Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

ColoCrossing Database Breach

1313234363739

Comments

  • @zGato said:
    @dotdotnetworks marking email? you guys deserve to be banned.

    LMFAO

    they explain like you really a 5 :o

  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited May 2025

    @zed said:
    Topic guys. CloudCrossing bad etc.

    Yeah, but it's not just bad, now there are serious consequences from that bad (such as customers getting spammed and scammed by other parties).

    Thanked by 1Xrmaddness
  • @default said:

    @zed said:
    Topic guys. CloudCrossing bad etc.

    Yeah, but it's not just bad, now there are serious consequences from that bad (such as customers getting spammed and scammed by other parties).

    My popcorn has gone stale

    Thanked by 1equalz
  • defaultdefault Veteran

    @barbarza said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Topic guys. CloudCrossing bad etc.

    Yeah, but it's not just bad, now there are serious consequences from that bad (such as customers getting spammed and scammed by other parties).

    My popcorn has gone stale

    That's because they do damage control while ignoring the issue in hopes it will go away. This is one of the mechanisms to reduce the volume of protest. If outcry keeps going, I guess the next step will be the setting of material to sink - but I can't know the future.

  • ahnlakahnlak Member

    @raindog308 said:

    @zGato said: I completely missed where they notified customers about their personal data being leaked (emails and full names, besides root passwords, vnc passwords, ...). Can you help me out with that?

    The email notification they sent does mention emails...?

    But anyway, CC is capable of speaking for themselves. I was just pointing out that saying they hadn't informed customers or hadn't apologized at all is inaccurate. Any deficiencies in such notifications are a different story.

    For the record, that email notification didn't get sent to everyone whose data got leaked - they sure as hell didn't bother sending me any notification at all but happily the spammers who downloaded that database are generously letting me know that my PII has been leaked.

    So no, they haven't informed (all) customers and don't seem to care about it.

    You can argue that they're somehow blameless in this mess, but quit trying to gaslight us into believing that they even tried to handle it properly.

  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited June 2025

    @ahnlak said:

    @raindog308 said:

    @zGato said: I completely missed where they notified customers about their personal data being leaked (emails and full names, besides root passwords, vnc passwords, ...). Can you help me out with that?

    The email notification they sent does mention emails...?

    But anyway, CC is capable of speaking for themselves. I was just pointing out that saying they hadn't informed customers or hadn't apologized at all is inaccurate. Any deficiencies in such notifications are a different story.

    [...] but happily the spammers who downloaded that database are generously letting me know that my PII has been leaked.

    When you put it like that, one might dare to think of some plot twist in which hackers cared more about ColoCrossing customers than ColoCrossing itself. Let's not forget though that hackers made the leakage available to public, while also using the passwords to gain deeper access onto servers, or onto the services hosted on those servers, or onto customer email accounts.

  • zedzed Member

    Oh hey this thread, I almost forgot about it thanks for bumping it guys. Has CloudColo notified their customers yet?

    Thanked by 1barbarza
  • @zed said:
    Oh hey this thread, I almost forgot about it thanks for bumping it guys. Has CloudColo notified their customers yet?

    The better question is will they ever be open and transparent about this incident?

    Thanked by 1default
  • eb1995eb1995 Member
    edited June 2025

    Who just got a ChatGPT invite from Linux.do?

    https://imgur.com/a/vAbA8VL

  • defaultdefault Veteran

    Thanked by 3plumberg admax msallak1
  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

  • @darkimmortal said:
    So when is colocrossing getting banned/warned? They cannot be allowed to continue with business as usual on LET after such a cock up

    I'm sure there will be a hit squad in the comments of any future offer thread they post, but not everyone reads that, especially with the LET signal to noise ratio at new lows

    @default said:
    I am going to call it. I hereby kindly request for ColoCrossing to be banned from LET or at least have all its provider tag removed. The provider has failed to properly inform customers and publicly apologise with full transparency about the situation. This behaviour should have been banned from LowEndTalk, just like other providers have been banned in the past. Preferential treatment should not be granted - all providers should be equal on this community. It has been 1 week since this thread was started - plenty of time, while we're at page 32.

    Tagging administrators and moderators of LET: @trewq / @jbiloh / @FAT32 / @hawc / @Jord / @netomx / @angstrom / @DP / @Arkas

    two more weeks guys, LET jannies will take actions, trust the plan.

  • bermudibermudi Member
    edited June 2025

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

  • equalzequalz Member

    yikes, messy as...

  • MannDudeMannDude Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited June 2025

    @bermudi said:

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

    Wait, Colocrossing is wanting you to pay them $5 to change the email address you have on file with them?

    Did I read that correctly?

    Any proof of this? This is completely absurd if true.

  • sixsix Member

    @MannDude said:

    @bermudi said:

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

    Wait, Colocrossing is wanting you to pay them $5 to change the email address you have on file with them?

    Did I read that correctly?

    Any proof of this? This is completely absurd if true.

    I encountered this as well for an unrelated issue prior to this breach. I tried to change my email a few months ago because I never received anything to my MXRoute email - they were sending from sendgrid.net directly rather than through colocrossing.com. They simply replied to my ticket with "We can change the email address on file for $5. Please suggest." Never changed my email, and I didn't get the initial breach email either.

  • @six said:

    @MannDude said:

    @bermudi said:

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

    Wait, Colocrossing is wanting you to pay them $5 to change the email address you have on file with them?

    Did I read that correctly?

    Any proof of this? This is completely absurd if true.

    I encountered this as well for an unrelated issue prior to this breach. I tried to change my email a few months ago because I never received anything to my MXRoute email - they were sending from sendgrid.net directly rather than through colocrossing.com. They simply replied to my ticket with "We can change the email address on file for $5. Please suggest." Never changed my email, and I didn't get the initial breach email either.

    If true, CC is truly damned.

    Or would be, in a just world...

  • rskrsk Member, Host Rep
    edited June 2025

    @MannDude said:

    @bermudi said:

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

    Wait, Colocrossing is wanting you to pay them $5 to change the email address you have on file with them?

    Did I read that correctly?

    Any proof of this? This is completely absurd if true.

    I know its an absurd thing, but we do it too. Hear me out first…

    We have a lot of people who abuse the system, where they know they can’t signup due to our fraud checks, so they just purchase a full account from an existing client.

    Now, from a legal perspective, we are supposed to keep up to date information on file in case of any abuse, but if the account is sold - the information we have is absolete and we will be penalized.

    Hence, that $5 we charge has worked wonders and it literally dropped the amount of account sharing/selling incidents to zero.

    It’s more of a deterrent than actual revenue stream.

    Thoughts? :)

  • ahnlakahnlak Member

    @rsk said:

    @MannDude said:

    @bermudi said:

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

    Wait, Colocrossing is wanting you to pay them $5 to change the email address you have on file with them?

    Did I read that correctly?

    Any proof of this? This is completely absurd if true.

    I know its an absurd thing, but we do it too. Hear me out first…

    We have a lot of people who abuse the system, where they know they can’t signup due to our fraud checks, so they just purchase a full account from an existing client.

    Now, from a legal perspective, we are supposed to keep up to date information on file in case of any abuse, but if the account is sold - the information we have is absolete and we will be penalized.

    Hence, that $5 we charge has worked wonders and it literally dropped the amount of account sharing/selling incidents to zero.

    It’s more of a deterrent than actual revenue stream.

    Thoughts? :)

    Are you familiar with GDPR's Right to Rectification? Or do you just not have any EU/UK customers?

  • @rsk said:

    @MannDude said:

    @bermudi said:

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

    Wait, Colocrossing is wanting you to pay them $5 to change the email address you have on file with them?

    Did I read that correctly?

    Any proof of this? This is completely absurd if true.

    I know its an absurd thing, but we do it too. Hear me out first…

    We have a lot of people who abuse the system, where they know they can’t signup due to our fraud checks, so they just purchase a full account from an existing client.

    Now, from a legal perspective, we are supposed to keep up to date information on file in case of any abuse, but if the account is sold - the information we have is absolete and we will be penalized.

    Hence, that $5 we charge has worked wonders and it literally dropped the amount of account sharing/selling incidents to zero.

    It’s more of a deterrent than actual revenue stream.

    Thoughts? :)

    So they are OK to pay for buying the account from someone else, but if you ask 5 USD more to change email they refuse to pay it, hence people stopped buying accounts?

    Yeah, that doesn’t make any sense at all, 5 USD is nothing considering they need someone else’s account.

    Doesn’t make sense at all.

  • Let's just save this bookmark and spam it always if ColoCrossing will post any deals on the forum, if they won't get banned.

  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad

    @TheGreatOakley said:
    Let's just save this bookmark and spam it always if ColoCrossing will post any deals on the forum, if they won't get banned.

  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    @barbaros said:

    @rsk said:

    @MannDude said:

    @bermudi said:

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

    Wait, Colocrossing is wanting you to pay them $5 to change the email address you have on file with them?

    Did I read that correctly?

    Any proof of this? This is completely absurd if true.

    I know its an absurd thing, but we do it too. Hear me out first…

    We have a lot of people who abuse the system, where they know they can’t signup due to our fraud checks, so they just purchase a full account from an existing client.

    Now, from a legal perspective, we are supposed to keep up to date information on file in case of any abuse, but if the account is sold - the information we have is absolete and we will be penalized.

    Hence, that $5 we charge has worked wonders and it literally dropped the amount of account sharing/selling incidents to zero.

    It’s more of a deterrent than actual revenue stream.

    Thoughts? :)

    So they are OK to pay for buying the account from someone else, but if you ask 5 USD more to change email they refuse to pay it, hence people stopped buying accounts?

    Yeah, that doesn’t make any sense at all, 5 USD is nothing considering they need someone else’s account.

    Doesn’t make sense at all.

    Mjj logic. You'd be surprised to see how much money scalpers make at NodeSeek.

  • zedzed Member

    @rsk said: Hence, that $5 we charge has worked wonders and it literally dropped the amount of account sharing/selling incidents to zero.

    I guess I understand your perspective, but I have to say that if I ever encounter this charge I'd just drop you as a provider rather than pay. I know I'm ancient but I continue to be amused/amazed by the ways business come up with to annoy legitimate customers in the name of .. what even is this? Security?

    Personal view of course and clearly I've not run into this before/yet.

    (btw your signature leads to your LET profile, in case it's not intentional. I was trying to figure out who your business is)

  • zGatozGato Member

    @six said:

    @MannDude said:

    @bermudi said:

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

    Wait, Colocrossing is wanting you to pay them $5 to change the email address you have on file with them?

    Did I read that correctly?

    Any proof of this? This is completely absurd if true.

    I encountered this as well for an unrelated issue prior to this breach. I tried to change my email a few months ago because I never received anything to my MXRoute email - they were sending from sendgrid.net directly rather than through colocrossing.com. They simply replied to my ticket with "We can change the email address on file for $5. Please suggest." Never changed my email, and I didn't get the initial breach email either.

    You also don't get any emails from them with your MXRoute email?

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @TheGreatOakley said:
    Let's just save this bookmark and spam it always if ColoCrossing will post any deals on the forum, if they won't get banned.

    LET knows a spell of "hide from the frontpage" as they did with another thread regarding offer thread spam

  • x0x0xx0x0x Member

    Just remember. Blue and purple. Untouchable.

  • VoidVoid Member

    I’m lowkey liking the compensation in terms of ChatGPT teams subscription, whoever sent it. Any idea what the catch is? Will the owner have access to all the stuff we send?

  • @MannDude said:

    @bermudi said:

    @DediRock said:
    Well it got handled fast so that's the positive.

    Now I'm getting spam on my registered email with them and they want me to pay $5 dollars to change it. Fuck 'em, I hope they do get banned although I know they won't... Worse providers are still being featured here constantly

    Wait, Colocrossing is wanting you to pay them $5 to change the email address you have on file with them?

    Did I read that correctly?

    Any proof of this? This is completely absurd if true.

    https://imgur.com/a/HvYoXM4

Sign In or Register to comment.