All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Introducing ServerVerify: built with the LowEndTalk community in mind
Hi Everyone,
We’re excited to share that ServerVerify, a new platform created to track hosting provider reviews and benchmarks, will launch publicly on Monday, September 15.
ServerVerify makes it easy to:
- Track the Leaderboard to see what hosts are performing best
- See YABS benchmarks linked directly to each provider
- Compare providers with reviews from the community
- Spot verified coupons and deals
- Explore enhanced connections between LowEndTalk, LowEndBox, and ServerVerify
Soon hosts featured on LowEndBox will have their offers measured by ServerVerify as a way to promote improved performance for the end user. We hope to see the same theme happen naturally at LowEndTalk.
Behind the scenes, we’ve added features like provider replies to reviews, benchmark reporting, and a faster system overall, making sure the data you see is clean and trustworthy all thanks to the feedback from LowEndTalk hosting providers the past few weeks.
We built this platform with the LowEndTalk community at its core, and your input, benchmarks, and reviews are what make it valuable. Once live, we encourage you to log in, explore, and share your feedback.
So checkout ServerVerify.com and let us know what you think!
Best,
Jon


Comments
How much for a sponsored listing?
https://wnyitservices.com/
If someone wonders who's behind this project.
Nice work @jbiloh and team — exciting to see this come together!
Does it come with deadpool tracker?
MORE CORES == MORE SCORE?
Amazing CPU measuring system.
https://serververify.com/benchmarks/95233f62-d478-45e9-b858-a9f6c5d19746
1884 single core score GB6 = CPU Top 3.75% A
https://serververify.com/benchmarks/0f99c53a-a56e-4c86-8152-a2fb979b358d
2136 single core score GB6 = CPU Top 26.99% B
https://serververify.com/benchmarks/e506c054-f50b-4747-a180-8cafede2317b
1687 single core score GB6 = CPU Top 17.28% A
Why, how?
Make that fucking ranking per single core and multicore.
@jsg can you please confirm this benchmark scoring system?
Yes, this is part of the LowEndBox ecosystem. There is actually a picture of LowEndBox on the ServerVerify About page.
More cores usually helps performance.
It looks like LEB clone.
It's a usable feature.
So let me see if I got this right. You scraped the YABS from this forum, and maybe elsewhere, and some of those YABS are 5 years old, and am using that as current benchmarks ?
granted I only followed up on one result. But the shear number of entries you already leads me to believe a whole lot of older data was scraped.
https://serververify.com/benchmarks/905d63cb-56d3-498b-9b3b-1e47b1d40527
Its a good start. this could benefit from:
better filtering . EG: I want to look at racknerd vps with 4gb of ram and a E5-2680 v2 processor. Limit YABS from last 6 months.
a value score. EG: YABS / cost.
I didnt look at but saw the 'coupons'. I think that will be a hit.
possible to detect subnet prefix length for ipv6?
and mention it somewhere, like, /64 available.
If I try to login to this website with my email, it says my email is invalid regardless of upper or lowercase.
If I try a password recovery, it says email is invalid, unless I capitalize the first letter.
After password recovery I am logged in.
If I logout, I need to do another password recovery to login, since login won't accept my email.
I hope this gets fixed
I think it's a good project, but I understand that each project has its costs. Having advertising for almost 90% of a single CC provider on LowEndTalk and LowEndBox is important. Now, you should verify and analyze what's best for you and give other providers the opportunity to advertise
In this project, you have advertising for companies that are blocked on LET/LOWENDBOX
It's just a suggestion, and it looks promising
Yes, we pulled the yabs from LowEndBox and LowEndTalk. Every single yabs was reviewed by a human (mostly me) for accuracy of assignment and validity of the data. There are still probably some bad yabs in there which will get user reported over time.
We are working on advanced search and better filtering right now. Expecting to release that by end of next week.
We've been working on this for over a year and eventually you've gotta just get it released otherwise feature creep will keep you in pre release dev mode forever.
Please send me a pm with the email you are trying to use and we'll get this big fixed super fast.
Thanks for the feedback.
We have 5 paid advertisers for banners now. We are accepting more. If you want to chat just send me a pm.
With the reviews, allow an indication of what the server is being used for eg. Web hosting, AI LLMs, idling, etc…
Great idea! We will add this to our project tracker for implementation.
Consider that a lot of users here only have 1 or 2 cores. The performance of an individual core is far more important than the multi-core performance. I just got some Xeon Platinums that would demolish almost everything in multi-core but be very slow for a lot of things people want VPS for.
It's probably a good idea if you clarify where the reviews are coming from.
The majority of them is from random usernames and even ignoring the usernames, I can't find any of the reviews on LET either.
Not just for the users, but also for the companies on there.
I imagine some providers are not really fond of the fact to have random reviews.
1:“Hosting Services”cannot be sorted and you cannot edit items that have already been added.
2:“Add Service” No bandwidth/option for traffic and IPv4/IPv6/Port Speed
Can they be added?
Good feedback, thank you. We will consider how we can incorporate this into the algorithm.
Are you talking about being able to sort them on the public side or provider side?
provider side
Can you pm me a screenshot of what you have in mind?
Thanks for the suggestions!!
Do you list these important networking related metrics?
I had GPT write a demo.
Where do you think that should be presented?
On the provider profile?
Please allow registration / login with Google
(or even LET credentials - not sure if the forum software has an api or if databases would need to be synced)
It is already synced to lowendtalk.