Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

What happened to CloudCone? Was it hacked?

1567810

Comments

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate
    edited February 3

    @sunkiss said:
    it really ruins the mood.

    Cloud Cone: bad vibes only!

  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @s0n1c said: My question is why would someone store critical data on a $7/year VPS with no backups, then pay $100 to recover it, when they could have paid $100 or less for a much more reputable provider, or simply kept backups in the first place???

  • alfatarsosalfatarsos Member, Host Rep

    @yoursunny said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    … however, there’s a root shell in Virtualizor software that is protected merely by a password (not private keys or 2FA) and does not generate an audit trail.

    And if that password is weak enough or reused anywhere else... boom.

    That feature should probably be discontinued, Virtualizor is the only remaining VPS control panel where a terminal exists, afaik.

  • sunkisssunkiss Member
    edited February 4

    @sunkiss said:
    Day 5: I have three DC2 VPS instances. One was barely usable after a system reinstallation, while the other two couldn't be reinstalled at all and remained offline. I tried reinstalling them multiple times, but there was no progress whatsoever. When all data is lost and even a simple OS reinstallation becomes such a painful process, it really ruins the mood.

    Day 5.5: my 2 vps system reinstallation still not complete.

    CloudCone system reinstallation process is one of the most terrible I've encountered among all the service providers I've used.

  • @sunkiss said: CloudCone system reinstallation process is one of the most terrible I've encountered among all the service providers I've used.

    Did you open a ticket? Most likely something is broken. I doubt this is the norm.

  • @forest said:

    @sunkiss said: CloudCone system reinstallation process is one of the most terrible I've encountered among all the service providers I've used.

    Did you open a ticket? Most likely something is broken. I doubt this is the norm.

    I submitted support ticket asking for their help, see if they can process it manually to speed things up...but they told me to reinstall the system through the control panel, and then they quickly closed my ticket. Period.

  • virtualizorvirtualizor Member, Host Rep

    @alfatarsos said:

    Very much likely indeed...

    And Virtualizor didn't issue yet a public statement on the matter. Which would be important. We're not talking about one provider now, we're talking about more.

    We have posted this since yesterday :
    https://www.virtualizor.com/blog/security-update-transparency-regarding-a-recent-support-ticket-incident/

    @CloudHopper said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    @vitualizor can you clear up for us whether your support system was breached once or twice? And when did the last breach occur?

    @Cloudcone can you confirm for us when you last rotated your passwords and whether you had IP whitelisting for your instance and 2FA enabled?

    The above should clarify things.

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • starxstarx Member

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:

    Very much likely indeed...

    And Virtualizor didn't issue yet a public statement on the matter. Which would be important. We're not talking about one provider now, we're talking about more.

    We have posted this since yesterday :
    https://www.virtualizor.com/blog/security-update-transparency-regarding-a-recent-support-ticket-incident/

    @CloudHopper said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    @vitualizor can you clear up for us whether your support system was breached once or twice? And when did the last breach occur?

    @Cloudcone can you confirm for us when you last rotated your passwords and whether you had IP whitelisting for your instance and 2FA enabled?

    The above should clarify things.

    So that's all your fault.

  • NyrNyr Community Contributor, Veteran

    @starx said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:

    Very much likely indeed...

    And Virtualizor didn't issue yet a public statement on the matter. Which would be important. We're not talking about one provider now, we're talking about more.

    We have posted this since yesterday :
    https://www.virtualizor.com/blog/security-update-transparency-regarding-a-recent-support-ticket-incident/

    @CloudHopper said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    @vitualizor can you clear up for us whether your support system was breached once or twice? And when did the last breach occur?

    @Cloudcone can you confirm for us when you last rotated your passwords and whether you had IP whitelisting for your instance and 2FA enabled?

    The above should clarify things.

    So that's all your fault.

    No it isn't?

    If those are the facts, the affected providers were highly irresponsible, independent of the fact that Virtualizor got compromised.

  • CloudHopperCloudHopper Member
    edited February 4

    @Nyr said:

    @starx said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:

    Very much likely indeed...

    And Virtualizor didn't issue yet a public statement on the matter. Which would be important. We're not talking about one provider now, we're talking about more.

    We have posted this since yesterday :
    https://www.virtualizor.com/blog/security-update-transparency-regarding-a-recent-support-ticket-incident/

    @CloudHopper said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    @vitualizor can you clear up for us whether your support system was breached once or twice? And when did the last breach occur?

    @Cloudcone can you confirm for us when you last rotated your passwords and whether you had IP whitelisting for your instance and 2FA enabled?

    The above should clarify things.

    So that's all your fault.

    No it isn't?

    If those are the facts, the affected providers were highly irresponsible, independent of the fact that Virtualizor got compromised.

    Virtualizor requested passwords from their customers, retained them for a year and then [allegedly] lost them in a hack....but it's the providers who trusted them that were "highly irresponsible" 🤔

  • NyrNyr Community Contributor, Veteran

    @CloudHopper said:

    @Nyr said:

    @starx said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:

    Very much likely indeed...

    And Virtualizor didn't issue yet a public statement on the matter. Which would be important. We're not talking about one provider now, we're talking about more.

    We have posted this since yesterday :
    https://www.virtualizor.com/blog/security-update-transparency-regarding-a-recent-support-ticket-incident/

    @CloudHopper said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    @vitualizor can you clear up for us whether your support system was breached once or twice? And when did the last breach occur?

    @Cloudcone can you confirm for us when you last rotated your passwords and whether you had IP whitelisting for your instance and 2FA enabled?

    The above should clarify things.

    So that's all your fault.

    No it isn't?

    If those are the facts, the affected providers were highly irresponsible, independent of the fact that Virtualizor got compromised.

    Virtualizor requested passwords from their customers, retained them for a year and then [allegedly] lost them in a hack....but it's the providers who trusted them that were "highly irresponsible" 🤔

    Of course they were irresponsible. They should have rotated any credentials shared with a third party as soon as they are not required anymore, it is basic security hygiene. Independent of the also very irresponsible actions of their vendor, which nobody is disputing.

    Thanked by 2forest darkimmortal
  • Its their tool, they should do it better. In example, an automatic revoke of credentials after 24h. The admin could handle that, but the programmers not doing 100% security handling.

  • zedzed Member

    I mean they both can be irresponsible.

  • @zed said:
    I mean they both can be irresponsible.

    Exactly what I was going to say.
    If you have two parties and both do due diligence, stuff like this never happens.
    If one party is irresponsible, stuff might happen eventually.
    If both parties are irresponsible, shit will happen!

    The providers should have rotated the credentials and Virtualizor should not have saved them. Two idiots, and inevitably shit happened.

    Thanked by 3zed forest default
  • @Nyr said:

    @CloudHopper said:

    @Nyr said:

    @starx said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:

    Very much likely indeed...

    And Virtualizor didn't issue yet a public statement on the matter. Which would be important. We're not talking about one provider now, we're talking about more.

    We have posted this since yesterday :
    https://www.virtualizor.com/blog/security-update-transparency-regarding-a-recent-support-ticket-incident/

    @CloudHopper said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    @vitualizor can you clear up for us whether your support system was breached once or twice? And when did the last breach occur?

    @Cloudcone can you confirm for us when you last rotated your passwords and whether you had IP whitelisting for your instance and 2FA enabled?

    The above should clarify things.

    So that's all your fault.

    No it isn't?

    If those are the facts, the affected providers were highly irresponsible, independent of the fact that Virtualizor got compromised.

    Virtualizor requested passwords from their customers, retained them for a year and then [allegedly] lost them in a hack....but it's the providers who trusted them that were "highly irresponsible" 🤔

    Of course they were irresponsible. They should have rotated any credentials shared with a third party as soon as they are not required anymore, it is basic security hygiene. Independent of the also very irresponsible actions of their vendor, which nobody is disputing.

    That's fair comment, but I don't believe Virtualizor identified a breach and proved that it led to follow-on hacks within the ~36 hours it took for them to shift from "nothing to see here" to emailing that statement anyway.

    Given the complexity of the alleged hack they suffered, and the number of customers known to be affected, it doesn't seem plausible that they'd have a definitive answer that quickly...but it sure is a convenient way to shutdown the discussion! 🤷‍♀️

    Thanked by 1ralf
  • ralfralf Member

    @CloudHopper said:

    @Nyr said:

    @CloudHopper said:

    @Nyr said:

    @starx said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:

    Very much likely indeed...

    And Virtualizor didn't issue yet a public statement on the matter. Which would be important. We're not talking about one provider now, we're talking about more.

    We have posted this since yesterday :
    https://www.virtualizor.com/blog/security-update-transparency-regarding-a-recent-support-ticket-incident/

    @CloudHopper said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    @vitualizor can you clear up for us whether your support system was breached once or twice? And when did the last breach occur?

    @Cloudcone can you confirm for us when you last rotated your passwords and whether you had IP whitelisting for your instance and 2FA enabled?

    The above should clarify things.

    So that's all your fault.

    No it isn't?

    If those are the facts, the affected providers were highly irresponsible, independent of the fact that Virtualizor got compromised.

    Virtualizor requested passwords from their customers, retained them for a year and then [allegedly] lost them in a hack....but it's the providers who trusted them that were "highly irresponsible" 🤔

    Of course they were irresponsible. They should have rotated any credentials shared with a third party as soon as they are not required anymore, it is basic security hygiene. Independent of the also very irresponsible actions of their vendor, which nobody is disputing.

    That's fair comment, but I don't believe Virtualizor identified a breach and proved that it led to follow-on hacks within the ~36 hours it took for them to shift from "nothing to see here" to emailing that statement anyway.

    Given the complexity of the alleged hack they suffered, and the number of customers known to be affected, it doesn't seem plausible that they'd have a definitive answer that quickly...but it sure is a convenient way to shutdown the discussion! 🤷‍♀️

    Yeah, think back to the Ouiheberg incident. They hadn't received any logs or access to the affected systems, but somehow declared it was definitively nothing to do with them within only a couple of hours.

  • xvpsxvps Member
    edited February 4

    @ralf said:

    @CloudHopper said:

    @Nyr said:

    @CloudHopper said:

    @Nyr said:

    @starx said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:

    Very much likely indeed...

    And Virtualizor didn't issue yet a public statement on the matter. Which would be important. We're not talking about one provider now, we're talking about more.

    We have posted this since yesterday :
    https://www.virtualizor.com/blog/security-update-transparency-regarding-a-recent-support-ticket-incident/

    @CloudHopper said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    @vitualizor can you clear up for us whether your support system was breached once or twice? And when did the last breach occur?

    @Cloudcone can you confirm for us when you last rotated your passwords and whether you had IP whitelisting for your instance and 2FA enabled?

    The above should clarify things.

    So that's all your fault.

    No it isn't?

    If those are the facts, the affected providers were highly irresponsible, independent of the fact that Virtualizor got compromised.

    Virtualizor requested passwords from their customers, retained them for a year and then [allegedly] lost them in a hack....but it's the providers who trusted them that were "highly irresponsible" 🤔

    Of course they were irresponsible. They should have rotated any credentials shared with a third party as soon as they are not required anymore, it is basic security hygiene. Independent of the also very irresponsible actions of their vendor, which nobody is disputing.

    That's fair comment, but I don't believe Virtualizor identified a breach and proved that it led to follow-on hacks within the ~36 hours it took for them to shift from "nothing to see here" to emailing that statement anyway.

    Given the complexity of the alleged hack they suffered, and the number of customers known to be affected, it doesn't seem plausible that they'd have a definitive answer that quickly...but it sure is a convenient way to shutdown the discussion! 🤷‍♀️

    Yeah, think back to the Ouiheberg incident. They hadn't received any logs or access to the affected systems, but somehow declared it was definitively nothing to do with them within only a couple of hours.

    Well, some of the providers that have been hacked have stopped using chat software like tawk.to, Zoho, etc. on their websites. Totally random, right.

    And one of the times Virtualizor was hacked, it was due to a tawk.to security issue.

    Why is nobody talking about that and instead just blaming the Virtualizor software?

    And isn’t it natural for them to deny being hacked until there is evidence of a breach/vulnerability, when only one or a very limited number of their clients are affected?

    Virtualizor has found a reason and has been open about it, but some people simply deny it blindly because it doesn’t fit their narrative. The same people seem to trust the hackers’ short chat messages more.

    And why is the “security expert” who keeps insisting there is an unknown security issue in the Virtualizor software using a hacker group’s (campaign) name / method as a username?

    Thanked by 1Zhenmue
  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited February 4

    I hope we learn something from this. Sharing credentials, PIIs pose great danger, but it also highlight how PIIs should be handled too.
    It would be great if it could be decoupled, so leaked credentials doesn't leak PIIs

  • @xvps said:

    @ralf said:

    @CloudHopper said:

    @Nyr said:

    @CloudHopper said:

    @Nyr said:

    @starx said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:

    Very much likely indeed...

    And Virtualizor didn't issue yet a public statement on the matter. Which would be important. We're not talking about one provider now, we're talking about more.

    We have posted this since yesterday :
    https://www.virtualizor.com/blog/security-update-transparency-regarding-a-recent-support-ticket-incident/

    @CloudHopper said:

    @virtualizor said:

    @alfatarsos said:
    Well... with the script on the wild now, what prevents anyone of attempting to hack Virtualizor-based providers at this moment?

    Honest question...

    Please understand that there is no exploit in Virtualizor software. Its false information and there is no exploit.

    @vitualizor can you clear up for us whether your support system was breached once or twice? And when did the last breach occur?

    @Cloudcone can you confirm for us when you last rotated your passwords and whether you had IP whitelisting for your instance and 2FA enabled?

    The above should clarify things.

    So that's all your fault.

    No it isn't?

    If those are the facts, the affected providers were highly irresponsible, independent of the fact that Virtualizor got compromised.

    Virtualizor requested passwords from their customers, retained them for a year and then [allegedly] lost them in a hack....but it's the providers who trusted them that were "highly irresponsible" 🤔

    Of course they were irresponsible. They should have rotated any credentials shared with a third party as soon as they are not required anymore, it is basic security hygiene. Independent of the also very irresponsible actions of their vendor, which nobody is disputing.

    That's fair comment, but I don't believe Virtualizor identified a breach and proved that it led to follow-on hacks within the ~36 hours it took for them to shift from "nothing to see here" to emailing that statement anyway.

    Given the complexity of the alleged hack they suffered, and the number of customers known to be affected, it doesn't seem plausible that they'd have a definitive answer that quickly...but it sure is a convenient way to shutdown the discussion! 🤷‍♀️

    Yeah, think back to the Ouiheberg incident. They hadn't received any logs or access to the affected systems, but somehow declared it was definitively nothing to do with them within only a couple of hours.

    Well, some of the providers that have been hacked have stopped using chat software like tawk.to, Zoho, etc. on their websites. Totally random, right.

    And one of the times Virtualizor was hacked, it was due to a tawk.to security issue.

    Why is nobody talking about that and instead just blaming the Virtualizor software?

    And isn’t it natural for them to deny being hacked until there is evidence of a breach/vulnerability, when only one or a very limited number of their clients are affected?

    Virtualizor has found a reason and has been open about it, but some people simply deny it blindly because it doesn’t fit their narrative. The same people seem to trust the hackers’ short chat messages more.

    And why is the “security expert” who keeps insisting there is an unknown security issue in the Virtualizor software using a hacker group’s (campaign) name / method as a username?

    People are talking about Virtualizor as the source of this breach because they've admitted to being the root cause...which you say yourself further down your post...and people aren't talking about chat software getting hacked because it doesn't lead to a hypervisor breach and destroyed VMs.

    I'm glad you recognised the source of the CloudHopper pseudonym though. Did you Google it in an attempt to doxx me or were you already familiar?

    But as you ask, I used to have to keep up with various APT activities and that's one of my all time favourite campaigns because their approach was ruthlessly effective and they always got straight to the point.

    This is an easy read on the subject if anyone else is interested 👇
    https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/china-cyber-cloudhopper/

  • Day6:2 VPS servers have been restored; one still remains unrestored.

  • I have been communicating with customer service for a long time, and they have been closing my work order very perfunctorily, which is a very bad experience.

    I can't rebuild the system, but you say you can. When I send them the mistakes, they continue to pretend to be dead and not talk! I really didn't expect cloudcone to be so bad.

  • Task Progress Status
    86461 VPSRestart
    COMPLETE
    86456 ChangingVPSPassword RUNNING
    86455 FstrimHandle
    PENDING
    86454 ChangingDNSNameserver RUNNING
    86452 EditVPSCallback
    COMPLETE

    And it just keeps getting stuck on this task.

  • @xvps said: And why is the “security expert” who keeps insisting there is an unknown security issue in the Virtualizor software using a hacker group’s (campaign) name / method as a username?

    Who?

  • @lothos said:

    @sr3 said:
    I had my server and my backup on the same node because it was faster.

    Both now gone.

    Asked for the raw disks so I could try and buy my key. CC says no.

    Great job

    3 copies of your data, on 2 different types of media, with 1 copy offsite

    sorry for your loss, not trying to pour salt here, but help with the future

    Never trust any cheap VPS providers, > @DKAlexander said:

    I have been communicating with customer service for a long time, and they have been closing my work order very perfunctorily, which is a very bad experience.

    I can't rebuild the system, but you say you can. When I send them the mistakes, they continue to pretend to be dead and not talk! I really didn't expect cloudcone to be so bad.

    Same here, they don't directly answer my question, instead they repeat your VPS needs reinstalling, you can reinstall your VPS now... as if this is the only text in their pasteboard

  • @sunkiss said:
    Day6:2 VPS servers have been restored; one still remains unrestored.

    Hello there, how to restore the VPS? Keep reinstalling from time to time or just waiting 4-6 hours after clieck the reinstall button? thanks. :smile:

  • @tonyhead said:

    @sunkiss said:
    Day6:2 VPS servers have been restored; one still remains unrestored.

    Hello there, how to restore the VPS? Keep reinstalling from time to time or just waiting 4-6 hours after clieck the reinstall button? thanks. :smile:

    There's no special method; you just reinstall it through the Control Panel.

    Don't know what happened, they removed the Debian installation option.

    interesting.

  • zedzed Member

    @sunkiss said: they removed the Debian installation option

    wow rude

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • @sunkiss said: Don't know what happened, they removed the Debian installation option.

    Templates suck anyway. Just go to https://debian.org, copy the URL for the netboot ISO from the homepage, and boot into that.

  • @sunkiss said:

    @tonyhead said:

    @sunkiss said:
    Day6:2 VPS servers have been restored; one still remains unrestored.

    Hello there, how to restore the VPS? Keep reinstalling from time to time or just waiting 4-6 hours after clieck the reinstall button? thanks. :smile:

    There's no special method; you just reinstall it through the Control Panel.

    Don't know what happened, they removed the Debian installation option.

    interesting.

    That is likely just on the affected servers which were impacted by Virtualizor's hack. Other servers still have Debian as an option. In my client area I still see Debian available for reinstall (rebuild).

  • Got a message from that dumb "hacker" telegram bot lol

    To CloudCone users
    
    We remembered one thing we forgot to tell you.
    The CloudCone admin password has not changed since 2019 (before we arrived), meaning that for seven years, your data has been exposed and unsafe.
    
Sign In or Register to comment.