IPinfo.CV:IP information query, IP risk scoring and quality inspection, privacy leakage testing

xvps

It would be nice if we could make API calls instead of using the website.

tentor

Any plans to implement anycasted prefixes detection?

Looking up 2a14:1ec7:feff:1::1 produces funny results

zhujisou

@tentor said:
Any plans to implement anycasted prefixes detection?

Looking up 2a14:1ec7:feff:1::1 produces funny results

The new IPv6 data exhibits significant variations across different data sources. Perhaps I should incorporate more libraries

rpqu

@zhujisou hello again. Is there known packet loss/congestion monitor for 163, cn2gt, etc? If not, it would be a great addition to your website

zhujisou

@rpqu said:
@zhujisou hello again. Is there known packet loss/congestion monitor for 163, cn2gt, etc? If not, it would be a great addition to your website

From testing within China to routes like cn2gt or similar? You might want to try using another tool that I haven't officially released, and select a node within China. The link is https://tcp.cm/monitor

384_cz

I have attempted something similar:
https://pofiderni.cz/

Levi

@384_cz said:
I have attempted something similar:
https://pofiderni.cz/

That is disgusting. I like it!

zhujisou

@384_cz said:
I have attempted something similar:
https://pofiderni.cz/

wow,I thought I had entered some kind of deep web

rpqu

@zhujisou said:

@rpqu said:
@zhujisou hello again. Is there known packet loss/congestion monitor for 163, cn2gt, etc? If not, it would be a great addition to your website

From testing within China to routes like cn2gt or similar? You might want to try using another tool that I haven't officially released, and select a node within China. The link is https://tcp.cm/monitor

Looks great, although it doesn't seem the monitored sites are routed through greatly congested transit (or this specific traffic aren't throttled)

• The problem: too many mainland CN users complaining about packet loss through non-premium transit
• Proposed solution: packet loss benchmark, so these users could know whether their hosts is underperforming. Or it's just the usual congestion like the 8AM rush hour.

nghialele

Nice one looking for English docker version

david

Wow, I didn't realize VPN IPs had a much worse IP reputation vs. regular data center IPs.

My data center IPs get a score in the 60's "Normal." The Mullvad IPs I tested got 14 "Critical" for the IPv4 and 30 "High Risk" for the IPv6.

zhujisou

@david said:
Wow, I didn't realize VPN IPs had a much worse IP reputation vs. regular data center IPs.

My data center IPs get a score in the 60's "Normal." The Mullvad IPs I tested got 14 "Critical" for the IPv4 and 30 "High Risk" for the IPv6.

Although this score is for reference only, the IP credit scores of public VPNs are generally low.
In various IP databases, they will be marked as public proxies. If a user violates the rules, they may also be marked as abusive or attract complaints.

Netralex

@Levi said:

@384_cz said:
I have attempted something similar:
https://pofiderni.cz/

That is disgusting. I like it!

You two are disgusting. I like you both

@zhujisou can you look into maxmind data, ASN/ORG is correct but location is super outdated. (Can provide test ip in DMs if needed)

384_cz

@Levi said:

@384_cz said:
I have attempted something similar:
https://pofiderni.cz/

That is disgusting. I like it!

Please explain the word disgusting
Thanks
384.cz