Introducing ServerVerify: built with the LowEndTalk community in mind

jbiloh

@varwww said:
73100 reviews, 5445 benchmarks? How did you guys sort all this data, AI API?

It ended up being all manual as the accuracy levels weren't high enough as on lowendtalk it wasn't clear enough who the data should be assigned to.

Many, many, many hours of work.

Still not perfect but it's getting better every day.

xvps

@FAT32 said:

@Advin said:

@FAT32 said:

@Advin said:

@beanman109 said:

@Advin said:

@beanman109 said:

@Advin said: Quite a few benchmarks are mislabeled as being from 1GServers, Scaleblade, or MassiveGRID instead of Advin Servers. How did it even come to this conclusion?

It's simple really, @jbiloh bought the $30 Claude plan and banged this out in a month in between the rate limits and the 72,000 auto generated AI reviews 'anonymized' reviews before the subscription expired.

Anyways, I threw in one of our idling servers for fun:

https://serververify.com/benchmarks/dd55001c-56d8-4204-a15e-c567209123f2

Idling 128 cores is a crazy flex.. any ServerVerify launch day deals to celebrate?

I've created a promo code called beanman109 that applies to any product on our site to celebrate the launch of ServerVerify

Idling 128 cores is a crazy flex

It's broken, so that's why it's idling

When fat32 promo code

I've made a promo code called fat32 which applies to any product on our site to celebrate the launch of ServerVerify

Man never know my code is 300x better than @beanman109

Since you guys are already using AI to generate content:

Let’s carefully unpack this.

A –300% discount code means the price increases instead of decreases.

Example: If a product costs $100, applying –300% means you add $300, making the price $400.

In other words, the code is worse than useless, because it makes everything more expensive.

A $0.01 discount code means you reduce the price by 1 cent, regardless of the original cost.

On a $1 item, that’s 1% off.

On a $100 item, that’s only 0.01% off.

But it is always an actual discount.

So:

The –300% code isn’t a “discount” at all, it’s the opposite — it’s a surcharge.

The $0.01 code is infinitely better, because one actually lowers the price while the other raises it.

👉 Mathematically: Any positive discount compared to a negative “discount” is better by an infinite factor, since you can’t divide by negative benefit.

Regards

jbiloh

@jbiloh said:

@Hosteroid said:

@jbiloh said:

@Hosteroid said:
@jbiloh
How can we clear out benchmarks that are not complete and hence have very low score:
https://serververify.com/benchmarks?provider=hosteroid&page=1 ?

Hit the "Report' button next to any benchmark that you would like the admin team to review.

I do not see REPORT button anywhere, but this benchmark is in question:
https://serververify.com/benchmarks/a6a52926-3a3d-4192-ad6d-9a472bce89d7

Are you logged in? It's near the top next to the grade.

I think you've got it now, right?

ascicode

@zed said:

@rustelekom said:

@jbiloh said:

@rustelekom said:
Maybe it would be useful if you could add the native YABS report as an export option too.

On the bottom of every benchmark page this exists:

Hm, in my browser it seems like:

I have check in Yandex.Browser and in FireFox.

same

(Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:142.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/142.0)

Copy the visible code, or mean a txt file?

jbiloh

@rustelekom said:

@jbiloh said:

@rustelekom said:
Maybe it would be useful if you could add the native YABS report as an export option too.

On the bottom of every benchmark page this exists:

Hm, in my browser it seems like:

I have check in Yandex.Browser and in FireFox.

What is the URL of the benchmark you are referring to?

default

@beanman109 said:

@Hosteroid said:

@jbiloh said:

@Hosteroid said:
@jbiloh
How can we clear out benchmarks that are not complete and hence have very low score:
https://serververify.com/benchmarks?provider=hosteroid&page=1 ?

Hit the "Report' button next to any benchmark that you would like the admin team to review.

I do not see REPORT button anywhere, but this benchmark is in question:
https://serververify.com/benchmarks/a6a52926-3a3d-4192-ad6d-9a472bce89d7

BilohAI hallucinating (features) money again

There, fixed that for you.

zed

@jbiloh said:

@rustelekom said:

@jbiloh said:

@rustelekom said:
Maybe it would be useful if you could add the native YABS report as an export option too.

On the bottom of every benchmark page this exists:

Hm, in my browser it seems like:

I have check in Yandex.Browser and in FireFox.

What is the URL of the benchmark you are referring to?

I just grabbed the first one on the page https://serververify.com/benchmarks/77ecb812-2293-4e5c-9391-7c99b6637031

rustelekom

@jbiloh said:

@rustelekom said:

@jbiloh said:

@rustelekom said:
Maybe it would be useful if you could add the native YABS report as an export option too.

On the bottom of every benchmark page this exists:

Hm, in my browser it seems like:

I have check in Yandex.Browser and in FireFox.

What is the URL of the benchmark you are referring to?

Here is it https://serververify.com/benchmarks/42b5e40c-6d6d-406f-bd16-2f59ed7c14c8

Advin

@beanman109 said:

@Advin said:

@beanman109 said:

@FAT32 said:

@Advin said:

@FAT32 said:

@Advin said:

@beanman109 said:

@Advin said:

@beanman109 said:

@Advin said: Quite a few benchmarks are mislabeled as being from 1GServers, Scaleblade, or MassiveGRID instead of Advin Servers. How did it even come to this conclusion?

It's simple really, @jbiloh bought the $30 Claude plan and banged this out in a month in between the rate limits and the 72,000 auto generated AI reviews 'anonymized' reviews before the subscription expired.

Anyways, I threw in one of our idling servers for fun:

https://serververify.com/benchmarks/dd55001c-56d8-4204-a15e-c567209123f2

Idling 128 cores is a crazy flex.. any ServerVerify launch day deals to celebrate?

I've created a promo code called beanman109 that applies to any product on our site to celebrate the launch of ServerVerify

Idling 128 cores is a crazy flex

It's broken, so that's why it's idling

When fat32 promo code

I've made a promo code called fat32 which applies to any product on our site to celebrate the launch of ServerVerify

Man never know my code is 300x better than @beanman109

Struggling to decide if I should go with the $0.01 discount or the -300%

I’d prefer if you went with the -300%. I’m starting to run out of caviar and I’m close to pawning off my Lamborghini. Any dollar amount would help.

Okay done. Please keep me in mind while you drive off into the sunset with my 22k crypto
Order Number: 4162375939 please double my $12 VPS coupon codes

That’s wild

default

If I would have the financial stability, I would buy that -300% offer, just to show @Advin that I care about his business.

FAT32

@default said:
If I would have the financial stability, I would buy that -300% offer, just to show @Advin that I care about his business.

Same here but I don't have a deep pocket like @beanman109

tentor

@FAT32 said:

@default said:
If I would have the financial stability, I would buy that -300% offer, just to show @Advin that I care about his business.

Same here but I don't have a deep pocket like @beanman109

Secret of his deep pocket is $0/year VPS

jbiloh

@rustelekom said:

@jbiloh said:

@rustelekom said:

@jbiloh said:

@rustelekom said:
Maybe it would be useful if you could add the native YABS report as an export option too.

On the bottom of every benchmark page this exists:

Hm, in my browser it seems like:

I have check in Yandex.Browser and in FireFox.

What is the URL of the benchmark you are referring to?

Here is it https://serververify.com/benchmarks/42b5e40c-6d6d-406f-bd16-2f59ed7c14c8

I've added to our dev tracker to clean up the raw results that are generated from script-ran (aka ServerVerify) YABS so they look more like the ones scraped from LowEndTalk (cleaner to the eye).

Protocol903

@jbiloh Hey.
Found stupid bug:
1) This is classifying it as "Kimsufi" even tho provider is Netcup.
https://serververify.com/benchmarks/011d3d39-9c8f-4e1c-9e5a-21955f4aae88

2) It is syncing my old username even tho that username doesn't exist anymore:
https://serververify.com/benchmarks/011d3d39-9c8f-4e1c-9e5a-21955f4aae88

jbiloh

@Protocol903 said: 1) This is classifying it as "Kimsufi" even tho provider is Netcup.

Fixed, thank you. Let us know if you see any other cases like that.

@Protocol903 said: 2) It is syncing my old username even tho that username doesn't exist anymore:

I will see if we can improve this. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

beanman109

@tentor said:

@FAT32 said:

@default said:
If I would have the financial stability, I would buy that -300% offer, just to show @Advin that I care about his business.

Same here but I don't have a deep pocket like @beanman109

Secret of his deep pocket is $0/year VPS

Stop snitching

emgh

@beanman109 said:

@tentor said:

@FAT32 said:

@default said:
If I would have the financial stability, I would buy that -300% offer, just to show @Advin that I care about his business.

Same here but I don't have a deep pocket like @beanman109

Secret of his deep pocket is $0/year VPS

Stop snitching

What was the company called? Berry’s Servers?

tentor

@beanman109 said:

@tentor said:

@FAT32 said:

@default said:
If I would have the financial stability, I would buy that -300% offer, just to show @Advin that I care about his business.

Same here but I don't have a deep pocket like @beanman109

Secret of his deep pocket is $0/year VPS

Stop snitching

When DMing me you automatically accepted my ToS allowing to share the good dealz publicly

emgh

I can see this being really helpful. Is there an option to leave a tip/donate?

jbiloh

@emgh said: Berry’s Servers?

Fun fact, Berry's Servers (or "Berry's World") used to be the name of a large UK-based game server provider which I was once a customer of for a 32 slot SOF2 game server. Circa 2002.

plumberg

@jbiloh said:

@zed said:
should have just said they were placeholders @Jbiloh but jokes aside, good luck with it

Thanks

We put a ton of work into this.

We'll keep making it better over the next few days, weeks and months.

In addition to all this great feedback we've gotten so far what would be helpful is if folks start processing benchmarks plus leaving reviews.

Just like how spamming posts with double bandwidth was debated and a fix was just round the corner.

Good going!

plumberg

@jbiloh said:.

Right now the data is somewhere around 92-95% ish accurate, but there will still be incorrect assignments that need to be corrected.

Thank you!!

Wondering where these stats came from

I have heard llms are prone to hallucinations

plumberg

@jbiloh said:

@rustelekom said:
Maybe it would be useful if you could add the native YABS report as an export option too.

On the bottom of every benchmark page this exists:

Sure.

Let customers be guinea pigs and have them fiz the ai generated mess.

I am saying this with 92-94% accuracy

plumberg

@jbiloh said:

@varwww said:
73100 reviews, 5445 benchmarks? How did you guys sort all this data, AI API?

It ended up being all manual as the accuracy levels weren't high enough as on lowendtalk it wasn't clear enough who the data should be assigned to.

Many, many, many hours of work.

Still not perfect but it's getting better every day.

Sigh,
I wish many many many hours of work was out in other items like preventing spam double bandwidth

But sure this is important

jbiloh

@plumberg said: Wondering where these stats came from

Based on my auditing 3000 of the benchmark assignments and the corrections that needed to be made in that review list.

paroxsitic

Where did the reviews and their stars come from?

I don't think they came from LEB or LET, cant find anything relating to this company yet 2700 reviews https://serververify.com/hosting-providers/smarteraspnet

default

@paroxsitic said:
Where did the reviews and their stars come from?

I don't think they came from LEB or LET, cant find anything relating to this company yet 2700 reviews https://serververify.com/hosting-providers/smarteraspnet

Levi

@paroxsitic said:
Where did the reviews and their stars come from?

I don't think they came from LEB or LET, cant find anything relating to this company yet 2700 reviews https://serververify.com/hosting-providers/smarteraspnet

It was carefully predetermined by AI.

hostnamaste

Many Congratulations to @jbiloh and team, very nice work.

xvps

@paroxsitic said:
Where did the reviews and their stars come from?

I don't think they came from LEB or LET, cant find anything relating to this company yet 2700 reviews https://serververify.com/hosting-providers/smarteraspnet

ServerVerify.com:
Before the text:
"Last Updated | May 2022"

First sentence in text:
"SmarterASP.NET has been in operation since 1999, delivering hosting services for ASP.NET as well as Linux-based platforms to small and medium businesses."

source: https://serververify.com/hosting-providers/smarteraspnet#overview

---

Hostadvice.com:
Before the text:
"Last Update | May 2022"

First sentence in text:
"SmarterASP.NET has been around since 1999, providing ASP.NET as well as Linux-based hosting to small as well as medium-sized businesses."

source: https://gb.hostadvice.com/hosting-company/smarterasp-net-reviews/

---

Most, if not all, of the text and reviews on serververify.com are clearly AI-generated from scraped content from hostadvice.com or other websites.

There’s nothing as trustworthy as fake reviews.