Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
Home โ€บ General
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

What happened to CloudCone? Was it hacked?

15791011

Comments

  • ralfralf Member

    @sr3 said:

    The vps needs a reboot to launch the hack written on disk.

    You can't know that unless you have the encryption script.

    The script was shared earlier.

    Thanked by 2oloke CloudHopper
  • @sr3 said: Despite what CloudCone claims: disk was damaged with the attack. This makes little sense from a disk partition sense because people could see the VNC image that showed the contact info for the telegram contact. Meaning it was bootable, so disk functioned for all customers.

    The script overwrites the partition table and part of the file system. The code to display the contact info is then written into the first sector of the disk. So saying it is "bootable" might be stretching the definition of "bootable" a bit.

    I find it quite interesting that they install nasm to then assemble the new boot sector instead of just writing the new binary there (and patching the UUID).

  • It's been nearly 48 hours, and I still can't connect to the VPS or reinstall the system. :'(

  • emg88emg88 Member
    edited January 31

    I think @HostSlick was affected too ... Check out http://lg.hostslick.com , my VPS is down on hostslick.

  • @cmeerw said:

    @sr3 said: Despite what CloudCone claims: disk was damaged with the attack. This makes little sense from a disk partition sense because people could see the VNC image that showed the contact info for the telegram contact. Meaning it was bootable, so disk functioned for all customers.

    The script overwrites the partition table and part of the file system. The code to display the contact info is then written into the first sector of the disk. So saying it is "bootable" might be stretching the definition of "bootable" a bit.

    I find it quite interesting that they install nasm to then assemble the new boot sector instead of just writing the new binary there (and patching the UUID).

    It screams ai written, so I'm not too surprised

    Thanked by 2oloke rarecloud
  • my shits all fucked but idc anymore, im just gonna smoke some and go to bed, have a joyful weekend.

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • sr3sr3 Member
    edited January 31

    So with the raw disk data, file carving would be a possibility.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @stektkorv said:
    my shits all fucked but idc anymore, im just gonna smoke some and go to bed, have a joyful weekend.

    Hello fellow kรถrvรคlskare

    Thanked by 1stektkorv
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @CloudHopper said:
    Disks can fail, whether the node gets ransomed or not, so just take the L and make sure you take backups, (which you've tested restoring), for the next time disaster strikes.

    (emphasis mine)

    ^THAT!

    @sr3 said:

    @CloudHopper said:
    Disks can fail, whether the node gets ransomed or not, so just take the L and make sure you take backups, (which you've tested restoring), for the next time disaster strikes.

    Disk can fail, sure. But virtual disk because of a software attack? On all nodes? That's like winning the lottery 10 times in a row!

    Nope, that's like x (e.g. a dozen) virtual disks on one physical disk.

  • lowendbot1lowendbot1 Barred
    edited January 31

    well, this was a good game
    we will be better next time and btw spammers, spamming on our keys.php will do nothing ;)
    in total we made 1k, but still not bad

    we will learn our mistakes, hope you will hear about us soon!
    Any questions - @cloudcone_Raidbot

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad
    edited January 31
  • What kind of person will risk prison for 100 dollar?

  • @aluy said:

    @r1nx said:

    @jackgo said:

    @Murv said:
    No worries guys, I'm a professional at negotiating with terrorists.

    image

    sorry we are not accepting this offer
    And yes, we were listening to sigma girl while doing this;)

    p.s. colocrossing, cloudcone, dedirock hackers ;)
    we are back with new hits, but much bigger this time

    bro is so paranoid he censored his youtube recommended section ๐Ÿ’€

    censored everything but the fact his youtube is in switzerland

    anyone can change that, you just have to change your Youtube location

  • forestforest Member
    edited January 31

    @lowendbot1 said: in total we made 1k, but still not bad

    Only 1k? :#

    Take it from an ex-blackhat: Hone your skills and use it for something more useful than shit-tier ransomware. If you have a 0day in Virtualizer, even if it only works on relatively obscure configurations, there is so much more you could have done. FFS, I can think off the top of my head four different ways you could have used your access to make roughly $20k with no effort whatsoever in a week. No, I won't tell you what they are. Also, improve your OPSEC.

    You are a script kiddie right now and your actions (the shit-tier extortion, not the actual compromises) are going to keep you a script kiddie. Maybe spend some time learning real vulndev and you won't have to settle for extorting a couple of desperate MJJs who want the data on their $7 VPS back.

    Thanked by 4oloke jsg Kodomu WyvernCo
  • @jackgo said: we are back with new hits, but much bigger this time

    "New hits" sounds to me like they're scanning for Virtualizor endpoints accessible on the public net?
    Not too familiar with Virtualizor, but if these don't strictly have to be publicly accessible, any future providers who get hit by this due to being too retarded to lock their shit down behind a VPN should be held liable for all damages.

  • rarecloudrarecloud Member, Patron Provider

    @sunkiss said:
    Many people VPS servers are offline.

    details:https://www.nodeseek.com/post-600738-1

    Some people speculate that the main server was hacked. Is that true? :'(

    Please restore it quickly; I have important services running on it. :'(

    This can happen if the Virtualizor Master server has been compromised. Once inside, Virtualizor has a built-in Terminal feature that gives root access to all connected nodes. So yes, their main server was most likely compromised.

    As for how they got in... doesn't look like a 0-day to me. If attackers had a real exploit, every provider running Virtualizor would be having a very bad day right now, not just a few. ๐Ÿคท

    More likely a data leak from virtualizor... wouldn't be the first time.

  • rarecloudrarecloud Member, Patron Provider

    @Mainfrezzer said:

    @cmeerw said:

    @sr3 said: Despite what CloudCone claims: disk was damaged with the attack. This makes little sense from a disk partition sense because people could see the VNC image that showed the contact info for the telegram contact. Meaning it was bootable, so disk functioned for all customers.

    The script overwrites the partition table and part of the file system. The code to display the contact info is then written into the first sector of the disk. So saying it is "bootable" might be stretching the definition of "bootable" a bit.

    I find it quite interesting that they install nasm to then assemble the new boot sector instead of just writing the new binary there (and patching the UUID).

    It screams ai written, so I'm not too surprised

    If you can spot AI writing that fast, you're probably using it quite a bit yourself ๐Ÿ˜„

    But seriously, we're all tech people here. Using tools to get things done faster is literally what we do.

  • @cmeerw said:

    @sr3 said: Despite what CloudCone claims: disk was damaged with the attack. This makes little sense from a disk partition sense because people could see the VNC image that showed the contact info for the telegram contact. Meaning it was bootable, so disk functioned for all customers.

    The script overwrites the partition table and part of the file system. The code to display the contact info is then written into the first sector of the disk. So saying it is "bootable" might be stretching the definition of "bootable" a bit.

    I find it quite interesting that they install nasm to then assemble the new boot sector instead of just writing the new binary there (and patching the UUID).

    I doubt the poor guy even knows what nasm is, much less how to write even the most basic assembly.

    Thanked by 2jsg oloke
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @forest said:

    @cmeerw said:

    @sr3 said: Despite what CloudCone claims: disk was damaged with the attack. This makes little sense from a disk partition sense because people could see the VNC image that showed the contact info for the telegram contact. Meaning it was bootable, so disk functioned for all customers.

    The script overwrites the partition table and part of the file system. The code to display the contact info is then written into the first sector of the disk. So saying it is "bootable" might be stretching the definition of "bootable" a bit.

    I find it quite interesting that they install nasm to then assemble the new boot sector instead of just writing the new binary there (and patching the UUID).

    I doubt the poor guy even knows what nasm is, much less how to write even the most basic assembly.

    Thanked by 2matey0 mans_xd
  • @rarecloud said:

    @Mainfrezzer said:

    @cmeerw said:

    @sr3 said: Despite what CloudCone claims: disk was damaged with the attack. This makes little sense from a disk partition sense because people could see the VNC image that showed the contact info for the telegram contact. Meaning it was bootable, so disk functioned for all customers.

    The script overwrites the partition table and part of the file system. The code to display the contact info is then written into the first sector of the disk. So saying it is "bootable" might be stretching the definition of "bootable" a bit.

    I find it quite interesting that they install nasm to then assemble the new boot sector instead of just writing the new binary there (and patching the UUID).

    It screams ai written, so I'm not too surprised

    If you can spot AI writing that fast, you're probably using it quite a bit yourself ๐Ÿ˜„

    But seriously, we're all tech people here. Using tools to get things done faster is literally what we do.

    Looking at the code, the comments, were enough. It talks about preventing data loss in the install chain... Data loss, a serious concern for a ransomware tool ๐Ÿคฃ

  • ralfralf Member

    I didn't understand the comments and didn't bother to translate them, but Russian comments and then very descriptive names in English including a size _IN_MB was a bit of a giveaway that the code has been stolen from an example of some kind. That and lots of small functions in a small bag script looks copied, but then where would you find an example function to compile a bit sector and write it to a disk? So AI is likely.

    Data corruption is a concern if you are serious about decrypting the data after payment, but this just erases data at the end of the disk. Many people won't have any data there but some will.

  • @ralf said:
    I didn't understand the comments and didn't bother to translate them, but Russian comments and then very descriptive names in English including a size _IN_MB was a bit of a giveaway that the code has been stolen from an example of some kind. That and lots of small functions in a small bag script looks copied, but then where would you find an example function to compile a bit sector and write it to a disk? So AI is likely.

    Data corruption is a concern if you are serious about decrypting the data after payment, but this just erases data at the end of the disk. Many people won't have any data there but some will.

    I suspect the script kiddie was intending to make the contents decryptable, but couldn't even succeed at doing that reliably, and so gave up and decided just to scam people.

    Thanked by 3rpqu tentor oloke
  • Where is the script, can someone re-share?

    @Mainfrezzer said:

    @rarecloud said:

    @Mainfrezzer said:

    @cmeerw said:

    @sr3 said: Despite what CloudCone claims: disk was damaged with the attack. This makes little sense from a disk partition sense because people could see the VNC image that showed the contact info for the telegram contact. Meaning it was bootable, so disk functioned for all customers.

    The script overwrites the partition table and part of the file system. The code to display the contact info is then written into the first sector of the disk. So saying it is "bootable" might be stretching the definition of "bootable" a bit.

    I find it quite interesting that they install nasm to then assemble the new boot sector instead of just writing the new binary there (and patching the UUID).

    It screams ai written, so I'm not too surprised

    If you can spot AI writing that fast, you're probably using it quite a bit yourself ๐Ÿ˜„

    But seriously, we're all tech people here. Using tools to get things done faster is literally what we do.

    Looking at the code, the comments, were enough. It talks about preventing data loss in the install chain... Data loss, a serious concern for a ransomware tool ๐Ÿคฃ

    Thanked by 2oloke emgh
  • @justyy said:

    Where is the script, can someone re-share?

    @Mainfrezzer said:

    @rarecloud said:

    @Mainfrezzer said:

    @cmeerw said:

    @sr3 said: Despite what CloudCone claims: disk was damaged with the attack. This makes little sense from a disk partition sense because people could see the VNC image that showed the contact info for the telegram contact. Meaning it was bootable, so disk functioned for all customers.

    The script overwrites the partition table and part of the file system. The code to display the contact info is then written into the first sector of the disk. So saying it is "bootable" might be stretching the definition of "bootable" a bit.

    I find it quite interesting that they install nasm to then assemble the new boot sector instead of just writing the new binary there (and patching the UUID).

    It screams ai written, so I'm not too surprised

    If you can spot AI writing that fast, you're probably using it quite a bit yourself ๐Ÿ˜„

    But seriously, we're all tech people here. Using tools to get things done faster is literally what we do.

    Looking at the code, the comments, were enough. It talks about preventing data loss in the install chain... Data loss, a serious concern for a ransomware tool ๐Ÿคฃ

    https://pastebin.com/SrpYNVUx

  • olokeoloke Member, Host Rep

    @rarecloud said:

    @Mainfrezzer said:

    @cmeerw said:

    @sr3 said: Despite what CloudCone claims: disk was damaged with the attack. This makes little sense from a disk partition sense because people could see the VNC image that showed the contact info for the telegram contact. Meaning it was bootable, so disk functioned for all customers.

    The script overwrites the partition table and part of the file system. The code to display the contact info is then written into the first sector of the disk. So saying it is "bootable" might be stretching the definition of "bootable" a bit.

    I find it quite interesting that they install nasm to then assemble the new boot sector instead of just writing the new binary there (and patching the UUID).

    It screams ai written, so I'm not too surprised

    If you can spot AI writing that fast, you're probably using it quite a bit yourself ๐Ÿ˜„

    No, as a rarecloud customer, I'm just used to getting 8 AI generated emails in a month ;)

    @forest said:

    @ralf said:
    I didn't understand the comments and didn't bother to translate them, but Russian comments and then very descriptive names in English including a size _IN_MB was a bit of a giveaway that the code has been stolen from an example of some kind. That and lots of small functions in a small bag script looks copied, but then where would you find an example function to compile a bit sector and write it to a disk? So AI is likely.

    Data corruption is a concern if you are serious about decrypting the data after payment, but this just erases data at the end of the disk. Many people won't have any data there but some will.

    I suspect the script kiddie was intending to make the contents decryptable, but couldn't even succeed at doing that reliably, and so gave up and decided just to scam people.

    Same what I thought. They are either really really dumb or their decryption tool just didn't work so they couldn't restore data to those who paid.
    This was all executed very poorly, but I guess it was expected - LowEnd target, even Lower End skibidi minecraft skid.

    @ralf said:
    I didn't understand the comments and didn't bother to translate them, but Russian comments and then very descriptive names in English including a size _IN_MB was a bit of a giveaway that the code has been stolen from an example of some kind. That and lots of small functions in a small bag script looks copied, but then where would you find an example function to compile a bit sector and write it to a disk? So AI is likely.

    I don't think this script was even mildly edited manually, this is pure AI. Even being so lazy to leave comments and verbose logging with colors. Installing nasm to compile payload in the victim environment is also unheard of.
    Maybe next time they will open a support ticket asking for help with installing tools on the hypervisor.

  • Happened on my Hostslick VM. No comms from Hostslick so far.

    Thanked by 1mmint
  • sad

  • Hostslick VM too :neutral:

  • @beadcf said:
    Hostslick VM too :neutral:

    No interaction with the VM in the panel for you as well?

Sign In or Register to comment.