Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Providers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

CharityHost attempts to censor documentation of his actions on Host.charity

12345679»

Comments

  • ServerBachelorServerBachelor Member

    @Mumbly said:

    @PineappleM said: Well when you put it that way, rather than...

    I said that on purpose (I know better than that), but only after everything had already been said. So how come you only remember that part? And you even changed it a bit, giving it a different meaning - I never said "all of you", but responded to a certain person :-)
    The posts before that statement were no different from the one above.

    To @PineappleM 's credit, the 2nd person plural isn't so easily distinguished from the 2nd person singular :)

  • MumblyMumbly Member

    @ServerBachelor said: To @PineappleM 's credit, the 2nd person plural isn't so easily distinguished from the 2nd person singular

    I quoted your post and responded to your post directly. There’s nothing unclear about that, is there? ;-)
    You just can't help yourself from pretending, can you? ;)

  • ServerBachelorServerBachelor Member

    @Mumbly said:

    @ServerBachelor said: To @PineappleM 's credit, the 2nd person plural isn't so easily distinguished from the 2nd person singular

    I quoted your post and responded to your post directly. There’s nothing unclear about that, is there? ;-)
    You just can't help yourself from pretending, can you? ;)

    Never said a word about my post in my response to @PineappleM , did I?

    Regardless, I invite you (or anyone else who might be in agreement) to flag this thread and all comments that you believe to be worthy of administrative review.

  • MumblyMumbly Member

    Here we go again. Keep pretending? Who said anything about being worthy of administrative review? I'm clearly just expressing my opinion, same as you. Man, you're so full of shit. :-)

  • cybertechcybertech Member

    @Mumbly said:
    Here we go again. Keep pretending? Who said anything about being worthy of administrative review? I'm clearly just expressing my opinion, same as you. Man, you're so full of shit. :-)

    Andrew totally deserves it.

    Thanked by 3ServerBachelor Marx borkedascii
  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited May 2025

    Sure. Let's torch his home now that he’s done on LET.

  • ServerBachelorServerBachelor Member

    @Mumbly said:
    Here we go again. Keep pretending? Who said anything about being worthy of administrative review? I'm clearly just expressing my opinion, same as you.

    You made that opinion clear nearly 12 hours ago.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4410999#Comment_4410999

    Man, you're so full of shit. :-)

    You've said this at least three times now. If you have nothing productive to add to this conversation, then don't add it?

  • ServerBachelorServerBachelor Member

    @Mumbly said:
    Sure. Let's torch his home now that he’s done on LET.

    No one had said anything about torching anything until now.

    Thanked by 3tentor Marx borkedascii
  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited May 2025

    @ServerBachelor said: If you have nothing productive to add to this conversation, then don't add it?

    Same goes to you. And you're doing this way longer ;-)

  • lirrrlirrr Member

    FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

    Thanked by 2beanman109 satorik
  • ServerBachelorServerBachelor Member

    @Mumbly said:
    Same goes to you. And you're doing this way longer ;-)

    I also have never criticized anyone for continuing this discussion. The duration of an individual's participation in a conversation is not inherently inversely proportional to their desire to be there.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @Mumbly said:
    Sure. Let's torch his home now that he’s done on LET.

    that's really below your level, you know that yourself, don't you?

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited May 2025

    @ServerBachelor said: No one had said anything about torching anything until now.

    You see, I keep telling you that you're not the sharpest tool in the drawer, and you keep proving it. We're on tech forum. It was obviously meant figuratively.

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • ServerBachelorServerBachelor Member

    @lirrr said:
    FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

    For $7 a year? I'll take it!

  • ServerBachelorServerBachelor Member

    @Mumbly said:

    @ServerBachelor said: No one had said anything about torching anything until now.

    You see, I keep telling you that you're not the sharpest tool in the drawer, and you keep proving it. It was obviously meant figuratively.

    If I could read, I'd be really upset :(

  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited May 2025

    @hyperblast said: that's really below your level, you know that yourself, don't you?

    &

    @Mumbly said: You see, I keep telling you that you're not the sharpest tool in the drawer, and you keep proving it. We're on tech forum. It was obviously meant figuratively.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited May 2025

    @Mumbly said:

    @hyperblast said: that's really below your level, you know that yourself, don't you?

    &

    @Mumbly said: You see, I keep telling you that you're not the sharpest tool in the drawer, and you keep proving it. We're on tech forum. It was obviously meant figuratively.

    ok.
    viewed in isolation (in relation to your first post), it would be a pretty big announcement.

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited May 2025

    I have no clue what you're talking about. It was clearly a sarcastic response to people who don’t know when it's time to quit beating a dead horse.

    Let me help you again:

    You don't get it, do you? This has nothing to do with us "seeing the severity of CharityHost's misdeeds differently". I didn't even talk much about his misdeeds. I'm talking about you, a few of you. How long will you keep following him? Stalking him? Doing everything in your power to destroy his business, his livelihood, now, when he's already banned from the forum?
    Yes, he may deadpool, that's true. But a few of you are surely doing everything in your power to ruin him even more, as if he hasn't already done enough damage to himself.

    You're hiding behind the usual phrases like "My sympathy is for his customers and those affected by his behavior" and "transparency" as if you genuinely care. But we're long past that. What you're really doing is beating a dead horse for your own amusement, for your own fun. At least be honest about it. Admit you're doing this for your entertainment, instead of dragging it on just because you're getting approval from a few like-minded people.

    You see, my post isn't about CharityHost, it's about you, a few of you, who are hiding behind standard phrases and pretending you're still doing good work, while the guy is more or less finished and most likely just trying to keep his business alive despite everything.

    Maybe I'm too weak, too sympathetic, that's possible. But come on, after all these weeks, people are making websites and who knows what else about him? If you only knew everything that has gone through this forum, you'd realize how insignificant CharityHost is in comparison and how ridiculous your crusade looks now that everything has already been said and done.

  • 10thHouse10thHouse Member

    @Mumbly and @ServerBachelor are derailing this thread and turning it into a public clown competition.

    @Arkas @DP it may be time to close it.

    Thanked by 1tentor
  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited May 2025

    @10thHouse said:
    @Mumbly and @ServerBachelor are derailing this thread and turning it into a public clown competition.

    So you're saying that I don't fit in? :(
    We even made some extra pages of this overly extended stupid witch hunt thread. What's there not to like?

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    i say: beating a dead horse is not a crime!

    and andre (@CharityHost_org) is happy how the users here tear each other apart.

    Thanked by 2ServerBachelor PineappleM
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @10thHouse said:
    @Mumbly and @ServerBachelor are derailing this thread and turning it into a public clown competition.

    @Arkas @DP it may be time to close it.

    but it is (according to the logic of the guy we're talking about here) @ServerBachelor 's thread! ;)

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @lirrr said:
    FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

    Sir this is digital town square

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • 10thHouse10thHouse Member

    @Mumbly said:

    @10thHouse said:
    @Mumbly and @ServerBachelor are derailing this thread and turning it into a public clown competition.

    So you're saying that I don't fit in? :(

    Your goals in your initial comments, though noble, have been undermined by your behavior in the hours following. You and @ServerBachelor are two sides of the same thread-bumping, drama-prolonging coin.

    @ServerBachelor wants to keep all eyes on CharityHost.

    You want to keep all eyes on @ServerBachelor.

    @raindog308 @angstrom it's time to close this thread and let LET move on.

    Thanked by 8tentor Mumbly ServerBachelor angstrom PineappleM iKeyZ borkedascii satorik
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    People, let's try not to beat a dead horse

    This thread is nine pages long, and everything that needed to be said about this particular incident has been said (unless I'm mistaken)

    If there's a new incident, please start a new thread for this

    Thread closed

    Thanked by 14ServerBachelor 10thHouse tentor JohnFilch123 brauni Mumbly zed PineappleM Marx nghialele borkedascii satorik gbzret4d bdspice
This discussion has been closed.