Velox media under new management

VeloxMedia · January 9

@Calypso said:

@VeloxMedia said:

Logos redesigned Changed the logo of kyytechnologies a little
sites getting rebuilt Copied the original ToS where Lewis is still mentioned in

Fixed it for you

All about brand integration between our companies.
Yupp we need to make sure not to interfere with Lewis's agreements you have with him. He's still your DPO

tfgp99 · January 9

One more evidence that you're selecting what do you want to read and see.

VeloxMedia · January 9

@225thinker said:

@VeloxMedia said:

You have 100x more of a case in suing LET because they facilitated the transaction by approving Lewis as a provider.

Now he's trying to divert focus to LET ownership/management itself. Sounds like he is now trying to invite a ban at this stage of the failing scam.

If LET does that, hopefully they will also ban all the associated logins that have been used in this scam/attempted additional scam as well. (A little log review will clearly reveal their interconnection -- common VPNs and maybe even some more telling slip-ups in the heat of the moment.)

The only character he won't truly focus his venom on is "Lewis" for some reason. You know, the guy who became exhausted from collecting all the money from those Tom Harper-pimped BF pre-paid annual deals before he even paid his January monthly server renewals.

A Gold Star for the first person to correctly figure out why that is.

That's how the law works my brotha. You should hire an attorney to help explain it to you

tfgp99 · January 9

@VeloxMedia said: He's still your DPO

You're not respecting your DPO!

MaxTakeba · January 9

@225thinker said:

@VeloxMedia said:

You have 100x more of a case in suing LET because they facilitated the transaction by approving Lewis as a provider.

Now he's trying to divert focus to LET ownership/management itself. Sounds like he is now trying to invite a ban at this stage of the failing scam.

If LET does that, hopefully they will also ban all the associated logins that have been used in this scam/attempted additional scam as well. (A little log review will clearly reveal their interconnection -- common VPNs and maybe even some more telling slip-ups in the heat of the moment.)

The only character he won't truly focus his venom on is "Lewis" for some reason. You know, the guy who became exhausted from collecting all the money from those Tom Harper-pimped BF pre-paid annual deals before he even paid his January monthly server renewals.

A Gold Star for the first person to correctly figure out why that is.

A little while ago when it was "Andrew" that posted on the VeloxMedia account. I asked @DP an extremely simple question. Was the geo location different vs the one supposedly behind the "Eric" personality. Didn't get an answer.

I think this has been an exercise in data mining, coercion (remember the 1000 bucks to fix a ddos issue?), high effort trolling and outright attempting to rug pull once it's a little too late. Along with the emotional powered threats of culling everyone who came from LET (because the majority called it out and we're not happy with the unprofessional behavior).

I still think for the betterment of everyone. A ban should happen now, triggering the culling so everyone capable can do charge backs/disputes now rather than later. Anyone who paid in crypto is obviously shit out of luck. Of course this thread would explode with activity and then people can start raising complaints with the relevant bodies as the evidence is all in this wonderful 100 plus large thread.

jsg · January 9

@225thinker said:

@VeloxMedia said:

You have 100x more of a case in suing LET because they facilitated the transaction by approving Lewis as a provider.

Now he's trying to divert focus to LET ownership/management itself. Sounds like he is now trying to invite a ban at this stage of the failing scam.

If LET does that, hopefully they will also ban all the associated logins that have been used in this scam/attempted additional scam as well. (A little log review will clearly reveal their interconnection -- common VPNs and maybe even some more telling slip-ups in the heat of the moment.)

The only character he won't truly focus his venom on is "Lewis" for some reason. You know, the guy who became exhausted from collecting all the money from those Tom Harper-pimped BF pre-paid annual deals before he even paid his January monthly server renewals.

A Gold Star for the first person to correctly figure out why that is.

Actually while based on what I know Lewis pretty much fucked up, he seems to not have been a bad guy. In fact, he even responded to my ticket in what must have been in his last hours as the guy running the operations.

So, why hitting at Lewis needlessly?

Btw. I don't care about your gold star.

VeloxMedia · January 9

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:

@VeloxMedia said: we're compliant

You? Compliant? Where? Evidences here.

Check the ICO website. We even posted the link on here to make it easier.

You are so compliant that the name of Lewis is still there! Don't even try lying to us.

Is that public or

Yes it is.

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:
Gotcha, I'll stick with my team of attorneys with law degrees who specialize in GDPR.

OK, good luck with that.

Yupp. So on to @Saragoldfarb why won't you look into that?

I have real work to do during the day, and my spare time is already spoken for with another time sensitive task.

Guess you don't actually care about GDPR and people's rights. Just the double standard.

I do very much care about GDPR. However, I only have so much time, and it's already set aside for gathering all the evidence against you into a suitable format to be handed over to ICO at the appropriate time.

I haven't seen the thing you claim Sara has done, so I have no opinion on whether it is infringing or not. However, from what you said earlier, and knowing that you are a US citizen, it's unlikely the GDPR will be relevant.

The hypocrisy

Yes, you are rather good at it, aren't you?

You haven't seen the multiple posts from him with the discord dumps? Including every image with PII from a private server?

Also the fact he stated it's his company server that he has attorney on retainer

MaxTakeba · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:

@VeloxMedia said: we're compliant

You? Compliant? Where? Evidences here.

Check the ICO website. We even posted the link on here to make it easier.

You are so compliant that the name of Lewis is still there! Don't even try lying to us.

Is that public or

Yes it is.

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:
Gotcha, I'll stick with my team of attorneys with law degrees who specialize in GDPR.

OK, good luck with that.

Yupp. So on to @Saragoldfarb why won't you look into that?

I have real work to do during the day, and my spare time is already spoken for with another time sensitive task.

Guess you don't actually care about GDPR and people's rights. Just the double standard.

I do very much care about GDPR. However, I only have so much time, and it's already set aside for gathering all the evidence against you into a suitable format to be handed over to ICO at the appropriate time.

I haven't seen the thing you claim Sara has done, so I have no opinion on whether it is infringing or not. However, from what you said earlier, and knowing that you are a US citizen, it's unlikely the GDPR will be relevant.

The hypocrisy

Yes, you are rather good at it, aren't you?

You haven't seen the multiple posts from him with the discord dumps? Including every image with PII from a private server?

Also the fact he stated it's his company server that he has attorney on retainer

Links please.

ralf · January 9

@jsg said:

@Saragoldfarb said:
Its not your data mate. They're not your clients. They Lewis's clients. But you know....

So, how come that people who are not his clients have all sorts of demands?

Under the GDPR, any PII data concerning EU/UK citizens can only be held for justifiable business reasons established in the law and with the consent of the data subject. Any PII data needs to be deleted as soon as possible, and at a maximum of 30 days after that business use has ended.

Eric has stated multiple times that anyone who bought a server from Veloxmedia before he took over is not his customer. If this is true, he has no justifiable business reason to hold that data and it must be deleted immediately.

Eric's insistence that we are not his customers is exactly the reason he must delete our data.

network · January 9

@barbarza said:

@network said:

@barbarza said:
Everything that @VeloxMedia has posted is absolute crap, non-sensicle and even contradictory.

It is all scammer speak - making up excuses, challenging truths and delay tactics.

There is no multimillion dollar company. There are no extensive hardware networks or legal teams.

None of the actions that 'Eric' has taken make any sense, from taking over the VeloxMedia brand but not taking it over, having the customers but not wanting them, needing the original VeloxMedia infrastructure but having millions to spend on the project, etc etc.

It is just one person, we don't know who they really are but they have shown up as Eric, Lewis Tom and Andrew at least. I'm sure if you run all their posts through AI it will pick up consistencies proving this.

The first phase of the scam was obviously an exit scam. What the current phase is I'm not sure, but it's definitely still a scam.

Actions to take include charging back where possible, laying complaints with payment providers and regulatory authorities and warning all future potential customers of the scam. Further investigation into who the individual behind this all is would be great, but I'm not sure how much real information would surface.

We do know that Eric Banks is a real person now at least don't we? From the company registration?

Don't need ID to register a company in someones name in some states. You can also register a US company from almost anywhere else in the world, just using a local representative service.

That's interesting, I did not know that.

jsg · January 9

@Saragoldfarb said:

@jsg said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@magicvpn said:
I missed 1.1k comments, but how did we get from telling people gdpr and all that stuff doesn't apply to crying about gdpr...?

Because how data privacy laws work in other countries. US doesn't need to comply with GDPR unless we provide a product or service. But since he's in EU/UK he has to comply regardless.

It's the difference between having a legal team that understands the law and people that Google the law.

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:
@VeloxMedia you, Eric from US, do you need to be GDPR compliant in your own country? Or the law just applies just in your favor?

We only need to be compliant if we provide goods or services to the data subjects. Below is the law right from their site. We're not providing goods or services as we just haven't deleted the data yet.

The law is crystal clear on this

https://gdpr.eu/Recital-23-Applicable-to-processors-not-established-in-the-Union-if-data-subjects-within-the-Union-are-targeted/

And as I explained yesterday, this section means the exact opposite to what you clearly believe it means.

I would explain, but I've given you free advice. If you want more my day rate is $1500.

Please explain how the other site is GDPR complaint. That's the question.

Do you want to send me over a work order? $1500 per day. And given how sketchy you seem, that'll be $1500 before the work takes place.

But again, I'll remind you. This section means the exact opposite to what you clearly believe it means.

I'm good we have full attorneys that are specialists in GDPR who say otherwise. Do you have a law degree?

Good luck with that.

Assuming you actually have attorneys, then you have ones that seemingly are both unfamiliar with the GDPR and seemingly unable to parse statutes and understand their meaning.

Some free advice: try asking a different attorney who specialises in this stuff and see if they agree with your attorneys.

Again why are you singling me out when he posted everyone's data publicly on the Internet??? Are you not concerned?

I have other things to do with my time. I can only do so much pro-bono.

Since you offered your services, again I ask do you have a law degree?

I do not, but I have worked on compliance with data protection long enough to know unequivocally that your lawyers are wrong.

Like I said, take my free advice - you need to get some time with a lawyer who's actually familiar with the GDPR. If you rely on your lawyer's bad advice, it's going to cost you dearly.

You are very keen to keep posting recital 23 as your reason for non-compliance. I will tell you for free, categorically, that under recital 23, you would fall under the regulations.

But as to your question, no I do not have a law degree. If I did, my day rate would be significantly higher than $1500.

Gotcha, I'll stick with my team of attorneys with law degrees who specialize in GDPR.

But I'm sure @Saragoldfarb would love some info. Why won't you explain to us about this clear violation of all our data?

Its not your data mate. They're not your clients. They Lewis's clients. But you know....

So, how come that people who are not his clients have all sorts of demands?

You at least actually are or have been one of their clients. Unfortunately though you feel betrayed - be it rightfully or made up, Idk. Do you still think that talking aggressively and/or threatening will work? From what I see it does not.

In case you actually and really sue, please inform us and provide the relevant documents (PII blacked out, of course)!

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@tfgp99 said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@NotFoundException said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

Yes, they just took my money.

Yes. Thank you.

Also please ensure you're GDPR compliant as you took our PII data along with all our members when you scraped our discord and placed this on your "company" server without our permission. We will be filing a formal complaint

Oh, by the way, it's on a server with Lewis if that makes the complaint easier.

It doesn't. Again please state how you are GDPR compliant and obtained my PII along with our customers who are on here's data and are protecting their rights. Because you just posted it all publicly online for everyone to see which is a massive GDPR violation.

Again, days and days of people attacking me here and yet not a single person calling you out on this. Such a double standard.

Why is everyone else quiet on this? Is this not a violation or is it? @rpqu

Why are you still posting, after saying, that you will quit LET and delete everything multiple times. Why can’t you commit to anything? Were you drunk too much last night at the party you posted about on DC and now trying to correct it?

First off I don't drink.

Second we are still deleting LET accounts, haven't changed that. We'll likely give them the option to purchase service for a few $ a month if they want to continue based on feedback from customers. This way it isn't an exit scam and they can become customers. Meanwhile we're just deleting any customers who complain or cause issues as we find them. We're not in any rush.

You kind of are. You have 13 days before I report you to ICO for obtaining PII data illegally and then deliberately violating the GDPR regulations, despite confirming to ICO that you would process data responsibly.

You should. Are you going to do the same with @Saragoldfarb or am I just singled out?

Just @VeloxMedia at this time, correct.

I don't use discord so I have no way of gathering enough data to verify your claims, so perhaps you should complain about her if you think you'd be better placed to make the case. If you'd like me to support you, again my day rate is a very reasonable $1500.

Why aren't you concerned about @Saragoldfarb posting GDPR data publicly with multiple links in this thread full of people's PII on here?

Isn't this a massive breach?

Where's my credit and why did you charge my card?

Card is still saved? oh damn

Yes, so make sure to wipe your payment details.

Also watch out for automated PP subscriptions.

You entered your credit card info into the system yesterday. Remember? You even posted about it

Yes, so what? Your site states I won't be charged. Used as a verification measure all the time. No biggy.

Till you made an unauthorized charge.

So just to be clear.
You entered the credit card info into our system.
And you agreed to purchase service for $5 a month.
You clicked submit order for the service.
You used the service and posted how great and fast it was.

Are all these correct?

No.

Please kindly elaborate.

Look, he stole my money. Threatening me. Should I stay calm. You don't believe the proof I posted? He literally admitted taking my money.

ITS all been very well documented here but I will happily open a new thread on some forums with the exact timeline, unredacted content and the money trail.

ITS an easy win if I'd sue but I wont. You all so worried about suing but it's much simpler. I build the case, report it... Things will be set in motion. Doesn't
cost a penny.

That's how you perceive it, I don't doubt that.

But your were asked concrete and simple questions by @VeloxMedia and I think you should answer them.

ralf · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@Calypso said:

@VeloxMedia said:

Logos redesigned Changed the logo of kyytechnologies a little
sites getting rebuilt Copied the original ToS where Lewis is still mentioned in

Fixed it for you

All about brand integration between our companies.
Yupp we need to make sure not to interfere with Lewis's agreements you have with him. He's still your DPO

You have our data. You are the the relevant DPO.

VeloxMedia · January 9

@Saragoldfarb said:

@jsg said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@magicvpn said:
I missed 1.1k comments, but how did we get from telling people gdpr and all that stuff doesn't apply to crying about gdpr...?

Because how data privacy laws work in other countries. US doesn't need to comply with GDPR unless we provide a product or service. But since he's in EU/UK he has to comply regardless.

It's the difference between having a legal team that understands the law and people that Google the law.

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:
@VeloxMedia you, Eric from US, do you need to be GDPR compliant in your own country? Or the law just applies just in your favor?

We only need to be compliant if we provide goods or services to the data subjects. Below is the law right from their site. We're not providing goods or services as we just haven't deleted the data yet.

The law is crystal clear on this

https://gdpr.eu/Recital-23-Applicable-to-processors-not-established-in-the-Union-if-data-subjects-within-the-Union-are-targeted/

And as I explained yesterday, this section means the exact opposite to what you clearly believe it means.

I would explain, but I've given you free advice. If you want more my day rate is $1500.

Please explain how the other site is GDPR complaint. That's the question.

Do you want to send me over a work order? $1500 per day. And given how sketchy you seem, that'll be $1500 before the work takes place.

But again, I'll remind you. This section means the exact opposite to what you clearly believe it means.

I'm good we have full attorneys that are specialists in GDPR who say otherwise. Do you have a law degree?

Good luck with that.

Assuming you actually have attorneys, then you have ones that seemingly are both unfamiliar with the GDPR and seemingly unable to parse statutes and understand their meaning.

Some free advice: try asking a different attorney who specialises in this stuff and see if they agree with your attorneys.

Again why are you singling me out when he posted everyone's data publicly on the Internet??? Are you not concerned?

I have other things to do with my time. I can only do so much pro-bono.

Since you offered your services, again I ask do you have a law degree?

I do not, but I have worked on compliance with data protection long enough to know unequivocally that your lawyers are wrong.

Like I said, take my free advice - you need to get some time with a lawyer who's actually familiar with the GDPR. If you rely on your lawyer's bad advice, it's going to cost you dearly.

You are very keen to keep posting recital 23 as your reason for non-compliance. I will tell you for free, categorically, that under recital 23, you would fall under the regulations.

But as to your question, no I do not have a law degree. If I did, my day rate would be significantly higher than $1500.

Gotcha, I'll stick with my team of attorneys with law degrees who specialize in GDPR.

But I'm sure @Saragoldfarb would love some info. Why won't you explain to us about this clear violation of all our data?

Its not your data mate. They're not your clients. They Lewis's clients. But you know....

So, how come that people who are not his clients have all sorts of demands?

You at least actually are or have been one of their clients. Unfortunately though you feel betrayed - be it rightfully or made up, Idk. Do you still think that talking aggressively and/or threatening will work? From what I see it does not.

In case you actually and really sue, please inform us and provide the relevant documents (PII blacked out, of course)!

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@tfgp99 said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@NotFoundException said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

Yes, they just took my money.

Yes. Thank you.

Also please ensure you're GDPR compliant as you took our PII data along with all our members when you scraped our discord and placed this on your "company" server without our permission. We will be filing a formal complaint

Oh, by the way, it's on a server with Lewis if that makes the complaint easier.

It doesn't. Again please state how you are GDPR compliant and obtained my PII along with our customers who are on here's data and are protecting their rights. Because you just posted it all publicly online for everyone to see which is a massive GDPR violation.

Again, days and days of people attacking me here and yet not a single person calling you out on this. Such a double standard.

Why is everyone else quiet on this? Is this not a violation or is it? @rpqu

Why are you still posting, after saying, that you will quit LET and delete everything multiple times. Why can’t you commit to anything? Were you drunk too much last night at the party you posted about on DC and now trying to correct it?

First off I don't drink.

Second we are still deleting LET accounts, haven't changed that. We'll likely give them the option to purchase service for a few $ a month if they want to continue based on feedback from customers. This way it isn't an exit scam and they can become customers. Meanwhile we're just deleting any customers who complain or cause issues as we find them. We're not in any rush.

You kind of are. You have 13 days before I report you to ICO for obtaining PII data illegally and then deliberately violating the GDPR regulations, despite confirming to ICO that you would process data responsibly.

You should. Are you going to do the same with @Saragoldfarb or am I just singled out?

Just @VeloxMedia at this time, correct.

I don't use discord so I have no way of gathering enough data to verify your claims, so perhaps you should complain about her if you think you'd be better placed to make the case. If you'd like me to support you, again my day rate is a very reasonable $1500.

Why aren't you concerned about @Saragoldfarb posting GDPR data publicly with multiple links in this thread full of people's PII on here?

Isn't this a massive breach?

Where's my credit and why did you charge my card?

Card is still saved? oh damn

Yes, so make sure to wipe your payment details.

Also watch out for automated PP subscriptions.

You entered your credit card info into the system yesterday. Remember? You even posted about it

Yes, so what? Your site states I won't be charged. Used as a verification measure all the time. No biggy.

Till you made an unauthorized charge.

So just to be clear.
You entered the credit card info into our system.
And you agreed to purchase service for $5 a month.
You clicked submit order for the service.
You used the service and posted how great and fast it was.

Are all these correct?

No.

Please kindly elaborate.

Look, he stole my money. Threatening me. Should I stay calm. You don't believe the proof I posted? He literally admitted taking my money.

ITS all been very well documented here but I will happily open a new thread on some forums with the exact timeline, unredacted content and the money trail.

ITS an easy win if I'd sue but I wont. You all so worried about suing but it's much simpler. I build the case, report it... Things will be set in motion. Doesn't
cost a penny.

You should sue. You have our info on your invoice. Hire an attorney and file the suit, quit talking about it

x0x0x · January 9

ralf · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:

@VeloxMedia said: we're compliant

You? Compliant? Where? Evidences here.

Check the ICO website. We even posted the link on here to make it easier.

You are so compliant that the name of Lewis is still there! Don't even try lying to us.

Is that public or

Yes it is.

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:
Gotcha, I'll stick with my team of attorneys with law degrees who specialize in GDPR.

OK, good luck with that.

Yupp. So on to @Saragoldfarb why won't you look into that?

I have real work to do during the day, and my spare time is already spoken for with another time sensitive task.

Guess you don't actually care about GDPR and people's rights. Just the double standard.

I do very much care about GDPR. However, I only have so much time, and it's already set aside for gathering all the evidence against you into a suitable format to be handed over to ICO at the appropriate time.

I haven't seen the thing you claim Sara has done, so I have no opinion on whether it is infringing or not. However, from what you said earlier, and knowing that you are a US citizen, it's unlikely the GDPR will be relevant.

The hypocrisy

Yes, you are rather good at it, aren't you?

You haven't seen the multiple posts from him with the discord dumps? Including every image with PII from a private server?

Also the fact he stated it's his company server that he has attorney on retainer

Be a darling and share a link so I can read all about it. I don't use discord myself, so I'm only hearing bits and pieces of he-said-she-said, I'm afraid.

pba09391 · January 9

has to be trolling. 107 pages of entertainment

jsg · January 9

@ralf said:

@jsg said:

@Saragoldfarb said:
Its not your data mate. They're not your clients. They Lewis's clients. But you know....

So, how come that people who are not his clients have all sorts of demands?

Under the GDPR, any PII data concerning EU/UK citizens can only be held for justifiable business reasons established in the law and with the consent of the data subject. Any PII data needs to be deleted as soon as possible, and at a maximum of 30 days after that business use has ended.

Eric has stated multiple times that anyone who bought a server from Veloxmedia before he took over is not his customer. If this is true, he has no justifiable business reason to hold that data and it must be deleted immediately.

Eric's insistence that we are not his customers is exactly the reason he must delete our data.

First wait until the 30 days period is over, then make allegations. Btw, I don't think that Eric is all that interested in those data anyway. I guess he already has some mechanism created (or already in place) to delete those data from their systems.
Also btw, there also might be other laws and regulations for us-american companies requiring @VeloxMedia to keep the data or parts thereof for a longer time.

Whatever, the 30 days haven't passed yet.

VeloxMedia · January 9

@MaxTakeba said:

@225thinker said:

@VeloxMedia said:

You have 100x more of a case in suing LET because they facilitated the transaction by approving Lewis as a provider.

Now he's trying to divert focus to LET ownership/management itself. Sounds like he is now trying to invite a ban at this stage of the failing scam.

If LET does that, hopefully they will also ban all the associated logins that have been used in this scam/attempted additional scam as well. (A little log review will clearly reveal their interconnection -- common VPNs and maybe even some more telling slip-ups in the heat of the moment.)

The only character he won't truly focus his venom on is "Lewis" for some reason. You know, the guy who became exhausted from collecting all the money from those Tom Harper-pimped BF pre-paid annual deals before he even paid his January monthly server renewals.

A Gold Star for the first person to correctly figure out why that is.

A little while ago when it was "Andrew" that posted on the VeloxMedia account. I asked @DP an extremely simple question. Was the geo location different vs the one supposedly behind the "Eric" personality. Didn't get an answer.

I think this has been an exercise in data mining, coercion (remember the 1000 bucks to fix a ddos issue?), high effort trolling and outright attempting to rug pull once it's a little too late. Along with the emotional powered threats of culling everyone who came from LET (because the majority called it out and we're not happy with the unprofessional behavior).

I still think for the betterment of everyone. A ban should happen now, triggering the culling so everyone capable can do charge backs/disputes now rather than later. Anyone who paid in crypto is obviously shit out of luck. Of course this thread would explode with activity and then people can start raising complaints with the relevant bodies as the evidence is all in this wonderful 100 plus large thread.

People should chargeback. We're terminating LET orders

Calypso · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

Logos redesigned Changed the logo of kyytechnologies a little

All about brand integration between our companies.

Then you can hardly speak of a "logo redesign". But it's good to know that those companies are connected.

sites getting rebuilt Copied the original ToS where Lewis is still mentioned in

Yupp we need to make sure not to interfere with Lewis's agreements you have with him. He's still your DPO

When "you" first entered this forum: "Lewis is gone". Then it was still "he's cooperating in getting things transitioned". Later: "We haven't got access to Lewis' credentials for the payment processors" and "He's gone and out of the picture". Now basically you say: we still give Lewis an e-mail address.

I don't buy that crap.

x0x0x · January 9

@pba09391 said:
has to be trolling. 107 pages of entertainment

LET kicking off 2026 with a bang!

default · January 9

Unfotunately I need to disconnect from the screen a few minutes, to make some popcorn and pop a can of soda... this is too good.

VeloxMedia · January 9

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Calypso said:

@VeloxMedia said:

Logos redesigned Changed the logo of kyytechnologies a little
sites getting rebuilt Copied the original ToS where Lewis is still mentioned in

Fixed it for you

All about brand integration between our companies.
Yupp we need to make sure not to interfere with Lewis's agreements you have with him. He's still your DPO

You have our data. You are the the relevant DPO.

You don't have time to discuss remember. If you do have time you should look into the massive violation by @Saragoldfarb

MaxTakeba · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Calypso said:

@VeloxMedia said:

Logos redesigned Changed the logo of kyytechnologies a little
sites getting rebuilt Copied the original ToS where Lewis is still mentioned in

Fixed it for you

All about brand integration between our companies.
Yupp we need to make sure not to interfere with Lewis's agreements you have with him. He's still your DPO

You have our data. You are the the relevant DPO.

You don't have time to discuss remember. If you do have time you should look into the massive violation by @Saragoldfarb

Where?

For I think the 4th time where is it? Where has she done this?

tfgp99 · January 9

Calypso · January 9

@jsg said:
But your were asked concrete and simple questions by @VeloxMedia and I think you should answer them.

There were "concrete and simple questions" asked to @VeloxMedia that still aren't answered or are different/not lived up to every few days.

Let's first get answers to those.

tfgp99 · January 9

@Calypso said:

@jsg said:
But your were asked concrete and simple questions by @VeloxMedia and I think you should answer them.

There were "concrete and simple questions" asked to @VeloxMedia that still aren't answered or are different/not lived up to every few days.

Let's first get answers to those.

He is really selective, he does reply what is convenient and easy to start another circle.

ralf · January 9

@jsg said:

@ralf said:

@jsg said:

@Saragoldfarb said:
Its not your data mate. They're not your clients. They Lewis's clients. But you know....

So, how come that people who are not his clients have all sorts of demands?

Under the GDPR, any PII data concerning EU/UK citizens can only be held for justifiable business reasons established in the law and with the consent of the data subject. Any PII data needs to be deleted as soon as possible, and at a maximum of 30 days after that business use has ended.

Eric has stated multiple times that anyone who bought a server from Veloxmedia before he took over is not his customer. If this is true, he has no justifiable business reason to hold that data and it must be deleted immediately.

Eric's insistence that we are not his customers is exactly the reason he must delete our data.

First wait until the 30 days period is over, then make allegations. Btw, I don't think that Eric is all that interested in those data anyway. I guess he already has some mechanism created (or already in place) to delete those data from their systems.
Also btw, there also might be other laws and regulations for us-american companies requiring @VeloxMedia to keep the data or parts thereof for a longer time.

They're not allegations, he's said he has our data, and says we're not his customers. It's clear cut. I'm simply informing him of his obligations.

Whatever, the 30 days haven't passed yet.

Yes, as I've stated already, I'm waiting until 30 days since he obtained the PII has passed. At that point, it will be clear he has broken the law.

I hope that he will take remedial action before then, because that would be the best outcome for everybody.

barbarza · January 9

@MaxTakeba said:

@jsg said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@magicvpn said:
I missed 1.1k comments, but how did we get from telling people gdpr and all that stuff doesn't apply to crying about gdpr...?

Because how data privacy laws work in other countries. US doesn't need to comply with GDPR unless we provide a product or service. But since he's in EU/UK he has to comply regardless.

It's the difference between having a legal team that understands the law and people that Google the law.

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:
@VeloxMedia you, Eric from US, do you need to be GDPR compliant in your own country? Or the law just applies just in your favor?

We only need to be compliant if we provide goods or services to the data subjects. Below is the law right from their site. We're not providing goods or services as we just haven't deleted the data yet.

The law is crystal clear on this

https://gdpr.eu/Recital-23-Applicable-to-processors-not-established-in-the-Union-if-data-subjects-within-the-Union-are-targeted/

And as I explained yesterday, this section means the exact opposite to what you clearly believe it means.

I would explain, but I've given you free advice. If you want more my day rate is $1500.

Please explain how the other site is GDPR complaint. That's the question.

Do you want to send me over a work order? $1500 per day. And given how sketchy you seem, that'll be $1500 before the work takes place.

But again, I'll remind you. This section means the exact opposite to what you clearly believe it means.

I'm good we have full attorneys that are specialists in GDPR who say otherwise. Do you have a law degree?

Good luck with that.

Assuming you actually have attorneys, then you have ones that seemingly are both unfamiliar with the GDPR and seemingly unable to parse statutes and understand their meaning.

Some free advice: try asking a different attorney who specialises in this stuff and see if they agree with your attorneys.

Again why are you singling me out when he posted everyone's data publicly on the Internet??? Are you not concerned?

I have other things to do with my time. I can only do so much pro-bono.

Since you offered your services, again I ask do you have a law degree?

I do not, but I have worked on compliance with data protection long enough to know unequivocally that your lawyers are wrong.

Like I said, take my free advice - you need to get some time with a lawyer who's actually familiar with the GDPR. If you rely on your lawyer's bad advice, it's going to cost you dearly.

You are very keen to keep posting recital 23 as your reason for non-compliance. I will tell you for free, categorically, that under recital 23, you would fall under the regulations.

But as to your question, no I do not have a law degree. If I did, my day rate would be significantly higher than $1500.

Gotcha, I'll stick with my team of attorneys with law degrees who specialize in GDPR.

But I'm sure @Saragoldfarb would love some info. Why won't you explain to us about this clear violation of all our data?

Its not your data mate. They're not your clients. They Lewis's clients. But you know....

So, how come that people who are not his clients have all sorts of demands?

VeloxMedia made a pretty serious accusation. I want them to follow up. Client or not it doesn't matter I'm allowed to ask. If VeloxMedia doesn't want to show proof that it was posted in this thread, with links and examples of PII from that dump, then that's on VeloxMedia and VeloxMedia is both a liar and a coward.

Why are you still greasing his dick?

@VeloxMedia is an idiot, simple as that.

MaxTakeba · January 9

@barbarza said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@jsg said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@magicvpn said:
I missed 1.1k comments, but how did we get from telling people gdpr and all that stuff doesn't apply to crying about gdpr...?

Because how data privacy laws work in other countries. US doesn't need to comply with GDPR unless we provide a product or service. But since he's in EU/UK he has to comply regardless.

It's the difference between having a legal team that understands the law and people that Google the law.

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:
@VeloxMedia you, Eric from US, do you need to be GDPR compliant in your own country? Or the law just applies just in your favor?

We only need to be compliant if we provide goods or services to the data subjects. Below is the law right from their site. We're not providing goods or services as we just haven't deleted the data yet.

The law is crystal clear on this

https://gdpr.eu/Recital-23-Applicable-to-processors-not-established-in-the-Union-if-data-subjects-within-the-Union-are-targeted/

And as I explained yesterday, this section means the exact opposite to what you clearly believe it means.

I would explain, but I've given you free advice. If you want more my day rate is $1500.

Please explain how the other site is GDPR complaint. That's the question.

Do you want to send me over a work order? $1500 per day. And given how sketchy you seem, that'll be $1500 before the work takes place.

But again, I'll remind you. This section means the exact opposite to what you clearly believe it means.

I'm good we have full attorneys that are specialists in GDPR who say otherwise. Do you have a law degree?

Good luck with that.

Assuming you actually have attorneys, then you have ones that seemingly are both unfamiliar with the GDPR and seemingly unable to parse statutes and understand their meaning.

Some free advice: try asking a different attorney who specialises in this stuff and see if they agree with your attorneys.

Again why are you singling me out when he posted everyone's data publicly on the Internet??? Are you not concerned?

I have other things to do with my time. I can only do so much pro-bono.

Since you offered your services, again I ask do you have a law degree?

I do not, but I have worked on compliance with data protection long enough to know unequivocally that your lawyers are wrong.

Like I said, take my free advice - you need to get some time with a lawyer who's actually familiar with the GDPR. If you rely on your lawyer's bad advice, it's going to cost you dearly.

You are very keen to keep posting recital 23 as your reason for non-compliance. I will tell you for free, categorically, that under recital 23, you would fall under the regulations.

But as to your question, no I do not have a law degree. If I did, my day rate would be significantly higher than $1500.

Gotcha, I'll stick with my team of attorneys with law degrees who specialize in GDPR.

But I'm sure @Saragoldfarb would love some info. Why won't you explain to us about this clear violation of all our data?

Its not your data mate. They're not your clients. They Lewis's clients. But you know....

So, how come that people who are not his clients have all sorts of demands?

VeloxMedia made a pretty serious accusation. I want them to follow up. Client or not it doesn't matter I'm allowed to ask. If VeloxMedia doesn't want to show proof that it was posted in this thread, with links and examples of PII from that dump, then that's on VeloxMedia and VeloxMedia is both a liar and a coward.

Why are you still greasing his dick?

@VeloxMedia is an idiot, simple as that.

I don't think VeloxMedia is an idiot. VeloxMedia has admitted to find this entertaining so I think VeloxMedia is a narcissist.

VeloxMedia · January 9

@ralf said:

@jsg said:

@Saragoldfarb said:
Its not your data mate. They're not your clients. They Lewis's clients. But you know....

So, how come that people who are not his clients have all sorts of demands?

Under the GDPR, any PII data concerning EU/UK citizens can only be held for justifiable business reasons established in the law and with the consent of the data subject. Any PII data needs to be deleted as soon as possible, and at a maximum of 30 days after that business use has ended.

Eric has stated multiple times that anyone who bought a server from Veloxmedia before he took over is not his customer. If this is true, he has no justifiable business reason to hold that data and it must be deleted immediately.

Eric's insistence that we are not his customers is exactly the reason he must delete our data.

30 days not immediately. You even stated it here. Please cite where it says immediately.

Also please show me a single case where someone has data stored and wants it deleted and we haven't. We keep requesting for this info.

Pop a ticket with your account info and we'll delete it asap. We need to know which are EU/UK customers and GDPR required

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

Velox media under new management

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

Velox media under new management

Comments