Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

2025 Black Friday / Cyber Monday: FLASH SALE & MEGATHREAD - "The Trade War"

1658659661663664733

Comments

  • @PulsedMedia said:

    🐔 TOTALLY CHICKEN DEAL – NOT EVEN 7€! 🐔

    🎉 455GiB SSD Seedbox – Mind-Blowing 3-Year Deal! 🎉

    🚀 Insane Value at Only €69.69 for 3 Years! 🚀

    Fine. You twisted my arm. :P Somehow I missed this one before, and it's perfect for making sure all the current Linux distros on the DistroWatch Torrents page have a seed... >.>

  • @ralf said:

    @rpqu said: Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I do the same with my company, which is one of the reasons I never reveal here what my company is or what it does!

    The fees have increased now, but it used to cost £13 to register a company yourself, and most accountants would charge upwards of £500 to do it for you. It's a relatively small expense compared to getting year-end accounts done, but when you're first starting a business on tiny seed capital, it can make all the difference.

    From what I can gather, it costs about £50 to register a limited company in UK, using online forms. Business names are free, with no registration required by law.

    Thanked by 1rpqu
  • @ralf said:

    @rpqu said: Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I do the same with my company, which is one of the reasons I never reveal here what my company is or what it does!

    The fees have increased now, but it used to cost £13 to register a company yourself, and most accountants would charge upwards of £500 to do it for you. It's a relatively small expense compared to getting year-end accounts done, but when you're first starting a business on tiny seed capital, it can make all the difference.

    Also forgot to say - once your address is listed at Companies House, it's pretty hard to get rid of it. You can superficially do it, e.g. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/removing-your-home-address-from-the-companies-house-register but it takes a long time, is expensive and all the previously filed accounts / charges will still have your address on and not all of them can be changed.

  • @VeloxMedia said:

    @Maki said:

    @VeloxMedia said:

    @Maki said:

    @VeloxMedia said:
    Good morning everyone,

    ....
    To the people in regards to the 3 bundle VPS. We have our links scraped and leaked all the time (those hidden links in WHMCS), unfortunately this has ruined a few Black Friday flash deals for us so tensions were high, I want to personally apologise to you both, and to make things right or at least try, please send me a DM and I want to give you both the 3 bundle VPS, this will be given to you for free for 3 years if you’d rather not have any dealings with us, then I understand but the offer is always there!

    ...

    Thank you
    Lewis Edwards
    VeloxMedia

    Are you gonna lie when its "NOT SCRAPPED", I have recording of buying it from your site, and how to get "3 Bundle for 10 poundsterling", please check that 3rd party also checking the incorrectly setting plan, it's not hidden, its better to not listen what your "staff" saying for saving face.

    AS A PROOF, this is the video

    The links are hidden, bundles are setup weird in WHMCS.

    You need to create the links, for example these are California prod1, Salt Lake City prod1, London prod1, then they are made into the bundle.

    The bundles are the only visible links in WHMCS, but clearly there is a problem, when you buy a bundle you’re not suppose to edit stock, delete them etc, however a bundle should not allow this and charges for what’s there and acts as a single product rather than the bundle.

    I admit it’s not the most clever tools that is built into WHMCS, I can only control so much with WHMCS from the admin end.

    So yes, there was an issue that I did not see at first but I can easily show you the 3 individual plans that are hidden to prove what I mean?

    We as customer, doesn't really care about what the stack that you use for serving us the billing page, but what we care about how you present it, the flow must be dumb friendly.

    @VeloxMedia said: You need to create the links, for example these are California prod1, Salt Lake City prod1, London prod1, then they are made into the bundle.

    IN the website, especially billing page, there are 0 Instruction HOW to do it, and we ASSUME, if it's on the cart, its purchasable, since how it's WORKS in other WHMCS Framework

    @VeloxMedia said: I can easily show you the 3 individual plans that are hidden to prove what I mean?

    We don't care about 3 hidden link that you make use go to set up after click "Continue", its on the cart, its purchasable. its end,

    BUT You made customer to "FORCEFULLY" click other "HIDDEN" link just to add 2 another bundle?

    That's obviously not how to do it, its the same as ordering 3 things "FORCEFULLY", instead of ordering 1, you get 3.

    Thats just part of What We see as Customer.

    Now to the payment, obviously, as 1 PRODUCT is 10 poundsterling, we already assume thats the entire product, we pay it, "3 Bundle" for "13.20 usd", and it should be a binding

    But whatever, the main problem is the error is due to diligence failure, not customer fault,

    WE customer doesnt know what, and there is NO instruction, there is no SYSTEM check for whatever the bundle plan works

    I agree this was on oversight, I assumed people would know and a lesson had certainly been learned here.

    I apologise for assuming and not making any sort of tutorial, instructions on this.

    With how it’s setup it theoretically shouldn’t have allowed the plan to be purchased if adjusted and clearly this did not happen. I didn’t test removing a product, adjusting stock as I did assume it would cancel the bundle like it should do (or I’m missing something that I didn’t see) we’ve ran loads of bundles with no hiccups but not this time around.

    If I have offended, accused or been unfair on this, then I extend my apology for the bundle deal, clearly it’s not working how it should be for us as a provider or you as a customer.

    It should be straight forward and an easy order process - we have failed you on this.

    Instead of doing something that already tested, instead you playing with fire, and now you burn your own home

    I dont need the apologize, you need to apologize to other customer THAT actually pay for it and you accuse WRONGLY, they deserve that sorry

    Im sorry if my word are a bit attacking, I'm just trying pointing the truth, that you or your staff trying to hide

    I dont really care about how its implemented, what I care is when someone pay for it, you need to honor it, not cancelling because of your own due diligence failures

    You wasted:
    1. people time,
    2. people money that can be allocated to buy another server, and most importantly
    3. trust

  • ZYXinZYXin Member
    edited December 2025

    Let me check the monitoring system I set up as a MJJ to see what's going on. :o
    The video shows only one VPS. If you add three to your shopping cart, you'll find there are three VPS in the cart and get a bundle price, but you've only paid for one of them?
    service cancelled? not a good idea.

  • @VeloxMedia said:
    VeloxMedia is only under the group ARPW GROUP, they have no deals with VeloxMedia and we are separate. I can not comment on how they run their business, however we are not limited, we are sole traders and do not need to register on companies house. The admins here or atleast who dealt with my host ya knows all of this, I’m not kidding when I say a host is vetted, we are vetted hard and for good reason.

    Honestly, this makes no sense.

    A sole trader cannot be part of a group of companies. A group is a specific legal definition, with specific legal obligations to permit assets and profits to be moved between member companies without incurring additional tax liabilities.

    FWIW, I'd strongly advise you to operate as a limited company. You're opening yourself up to a whole load of personal liability as a sole trader. Look at how many new hosting providers deadpool within a couple of years. Ask yourself - if that happened, do I want to be able to walk away from it with just my reputation damaged, or do I want to lose my house as well?

  • Sometimes I wonder why we have any hosts here at all.

    Can't believe how long this has been drawn out over $13, everyone's got their money back, who's going to give me my time back....

  • Wait, there’s a drama now on this thread?
    Any TLDR?

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @VeloxMedia said: VeloxMedia is only under the group ARPW GROUP, they have no deals with VeloxMedia and we are separate. I can not comment on how they run their business, however we are not limited, we are sole traders and do not need to register on companies house.

    ARPW Group is a Limited Company, I'd imagine any 'companies' you're running under it are considered part of your Limited Company, e.g VeloxMedia

    Regardless of that part of it - even if you are a Sole Trader you're required by UK law to display your registration / the names of all individuals involved for this on your website and invoices.

    VeloxMedia isn't a registered entity with CH in the UK so you're either funneling this money through a Limited Company (ARPW) or your Sole Trader entity in which case you should be displaying your Full Name on your invoices and website.

    https://www.gov.uk/invoicing-and-taking-payment-from-customers/invoices-what-they-must-include

    https://www.legalo.co.uk/blog/website-legal-requirements/

  • tldr seems to be that there was a misconfiguration and the wrong price got charged for something, apology was issued, and things seem to have been made right. don't know why it's still going on.

  • @sliix said:
    Wait, there’s a drama now on this thread?
    Any TLDR?

    TLDR:
    1. Someone complain about "bundle order" to be canceled
    2. VeloxMedia response with accusing to "DELETE 2 OTHER VPS in the cart"
    3. The guy didnt use the "DELETE 2 OTHER VPS"
    4. Multiple people give proof its indeed not scrape link
    5. VeloxMedia ignoring the proof, and Keep defending its a "SCRAPE LINK"
    6. Some guy Send the proof again
    7. VeloxMedia finally admit the dumb things that we customer do

  • @lewellyn said:
    tldr seems to be that there was a misconfiguration and the wrong price got charged for something, apology was issued, and things seem to have been made right. don't know why it's still going on.

    Or from the other angle:

    Someone followed an order link for 3 crappy VPS for $47. Basket contained 1 crappy VPS for $13 and they bought it.

    Provider accused customer of hacking the site and then doxxed them.

    Other people then tried and found that the customer was right.

    Provider blamed everyone but themselves, only apologising after they realised that everybody agreed with the customer.

    All this for a handful of low-spec servers sold at 1 for $13 instead of 3 for $47. Even if that wasn't the intended deal, the provider could have just honoured what was sold at almost no financial cost and no reputational cost.

  • cz83scz83s Member
    edited December 2025

    @Umcookies said:
    Sometimes I wonder why we have any hosts here at all.

    Can't believe how long this has been drawn out over $13, everyone's got their money back, who's going to give me my time back....

    Not $, but £.

  • I tried to condense it as far as reasonable and impartially. shrug It looked like a misconfiguration, and I concur that the handling of the situation was poor (but that's par for the course around here, and always has been). But it also sounded like everything is resolved now.

    Thanked by 2sliix FAT32
  • @cz83s said:

    @Umcookies said:
    Sometimes I wonder why we have any hosts here at all.

    Can't believe how long this has been drawn out over $13, everyone's got their money back, who's going to give me my time back....

    Not $, but £.

    its 13.2 usd, or 10 pound sterling

    Thanked by 2ralf cz83s
  • cz83scz83s Member
    edited December 2025

    @sliix said:
    Wait, there’s a drama now on this thread?
    Any TLDR?

    -bug, keep your money.
    -no bug, give me product
    
  • @lewellyn said:
    I tried to condense it as far as reasonable and impartially. shrug It looked like a misconfiguration, and I concur that the handling of the situation was poor (but that's par for the course around here, and always has been). But it also sounded like everything is resolved now.

    The drama start when the provider accused the customer to be lie, and importantnly the line "Are you bot" is insulting

  • @chenxuhua said:

    @FAT32 said:
    image

    28/11 09:30

    SmokyHosts: $15.97/yr 4GB VPS in US

    • 2 vCPU
    • 4GB RAM
    • 40GB SSD
    • 800GB @ 1Gbps
    • 1 IPv4
    • Location: Buffalo / Los Angeles, US
    • Quantity: 15
    • Coupon code: bf50offvps
    • $15.97/yr or $40.97/3yr

    image


    Reply with your order ID to get:

    • 4TB Bandwidth instead of 800GB
    • Additional 3 months when prepay for 3 years

    Test IP:

    • Buffalo: 107.174.63.26
    • Los Angeles: 104.223.20.158

    Invoice #3198
    Order Number: 3888653114
    Please help me upgrade to 4TB bandwidth, thank you.

    @SmokyHosts

  • @beanman109 said:

    @VeloxMedia said: VeloxMedia is only under the group ARPW GROUP, they have no deals with VeloxMedia and we are separate. I can not comment on how they run their business, however we are not limited, we are sole traders and do not need to register on companies house.

    ARPW Group is a Limited Company, I'd imagine any 'companies' you're running under it are considered part of your Limited Company, e.g VeloxMedia

    Regardless of that part of it - even if you are a Sole Trader you're required by UK law to display your registration / the names of all individuals involved for this on your website and invoices.

    VeloxMedia isn't a registered entity with CH in the UK so you're either funneling this money through a Limited Company (ARPW) or your Sole Trader entity in which case you should be displaying your Full Name on your invoices and website.

    https://www.gov.uk/invoicing-and-taking-payment-from-customers/invoices-what-they-must-include

    https://www.legalo.co.uk/blog/website-legal-requirements/

    Does this mean they are illegal?

  • FWIW, an example of a similar misconfiguration last year with me and Hosthatch. 10TB server priced same as 5TB for a few minutes. I thought it'd be corrected on the last page, but clicked buy just to test it (if I really wanted to scam them, I'd have gone for 3 years at an even cheaper wrong price instead of 1 year). Contacted HH immediately via DM here, ticket and posting about the mistake in thread. Only reply I got was after the sale and their usual "orders are final and can't be refunded". This year, the renewal invoice was automatically generated and the unintentional discount is still being honoured going forward.

    I felt bad that I'm losing them money on a product that already has razor-thin margins, but equally I can see that it doesn't matter much in the grand scheme of things long-term. The price for 3x one year at the wrong lower price isn't all that much lower than 3 years at the correct price, so they obviously decided that honouring mistakes is better than potentially pissing off a customer (even though I was offering to pay more).

  • @Maki said:

    @cz83s said:

    @Umcookies said:
    Sometimes I wonder why we have any hosts here at all.

    Can't believe how long this has been drawn out over $13, everyone's got their money back, who's going to give me my time back....

    Not $, but £.

    its 13.2 usd, or 10 pound sterling

    First Payment Amount: $13.27USD
    Recurring Amount: $13.27USD
    

    You're right, I was wrong.

  • @ralf said:
    FWIW, an example of a similar misconfiguration last year with me and Hosthatch. 10TB server priced same as 5TB for a few minutes. I thought it'd be corrected on the last page, but clicked buy just to test it (if I really wanted to scam them, I'd have gone for 3 years at an even cheaper wrong price instead of 1 year). Contacted HH immediately via DM here, ticket and posting about the mistake in thread. Only reply I got was after the sale and their usual "orders are final and can't be refunded". This year, the renewal invoice was automatically generated and the unintentional discount is still being honoured going forward.

    I felt bad that I'm losing them money on a product that already has razor-thin margins, but equally I can see that it doesn't matter much in the grand scheme of things long-term. The price for 3x one year at the wrong lower price isn't all that much lower than 3 years at the correct price, so they obviously decided that honouring mistakes is better than potentially pissing off a customer (even though I was offering to pay more).

    W with HostHatch, its our fault, we will honor it

    but here, its our fault, we blame you, fuck with the deal

  • I think the real drama was leak of customer info into these forums by provider.

    Seems folks all forgot this.
    The other issue is really a non-issue after all the apologies and refunds and what not and is not worth beating a dead horse on.

  • @cz83s said:

    @Maki said:

    @cz83s said:

    @Umcookies said:
    Sometimes I wonder why we have any hosts here at all.

    Can't believe how long this has been drawn out over $13, everyone's got their money back, who's going to give me my time back....

    Not $, but £.

    its 13.2 usd, or 10 pound sterling

    First Payment Amount: $13.27USD
    Recurring Amount: $13.27USD
    

    You're right, I was wrong.

    Dont worry, I still have fresh mind about this

    Thanked by 1cz83s
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @Maki said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @VeloxMedia said: VeloxMedia is only under the group ARPW GROUP, they have no deals with VeloxMedia and we are separate. I can not comment on how they run their business, however we are not limited, we are sole traders and do not need to register on companies house.

    ARPW Group is a Limited Company, I'd imagine any 'companies' you're running under it are considered part of your Limited Company, e.g VeloxMedia

    Regardless of that part of it - even if you are a Sole Trader you're required by UK law to display your registration / the names of all individuals involved for this on your website and invoices.

    VeloxMedia isn't a registered entity with CH in the UK so you're either funneling this money through a Limited Company (ARPW) or your Sole Trader entity in which case you should be displaying your Full Name on your invoices and website.

    https://www.gov.uk/invoicing-and-taking-payment-from-customers/invoices-what-they-must-include

    https://www.legalo.co.uk/blog/website-legal-requirements/

    Does this mean they are illegal?

    I'm not a lawyer but probably

    You can't be a sole trader under a 'group' or another company that's for sure, so money from sales is either going through a Limited Company or a Sole Tradership but it's not clear which as they leave all relevant required info about this off of the website and invoices.

    Thanked by 2Maki geo
  • @op23 said:
    I think the real drama was leak of customer info into these forums by provider.

    Seems folks all forgot this.
    The other issue is really a non-issue after all the apologies and refunds and what not and is not worth beating a dead horse on.

    That prob after the root cause of that guy complaining, Its already loud when they start to mocking the customer

  • Vibes right now:

    Thanked by 3Maki cz83s vadiheg
  • @beanman109 said:

    @Maki said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @VeloxMedia said: VeloxMedia is only under the group ARPW GROUP, they have no deals with VeloxMedia and we are separate. I can not comment on how they run their business, however we are not limited, we are sole traders and do not need to register on companies house.

    ARPW Group is a Limited Company, I'd imagine any 'companies' you're running under it are considered part of your Limited Company, e.g VeloxMedia

    Regardless of that part of it - even if you are a Sole Trader you're required by UK law to display your registration / the names of all individuals involved for this on your website and invoices.

    VeloxMedia isn't a registered entity with CH in the UK so you're either funneling this money through a Limited Company (ARPW) or your Sole Trader entity in which case you should be displaying your Full Name on your invoices and website.

    https://www.gov.uk/invoicing-and-taking-payment-from-customers/invoices-what-they-must-include

    https://www.legalo.co.uk/blog/website-legal-requirements/

    Does this mean they are illegal?

    I'm not a lawyer but probably

    You can't be a sole trader under a 'group' or another company that's for sure, so money from sales is either going through a Limited Company or a Sole Tradership but it's not clear which as they leave all relevant required info about this off of the website and invoices.

    I see, now all the invoice isn't lawful, does that mean its nulled?

  • UmcookiesUmcookies Member
    edited December 2025

    @cz83s said:

    @Umcookies said:
    Sometimes I wonder why we have any hosts here at all.

    Can't believe how long this has been drawn out over $13, everyone's got their money back, who's going to give me my time back....

    Not $, but £.

    Could be bilbobuck's for all I care.

    All this badgering over a mistake, incompetence, human error. Pick whichever one makes you sleep better.
    Could Velox have handled it better? Yes.
    Do I think they have a right to cancel service for improperly configured products? Yes.
    For each instance where a single product being ordered put the onus back on the customer, "Hey customer, we apologize but the product you have ordered is part of a bundle deal and can't be ordered individually. Would you like us to issue two additional invoices for the full bundle, or refund?" end of conversation.

    Or as others have pointed out, eat the loss, disable the deal and figure out how the customer has managed to do it.

  • @Maki said:

    @lewellyn said:
    I tried to condense it as far as reasonable and impartially. shrug It looked like a misconfiguration, and I concur that the handling of the situation was poor (but that's par for the course around here, and always has been). But it also sounded like everything is resolved now.

    The drama start when the provider accused the customer to be lie, and importantnly the line "Are you bot" is insulting

    I kinda wish I was a bot actually...

    Thanked by 3ZA_capetown boba cz83s
This discussion has been closed.