Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › General
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Hypervisor V2 - A Lightweight KVM Control Panel for Low-End & High-End Alike!

24

Comments

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @Levi said:
    A bash in commercial software? At least python. Aside of this, tech stack looks very heavy and complex.

    Tbh thats only the acme.sh script :D and the pre-installers

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @nohavps said:
    Why choose a external dashboard instead of integrating it like Virtualizor and SolusVM do?

    Virtfusion is almost the same with more options.

    I'm not critical; I think these dashboards are perfect.

    Not sure what external dashboard are you referring to?

  • nohavpsnohavps Member, Host Rep

    @BharatB said:

    @nohavps said:
    Why choose a external dashboard instead of integrating it like Virtualizor and SolusVM do?

    Virtfusion is almost the same with more options.

    I'm not critical; I think these dashboards are perfect.

    Not sure what external dashboard are you referring to?

    You have to click on the SSO link to open the panel to manage your VPS server.

  • johndeo983johndeo983 Member

    Looks like garbage written by chatgpt+Claude and not really tested

    Thanked by 6BharatB fluffernutter ethanblake87 chria838373 oddmario Protocol903
  • Just295Just295 Member

    https://docs.hypervisor.io/Installation/ How do we even install it? Is this a stand alone install or does it install ontop of an exisiting OS?

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    https://docs.hypervisor.io/installation/management-server

  • Just295Just295 Member

    @BharatB ah sorry for that, I never clicked farther. Totally my bad.
    Thanks!

    Thanked by 1BharatB
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @BharatB said:
    https://docs.hypervisor.io/installation/management-server

    Wait... Laravel?!

  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    Congrats man, awesome news.

    Thanked by 2BharatB tux
  • SaahibSaahib Host Rep, Veteran

    @Andreix said:

    @BharatB said:
    I think the thread is derailing a bit, I agree with @Andreix on his views, @Saahib thanks for pitching in, I believe Ive been here long enough for people to trust my company, since 2016 its roughly been 10 years I guess, so yeah I’m patient enough to see how things play out.

    You confuse two things: Your company with your (company)'s product.
    For example: I may sell web hosting for 20 years and people know my web hosting service is good. I may have 200.000 clients for web hosting.

    However, if I start offering CDN or Object storage hosting, I doubt 10.000 customers from those 200.000 I already have for web hosting, will dump Fastly and Cloudflare to use my CDN service.

    Real number may be 100-200-1.000 clients at most, that decided to "give it a try".

    So, there's not really a question if your company is trusted, but if your product is trusted. If your coding skills and your product's security are considered "safe" enough to switch from a well-established product like SolusVM or Virtuozzo, to your "1-2-3" years old product.

    Look what happened with SolusVM - since I kept giving it as an example - as soon as Plesk took over it, people started to switch to other solutions. Some didn't like Plesk as a company, some didn't like the new SolusVM direction and some chose the new virtualization product that one of SolusVM original developers launched on the market.

    Why? I guess they trusted him and his skills - which were "proven" over the years.

    This is what I really meant.

    PS: 2015 here. I won. :P

    Aren't you talking biased here ?

    You are saying that one need to have credibility or need to prove in order to get their product accepted. However, here you are, trying to prove product wrong before even giving time to prove itself.

    If you don't want to use it then don't. I am sure you have your reasons. If you see this product's history, its V2, whatever learned from V1's experience, which was launched few years ago, have been applied here.

    I am not sure if you know this, virtualizor (vzr) is now used in so many large deployments with thousands of clients and hundreds of slaves. It might have rough start but silently it created its own user base.

    Hypervisor V2, its not new product but over time if its continously maintained, would come out as a worthy choice, give it time man..

    Thanked by 3theraw rooted nohavps
  • aluyaluy Member, Patron Provider

    sorry but installation is completely bugged, tried debian 12 and it worked (except for missing unzip) until ssl, thats completely broken and theres absolutely no nginx config even after i tried to work around. On ubuntu 24 it was even worse, already errored during installation, ssl is obviously the same issue. While i think its a nice and cheap project it just isnt working for me.

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @aluy said:
    sorry but installation is completely bugged, tried debian 12 and it worked (except for missing unzip) until ssl, thats completely broken and theres absolutely no nginx config even after i tried to work around. On ubuntu 24 it was even worse, already errored during installation, ssl is obviously the same issue. While i think its a nice and cheap project it just isnt working for me.

    We have just added the 30 trial thing, let me see if older file was pushed

  • TicagaTicaga Member, Host Rep
    edited July 2025

    Congrats on the VPS Panel, I spotted it on here and checked it out, your previews look amazing, good luck mate. It looks better than some of the big guys out there.

  • therawtheraw Member

    @Saahib said:

    If you see this product's history, its V2, whatever learned from V1's experience, which was launched few years ago, have been applied here.

    obviously he and few more people missed that part.

    Thanked by 2BharatB Saahib
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @Saahib said:

    @Andreix said:

    @BharatB said:
    I think the thread is derailing a bit, I agree with @Andreix on his views, @Saahib thanks for pitching in, I believe Ive been here long enough for people to trust my company, since 2016 its roughly been 10 years I guess, so yeah I’m patient enough to see how things play out.

    You confuse two things: Your company with your (company)'s product.
    For example: I may sell web hosting for 20 years and people know my web hosting service is good. I may have 200.000 clients for web hosting.

    However, if I start offering CDN or Object storage hosting, I doubt 10.000 customers from those 200.000 I already have for web hosting, will dump Fastly and Cloudflare to use my CDN service.

    Real number may be 100-200-1.000 clients at most, that decided to "give it a try".

    So, there's not really a question if your company is trusted, but if your product is trusted. If your coding skills and your product's security are considered "safe" enough to switch from a well-established product like SolusVM or Virtuozzo, to your "1-2-3" years old product.

    Look what happened with SolusVM - since I kept giving it as an example - as soon as Plesk took over it, people started to switch to other solutions. Some didn't like Plesk as a company, some didn't like the new SolusVM direction and some chose the new virtualization product that one of SolusVM original developers launched on the market.

    Why? I guess they trusted him and his skills - which were "proven" over the years.

    This is what I really meant.

    PS: 2015 here. I won. :P

    Aren't you talking biased here ?

    You are saying that one need to have credibility or need to prove in order to get their product accepted. However, here you are, trying to prove product wrong before even giving time to prove itself.

    If you don't want to use it then don't. I am sure you have your reasons. If you see this product's history, its V2, whatever learned from V1's experience, which was launched few years ago, have been applied here.

    I am not sure if you know this, virtualizor (vzr) is now used in so many large deployments with thousands of clients and hundreds of slaves. It might have rough start but silently it created its own user base.

    Hypervisor V2, its not new product but over time if its continously maintained, would come out as a worthy choice, give it time man..

    I don't really imagine that in 2025 people need a disclaimer or a tutorial on how to read my messages. Don't really have time for that nor for endless replies to useless comments.

    I believe my messages were clear enough for anyone with elementary school or higher to understand. If you don't qualify, visiting school first may be wise at this point.

    Take care!

  • therawtheraw Member

    @Andreix said:
    Wait... Laravel?!

    seems someone needs a elementary school or video tutorial how to read LET threads.

    rearguards

    Thanked by 2Andreix TimboJones
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @theraw said:

    @Andreix said:
    Wait... Laravel?!

    seems someone needs a elementary school or video tutorial how to read LET threads.

    rearguards

    Or enough time to actually read every line of the first post.

    frontguards

  • SaahibSaahib Host Rep, Veteran

    @Andreix said:

    @Saahib said:

    @Andreix said:

    @BharatB said:
    I think the thread is derailing a bit, I agree with @Andreix on his views, @Saahib thanks for pitching in, I believe Ive been here long enough for people to trust my company, since 2016 its roughly been 10 years I guess, so yeah I’m patient enough to see how things play out.

    You confuse two things: Your company with your (company)'s product.
    For example: I may sell web hosting for 20 years and people know my web hosting service is good. I may have 200.000 clients for web hosting.

    However, if I start offering CDN or Object storage hosting, I doubt 10.000 customers from those 200.000 I already have for web hosting, will dump Fastly and Cloudflare to use my CDN service.

    Real number may be 100-200-1.000 clients at most, that decided to "give it a try".

    So, there's not really a question if your company is trusted, but if your product is trusted. If your coding skills and your product's security are considered "safe" enough to switch from a well-established product like SolusVM or Virtuozzo, to your "1-2-3" years old product.

    Look what happened with SolusVM - since I kept giving it as an example - as soon as Plesk took over it, people started to switch to other solutions. Some didn't like Plesk as a company, some didn't like the new SolusVM direction and some chose the new virtualization product that one of SolusVM original developers launched on the market.

    Why? I guess they trusted him and his skills - which were "proven" over the years.

    This is what I really meant.

    PS: 2015 here. I won. :P

    Aren't you talking biased here ?

    You are saying that one need to have credibility or need to prove in order to get their product accepted. However, here you are, trying to prove product wrong before even giving time to prove itself.

    If you don't want to use it then don't. I am sure you have your reasons. If you see this product's history, its V2, whatever learned from V1's experience, which was launched few years ago, have been applied here.

    I am not sure if you know this, virtualizor (vzr) is now used in so many large deployments with thousands of clients and hundreds of slaves. It might have rough start but silently it created its own user base.

    Hypervisor V2, its not new product but over time if its continously maintained, would come out as a worthy choice, give it time man..

    I don't really imagine that in 2025 people need a disclaimer or a tutorial on how to read my messages. Don't really have time for that nor for endless replies to useless comments.

    I believe my messages were clear enough for anyone with elementary school or higher to understand. If you don't qualify, visiting school first may be wise at this point.

    Take care!

    So whatever you said, I got it all wrong, then please help me to understand where I read it wrong ?

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    Just to get this thread back in line, we are offering 50% on licenses to 10 early adopters and extended trials for people who can help us finding bugs, thus stablizing the product further.

    Thanked by 1dsbnoob
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @Saahib said:

    @Andreix said:

    @Saahib said:

    @Andreix said:

    @BharatB said:
    I think the thread is derailing a bit, I agree with @Andreix on his views, @Saahib thanks for pitching in, I believe Ive been here long enough for people to trust my company, since 2016 its roughly been 10 years I guess, so yeah I’m patient enough to see how things play out.

    You confuse two things: Your company with your (company)'s product.
    For example: I may sell web hosting for 20 years and people know my web hosting service is good. I may have 200.000 clients for web hosting.

    However, if I start offering CDN or Object storage hosting, I doubt 10.000 customers from those 200.000 I already have for web hosting, will dump Fastly and Cloudflare to use my CDN service.

    Real number may be 100-200-1.000 clients at most, that decided to "give it a try".

    So, there's not really a question if your company is trusted, but if your product is trusted. If your coding skills and your product's security are considered "safe" enough to switch from a well-established product like SolusVM or Virtuozzo, to your "1-2-3" years old product.

    Look what happened with SolusVM - since I kept giving it as an example - as soon as Plesk took over it, people started to switch to other solutions. Some didn't like Plesk as a company, some didn't like the new SolusVM direction and some chose the new virtualization product that one of SolusVM original developers launched on the market.

    Why? I guess they trusted him and his skills - which were "proven" over the years.

    This is what I really meant.

    PS: 2015 here. I won. :P

    Aren't you talking biased here ?

    You are saying that one need to have credibility or need to prove in order to get their product accepted. However, here you are, trying to prove product wrong before even giving time to prove itself.

    If you don't want to use it then don't. I am sure you have your reasons. If you see this product's history, its V2, whatever learned from V1's experience, which was launched few years ago, have been applied here.

    I am not sure if you know this, virtualizor (vzr) is now used in so many large deployments with thousands of clients and hundreds of slaves. It might have rough start but silently it created its own user base.

    Hypervisor V2, its not new product but over time if its continously maintained, would come out as a worthy choice, give it time man..

    I don't really imagine that in 2025 people need a disclaimer or a tutorial on how to read my messages. Don't really have time for that nor for endless replies to useless comments.

    I believe my messages were clear enough for anyone with elementary school or higher to understand. If you don't qualify, visiting school first may be wise at this point.

    Take care!

    So whatever you said, I got it all wrong, then please help me to understand where I read it wrong ?

    https://chatgpt.com/c/6868f3b9-4a3c-8006-a946-93fc824bc1a9

  • SaahibSaahib Host Rep, Veteran

    @Andreix said:
    https://chatgpt.com/c/6868f3b9-4a3c-8006-a946-93fc824bc1a9

  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @Saahib said:

    @Andreix said:
    https://chatgpt.com/c/6868f3b9-4a3c-8006-a946-93fc824bc1a9

    https://chatgpt.com/share/686982ba-cc54-8006-bce6-88373734657b

  • therawtheraw Member
    edited July 2025

    Since its laravel, can we change frontend template to whatever we like? will updates revert it to default? or is limited by license?

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @theraw said:
    Since its laravel, can we change frontend template to whatever we like? will updates revert it to default? or is limited by license?

    We are using inertiajs for UI, not sure if we will allow to change UI as we are sending in compiled assets, once the API is out maybe you can build your own UI

    Thanked by 1theraw
  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    We got the product ISO:27001 certified.

    Thanked by 2dsbnoob DigitalFyre
  • VoidVoid Member

    Compliance certifications are good to have, but a pentest shows a clearer picture of the system’s actual security posture.

    Thanked by 1BharatB
  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @Void said:
    Compliance certifications are good to have, but a pentest shows a clearer picture of the system’s actual security posture.

    Will get that done as well.

    Thanked by 1Void
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    So, it's SOUNDARYA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED or Readydedis, LLC who develops and maintain the product?

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @Andreix said:
    So, it's SOUNDARYA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED or Readydedis, LLC who develops and maintain the product?

    Both are my entities, SIPL is Indian RD is American

  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @BharatB said:

    @Andreix said:
    So, it's SOUNDARYA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED or Readydedis, LLC who develops and maintain the product?

    Both are my entities, SIPL is Indian RD is American

    So, let me rephrase:
    Who is legally responsible in case of a serious data breach or catastrophic security issues? The indian company or the american one?

Sign In or Register to comment.