Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Naranja's network is somewhat terrible...

13

Comments

  • @nick_ said:
    I'm on a Milan node and I'm still having the same slow network problem as you. It's unusable since purchase. But my Genoa VPS is working fine. It still has a network issue that should have been fixed according to my HetrixTools report.

    I have communicated many times through tickets, and they replied that the test results are not reliable because the network is dynamic over time. However, the results are still not good even with nearby positions. The positive aspect is that they are somewhat stable. After purchasing from other providers and running tests, I am left wondering why the performance is so poor when it shouldn't be.

    Thanked by 1nick_
  • @NaughtyWombat said:

    @nick_ said:
    I'm on a Milan node and I'm still having the same slow network problem as you. It's unusable since purchase. But my Genoa VPS is working fine. It still has a network issue that should have been fixed according to my HetrixTools report.

    I have communicated many times through tickets, and they replied that the test results are not reliable because the network is dynamic over time. However, the results are still not good even with nearby positions. The positive aspect is that they are somewhat stable. After purchasing from other providers and running tests, I am left wondering why the performance is so poor when it shouldn't be.

    So, I am here to see if it is normal for naranjas

  • I just got a down notification for ping test results from Hetrix, which I wasn’t getting for the last few days about Naranjatech.

    It seems like the networking issue is back.

  • webcraftwebcraft Member
    edited April 2025

    @barbaros said:
    I just got a down notification for ping test results from Hetrix, which I wasn’t getting for the last few days about Naranjatech.

    It seems like the networking issue is back.

    Theirs as well as Liteservers are both unusable for the pasts months or probably almost a year already. Sometime last summer the problems started, meanwhile he promises to improve but that was temporary only. It's unstable and virtualizor is buggy too.

    Thanked by 1nick_
  • # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Apr 24 03:10:45 PM EDT 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2999.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 98.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-33-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    ASN        : AS41608 NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Host       : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Location   : Amsterdam, North Holland (NH)
    Country    : The Netherlands
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 166.65 MB/s  (41.6k) | 824.78 MB/s  (12.8k)
    Write      | 167.09 MB/s  (41.7k) | 829.12 MB/s  (12.9k)
    Total      | 333.75 MB/s  (83.4k) | 1.65 GB/s    (25.8k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.13 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.13 GB/s     (1.1k)
    Write      | 1.19 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.20 GB/s     (1.1k)
    Total      | 2.32 GB/s     (4.5k) | 2.33 GB/s     (2.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 341 Mbits/sec   | 146 Mbits/sec   | 9.12 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 369 Mbits/sec   | 432 Mbits/sec   | 4.22 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 322 Mbits/sec   | 43.4 Mbits/sec  | 93.0 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 336 Mbits/sec   | 59.7 Mbits/sec  | 163 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 306 Mbits/sec   | 28.8 Mbits/sec  | 144 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 329 Mbits/sec   | 81.5 Mbits/sec  | 78.0 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 305 Mbits/sec   | 19.1 Mbits/sec  | 192 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 175 Mbits/sec   | 126 Mbits/sec   | 9.11 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 171 Mbits/sec   | 403 Mbits/sec   | 2.32 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 151 Mbits/sec   | 30.6 Mbits/sec  | 91.5 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 133 Mbits/sec   | 64.7 Mbits/sec  | 164 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 154 Mbits/sec   | 34.6 Mbits/sec  | 141 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 152 Mbits/sec   | 85.4 Mbits/sec  | 78.0 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 145 Mbits/sec   | 28.0 Mbits/sec  | 191 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1272                          
    Multi Core      | 2345                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11670515
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 36 sec
    

    @NaughtyWombat here's mine, it is indeed awful, I've let it idle for the past months and never find out the network is that bad.
    definitely will not renew.

  • @gigazil said:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Apr 24 03:10:45 PM EDT 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2999.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 98.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-33-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    ASN        : AS41608 NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Host       : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Location   : Amsterdam, North Holland (NH)
    Country    : The Netherlands
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 166.65 MB/s  (41.6k) | 824.78 MB/s  (12.8k)
    Write      | 167.09 MB/s  (41.7k) | 829.12 MB/s  (12.9k)
    Total      | 333.75 MB/s  (83.4k) | 1.65 GB/s    (25.8k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.13 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.13 GB/s     (1.1k)
    Write      | 1.19 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.20 GB/s     (1.1k)
    Total      | 2.32 GB/s     (4.5k) | 2.33 GB/s     (2.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 341 Mbits/sec   | 146 Mbits/sec   | 9.12 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 369 Mbits/sec   | 432 Mbits/sec   | 4.22 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 322 Mbits/sec   | 43.4 Mbits/sec  | 93.0 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 336 Mbits/sec   | 59.7 Mbits/sec  | 163 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 306 Mbits/sec   | 28.8 Mbits/sec  | 144 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 329 Mbits/sec   | 81.5 Mbits/sec  | 78.0 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 305 Mbits/sec   | 19.1 Mbits/sec  | 192 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 175 Mbits/sec   | 126 Mbits/sec   | 9.11 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 171 Mbits/sec   | 403 Mbits/sec   | 2.32 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 151 Mbits/sec   | 30.6 Mbits/sec  | 91.5 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 133 Mbits/sec   | 64.7 Mbits/sec  | 164 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 154 Mbits/sec   | 34.6 Mbits/sec  | 141 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 152 Mbits/sec   | 85.4 Mbits/sec  | 78.0 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 145 Mbits/sec   | 28.0 Mbits/sec  | 191 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1272                          
    Multi Core      | 2345                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11670515
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 36 sec
    

    @NaughtyWombat here's mine, it is indeed awful, I've let it idle for the past months and never find out the network is that bad.
    definitely will not renew.

    I did YABS on one of my Naranjatech servers (I have like 3 other). I noticed that the GB6 score is decreased drastically , but network isn't terrible as yours. Nonetheless, I will cancel this one also

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 26 days, 2 hours, 43 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 1 @ 2350.000 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 1.9 GiB
    Swap : 255.0 MiB
    Disk : 29.2 GiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-32-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:

    ISP : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    ASN : AS41608 NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Host : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Location : Amsterdam, North Holland (NH)
    Country : The Netherlands

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 148.39 MB/s (37.0k) 1.34 GB/s (20.9k)
    Write 148.78 MB/s (37.1k) 1.34 GB/s (21.0k)
    Total 297.17 MB/s (74.2k) 2.69 GB/s (42.0k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 3.80 GB/s (7.4k) 4.66 GB/s (4.5k)
    Write 4.00 GB/s (7.8k) 4.97 GB/s (4.8k)
    Total 7.81 GB/s (15.2k) 9.64 GB/s (9.4k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 821 Mbits/sec 171 Mbits/sec 9.09 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 844 Mbits/sec 796 Mbits/sec 1.84 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 449 Mbits/sec 44.0 Mbits/sec 94.7 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 341 Mbits/sec 178 Mbits/sec 161 ms
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 392 Mbits/sec 40.6 Mbits/sec 140 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 282 Mbits/sec 324 Mbits/sec 81.2 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 338 Mbits/sec 132 Mbits/sec 199 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 848 Mbits/sec 167 Mbits/sec 8.91 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 861 Mbits/sec busy 2.20 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 478 Mbits/sec 25.8 Mbits/sec 93.5 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 349 Mbits/sec 241 Mbits/sec --
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 422 Mbits/sec 176 Mbits/sec 140 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 458 Mbits/sec 511 Mbits/sec 78.6 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 287 Mbits/sec 132 Mbits/sec 223 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 614
    Multi Core | 627
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11670822

    YABS completed in 23 min 53 sec

  • @barbaros said:

    @gigazil said:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Apr 24 03:10:45 PM EDT 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2999.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 98.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-33-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    ASN        : AS41608 NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Host       : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Location   : Amsterdam, North Holland (NH)
    Country    : The Netherlands
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 166.65 MB/s  (41.6k) | 824.78 MB/s  (12.8k)
    Write      | 167.09 MB/s  (41.7k) | 829.12 MB/s  (12.9k)
    Total      | 333.75 MB/s  (83.4k) | 1.65 GB/s    (25.8k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.13 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.13 GB/s     (1.1k)
    Write      | 1.19 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.20 GB/s     (1.1k)
    Total      | 2.32 GB/s     (4.5k) | 2.33 GB/s     (2.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 341 Mbits/sec   | 146 Mbits/sec   | 9.12 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 369 Mbits/sec   | 432 Mbits/sec   | 4.22 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 322 Mbits/sec   | 43.4 Mbits/sec  | 93.0 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 336 Mbits/sec   | 59.7 Mbits/sec  | 163 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 306 Mbits/sec   | 28.8 Mbits/sec  | 144 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 329 Mbits/sec   | 81.5 Mbits/sec  | 78.0 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 305 Mbits/sec   | 19.1 Mbits/sec  | 192 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 175 Mbits/sec   | 126 Mbits/sec   | 9.11 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 171 Mbits/sec   | 403 Mbits/sec   | 2.32 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 151 Mbits/sec   | 30.6 Mbits/sec  | 91.5 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 133 Mbits/sec   | 64.7 Mbits/sec  | 164 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 154 Mbits/sec   | 34.6 Mbits/sec  | 141 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 152 Mbits/sec   | 85.4 Mbits/sec  | 78.0 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 145 Mbits/sec   | 28.0 Mbits/sec  | 191 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1272                          
    Multi Core      | 2345                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11670515
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 36 sec
    

    @NaughtyWombat here's mine, it is indeed awful, I've let it idle for the past months and never find out the network is that bad.
    definitely will not renew.

    I did YABS on one of my Naranjatech servers (I have like 3 other). I noticed that the GB6 score is decreased drastically , but network isn't terrible as yours. Nonetheless, I will cancel this one also

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 26 days, 2 hours, 43 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 1 @ 2350.000 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 1.9 GiB
    Swap : 255.0 MiB
    Disk : 29.2 GiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-32-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:

    ISP : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    ASN : AS41608 NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Host : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Location : Amsterdam, North Holland (NH)
    Country : The Netherlands

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 148.39 MB/s (37.0k) 1.34 GB/s (20.9k)
    Write 148.78 MB/s (37.1k) 1.34 GB/s (21.0k)
    Total 297.17 MB/s (74.2k) 2.69 GB/s (42.0k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 3.80 GB/s (7.4k) 4.66 GB/s (4.5k)
    Write 4.00 GB/s (7.8k) 4.97 GB/s (4.8k)
    Total 7.81 GB/s (15.2k) 9.64 GB/s (9.4k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 821 Mbits/sec 171 Mbits/sec 9.09 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 844 Mbits/sec 796 Mbits/sec 1.84 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 449 Mbits/sec 44.0 Mbits/sec 94.7 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 341 Mbits/sec 178 Mbits/sec 161 ms
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 392 Mbits/sec 40.6 Mbits/sec 140 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 282 Mbits/sec 324 Mbits/sec 81.2 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 338 Mbits/sec 132 Mbits/sec 199 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 848 Mbits/sec 167 Mbits/sec 8.91 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 861 Mbits/sec busy 2.20 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 478 Mbits/sec 25.8 Mbits/sec 93.5 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 349 Mbits/sec 241 Mbits/sec --
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 422 Mbits/sec 176 Mbits/sec 140 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 458 Mbits/sec 511 Mbits/sec 78.6 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 287 Mbits/sec 132 Mbits/sec 223 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 614
    Multi Core | 627
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11670822

    YABS completed in 23 min 53 sec

    Thanks for the information. I will definitely not renew the service too.

  • nick_nick_ Member

    Me neither. Will not renew both providers.

  • remyremy Member

    It's sad to see that a provider with such a good reputation doesn't give any answers.
    I didn't create a ticket, thinking that some had. That’s the case ?

  • @remy said:
    It's sad to see that a provider with such a good reputation doesn't give any answers.
    I didn't create a ticket, thinking that some had. That’s the case ?

    I think so but only empty promises.

  • Mine is not on epyc's node and been great so far.

    Fri Apr 25 10:13:57 CEST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 143 days, 15 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6126 CPU @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2599.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 2.0 GiB
    Disk       : 46.9 GiB
    Distro     : Slackware 15.0 x86_64
    Kernel     : 5.15.161
    VM Type    :
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    ASN        : AS41608 NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Host       : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Location   : Amsterdam, North Holland (NH)
    Country    : The Netherlands
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/root):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 6.41 MB/s     (1.6k) | 73.88 MB/s    (1.1k)
    Write      | 6.42 MB/s     (1.6k) | 74.26 MB/s    (1.1k)
    Total      | 12.83 MB/s    (3.2k) | 148.15 MB/s   (2.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 338.95 MB/s    (662) | 330.76 MB/s    (323)
    Write      | 356.96 MB/s    (697) | 352.79 MB/s    (344)
    Total      | 695.91 MB/s   (1.3k) | 683.55 MB/s    (667)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 895 Mbits/sec   | 767 Mbits/sec   | 8.89 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 885 Mbits/sec   | 852 Mbits/sec   | 1.82 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 662 Mbits/sec   | 694 Mbits/sec   | 92.3 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 344 Mbits/sec   | 471 Mbits/sec   | 164 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 497 Mbits/sec   | 637 Mbits/sec   | 145 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 802 Mbits/sec   | 677 Mbits/sec   | 77.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 389 Mbits/sec   | 544 Mbits/sec   | 189 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 884 Mbits/sec   | 853 Mbits/sec   | 8.77 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 857 Mbits/sec   | 900 Mbits/sec   | 1.66 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 550 Mbits/sec   | 684 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 459 Mbits/sec   | 603 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 573 Mbits/sec   | 747 Mbits/sec   | 145 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 715 Mbits/sec   | 673 Mbits/sec   | --
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 382 Mbits/sec   | 512 Mbits/sec   | 189 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 842
    Multi Core      | 838
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11678329
    
    YABS completed in 20 min 48 sec
    

  • NaughtyWombatNaughtyWombat Member
    edited April 2025

    @emperor said:
    Mine is not on epyc's node and been great so far.

    Fri Apr 25 10:13:57 CEST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 143 days, 15 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6126 CPU @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2599.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 2.0 GiB
    Disk       : 46.9 GiB
    Distro     : Slackware 15.0 x86_64
    Kernel     : 5.15.161
    VM Type    :
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    ASN        : AS41608 NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Host       : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Location   : Amsterdam, North Holland (NH)
    Country    : The Netherlands
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/root):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 6.41 MB/s     (1.6k) | 73.88 MB/s    (1.1k)
    Write      | 6.42 MB/s     (1.6k) | 74.26 MB/s    (1.1k)
    Total      | 12.83 MB/s    (3.2k) | 148.15 MB/s   (2.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 338.95 MB/s    (662) | 330.76 MB/s    (323)
    Write      | 356.96 MB/s    (697) | 352.79 MB/s    (344)
    Total      | 695.91 MB/s   (1.3k) | 683.55 MB/s    (667)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 895 Mbits/sec   | 767 Mbits/sec   | 8.89 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 885 Mbits/sec   | 852 Mbits/sec   | 1.82 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 662 Mbits/sec   | 694 Mbits/sec   | 92.3 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 344 Mbits/sec   | 471 Mbits/sec   | 164 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 497 Mbits/sec   | 637 Mbits/sec   | 145 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 802 Mbits/sec   | 677 Mbits/sec   | 77.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 389 Mbits/sec   | 544 Mbits/sec   | 189 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 884 Mbits/sec   | 853 Mbits/sec   | 8.77 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 857 Mbits/sec   | 900 Mbits/sec   | 1.66 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 550 Mbits/sec   | 684 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 459 Mbits/sec   | 603 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 573 Mbits/sec   | 747 Mbits/sec   | 145 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 715 Mbits/sec   | 673 Mbits/sec   | --
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 382 Mbits/sec   | 512 Mbits/sec   | 189 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 842
    Multi Core      | 838
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11678329
    
    YABS completed in 20 min 48 sec
    

    They apparently treated the users differently.

  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited April 2025

    @emperor said:
    Mine is not on epyc's node and been great so far.

    Those micro-disconnections usually lasted only a few seconds, and since they came from their uplink, LiteServer, I doubt you were immune to them. They might not have been caught by the 1 minute monitoring interval check.
    My UptimeRobot checks didn't notice them either, but my regular Irssi (dis)connections to various networks did.

    It's not like downtime that lasts for minutes. It's more of a recurring network blip, then it's okay until the next day or so.

    Thanked by 1emperor
  • @emperor said:
    Mine is not on epyc's node and been great so far.

    Fri Apr 25 10:13:57 CEST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 143 days, 15 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6126 CPU @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2599.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 2.0 GiB
    Disk       : 46.9 GiB
    Distro     : Slackware 15.0 x86_64
    Kernel     : 5.15.161
    VM Type    :
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    ASN        : AS41608 NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Host       : NextGenWebs, S.L.
    Location   : Amsterdam, North Holland (NH)
    Country    : The Netherlands
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/root):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 6.41 MB/s     (1.6k) | 73.88 MB/s    (1.1k)
    Write      | 6.42 MB/s     (1.6k) | 74.26 MB/s    (1.1k)
    Total      | 12.83 MB/s    (3.2k) | 148.15 MB/s   (2.3k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 338.95 MB/s    (662) | 330.76 MB/s    (323)
    Write      | 356.96 MB/s    (697) | 352.79 MB/s    (344)
    Total      | 695.91 MB/s   (1.3k) | 683.55 MB/s    (667)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 895 Mbits/sec   | 767 Mbits/sec   | 8.89 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 885 Mbits/sec   | 852 Mbits/sec   | 1.82 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 662 Mbits/sec   | 694 Mbits/sec   | 92.3 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 344 Mbits/sec   | 471 Mbits/sec   | 164 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 497 Mbits/sec   | 637 Mbits/sec   | 145 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 802 Mbits/sec   | 677 Mbits/sec   | 77.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 389 Mbits/sec   | 544 Mbits/sec   | 189 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 884 Mbits/sec   | 853 Mbits/sec   | 8.77 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 857 Mbits/sec   | 900 Mbits/sec   | 1.66 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 550 Mbits/sec   | 684 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 459 Mbits/sec   | 603 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 573 Mbits/sec   | 747 Mbits/sec   | 145 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 715 Mbits/sec   | 673 Mbits/sec   | --
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 382 Mbits/sec   | 512 Mbits/sec   | 189 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 842
    Multi Core      | 838
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11678329
    
    YABS completed in 20 min 48 sec
    

    Setup a ping check on the IP, I used Hetrix, and choose random regions. You will get ping timeouts from certain regions every day or in a day or two.

    The issue as it mentioned is random short time ping losses. Before I set up the ping test, I thought I don't had those issues either.

  • @Mumbly said: Those micro-disconnections usually lasted only a few seconds, and since they came from their uplink, LiteServer, I doubt you were immune to them.

    Yes i've seen this on my server status page, both LiteServer and Naranja goes offline for 1-2-5 sec then come back.

    Thanked by 2Mumbly nick_
  • RamsterdamRamsterdam Member
    edited April 2025

    @Mumbly said:

    @emperor said:
    Mine is not on epyc's node and been great so far.

    Those micro-disconnections usually lasted only a few seconds, and since they came from their uplink, LiteServer, I doubt you were immune to them. They might not have been caught by the 1 minute monitoring interval check.
    My UptimeRobot checks didn't notice them either, but my regular Irssi (dis)connections to various networks did.

    It's not like downtime that lasts for minutes. It's more of a recurring network blip, then it's okay until the next day or so.

    Which is a nightmare for any TCP hosted app. For a webserver that's not an issue but on the TCP side it's simply not usable whatsoever. I wonder if there will be any compensation of any kind for those who have been affected by this issue for the past several months @naranjatech

  • @Ramsterdam said:

    @Mumbly said:

    @emperor said:
    Mine is not on epyc's node and been great so far.

    Those micro-disconnections usually lasted only a few seconds, and since they came from their uplink, LiteServer, I doubt you were immune to them. They might not have been caught by the 1 minute monitoring interval check.
    My UptimeRobot checks didn't notice them either, but my regular Irssi (dis)connections to various networks did.

    It's not like downtime that lasts for minutes. It's more of a recurring network blip, then it's okay until the next day or so.

    Which is a nightmare for any TCP hosted app. For a webserver that's not an issue but on the TCP side it's simply not usable whatsoever. I wonder if there will be any compensation of any kind for those who have been affected by this issue for the past several months @naranjatech

    They will just return back on BF and throw around some deals and then leave the LET till next BF again. Tagging them is useless.

  • @heartbeat_IT seems to be using the same network as well, exact behavior with multiple micro-disconnections.

  • nick_nick_ Member

    @Ramsterdam said:
    @heartbeat_IT seems to be using the same network as well, exact behavior with multiple micro-disconnections.

    Nope, they are not using the same DC.

  • @Ramsterdam said:
    @heartbeat_IT seems to be using the same network as well, exact behavior with multiple micro-disconnections.

    Is that still going on btw? They had some long maintenance recently, wondering if that issue is solved or not.

  • @nick_ said: Nope, they are not using the same DC.

    Thanks for confirming, guess I'll submit a ticket if this continues.

    @barbaros said: Is that still going on btw? They had some long maintenance recently, wondering if that issue is solved or not.

    Are you asking about heartbeat or LiteServer/Naranja? If it's heartbeat, they've been pretty stable since the middle of this month except yesterday when they had like 7-8 small outages of about <1m each. It happened around the same time with my LiteServer and Naranja servers before as well so thought they're using the same DC as well but guess it was a coincidence.

  • naranjatechnaranjatech Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2025

    @Ramsterdam @barbaros @nick_ @emperor @Mumbly @NaughtyWombat @webcraft @remy @gigazil Anybody who has experience the neywork issues, please PM me with your email address for the client area and the ticket id about the issue and we will get back to you with something!

  • A bit late, isn't it?

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • naranjatechnaranjatech Member, Patron Provider

    @ascicode said:
    A bit late, isn't it?

    Better late than never! I don't login to LET very often (once or twice per year) and missed this completely, my apologies.

  • @naranjatech said:

    @ascicode said:
    A bit late, isn't it?

    Better late than never! I don't login to LET very often (once or twice per year) and missed this completely, my apologies.

    you didn't login to check tickets either?

  • @barbaros said:

    @Ramsterdam said:

    @Mumbly said:

    @emperor said:
    Mine is not on epyc's node and been great so far.

    Those micro-disconnections usually lasted only a few seconds, and since they came from their uplink, LiteServer, I doubt you were immune to them. They might not have been caught by the 1 minute monitoring interval check.
    My UptimeRobot checks didn't notice them either, but my regular Irssi (dis)connections to various networks did.

    It's not like downtime that lasts for minutes. It's more of a recurring network blip, then it's okay until the next day or so.

    Which is a nightmare for any TCP hosted app. For a webserver that's not an issue but on the TCP side it's simply not usable whatsoever. I wonder if there will be any compensation of any kind for those who have been affected by this issue for the past several months @naranjatech

    They will just return back on BF and throw around some deals and then leave the LET till next BF again. Tagging them is useless.

    Ehm.

  • naranjatechnaranjatech Member, Patron Provider

    @zGato said:

    @naranjatech said:

    @ascicode said:
    A bit late, isn't it?

    Better late than never! I don't login to LET very often (once or twice per year) and missed this completely, my apologies.

    you didn't login to check tickets either?

    I don't handle tickets myself. That's why I am asking for this info to get this issue solved for the future!

  • Hey,

    I never openeded a ticket, but I am sure I was affected too, what can I get?!
    /s

  • @naranjatech said:

    @ascicode said:
    A bit late, isn't it?

    Better late than never! I don't login to LET very often (once or twice per year) and missed this completely, my apologies.

    You don't login to your ticket system either, maybe also once or twice per year?

    I'm sure your ticketing is full of reports of horrible networking right now, but you just ignore them, right?

    Thanked by 1Ramsterdam
  • naranjatechnaranjatech Member, Patron Provider

    @maverick said:

    @naranjatech said:

    @ascicode said:
    A bit late, isn't it?

    Better late than never! I don't login to LET very often (once or twice per year) and missed this completely, my apologies.

    You don't login to your ticket system either, maybe also once or twice per year?

    I'm sure your ticketing is full of reports of horrible networking right now, but you just ignore them, right?

    No, like I said: I don't handle tickets myself. That's why I am asking for this info to get this issue solved for the future!

Sign In or Register to comment.