day Free Trial
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

I want to know the reviews of all paid and free AI tools.

NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

Hello LET,

I am curious about all kinds of AI. In the field of coding, I always prefer to use VS Code with Copilot. I would like to know the reviews of different AI tools available on the internet.

For learning, I usually rely on Copilot and Gemini. I want to know if all others will agree with me?

Thanked by 1WyvernCo

Comments

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    What about Deepseek ??

  • emghemgh Veteran, Megathread Squad

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Thanked by 2NushairAlvi ravi
  • @NushairAlvi said:
    What about Deepseek ??

    I tried deepseek, its not good at coding. Try Codex by openai once, they have published a vscode extension too! I used it to vibe code a ssh app for gnome and it worked as expected, but I dont use the app tbh.... I just vibe coded that app to test how codex works!

  • JordJord Moderator, Host Rep, Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Codex 3.5 seems very good so far. Not tried Opus 4.6 that much but it seemed a lot slower than 4.5 that's for sure.

    Thanked by 2emgh NushairAlvi
  • Claude is good but you have to be a rich coder or working in a rich corporate.

    Thanked by 1NushairAlvi
  • xvpsxvps Member
    edited March 1

    Since many here prefer privacy,

    Anthropic (Claude) has been dropped by the U.S. government after an order from Donald Trump, because Anthropic wanted assurances that its technology would not be used for mass surveillance or for autonomous weapons systems that can kill people without human input.

    The Pentagon has made an agreement with OpenAI (ChatGPT/Codex) instead.

    OpenAI claims that its agreement with the U.S. government includes assurances that it will not be used for those purposes. (Yeah, right. 😄)

    See: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/feb/28/openai-us-military-anthropic

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @emgh said:

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Yes, you're absolutely Right.But with the experience, I can surely say that VS Code is Better than any other AI coder in the field.

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @buggedout said:

    @NushairAlvi said:
    What about Deepseek ??

    I tried deepseek, its not good at coding. Try Codex by openai once, they have published a vscode extension too! I used it to vibe code a ssh app for gnome and it worked as expected, but I dont use the app tbh.... I just vibe coded that app to test how codex works!

    Thanks for the information. I will try that ASAP. But I usually use VS code and I always open Copilot for additional help. But the funniest thing is that they work flawlessly together like Spouse .

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @itachikonoha said:
    Claude is good, but you have to be a rich coder or working in a rich corporate.

    Yes, you're at the right point. But brother, quality matters more than quantity. And also, the experience matters for some people like me.

  • xvpsxvps Member

    @NushairAlvi said:

    @emgh said:

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Yes, you're absolutely Right.But with the experience, I can surely say that VS Code is Better than any other AI coder in the field.

    I have a lot better experience with Cursor. It's a fork of vscode but AI is better integrated.

    Thanked by 1NushairAlvi
  • emghemgh Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @Jord said:

    @emgh said:

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Codex 3.5 seems very good so far. Not tried Opus 4.6 that much but it seemed a lot slower than 4.5 that's for sure.

    I don’t like it at all tbh but I guess it’s personal

    I imagine exactly how I want the end product to look like and tend to explain my ambitions quite detailed and Codex just likes to take initiatives I don’t want

    Thanked by 1NushairAlvi
  • JordJord Moderator, Host Rep, Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:

    @Jord said:

    @emgh said:

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Codex 3.5 seems very good so far. Not tried Opus 4.6 that much but it seemed a lot slower than 4.5 that's for sure.

    I don’t like it at all tbh but I guess it’s personal

    I imagine exactly how I want the end product to look like and tend to explain my ambitions quite detailed and Codex just likes to take initiatives I don’t want

    That's fair, I've not used Opus 4.6 a lot, but when it first came out it seemed a lot slower. Might have gotten better.

    Thanked by 3oloke emgh NushairAlvi
  • LeviLevi Veteran

    Unless you go with claude max plan for 200/mo - it has very tight limits. Codex is way more generous. And on xhigh it is extremely capable

    Thanked by 1NushairAlvi
  • JordJord Moderator, Host Rep, Veteran, Megathread Squad

    Yeah their limits are smol, I got rid of my cursor pro plan as auto is no longer unlimited/counts towards your plan. So currently sticking with codex.

    Thanked by 1NushairAlvi
  • uhuuhu Member

    GPT5.3 Codex seems to have been a decent step up from 5.2.

    Thanked by 1NushairAlvi
  • forestforest Member

    @xvps said: because Anthropic wanted assurances that its technology would not be used for mass surveillance or for autonomous weapons systems that can kill people without human input.

    I hate AI companies with a passion, but honestly props to Anthropic for standing their ground.

    Thanked by 2NushairAlvi OhJohn
  • sliixsliix Member

    @uhu said:
    GPT5.3 Codex seems to have been a decent step up from 5.2.

    Agreed. It feels more capable like Opus now. I know from experience that before Codex 5.3, Codex CLI always let me down and I have to switch to Claude Code.

    5.3 is really good and OpenAI is generous with their limits. But I'm sticking with Anthropic now due to the recent event.

    Thanked by 2NushairAlvi uhu
  • cash602cash602 Member

    Try Qwen

    Thanked by 1NushairAlvi
  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @xvps said:
    Since many here prefer privacy,

    Anthropic (Claude) has been dropped by the U.S. government after an order from Donald Trump, because Anthropic wanted assurances that its technology would not be used for mass surveillance or for autonomous weapons systems that can kill people without human input.

    The Pentagon has made an agreement with OpenAI (ChatGPT/Codex) instead.

    OpenAI claims that its agreement with the U.S. government includes assurances that it will not be used for those purposes. (Yeah, right. 😄)

    See: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/feb/28/openai-us-military-anthropic

    Interesting point. I am going to research more about this!!!

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @xvps said:

    @NushairAlvi said:

    @emgh said:

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Yes, you're absolutely Right.But with the experience, I can surely say that VS Code is Better than any other AI coder in the field.

    I have a lot better experience with Cursor. It's a fork of vscode but AI is better integrated.

    Okay, then I should give it a try! I tried that 2 or 3 years ago, but I didn’t like it then. However, I think they’ve made a lot of improvements now.

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @Jord said:

    @emgh said:

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Codex 3.5 seems very good so far. Not tried Opus 4.6 that much but it seemed a lot slower than 4.5 that's for sure.

    Yes, Absolutely. But Codex is not bad at all !!

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @emgh said:

    @Jord said:

    @emgh said:

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Codex 3.5 seems very good so far. Not tried Opus 4.6 that much but it seemed a lot slower than 4.5 that's for sure.

    I don’t like it at all tbh but I guess it’s personal

    I imagine exactly how I want the end product to look like and tend to explain my ambitions quite detailed and Codex just likes to take initiatives I don’t want

    Yeah!! It's totally personal, but I think Codex is not bad at all for use !! It is usable.

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep
    edited March 2

    @Jord said:

    @emgh said:

    @Jord said:

    @emgh said:

    all openai models suck and Claude is great

    Codex 3.5 seems very good so far. Not tried Opus 4.6 that much but it seemed a lot slower than 4.5 that's for sure.

    I don’t like it at all tbh but I guess it’s personal

    I imagine exactly how I want the end product to look like and tend to explain my ambitions quite detailed and Codex just likes to take initiatives I don’t want

    That's fair, I've not used Opus 4.6 a lot, but when it first came out it seemed a lot slower. Might have gotten better.

    I think it is doing well now obviously not the best . But In the past, it was very laggy.

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @Levi said:
    Unless you go with claude max plan for 200/mo - it has very tight limits. Codex is way more generous. And on xhigh it is extremely capable

    Yes. But Max 20x package also makes you a beggar. It is good, but not in price.

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @Jord said:
    Yeah their limits are smol, I got rid of my cursor pro plan as auto is no longer unlimited/counts towards your plan. So currently sticking with codex.

    Yes. The main problem with VS Code is the limitation. It was much better in the past when it had no limit !!

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @uhu said:
    GPT5.3 Codex seems to have been a decent step up from 5.2.

    Yes, I think. I have to try that !!

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @forest said:

    @xvps said: because Anthropic wanted assurances that its technology would not be used for mass surveillance or for autonomous weapons systems that can kill people without human input.

    I hate AI companies with a passion, but honestly props to Anthropic for standing their ground.

    I just discovered that ClaudeAI and Anthropic are connected to each other.

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @sliix said:

    @uhu said:
    GPT5.3 Codex seems to have been a decent step up from 5.2.

    Agreed. It feels more capable like Opus now. I know from experience that before Codex 5.3, Codex CLI always let me down and I have to switch to Claude Code.

    5.3 is really good and OpenAI is generous with their limits. But I'm sticking with Anthropic now due to the recent event.

    Seems you all want to convert me from VS Code. :D :D

  • NushairAlviNushairAlvi Member, Host Rep

    @cash602 said:
    Try Qwen

    I will also give it a try. Is there any free coding AI with a good reputation?

Sign In or Register to comment.