Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Our experience with aurologic: fair warning if you're a customer

1246711

Comments

  • I really think you should listen to @layer7 — you couldn’t have gotten better advice if you paid for it. It is both factual and comes from the heart!

    Pay the 3 months. Save yourself the agony. It’s simply not worth being stubborn. It makes you lose clarity. Thankfully, @layer7 amongst a few others has really tried to show you the way. (Kudos!)

  • jh_aurologicjh_aurologic Member, Patron Provider
    edited June 2025

    @layer7 said:

    @AS203446 said:
    I wouldn't say I was too late.

    The terms state that the contract has a minimum term of 12 months.

    If the contract is not cancelled 90 days prior to the end of the 12 month term, it will renew on a month month basis.

    I cancelled on December 24th 2024. How is a 90 day renewal possible in that case?

    How can I cancel a contract 90 days prior with a 1 month term?

    Hi,

    i am sorry, but your conclusion will most probably backfire.

    In best case you have here a contradiction. 1 month vs 90 days.

    Because both are written there, they are both equal in power. So if either party will say its invalid, the court will check if either rule has more power / priority ( 1 month or 90 days ).

    As it seems, and the way the words are put, this is not the case.

    If contradicting rules of same power are present in a contract, then the court will start interpreting what was truly meant and wanted by both parties at the time the contract was agreed on. For this interpretation the court will check the other rules in the contract, will check the AGB's ( if they became a valid part of the contract ) and will check the nature of the deal ( what is actually common in similar deals in general in this field ).

    And sorry to say, but monthly contracts are highly uncommon in datacenter B2B contracts.
    Again, if this is B2C, things would be entirely different.

    But here 2 business entities making a contract for IP transit, datacenter services, what ever in this kind of things i assume. And i am doing this business since 2003 and i can hardly remember any contract i ever had with a carrier or a datacenter that was with 1 month renewal. So this 1 month IS uncommon. Its just like that. And if its uncommon and if there are contradicting things, then the court will assume that you as adult business people will have had agreed to something that is common. -- And that wont be your 1 month most probably.

    Dont get me wrong, i was also 22 years old long long time ago. And i also had legal issues, because i was just a bloody noob.

    It took me 10 years ( no joke ) to fight my ass through, ending up with the court telling me that i was right. But because my lawyers f*** it up, the court did not agree with the money i wanted from the datacenter ( that sued me actually, not i them ) as reimburstment.
    Pure interpretation of the court met pure stupidity of my lawyers ending up in the fact that i had to pay to the datacenter something ( after 10 years the amount had plain > doubled ).
    Later i sue the lawyers and got back a part of the money at least.

    But the point in the story is: Even you might be right, you can still loose.

    That goes for both of you parties.... with this kind of combination... contradicting stuff, contracts in git repositories, the fact that in general if rules in contracts are unclear/missleading or giving space for interpretation, courts tend to blame the one who use/made it -- in your case the provider, not the customer -- and might interpret things in the favor of the customer -- especially if its a 22 years old/young sole entrepreneur customer vs. a GmbH ( company with limited liability, usually assuming the more "adult" ) one.

    So you both should really really think about if you really want and need this shitshow that might potentially wait for you. Maybe meeting somewhere in the middle of the 3 months or where ever around this will be better for both of you if you consider what you can potentially loose or gain if you win or loose this court stuff.

    For @jh_aurologic its easy and no problem to take back his sue. Will have minimal court cost. The other question is the lawyer expenses....

    Anyway, i wrote what i wanted to write. Maybe you will find a way out, maybe not.

    I hope you can handle it better than doing this with a court.

    Good luck to both of you!

    My standpoint here is clear and as always I‘m open to talk, but I wont be nice anymore if some tries to fool me and starts a Kindergarten - or to say it in German: "Ich kann auch anders, wenn man versucht mich zu ärgern" ;

    PS: The whole thread is not so smart(net), its rather a shame.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @jh_aurologic said:
    PS: The whole thread is not so smart(net), its rather a shame.

    The presence of this thread tells customers to run away from both providers.

  • AS203446AS203446 Member, Patron Provider

    @layer7 said: Dont get me wrong, i was also 22 years old long long time ago. And i also had legal issues, because i was just a bloody noob.

    I'm not sure what you are trying to tell me with this statement - Joseph is not even 10 years older than me. I wouldn't call myself a bloody noob just because I'm 22 and having to deal with legal matters.

    @layer7 said: But here 2 business entities making a contract for IP transit, datacenter services, what ever in this kind of things i assume. And i am doing this business since 2003 and i can hardly remember any contract i ever had with a carrier or a datacenter that was with 1 month renewal. So this 1 month IS uncommon. Its just like that. And if its uncommon and if there are contradicting things, then the court will assume that you as adult business people will have had agreed to something that is common. -- And that wont be your 1 month most probably.

    aurologic neither is a carrier nor a data center - they are a service provider/ISP. 1 month contracts are not uncommon with their customer base.

    @layer7 said: So you both should really really think about if you really want and need this shitshow that might potentially wait for you. Maybe meeting somewhere in the middle of the 3 months or where ever around this will be better for both of you if you consider what you can potentially loose or gain if you win or loose this court stuff.

    I offered to pay 1 month and that was about three weeks ago. My offer was rejected

    I never wanted this shitshow and offered to pay at least one month, but that was my last offer.

  • @AS203446 You can’t seriously believe that you can haggle your way out of paying a business related commitment? 😅

    Fair enough if it were you trying to fight someone as a consumer… but arguing over something that is most absolutely normal, taking it public, and ignoring what was probably the best advice I have seen in a while is just… well, immature? Oh, to be young…

  • ezethezeth Member, Host Rep
    edited June 2025

    @PineappleM said: German providers are synonymous to contracts, termination notices… why I rarely deal with German hosting companies

    Bro just wants his service terminated if invoice is overdue, no matter if it's mission critical because the invoice got lost in the email, or the employee quit and new staff didn't know about the invoice. Yes that's a lot better I agree.

    How hard is it to tell the supplier you don't want the service before the due date?
    (ignoring OP particular 90 day notice)

  • PineappleMPineappleM Member
    edited June 2025

    @ezeth said:
    Bro just wants his service terminated if invoice is overdue, no matter if it's mission critical because the invoice got lost in the email, or the employee quit and new staff didn't know about the invoice. Yes that's a lot better I agree.

    Any competent or sane client running something mission critical would have autopay set up to automatically charge the invoice to a payment method on file, preferably with multiple backup payment methods on top.

    I don't run anything mission critical yet I have a virtual credit card saved for providers to bill me whenever an invoice is generated. I don't need to remember to manually log in to pay, and my service remains online.

  • AS203446AS203446 Member, Patron Provider

    @Verasel said:
    @AS203446 You can’t seriously believe that you can haggle your way out of paying a business related commitment? 😅

    Fair enough if it were you trying to fight someone as a consumer… but arguing over something that is most absolutely normal, taking it public, and ignoring what was probably the best advice I have seen in a while is just… well, immature? Oh, to be young…

    I'll say it again and again, I offered to pay for one additional month, my offer was rejected.

    aurologic has no proof that we agreed to an auto renewal after 12 months. I'm not saying our contract is invalid, but the 12 months auto renewal were not part of the initial contract I, "signed".

    It's not "absolutely normal" to use a service with a contract that has three terms, nobody knows the real notice periods and such.

    If you want to keep the age and me being immature the main problem, go for it, but this is not going to change the facts.

  • @FlorinMarian said: Damn, I also thought that RCS&RDS Romania and Orange are thieves who offer you a contractual offer to close the contract after the commitment, announcing it at least 30 days before the effective termination, but they take advantage of the legal deadline in which they must respond to your request within a maximum of 30 days and so you end up paying for another 2 months

    It's things like this that make me at least a little fortunate to live in Belgium, I can cancel most ISP's here either after a day, or after 15days (outside of the EU 14day policy), and they pay the remaining unused days back :D
    But this is mainly for consumers, not companies.

  • @AS203446

    With all due respect;

    I will try to be as direct as possible:

    • You simply DID NOT notify aurologic GmbH of your intent to cease your business relationship, and as such — you HAVE TO pay the 3 months. It is the norm, and you can argue about it all you want, but it won’t change the fact.
    • The reason why I mentioned the age is because, usually, with age comes maturity, and in your case, you seem to be an idealist (that will change with time, heh!) and believe that if something sounds like an injustice — that it is also not legal. Which, most certainly, isn’t the case.

    As others have advised you:

    • Pay what is owed. In full. Do not attempt to haggle.
    • Apologize to aurologic GmbH, ask for the thread to be deleted and move on with your life and business.
    • Let it serve as a not-so-expensive lesson that it can be.

    Look at things from someone else’s POV and you should be able to see that you are looking at things with a really clouded viewpoint, which paints you as a “victim” of some “bad company”. Facts show something entirely different…

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • AS203446AS203446 Member, Patron Provider

    @Verasel said: You simply DID NOT notify aurologic GmbH of your intent to cease your business relationship

    I did:

    The cancel button did not work so the cancellation date is December 23rd 2024, as
    confirmed by me in the ticket I opened on January 3rd 2025.

    aurologic responded on February 26th.

    You are not able to understand the facts.

    @Verasel said: you seem to be an idealist

    I am not. I have at least 20 contracts with other companies and those have clear terms and conditions. Everyone is being paid, except aurologic. Pretty weird, huh?

    I didn't just stop paying - I stopped paying after the contract had been cancelled. German law does not require a confirmation. I acted in good faith and my action was based on the terms I saw.

    @Verasel said: Apologize to aurologic GmbH, ask for the thread to be deleted and move on with your life and business.

    No need to apologize.

    Other aurologic customers have shared a similar experience. aurologic is unable to issue contracts with clear terms. This isn't the first time.

    But thanks for the ChatGPT summary.

  • jh_aurologicjh_aurologic Member, Patron Provider

    @AS203446 said:

    @Verasel said: You simply DID NOT notify aurologic GmbH of your intent to cease your business relationship

    I did:

    The cancel button did not work so the cancellation date is December 23rd 2024, as
    confirmed by me in the ticket I opened on January 3rd 2025.

    aurologic responded on February 26th.

    You are not able to understand the facts.

    @Verasel said: you seem to be an idealist

    I am not. I have at least 20 contracts with other companies and those have clear terms and conditions. Everyone is being paid, except aurologic. Pretty weird, huh?

    I didn't just stop paying - I stopped paying after the contract had been cancelled. German law does not require a confirmation. I acted in good faith and my action was based on the terms I saw.

    @Verasel said: Apologize to aurologic GmbH, ask for the thread to be deleted and move on with your life and business.

    No need to apologize.

    Other aurologic customers have shared a similar experience. aurologic is unable to issue contracts with clear terms. This isn't the first time.

    But thanks for the ChatGPT summary.

    Now I‘m curious, who did? :-)

  • AS203446AS203446 Member, Patron Provider

    @Verasel said: believe that if something sounds like an injustice — that it is also not legal. Which, most certainly, isn’t the case.

    I think you missed my message about the lawyers - they've seen all documents, TOS, Telegram messages, letters from the debt collection agency .. And you still want to well me I'm an idealist if three independet lawyers came to the same conclusion?

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @Verasel said:
    ask for the thread to be deleted

    LET is eternal.
    No reason to delete anything.
    We need three drama threads every week.
    Lessons written by @layer7 are valuable.

  • @AS203446
    I guess I will call your bluff RE: “ I am not. I have at least 20 contracts with other companies and those have clear terms and conditions. Everyone is being paid, except aurologic. Pretty weird, huh?”

    If that were the case, you would be aware of the fact that business is business, and you pay and move on.

    Also: “ I think you missed my message about the lawyers - they've seen all documents, TOS, Telegram messages, letters from the debt collection agency .. And you still want to well me I'm an idealist if three independet lawyers came to the same conclusion?”

    So.. I am sorry to ask, but wasn’t that money better spent on… Gee, I don’t know… settling the invoice?! 😂

    I am not being cheeky, it’s just… if it walks like a duck.. etc.

    My experience tells me that anyone working with 20 companies (!), and being able to hire 3 independent lawyers (!) is also aware that: a) it costs money to make money, and it pays to avoid trouble, and b) lawyers != smart.. a lot of hucksters out there doing anything for billables.

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • AS203446AS203446 Member, Patron Provider

    @jh_aurologic said:

    @AS203446 said:

    @Verasel said: You simply DID NOT notify aurologic GmbH of your intent to cease your business relationship

    I did:

    The cancel button did not work so the cancellation date is December 23rd 2024, as
    confirmed by me in the ticket I opened on January 3rd 2025.

    aurologic responded on February 26th.

    You are not able to understand the facts.

    @Verasel said: you seem to be an idealist

    I am not. I have at least 20 contracts with other companies and those have clear terms and conditions. Everyone is being paid, except aurologic. Pretty weird, huh?

    I didn't just stop paying - I stopped paying after the contract had been cancelled. German law does not require a confirmation. I acted in good faith and my action was based on the terms I saw.

    @Verasel said: Apologize to aurologic GmbH, ask for the thread to be deleted and move on with your life and business.

    No need to apologize.

    Other aurologic customers have shared a similar experience. aurologic is unable to issue contracts with clear terms. This isn't the first time.

    But thanks for the ChatGPT summary.

    Now I‘m curious, who did? :-)

    Sorry, my bad, TornadoDC customer. I almost forgot that these are two different legal entities.

    Contracts are not clear enough, that's what I heard and I can confirm it.

    I won't share any names here on LET - again, I'm not saying that the customers had the same dispute, but they raised concerns regarding their contract.

  • AS203446AS203446 Member, Patron Provider

    @Verasel said:
    @AS203446
    I guess I will call your bluff RE: “ I am not. I have at least 20 contracts with other companies and those have clear terms and conditions. Everyone is being paid, except aurologic. Pretty weird, huh?”

    If that were the case, you would be aware of the fact that business is business, and you pay and move on.

    Also: “ I think you missed my message about the lawyers - they've seen all documents, TOS, Telegram messages, letters from the debt collection agency .. And you still want to well me I'm an idealist if three independet lawyers came to the same conclusion?”

    So.. I am sorry to ask, but wasn’t that money better spent on… Gee, I don’t know… settling the invoice?! 😂

    I am not being cheeky, it’s just… if it walks like a duck.. etc.

    My experience tells me that anyone working with 20 companies (!), and being able to hire 3 independent lawyers (!) is also aware that: a) it costs money to make money, and it pays to avoid trouble, and b) lawyers != smart.. a lot of hucksters out there doing anything for billables.

    Luckily my insurance policy offers legal consultation for free - so I didn't pay a single cent.

    You still don't understand what the problem is.

  • jh_aurologicjh_aurologic Member, Patron Provider

    @AS203446 said:

    @jh_aurologic said:

    @AS203446 said:

    @Verasel said: You simply DID NOT notify aurologic GmbH of your intent to cease your business relationship

    I did:

    The cancel button did not work so the cancellation date is December 23rd 2024, as
    confirmed by me in the ticket I opened on January 3rd 2025.

    aurologic responded on February 26th.

    You are not able to understand the facts.

    @Verasel said: you seem to be an idealist

    I am not. I have at least 20 contracts with other companies and those have clear terms and conditions. Everyone is being paid, except aurologic. Pretty weird, huh?

    I didn't just stop paying - I stopped paying after the contract had been cancelled. German law does not require a confirmation. I acted in good faith and my action was based on the terms I saw.

    @Verasel said: Apologize to aurologic GmbH, ask for the thread to be deleted and move on with your life and business.

    No need to apologize.

    Other aurologic customers have shared a similar experience. aurologic is unable to issue contracts with clear terms. This isn't the first time.

    But thanks for the ChatGPT summary.

    Now I‘m curious, who did? :-)

    Sorry, my bad, TornadoDC customer. I almost forgot that these are two different legal entities.

    Contracts are not clear enough, that's what I heard and I can confirm it.

    I won't share any names here on LET - again, I'm not saying that the customers had the same dispute, but they raised concerns regarding their contract.

    Yes, different legal entity - but no, there are no uncertainities nor I had any discussion going.

  • AS203446AS203446 Member, Patron Provider

    @jh_aurologic said:

    @AS203446 said:

    @jh_aurologic said:

    @AS203446 said:

    @Verasel said: You simply DID NOT notify aurologic GmbH of your intent to cease your business relationship

    I did:

    The cancel button did not work so the cancellation date is December 23rd 2024, as
    confirmed by me in the ticket I opened on January 3rd 2025.

    aurologic responded on February 26th.

    You are not able to understand the facts.

    @Verasel said: you seem to be an idealist

    I am not. I have at least 20 contracts with other companies and those have clear terms and conditions. Everyone is being paid, except aurologic. Pretty weird, huh?

    I didn't just stop paying - I stopped paying after the contract had been cancelled. German law does not require a confirmation. I acted in good faith and my action was based on the terms I saw.

    @Verasel said: Apologize to aurologic GmbH, ask for the thread to be deleted and move on with your life and business.

    No need to apologize.

    Other aurologic customers have shared a similar experience. aurologic is unable to issue contracts with clear terms. This isn't the first time.

    But thanks for the ChatGPT summary.

    Now I‘m curious, who did? :-)

    Sorry, my bad, TornadoDC customer. I almost forgot that these are two different legal entities.

    Contracts are not clear enough, that's what I heard and I can confirm it.

    I won't share any names here on LET - again, I'm not saying that the customers had the same dispute, but they raised concerns regarding their contract.

    Yes, different legal entity - but no, there are no uncertainities nor I had any discussion going.

    Not yet at least - just because I know something doesn't mean the customer has already raised their concerns towards aurologic/Tornado

  • RubbenRubben Member

    i think its time to take this offline and i dont mean physically fight each other (although you could certainly do that as that is an option) because when you have an entire court case why spend your time arguing here? go to bed, dream about me featuring your logo on my t-shirt while flexing my biceps, wake up and talk to your lawyer about your $6 billion lawsuit

    Thanked by 4oloke zed wdmg nghialele
  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    @Rubben said: i think its time to take this offline and i dont mean physically fight each other (although you could certainly do that as that is an option)

    image

    Thanked by 1zed
  • Many German-net operators will speak of @AS203446 still trying to convince @jh_aurologic to accept the 1 month payment years to come… but they will say that he would be met with a simple response of: I will call my mom if you don’t leave! 😂

  • jh_aurologicjh_aurologic Member, Patron Provider

    TL;DR: The whole thread is non-sense in my eyes. I havent seen a customer, especially a serious business one, starting such in the past 10 years. I‘m quite sure there are disputes between other businesses, however you‘ll never hear anything about those - it‘s whats called professionalism. Thats why I referred to the age of the thread starter and how things are in the backend. Its basically a 22 year old employed guy running his 1 Pound share capital Limited from home, trying to sell quite cheap services below market prices. I‘m aware that there were some discussions with other suppliers similar to ours in the past. He also told me that he‘s a consumer before, to evade contractual bindings. Up on asking if he took the sales tax, he told me he did - consumers are not allowed to such. That was the first attempt to trick me. I‘m sure thats why we are at this point, the fear of being required to pay uncalculated charges may be reason enough to increase public pressure.

    However, back in 2012 we also started small - now we have multiple people employed, recently employed another guy and growing at a quite solid rate. Still we didnt bother to deal with our suppliers like that - I‘m missing the serious business men style here quite a lot.

    Talking about investments to fulfill the contract, surely every customer has its involvement in planning capacity long term. We didnt bother to spend six figures only on transport equipment to have sufficient capacity - also to serve this guy during his contract term he broke.

    Letting someone out of a contract who‘s cancellation is not yet in effect, is something we wont do at all. Try the same with a larger company and you‘ll be surprised how much they‘ll talk with you about that :)

    Over all: Kindergarten.

  • zedzed Member

    @jh_aurologic said: Over all: Kindergarten.

    I'm sure you feel all sexy after your post but I want you to know that you're the one sounding like a child in spite of the other gentleman being 22 and having a job.

    Just stop already.

  • JC_DevJC_Dev Member

    @jh_aurologic - when you started your business in 2012, how old were you then?

    Thanked by 2HostDZire nghialele
  • AS203446AS203446 Member, Patron Provider
    edited June 2025

    @jh_aurologic said: Its basically a 22 year old employed guy running his 1 Pound share capital Limited from home, trying to sell quite cheap services below market prices.

    The Limited has nothing to do with the actual business in Germany. The Limited soley exists for RIPE. Stop making false claims. You are aware of that.

    From "home" is an interesting statement, you do run 90% of your business from home as well - you have no office, except your data center in Langen.

    FYI: I am not going to renew my contract at the current company I work for - my business is successful and I have financial freedom. You started aurologic / KMS Hosting while being employed at some IT-Company. Did anyone judge you because of that or why do you need to judge me?

    @jh_aurologic said: He also told me that he‘s a consumer before, to evade contractual bindings. Up on asking if he took the sales tax, he told me he did - consumers are not allowed to such.

    Yes, I did. And I even apologized. You kept telling me different stories about the contract and I wasn't happy. I know that it wasn't right.

    @jh_aurologic said: I‘m sure thats why we are at this point, the fear of being required to pay uncalculated charges may be reason enough to increase public pressure.

    I did not make this public because I am fearing the court decision. Do you really believe I am thinking that you'll stop if I make this public? I am well aware about your decision to drag this to court.

    @jh_aurologic said: Talking about investments to fulfill the contract, surely every customer has its involvement in planning capacity long term. We didnt bother to spend six figures only on transport equipment to have sufficient capacity - also to serve this guy during his contract term he broke.

    Stop telling stories about my business, about my job and other things. But I'm OK with that- that shows your response to disputes and what kind of person you are.

    I never complained about your service and always had an honest opinion.

    You are making it seem like you are the hero, but in fact you are not. The way you are running your business is just unprofessional. Your business lacks structure for certain processes and yet you keep saying that you are much much better than the others.

    For everyone else reading this:

    Joseph and I had a pretty good relationship before all of this. But this shows me that he is in fact unprofessional and talks behind my back - and in public - about private stuff that has no relevance. I never did that and there is just no reason why he would do that.

    @jh_aurologic said: I havent seen a customer, especially a serious business one, starting such in the past 10 years.

    Then it's probably the first time that a former customer does not accept your contract terms, tries to solve the problem but fails to do so because you insist on the terms that you made up.

    @jh_aurologic said: However, back in 2012 we also started small - now we have multiple people employed, recently employed another guy and growing at a quite solid rate. Still we didnt bother to deal with our suppliers like that - I‘m missing the serious business men style here quite a lot.

    You didn't have any employees back in 2023. Your first real employees(Not freelancers) started working for aurologic in 2024 and 2025. Please do not make it seem like you've been out of the one man show for several(5+) years, because you are clearly not.

    Just because you are the CEO of your GmbH doesn't mean you weren't an one man show at some point, even with the GmbH. You are the only CEO.

    @jh_aurologic said: Thats why I referred to the age of the thread starter and how things are in the backend.

    You are 30, yet you behave like you are 14, throwing insults and other comments.

    This was our discussion in January:


    Joseph, [21.01.2025, 18:56:55]:
    Hi, I’ve been thinking a bit — there are still almost 9 months left on the contract — so my counteroffer is to reduce it to 4.5 months.
    Generally, I also have the situation with Aurologic’s suppliers that I must adhere to the terms of concluded contracts, but in this case, we’re not talking about anything particularly extensive, so I’m happy to compromise.


    Alexander, [21.01.2025, 18:57:33]:
    Renewal Term
    1 month(s)
    Minimum contract term
    12 month(s)
    Cancellation Notice Period
    90 day(s) before renewal
    Emergency SLA included

    I’ve looked at it again — Renewal Term: 1 month(s), that’s not 12 months.


    Alexander, [21.01.2025, 19:00:01]:
    What excuses?

    It’s written there, isn’t it?

    You’re simply not sticking to what was agreed.


    Joseph, [21.01.2025, 19:03:03]:
    Is this another Voxility story? :)


    Alexander, [21.01.2025, 19:03:17]:
    ???

    Please take a look at your interface.

    It says it right there — what does it say?


    Joseph, [21.01.2025, 19:04:05]:
    To me, Renewal Term translates to “extension period,” so you mean cancellation notice period?


    Alexander, [21.01.2025, 19:04:43]:
    To me, it means that after the initial 12 months, it moves to monthly renewals.
    Nowhere does it say the contract renews automatically.


    Joseph, [21.01.2025, 19:05:41]:
    Don’t worry, I’ll ask our lawyer — they’ll probably shed some light on this.


    Alexander, [21.01.2025, 19:05:53]:
    Do that. As far as I’m concerned, this matter is closed.


    You mentioned Voxility again, it just doesn't make any sense.

    Thanked by 1cu_olly
  • Thanks @jh_aurologic,

    Just like I’ve recommended providers in the past, you’ll now go in the “avoid at all costs” list — mostly because of how you leak personal data. That alone tells me enough about your standards.

  • MannDudeMannDude Patron Provider, Veteran

    After 4 pages of this... I want a bratwurst.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @Rubben said:
    go to bed, dream about me featuring your logo on my t-shirt while flexing my biceps

    Both @jh_aurologic and @AS203446 can send us shirts.
    Although our biceps aren't as big as @Rubben , we would upload a video that is more energetic than just a photo.

    @MannDude said:
    After 4 pages of this... I want a bratwurst.

    We recommend Impossible Foods plant-based bratwurst.

This discussion has been closed.