Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
Godlike VPS
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026! [DEALS MEGATHREAD]

1132134136137138

Comments

  • backtogeekbacktogeek Member, Host Rep
    edited January 14

    @rpqu said:

    @backtogeek said:

    @ralf said:

    @backtogeek said:
    If you are using resources in a blocking way that impacts others you will get a warning but this has been built from scratch by people who know the hosting industry as a project of passion, for fun, we know what people do, a lot of time and effort has gone into monitoring and dynamic live resource adjustments on disk, CPU and network.

    Ultimately if you do use CPU like it's yours 24x7 then you will end up sharing a single core with everyone else that does the same thing, you get the 'abuse core' leaving the rest available for everyone else not doing that which is 99% of people.

    I hope that clarifies

    Not really. If you're doing hourly rates rather than monthly, you've got to expect that people will want to spin up something for a short time to get something done, and then shut it off again. Just like you can with any other cloud based service.

    And if it's only a single core service, there's only so much you can do to keep your CPU usage not at 100% for the period when you're running something.

    Yep I assumed the same thing, I totally get your thinking, that's why it is 1 core right now, but actually, that is not what happened at all, you see a spike for a while as it updates and deploys the os plus whatever optional recipe is selected.

    Some of the nodes have 64 threads so it has not been an issue, don't worry about CPU unless you know you need dedicated resources long term, CPU is usually the last issue on a VPS node to be honest.

    What about network throughput? I expect at least 100mbps/unmetered at this price point

    "At this price point" which one? the $0.10 per month for a KVM VPS that you can run for free for 4 months with the free credit you get just by signing up?

    Well.. you know what they say about expectations :)

    Basic/low is 25 Mbit, the default settings will burst higher than 100mbit, it actually can get closer to 300 on the higher tier.

  • @Jord said:
    Is it time to let this thread die now?

    Please can we declare @FAT32 MIA, starting to get concerned..

    Thanked by 2ralf Saragoldfarb
  • ralfralf Member
    edited January 14

    @backtogeek said:

    @rpqu said:

    @backtogeek said:

    @ralf said:

    @backtogeek said:
    If you are using resources in a blocking way that impacts others you will get a warning but this has been built from scratch by people who know the hosting industry as a project of passion, for fun, we know what people do, a lot of time and effort has gone into monitoring and dynamic live resource adjustments on disk, CPU and network.

    Ultimately if you do use CPU like it's yours 24x7 then you will end up sharing a single core with everyone else that does the same thing, you get the 'abuse core' leaving the rest available for everyone else not doing that which is 99% of people.

    I hope that clarifies

    Not really. If you're doing hourly rates rather than monthly, you've got to expect that people will want to spin up something for a short time to get something done, and then shut it off again. Just like you can with any other cloud based service.

    And if it's only a single core service, there's only so much you can do to keep your CPU usage not at 100% for the period when you're running something.

    Yep I assumed the same thing, I totally get your thinking, that's why it is 1 core right now, but actually, that is not what happened at all, you see a spike for a while as it updates and deploys the os plus whatever optional recipe is selected.

    Some of the nodes have 64 threads so it has not been an issue, don't worry about CPU unless you know you need dedicated resources long term, CPU is usually the last issue on a VPS node to be honest.

    What about network throughput? I expect at least 100mbps/unmetered at this price point

    "At this price point" which one? the $0.10 per month for a KVM VPS that you can run for free for 4 months with the free credit you get just by signing up?

    Well.. you know what they say about expectations :)

    Basic/low is 25 Mbit, the default settings will burst higher than 100mbit, it actually can get closer to 300 on the higher tier.

    Actually, not particularly commenting on the specifics of the allowances, but you might want to explain what low, medium and high mean in real numbers in regards to CPU priority, IOPS and network. Each of them seem to just ±$0.01/m which kind of suggests that it doesn't really make much difference. I guess all low to all high is +$0.07/m but maybe this level of granularity on each isn't worth having. Like if I care about IOPS I probably also care about CPU priority.

    Equally, if there's a vague "don't be excessive" warning and people aren't supposed to max things out anyway, then that seems contrary to allowing someone to say "but I paid extra for high CPU priority, high IOPS and high network throughput".

    TBH I don't really know, but it's just an extra thing to decide before you order, and each extra thing is another chance of someone deciding not to bother.

    FWIW one comparison point is Oracle where IOPS is scaled to disk size. Not sure that's always great, but it's a useful way to simplify down the choices. (Although in my case it does mean I have a 100GB drive when everything comfortably fits in 10GB).

  • @barbarza said: Please can we declare @FAT32 MIA, starting to get concerned..

    Plot twist: FAT32 is @itsTomHarper

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @JabJab said:

    @barbarza said: Please can we declare @FAT32 MIA, starting to get concerned..

    Plot twist: FAT32 is @itsTomHarper

    Both last seen Jan 11? :#

  • backtogeekbacktogeek Member, Host Rep

    @ralf said:

    @backtogeek said:

    @rpqu said:

    @backtogeek said:

    @ralf said:

    @backtogeek said:
    If you are using resources in a blocking way that impacts others you will get a warning but this has been built from scratch by people who know the hosting industry as a project of passion, for fun, we know what people do, a lot of time and effort has gone into monitoring and dynamic live resource adjustments on disk, CPU and network.

    Ultimately if you do use CPU like it's yours 24x7 then you will end up sharing a single core with everyone else that does the same thing, you get the 'abuse core' leaving the rest available for everyone else not doing that which is 99% of people.

    I hope that clarifies

    Not really. If you're doing hourly rates rather than monthly, you've got to expect that people will want to spin up something for a short time to get something done, and then shut it off again. Just like you can with any other cloud based service.

    And if it's only a single core service, there's only so much you can do to keep your CPU usage not at 100% for the period when you're running something.

    Yep I assumed the same thing, I totally get your thinking, that's why it is 1 core right now, but actually, that is not what happened at all, you see a spike for a while as it updates and deploys the os plus whatever optional recipe is selected.

    Some of the nodes have 64 threads so it has not been an issue, don't worry about CPU unless you know you need dedicated resources long term, CPU is usually the last issue on a VPS node to be honest.

    What about network throughput? I expect at least 100mbps/unmetered at this price point

    "At this price point" which one? the $0.10 per month for a KVM VPS that you can run for free for 4 months with the free credit you get just by signing up?

    Well.. you know what they say about expectations :)

    Basic/low is 25 Mbit, the default settings will burst higher than 100mbit, it actually can get closer to 300 on the higher tier.

    Actually, not particularly commenting on the specifics of the allowances, but you might want to explain what low, medium and high mean in real numbers in regards to CPU priority, IOPS and network. Each of them seem to just ±$0.01/m which kind of suggests that it doesn't really make much difference. I guess all low to all high is +$0.07/m but maybe this level of granularity on each isn't worth having. Like if I care about IOPS I probably also care about CPU priority.

    Equally, if there's a vague "don't be excessive" warning and people aren't supposed to max things out anyway, then that seems contrary to allowing someone to say "but I paid extra for high CPU priority, high IOPS and high network throughput".

    TBH I don't really know, but it's just an extra thing to decide before you order, and each extra thing is another chance of someone deciding not to bother.

    FWIW one comparison point is Oracle where IOPS is scaled to disk size. Not sure that's always great, but it's a useful way to simplify down the choices. (Although in my case it does mean I have a 100GB drive when everything comfortably fits in 10GB).

    Well, I appreciate you dont have context as this is a sales megathread, a much longer introduction thread was done on the other green forum, but this is a from the ground up project (One of many) put together by a very small team, we are more than happy to admit, we dont know what we dont know yet, that is why it has been released this way rather than set anything in stone, the project is in Alpha status, not even Beta, we are gathering information from users actual use so we know.

    It is largley self funded, TierHive is not a cash grab or a corporate-style business, its people with a not-so-serious edge, figuring stuff out and adapting and being happy to learn from mistakes.

    I have been in different segments of this business for the better part of 20 years now, and got tired of the cookie-cutter WHMCS+panel = "host" method (No offence intended), it's so inflexible, so this is an attempt at something different, it may fail, we might get it badly wrong, we are all ok with that.

    There are a lot of moving parts to this and only so much time, but you are right, and others have said, it needs more specifics and clarity around resources, which has been the leading feedback, actually, and I promise it has been heard, if you are not sure what you are ordering, why would you order?

    At the same time, the truth is we did not know if we would set the baseline XYZ resource at 100, 200, 300, etc etc, is 1 CPU at full core burst better than 2 with a share limiter, do 95% of people ever even hit 100% for more than 1 minutes etc etc, this is all data we are gathering and we will adapt, thats why no specific numbers are on a few things, because they change, some of them have already changed a few times in the last month.

    tl;dr give us a bit of time, and it will get there, in the meantime, free credit on sign up so nothing to lose by trying, we don't even want your personal details, spread the word, the more people we load up even if they never convert to a paying customer, the more data we can get, the better the decisions we can make.

    Thanked by 2ralf JohnnySac
  • ehabehab Member

    @maverick said:

    @JabJab said:

    @barbarza said: Please can we declare @FAT32 MIA, starting to get concerned..

    Plot twist: FAT32 is @itsTomHarper

    Both last seen Jan 11? :#

    Thanked by 3ralf tentor maverick
  • ralfralf Member

    @backtogeek said:
    It is largley self funded, TierHive is not a cash grab or a corporate-style business, its people with a not-so-serious edge, figuring stuff out and adapting and being happy to learn from mistakes.
    ...

    BTW, these weren't intended as criticisms, more feedback. But you're right, the mega-thread probably isn't the best thread for this discussion.

    Thanked by 1backtogeek
  • ehabehab Member

    for sure @DP

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @backtogeek said:

    @rpqu said:

    @backtogeek said:

    @ralf said:

    @backtogeek said:
    If you are using resources in a blocking way that impacts others you will get a warning but this has been built from scratch by people who know the hosting industry as a project of passion, for fun, we know what people do, a lot of time and effort has gone into monitoring and dynamic live resource adjustments on disk, CPU and network.

    Ultimately if you do use CPU like it's yours 24x7 then you will end up sharing a single core with everyone else that does the same thing, you get the 'abuse core' leaving the rest available for everyone else not doing that which is 99% of people.

    I hope that clarifies

    Not really. If you're doing hourly rates rather than monthly, you've got to expect that people will want to spin up something for a short time to get something done, and then shut it off again. Just like you can with any other cloud based service.

    And if it's only a single core service, there's only so much you can do to keep your CPU usage not at 100% for the period when you're running something.

    Yep I assumed the same thing, I totally get your thinking, that's why it is 1 core right now, but actually, that is not what happened at all, you see a spike for a while as it updates and deploys the os plus whatever optional recipe is selected.

    Some of the nodes have 64 threads so it has not been an issue, don't worry about CPU unless you know you need dedicated resources long term, CPU is usually the last issue on a VPS node to be honest.

    What about network throughput? I expect at least 100mbps/unmetered at this price point

    "At this price point" which one? the $0.10 per month for a KVM VPS that you can run for free for 4 months with the free credit you get just by signing up?

    Well.. you know what they say about expectations :)

    Basic/low is 25 Mbit, the default settings will burst higher than 100mbit, it actually can get closer to 300 on the higher tier.

    I won't complain that kind of speed for a $0.10/m vps.
    I'm referring to the calculator $1.5/m or $0.0021/h vps (1g,20g). It would be nice if you allow 5-10GB ingress burst for installation purpose, before throttling kick-in (100mbps)

  • Thanked by 2ehab admax
  • @JabJab said:

    @barbarza said: Please can we declare @FAT32 MIA, starting to get concerned..

    Plot twist: FAT32 is @itsTomHarper

    Don't you dare put those words in your mouth!!

    Thanked by 2tentor rpqu
  • backtogeekbacktogeek Member, Host Rep

    @rpqu said: I won't complain that kind of speed for a $0.10/m vps.

    I'm referring to the calculator $1.5/m or $0.0021/h vps (1g,20g). It would be nice if you allow 5-10GB ingress burst for installation purpose, before throttling kick-in (100mbps)

    We do, just select High Performance when creating the VPS, do your install, change it back to medium or low in the resources tab, its 1 hour minimum on everything.

    I hope that clarifies.

  • Any 7/Y deal?

    Or better 3/Y ?

  • ehabehab Member

    merry xmas @backtogeek

    Thanked by 1backtogeek
  • @ehab said:
    merry xmas @backtogeek

    Why I was expecting that you have send merry xmas to someone when I opened the megathread? :D

    Thanked by 1ehab
  • ehabehab Member

    @tfgp99 said:

    @ehab said:
    merry xmas @backtogeek

    Why I was expecting that you have send merry xmas to someone when I opened the megathread? :D

  • @tfgp99 said:

    @ehab said:
    merry xmas @backtogeek

    Why I was expecting that you have send merry xmas to someone when I opened the megathread? :D

    Merry Xmas @tfgp99

    Thanked by 2ehab tfgp99
  • ehabehab Member

    @barbarza said:

    @tfgp99 said:

    @ehab said:
    merry xmas @backtogeek

    Why I was expecting that you have send merry xmas to someone when I opened the megathread? :D

    Merry Xmas @tfgp99

    me and @tfgp++ have some invoices if you can pay soon.

    Thanked by 1tfgp99
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @backtogeek said:

    @rpqu said: I won't complain that kind of speed for a $0.10/m vps.

    I'm referring to the calculator $1.5/m or $0.0021/h vps (1g,20g). It would be nice if you allow 5-10GB ingress burst for installation purpose, before throttling kick-in (100mbps)

    We do, just select High Performance when creating the VPS, do your install, change it back to medium or low in the resources tab, its 1 hour minimum on everything.

    I hope that clarifies.

    Thank you for explaining. I will try experimenting with your service later.
    And it would be very nice if it's calculated by minute or 10 minutes with minimum, let's say 10-30 minutes minimum.
    Does stopped vps consume non-storage resource?

    Thanked by 1ralf
  • backtogeekbacktogeek Member, Host Rep

    @rpqu said:

    @backtogeek said:

    @rpqu said: I won't complain that kind of speed for a $0.10/m vps.

    I'm referring to the calculator $1.5/m or $0.0021/h vps (1g,20g). It would be nice if you allow 5-10GB ingress burst for installation purpose, before throttling kick-in (100mbps)

    We do, just select High Performance when creating the VPS, do your install, change it back to medium or low in the resources tab, its 1 hour minimum on everything.

    I hope that clarifies.

    Thank you for explaining. I will try experimenting with your service later.
    And it would be very nice if it's calculated by minute or 10 minutes with minimum, let's say 10-30 minutes minimum.
    Does stopped vps consume non-storage resource?

    it sure would but you know, its hard enough tracking token based billing per hour, you would not believe the scale haha, per minute... i doubt a cron would even complete in time, so thats not really possible.

    While it exists, you are charged, the roadmap has the ability to freeze a VM so you are only charged for storage, and a deep freeze so you are only charged for storage but it may take time to "thaw" your VPS from cold storage, but that will be once (IF) we get to BETA stage.

    Thanks for the feedback though, appreciated.

    This service is not for everyone, if it does not work for you its fine, no problem, we appreciate its different, thats why we give free tokens on sign up so you dont waste anything and maybe have a bit of fun.

    So far I have notice that a LOT of people are using the ipxe/pxe config to play around with network installs, unsure if thats just for learning or fun, its a lost skill in my opinion and a great one.

    I play all the time too, its basically my cloud based homelab of 128MB ninjas.

    Thanked by 1rpqu
  • @Saragoldfarb said:
    Just crossposting so people are warned. VeloxMedia is now creating random invoices trying to charge saved payment methods. Check my last couple of posts on the Velox thread

    Thank you!

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    Merry Xmas everyone!!! I had a shitty day.

    Let's carry on.

    Thanked by 1barbarza
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad
    edited January 14

    @SmokyHosts said:

    @Astro said:
    @SmokyHosts why hide the CPU and network info?

    @Astro Actually no specific reason except that your edit already provided those details. Nonetheless, here is the entire yabs...

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Jan  9 06:25:01 AM UTC 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 2200.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 125.7 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 916.2 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-90-generic
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Gigahost AS
    ASN        : AS56655 Gigahost AS
    Host       : Terrahost V6net
    Location   : Sandefjord, Vestfold (07)
    Country    : Norway
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 749.06 MB/s (187.2k) | 584.58 MB/s   (9.1k)
    Write      | 751.04 MB/s (187.7k) | 587.66 MB/s   (9.1k)
    Total      | 1.50 GB/s   (375.0k) | 1.17 GB/s    (18.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.23 GB/s     (2.4k) | 1.67 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Write      | 1.30 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.78 GB/s     (1.7k)
    Total      | 2.54 GB/s     (4.9k) | 3.45 GB/s     (3.3k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 926 Mbits/sec   | 853 Mbits/sec   | 27.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 933 Mbits/sec   | 934 Mbits/sec   | 13.4 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 886 Mbits/sec   | 312 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 811 Mbits/sec   | 521 Mbits/sec   | 173 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 811 Mbits/sec   | 215 Mbits/sec   | 169 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | 670 Mbits/sec   | 87.2 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 776 Mbits/sec   | 113 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 914 Mbits/sec   | 827 Mbits/sec   | 27.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 641 Mbits/sec   | 922 Mbits/sec   | 13.4 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 862 Mbits/sec   | 307 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 793 Mbits/sec   | 520 Mbits/sec   | --
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 801 Mbits/sec   | 189 Mbits/sec   | 169 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 868 Mbits/sec   | 654 Mbits/sec   | 87.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 753 Mbits/sec   | 133 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2088
    Multi Core      | 9299
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15998796
    
    YABS completed in 11 min 26 sec
    

    ow, at giga. I like. Prem <3

    Thanked by 1SmokyHosts
  • where are the dinos?

  • ralfralf Member

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @SmokyHosts said:

    @Astro said:
    @SmokyHosts why hide the CPU and network info?

    @Astro Actually no specific reason except that your edit already provided those details. Nonetheless, here is the entire yabs...

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Jan  9 06:25:01 AM UTC 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 2200.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 125.7 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 916.2 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-90-generic
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Gigahost AS
    ASN        : AS56655 Gigahost AS
    Host       : Terrahost V6net
    Location   : Sandefjord, Vestfold (07)
    Country    : Norway
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 749.06 MB/s (187.2k) | 584.58 MB/s   (9.1k)
    Write      | 751.04 MB/s (187.7k) | 587.66 MB/s   (9.1k)
    Total      | 1.50 GB/s   (375.0k) | 1.17 GB/s    (18.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.23 GB/s     (2.4k) | 1.67 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Write      | 1.30 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.78 GB/s     (1.7k)
    Total      | 2.54 GB/s     (4.9k) | 3.45 GB/s     (3.3k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 926 Mbits/sec   | 853 Mbits/sec   | 27.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 933 Mbits/sec   | 934 Mbits/sec   | 13.4 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 886 Mbits/sec   | 312 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 811 Mbits/sec   | 521 Mbits/sec   | 173 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 811 Mbits/sec   | 215 Mbits/sec   | 169 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | 670 Mbits/sec   | 87.2 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 776 Mbits/sec   | 113 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 914 Mbits/sec   | 827 Mbits/sec   | 27.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 641 Mbits/sec   | 922 Mbits/sec   | 13.4 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 862 Mbits/sec   | 307 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 793 Mbits/sec   | 520 Mbits/sec   | --
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 801 Mbits/sec   | 189 Mbits/sec   | 169 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 868 Mbits/sec   | 654 Mbits/sec   | 87.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 753 Mbits/sec   | 133 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2088
    Multi Core      | 9299
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15998796
    
    YABS completed in 11 min 26 sec
    

    ow, at giga. I like. Prem <3

    That's the whole host though, not the VPS.

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • ralfralf Member

    @Saragoldfarb said:
    Merry Xmas everyone!!! I had a shitty day.

    Let's carry on.

    <3

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @ralf said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @SmokyHosts said:

    @Astro said:
    @SmokyHosts why hide the CPU and network info?

    @Astro Actually no specific reason except that your edit already provided those details. Nonetheless, here is the entire yabs...

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Jan  9 06:25:01 AM UTC 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 2200.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 125.7 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 916.2 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-90-generic
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Gigahost AS
    ASN        : AS56655 Gigahost AS
    Host       : Terrahost V6net
    Location   : Sandefjord, Vestfold (07)
    Country    : Norway
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 749.06 MB/s (187.2k) | 584.58 MB/s   (9.1k)
    Write      | 751.04 MB/s (187.7k) | 587.66 MB/s   (9.1k)
    Total      | 1.50 GB/s   (375.0k) | 1.17 GB/s    (18.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.23 GB/s     (2.4k) | 1.67 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Write      | 1.30 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.78 GB/s     (1.7k)
    Total      | 2.54 GB/s     (4.9k) | 3.45 GB/s     (3.3k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 926 Mbits/sec   | 853 Mbits/sec   | 27.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 933 Mbits/sec   | 934 Mbits/sec   | 13.4 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 886 Mbits/sec   | 312 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 811 Mbits/sec   | 521 Mbits/sec   | 173 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 811 Mbits/sec   | 215 Mbits/sec   | 169 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | 670 Mbits/sec   | 87.2 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 776 Mbits/sec   | 113 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 914 Mbits/sec   | 827 Mbits/sec   | 27.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 641 Mbits/sec   | 922 Mbits/sec   | 13.4 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 862 Mbits/sec   | 307 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 793 Mbits/sec   | 520 Mbits/sec   | --
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 801 Mbits/sec   | 189 Mbits/sec   | 169 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 868 Mbits/sec   | 654 Mbits/sec   | 87.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 753 Mbits/sec   | 133 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2088
    Multi Core      | 9299
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15998796
    
    YABS completed in 11 min 26 sec
    

    ow, at giga. I like. Prem <3

    That's the whole host though, not the VPS.

    Yeah so if they fuck up it's on them, not the host :)

    But rather go with giga directly tbh. They're a real gem and occasionally drop insane offers.

    Thanked by 1ralf
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @ralf said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:
    Merry Xmas everyone!!! I had a shitty day.

    Let's carry on.

    <3

    <3 <3

    Thanked by 1barbarza
Sign In or Register to comment.