IPinfo.CV:IP information query, IP risk scoring and quality inspection, privacy leakage testing

Comments

• xvps Member

  January 19

  It would be nice if we could make API calls instead of using the website.
• tentor Member, Host Rep

  March 8 edited March 8

  Any plans to implement anycasted prefixes detection?

  Looking up 2a14:1ec7:feff:1::1 produces funny results

  Thanked by 1oloke
• zhujisou Member

  March 9

  @tentor said:
  Any plans to implement anycasted prefixes detection?

  Looking up 2a14:1ec7:feff:1::1 produces funny results

  The new IPv6 data exhibits significant variations across different data sources. Perhaps I should incorporate more libraries

  Thanked by 1oloke
• rpqu Member

  March 9 edited March 9

  @zhujisou hello again. Is there known packet loss/congestion monitor for 163, cn2gt, etc? If not, it would be a great addition to your website
• zhujisou Member

  March 9

  @rpqu said:
  @zhujisou hello again. Is there known packet loss/congestion monitor for 163, cn2gt, etc? If not, it would be a great addition to your website

  From testing within China to routes like cn2gt or similar? You might want to try using another tool that I haven't officially released, and select a node within China. The link is https://tcp.cm/monitor

  Thanked by 1oloke
• 384_cz Member

  March 9

  I have attempted something similar:
  https://pofiderni.cz/

  Thanked by 1Netralex
• Levi Member

  March 9

  @384_cz said:
  I have attempted something similar:
  https://pofiderni.cz/

  That is disgusting. I like it!
• zhujisou Member

  March 9

  @384_cz said:
  I have attempted something similar:
  https://pofiderni.cz/

  wow,I thought I had entered some kind of deep web

  Thanked by 1oloke
• rpqu Member

  March 9 edited March 9

  @zhujisou said:

  @rpqu said:
  @zhujisou hello again. Is there known packet loss/congestion monitor for 163, cn2gt, etc? If not, it would be a great addition to your website

  From testing within China to routes like cn2gt or similar? You might want to try using another tool that I haven't officially released, and select a node within China. The link is https://tcp.cm/monitor

  Looks great, although it doesn't seem the monitored sites are routed through greatly congested transit (or this specific traffic aren't throttled)

  • The problem: too many mainland CN users complaining about packet loss through non-premium transit
  • Proposed solution: packet loss benchmark, so these users could know whether their hosts is underperforming. Or it's just the usual congestion like the 8AM rush hour.
• nghialele Member

  March 10

  Nice one looking for English docker version

  Thanked by 1tux
• david Member

  March 10

  Wow, I didn't realize VPN IPs had a much worse IP reputation vs. regular data center IPs.

  My data center IPs get a score in the 60's "Normal." The Mullvad IPs I tested got 14 "Critical" for the IPv4 and 30 "High Risk" for the IPv6.
• zhujisou Member

  March 10

  @david said:
  Wow, I didn't realize VPN IPs had a much worse IP reputation vs. regular data center IPs.

  My data center IPs get a score in the 60's "Normal." The Mullvad IPs I tested got 14 "Critical" for the IPv4 and 30 "High Risk" for the IPv6.

  Although this score is for reference only, the IP credit scores of public VPNs are generally low.
  In various IP databases, they will be marked as public proxies. If a user violates the rules, they may also be marked as abusive or attract complaints.

  Thanked by 2david tentor
• Netralex Member

  March 10

  @Levi said:

  @384_cz said:
  I have attempted something similar:
  https://pofiderni.cz/

  That is disgusting. I like it!

  You two are disgusting. I like you both

  @zhujisou can you look into maxmind data, ASN/ORG is correct but location is super outdated. (Can provide test ip in DMs if needed)
• 384_cz Member

  March 10

  @Levi said:

  @384_cz said:
  I have attempted something similar:
  https://pofiderni.cz/

  That is disgusting. I like it!

  Please explain the word disgusting
  Thanks
  384.cz