Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026! [DEALS MEGATHREAD]

1127128130132133138

Comments

  • alexanderrasalexanderras Member
    edited January 11

    @x1arch said:

    @barbarza said:

    @x1arch said:

    @AlteredParadox said:
    we need some celebratory "VeloxMedia finally got banned" deals

    Why? What he did? Damn, when it was Lewis it was a great service 😢 Eric discredited he self too quickly.

    Lewis exit scammed everyone!

    From Eric's words, isn't it? Lewis just sold company to someone else, his didn't tell anything to clients, that's bad, but we don't know a reason of this decision. Maybe he is a scammer, maybe not, I don't know. But service quality, while Lewis managed that, was really great. Anyway now we have what we have. 😢

    Lewis sold the ‘business’ without securing provision of services to his customers for the remainder of their contracts (or refunding them). Clearly a scam - and he’s responsible for that.

  • rpqurpqu Member

    @forest said:

    @x1arch said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @x1arch said:

    @AlteredParadox said:
    we need some celebratory "VeloxMedia finally got banned" deals

    Why? What he did? Damn, when it was Lewis it was a great service 😢 Eric discredited he self too quickly.

    http://62.164.143.88/

    Enjoy

    Too much to read it. TLDR requested

    Lewis sold the company to Eric after selling a bunch of unsustainable triennial deals. Eric proceeded to piss off the community by saying he doesn't consider Lewis' customers to be his customers and doesn't care about the GDPR. After some fighting and bickering for 100+ pages, he started threatening customers then began terminating people's VPSes without refund, offering an extortion fee to delay the deletion. All LET deals are going to be deleted within a week.

    He also tried threatening @DP with legal action if he didn't give him his provider tag back and if LET didn't create a prominent notice banner saying that LET officially supports VeloxMedia and officially recommends them.

    Then he got banned.

    Don't forget he intend to let lewis's customer rent free, got ridiculed by colleagues.
    It would have been nice if he just refund the customer, then let customer signed a new contract for the prescribed amount plus a small fee (for refund, or change to annual/semi-annual). That way, everyone could be happy

    Thanked by 2Saragoldfarb tentor
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @AlteredParadox said:

    @ascicode said:

    @Xytronix said:
    can anyone tell me where is @crunchbits ?

    Sitting on promises made last september.

    sounds like someone should call @Saragoldfarb

    What are we discussing?

  • cainyxuescainyxues Member
    edited January 11

    @forest said: He also tried threatening @DP with legal action if he didn't give him his provider tag back and if LET didn't create a prominent notice banner saying that LET officially supports VeloxMedia and officially recommends them.

    erm....what???

    Thanked by 2Saragoldfarb x1arch
  • forestforest Member
    edited January 11

    @cainyxues said:

    @forest said: He also tried threatening @DP with legal action if he didn't give him his provider tag back and if LET didn't create a prominent notice banner saying that LET officially supports VeloxMedia and officially recommends them.

    erm....what???

    This is what they sent (emphasis mine):

    To Whom It May Concern:
    We hereby issue this formal request that, within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt of this notice, the following actions be taken:
    1. Reinstatement of Provider Tag Membership and credit for all days during which the membership was suspended.
    2. Locking of the post titled “Velox Media under new management” by a moderator to prevent further commentary.
    3. Publication of a pinned statement on the main page of your website for a minimum of fourteen (14) consecutive days, affirming that VeloxMedia is an approved and recommended provider on your platform, together with any additional explanation deemed appropriate.
    Please be advised that VeloxMedia has recently undergone a corporate transition and is now owned by Velox Media Inc., 301 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA. This transition has not resulted in any changes to the products or services offered.
    It is our position that the suspension of our provider tag has caused significant confusion within the community and has resulted in substantial actual and reputational harm to our corporation. On December 25, 2025, VeloxMedia was subjected to a coordinated attack throughout the day. We have identified at least two individuals, who are members of your website, as being involved in this activity. Furthermore, we have documented a comment referencing a network, and within nine (9) minutes of that comment being posted, the associated subnet was added to the attack.
    In addition, we formally request your mailing address and legal contact information so that we may send a certified copy of this notice along with any additional legal documentation.
    Failure to comply with this request will result in the filing of an official complaint and the pursuit of damages to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law.

    Thanked by 2cainyxues x1arch
  • Popcorn time

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • forestforest Member
    edited January 11

    @truemagic said:

    Popcorn time

    The main course of drama is over as the provider has been banned. You missed 120+ pages of that!

    But I am sure there will be some extra drama from that subject in the next week.

  • @forest said:

    @truemagic said:

    Popcorn time

    The main course of drama is over as the provider has been banned. You missed 120+ pages of that!

    But I am sure there will be some extra drama from that subject in the next week.

    You're right it went way too fast during my busy days and eventually it got turned into megathread vibe (minus all the flash deals unfortunately😂)

    Thanked by 2Saragoldfarb tentor
  • I'm curious what about the legal thread (last sentence => Failure to comply with this request will result in the filing of an official complaint and the pursuit of damages to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law.) How LET is going to deal with it?

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • forestforest Member
    edited January 11

    @truemagic said:
    I'm curious what about the legal thread (last sentence => Failure to comply with this request will result in the filing of an official complaint and the pursuit of damages to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law.) How LET is going to deal with it?

    They'll ignore it. It has no weight to it, and "nothing" the "fullest extent permitted under applicable law". It's a very tricky phrase that seems to imply they have more power than they have.

    Thanked by 1truemagic
  • ralfralf Member
    edited January 11

    @truemagic said:
    I'm curious what about the legal thread (last sentence => Failure to comply with this request will result in the filing of an official complaint and the pursuit of damages to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law.) How LET is going to deal with it?

    Probably by referring them to the forum rules that Lewis agreed to when he paid for the provider tag.

    Thanked by 1truemagic
  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @truemagic said:
    I'm curious what about the legal thread (last sentence => Failure to comply with this request will result in the filing of an official complaint and the pursuit of damages to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law.) How LET is going to deal with it?

    I believe it was ChatGPT from Legal, so nothing will actually happen

    Thanked by 1truemagic
  • @tentor said:

    @truemagic said:
    I'm curious what about the legal thread (last sentence => Failure to comply with this request will result in the filing of an official complaint and the pursuit of damages to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law.) How LET is going to deal with it?

    I believe it was ChatGPT from Legal, so nothing will actually happen

    Hi @tentor !

  • Any deals?

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @tfgp99 said:
    Any deals?

    megathread drama pack for only €3.99/3yr! GDPR violations and entertainment included.

  • @tentor said:

    @tfgp99 said:
    Any deals?

    megathread drama pack for only €3.99/3yr! GDPR violations and entertainment included.

    VPS or WEB hosting

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @haolun said:

    @tentor said:

    @tfgp99 said:
    Any deals?

    megathread drama pack for only €3.99/3yr! GDPR violations and entertainment included.

    VPS or WEB hosting

    They will cost €4/month extra and will be unexpectedly terminated as a part of the drama deal

    Thanked by 1Saragoldfarb
  • @tentor said:

    @haolun said:

    @tentor said:

    @tfgp99 said:
    Any deals?

    megathread drama pack for only €3.99/3yr! GDPR violations and entertainment included.

    VPS or WEB hosting

    They will cost €4/month extra and will be unexpectedly terminated as a part of the drama deal

    :o

    Thanked by 2tentor Saragoldfarb
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @tentor said:

    @tfgp99 said:
    Any deals?

    megathread drama pack for only €3.99/3yr! GDPR violations and entertainment included.

    :D

  • @tentor said:

    @haolun said:

    @tentor said:

    @tfgp99 said:
    Any deals?

    megathread drama pack for only €3.99/3yr! GDPR violations and entertainment included.

    VPS or WEB hosting

    They will cost €4/month extra and will be unexpectedly terminated as a part of the drama deal

  • @x1arch said:

    @tentor said:

    @haolun said:

    @tentor said:

    @tfgp99 said:
    Any deals?

    megathread drama pack for only €3.99/3yr! GDPR violations and entertainment included.

    VPS or WEB hosting

    They will cost €4/month extra and will be unexpectedly terminated as a part of the drama deal

    Drama Deal ™ - A trademark of Dinos Against Scammers

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    @tfgp99 said:
    Any deals?

    Yes, be the first to tag me and I double your resources on microLXC.

  • x1archx1arch Member
    edited January 11

    @alexanderras said:

    @x1arch said:

    @barbarza said:

    @x1arch said:

    @AlteredParadox said:
    we need some celebratory "VeloxMedia finally got banned" deals

    Why? What he did? Damn, when it was Lewis it was a great service 😢 Eric discredited he self too quickly.

    Lewis exit scammed everyone!

    From Eric's words, isn't it? Lewis just sold company to someone else, his didn't tell anything to clients, that's bad, but we don't know a reason of this decision. Maybe he is a scammer, maybe not, I don't know. But service quality, while Lewis managed that, was really great. Anyway now we have what we have. 😢

    Lewis sold the ‘business’ without securing provision of services to his customers for the remainder of their contracts (or refunding them). Clearly a scam - and he’s responsible for that.

    How it possible to guarantee clients that new owner didn't close their accounts? I suppose it could be part of selling contract, but we don't know is the deal paper didn't include it. As I understand the legal wasn't the powerful side of Lewis.

    I know, maybe I sounds like lawyer of evil, but I know the man, who's behavior is 1 on 1 like Lewis, and he is really good guy, he not a scammer and in the end all the time he pays. I working with him more than 5 years, already.

    Second my argument is the BF deals was less than 1 month ago of the company sold, when charge back window is 90 days, you could get your money back in this or next month. Yes it takes a time, but you have a big chance to get your money back. Actually many clients already do that and get their money back. That's not how scam works. Only clients whose buy it on "the August deals party has got scammed", could you say, but they got a good service for last 4-5 months and after my bank charge back rules reading, I have not 0 chance to get my money back, because if I was pay for the loong-term service, the rule of 90 days could be excepted, but it up to bank decision.

    About "unsustainable" deals, wery often provider could buy a used server as is, with one cpu 40 cores and 700+ gb of ram, and in this case you have a lot of ram, but cpu is very limited, you could oversold cpu, like DeluxeHost, or you could sell only 3 core with lots of ram. I saw listings of selling hardware like this and if Lewis pays only for colocation of the hardware I believe the numbers could be be sustained and it could be a good case for makes your brand recognizable.

    Second possible case is sometimes companies buys hardware for the project and the project is closing by some reasons and they're have two ways sell the hardware as used or make a hoster and try to sell it.

    This is only my opinion, nothing else. In the reality we have what we have.

  • @Neoon said:

    @tfgp99 said:
    Any deals?

    Yes, be the first to tag me and I double your resources on microLXC.

    Thanked by 1tfgp99
  • @x1arch said:

    @forest said:

    @x1arch said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @x1arch said:

    @AlteredParadox said:
    we need some celebratory "VeloxMedia finally got banned" deals

    Why? What he did? Damn, when it was Lewis it was a great service 😢 Eric discredited he self too quickly.

    http://62.164.143.88/

    Enjoy

    Too much to read it. TLDR requested

    Lewis sold the company to Eric after selling a bunch of unsustainable triennial deals. Eric proceeded to piss off the community by saying he doesn't consider Lewis' customers to be his customers and doesn't care about the GDPR. After some fighting and bickering for 100+ pages, he started threatening customers then began terminating people's VPSes without refund, offering an extortion fee to delay the deletion. All LET deals are going to be deleted within a week.

    He also tried threatening @DP with legal action if he didn't give him his provider tag back and if LET didn't create a prominent notice banner saying that LET officially supports VeloxMedia and officially recommends them.

    Then he got banned.

    @alexanderras said:

    @x1arch said:

    @barbarza said:

    @x1arch said:

    @AlteredParadox said:
    we need some celebratory "VeloxMedia finally got banned" deals

    Why? What he did? Damn, when it was Lewis it was a great service 😢 Eric discredited he self too quickly.

    Lewis exit scammed everyone!

    From Eric's words, isn't it? Lewis just sold company to someone else, his didn't tell anything to clients, that's bad, but we don't know a reason of this decision. Maybe he is a scammer, maybe not, I don't know. But service quality, while Lewis managed that, was really great. Anyway now we have what we have. 😢

    Lewis sold the ‘business’ without securing provision of services to his customers for the remainder of their contracts (or refunding them). Clearly a scam - and he’s responsible for that.

    How it possible to guarantee clients that new owner didn't close their accounts? I suppose it could be part of selling contract, but we don't know is the deal paper didn't include it. As I understand the legal wasn't the powerful side of Lewis.

    I know, maybe I sounds like lawyer of evil, but I know the man, who's behavior is 1 on 1 like Lewis, and he is really good guy, he not a scammer and in the end all the time he pays. I working with him more than 5 years, already.

    Second my argument is the BF deals was less than 1 month ago of sold, when charge back window is 90 days, you could get your money back in this or next month. Yes it takes a time, but you have a big chance to get your money back. Actually many clients already do that and get their money back. That's not how scam works. Only clients whose buy it on "the August deals party has got scammed", could you say, but they got a good service for last 4-5 months and after my bank charge back rules reading, I have not 0 chance to get my money back, because if I was pay for the loong-term service, the rule of 90 days could be excepted, but it up to bank decision.

    About "unsustainable" deals, wery often provider could buy a used server as is, with one cpu 40 cores and 700+ gb of ram, and in this case you have a lot of ram, but cpu is very limited, you could oversold cpu, like DeluxeHost, or you could sell only 3 core with lots of ram. I saw listings of selling hardware like this and if Lewis pays only for colocation of the hardware I believe the numbers could be be sustained and it could be a good case for makes your brand recognizable.

    Second possible case is sometimes companies buys hardware for the project and the project is closing by some reasons and they're have two ways sell the hardware as used or make a hoster and try to sell it.

    This is only my opinion, nothing else. In the reality we have what we have.

    What did you do with him?
    Wasn't the service always rented? Or how would he come and go and spend thousands for hardware every time thinks, oh i need some cash for living?

  • alexanderrasalexanderras Member
    edited January 11

    @x1arch said:
    How it possible to guarantee clients that new owner didn't close their accounts? I suppose it could be part of selling contract, but we don't know is the deal paper didn't include it. As I understand the legal wasn't the powerful side of Lewis.

    Yes that’s exactly how you guarantee it. You structure the deal so that if customers stay with Lewis, there is a contract with the buyer as part of the sale to provision services for the remaining duration of their contracts.

    Alternatively, you agree that customers should be ported over to the buyer as part of the sale.

    What you don’t do, is allow contracts to be with one party but without an agreement for services to be provisioned. That’s what it sounds like they did.

    Lewis might be a nice guy, but he should have known better, and should refund everyone. Not doing so constitutes being a scammer

    Thanked by 2forest x1arch
  • @ascicode said:

    @x1arch said:

    @forest said:

    @x1arch said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @x1arch said:

    @AlteredParadox said:
    we need some celebratory "VeloxMedia finally got banned" deals

    Why? What he did? Damn, when it was Lewis it was a great service 😢 Eric discredited he self too quickly.

    http://62.164.143.88/

    Enjoy

    Too much to read it. TLDR requested

    Lewis sold the company to Eric after selling a bunch of unsustainable triennial deals. Eric proceeded to piss off the community by saying he doesn't consider Lewis' customers to be his customers and doesn't care about the GDPR. After some fighting and bickering for 100+ pages, he started threatening customers then began terminating people's VPSes without refund, offering an extortion fee to delay the deletion. All LET deals are going to be deleted within a week.

    He also tried threatening @DP with legal action if he didn't give him his provider tag back and if LET didn't create a prominent notice banner saying that LET officially supports VeloxMedia and officially recommends them.

    Then he got banned.

    @alexanderras said:

    @x1arch said:

    @barbarza said:

    @x1arch said:

    @AlteredParadox said:
    we need some celebratory "VeloxMedia finally got banned" deals

    Why? What he did? Damn, when it was Lewis it was a great service 😢 Eric discredited he self too quickly.

    Lewis exit scammed everyone!

    From Eric's words, isn't it? Lewis just sold company to someone else, his didn't tell anything to clients, that's bad, but we don't know a reason of this decision. Maybe he is a scammer, maybe not, I don't know. But service quality, while Lewis managed that, was really great. Anyway now we have what we have. 😢

    Lewis sold the ‘business’ without securing provision of services to his customers for the remainder of their contracts (or refunding them). Clearly a scam - and he’s responsible for that.

    How it possible to guarantee clients that new owner didn't close their accounts? I suppose it could be part of selling contract, but we don't know is the deal paper didn't include it. As I understand the legal wasn't the powerful side of Lewis.

    I know, maybe I sounds like lawyer of evil, but I know the man, who's behavior is 1 on 1 like Lewis, and he is really good guy, he not a scammer and in the end all the time he pays. I working with him more than 5 years, already.

    Second my argument is the BF deals was less than 1 month ago of sold, when charge back window is 90 days, you could get your money back in this or next month. Yes it takes a time, but you have a big chance to get your money back. Actually many clients already do that and get their money back. That's not how scam works. Only clients whose buy it on "the August deals party has got scammed", could you say, but they got a good service for last 4-5 months and after my bank charge back rules reading, I have not 0 chance to get my money back, because if I was pay for the loong-term service, the rule of 90 days could be excepted, but it up to bank decision.

    About "unsustainable" deals, wery often provider could buy a used server as is, with one cpu 40 cores and 700+ gb of ram, and in this case you have a lot of ram, but cpu is very limited, you could oversold cpu, like DeluxeHost, or you could sell only 3 core with lots of ram. I saw listings of selling hardware like this and if Lewis pays only for colocation of the hardware I believe the numbers could be be sustained and it could be a good case for makes your brand recognizable.

    Second possible case is sometimes companies buys hardware for the project and the project is closing by some reasons and they're have two ways sell the hardware as used or make a hoster and try to sell it.

    This is only my opinion, nothing else. In the reality we have what we have.

    What did you do with him?
    Wasn't the service always rented? Or how would he come and go and spend thousands for hardware every time thinks, oh i need some cash for living?

    I have no answers for your questions, I described, how I justified the price of this offer to myself.

  • AstroAstro Member

    deals? please?

    Thanked by 1barbarza
  • AstroAstro Member

    Any deals that appear now and are amazing. I'll list that provider in my signature for 2026.

Sign In or Register to comment.