Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

CharityHost attempts to censor documentation of his actions on Host.charity

1234579

Comments

  • @ServerBachelor said:

    @Neoon said:
    .ru domain is like 2$, cheapest russian machine is 0.75$/m.
    I doubt, he is gonna be able, to do anything against that.

    Just in case, he manages to get the domain taken down.

    Nothing that Host.charity has posted, said, or done is illegal in the United States. If we had to move, we'd go to the EU or somewhere else in non-Russian Europe.

    Besides, in this climate, Russia would be friendlier to US demands than any EU hosting provider. (semi /s).

    I have some vps in some exotic locations just in case

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • @Mumbly said:
    You're beating a dead horse. After everything that's already been written, ban, etc... it's just moronic. And for what? Acting as if you have some noble mission? Spare me the bullshit.

    Being banned from LET doesn’t mean you’re not still operating an unethical business. No one here is pretending to have a “noble mission,” only a commitment to transparency.

    Thanked by 3s0n1c Marx borkedascii
  • s0n1cs0n1c Member

    @Mumbly said:
    You're beating a dead horse. After everything that's already been written, ban, etc... it's just moronic. And for what? Acting as if you have some noble mission? Spare me the bullshit.

    rats don't die so easily

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • @gbzret4d said:

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @Neoon said:
    .ru domain is like 2$, cheapest russian machine is 0.75$/m.
    I doubt, he is gonna be able, to do anything against that.

    Just in case, he manages to get the domain taken down.

    Nothing that Host.charity has posted, said, or done is illegal in the United States. If we had to move, we'd go to the EU or somewhere else in non-Russian Europe.

    Besides, in this climate, Russia would be friendlier to US demands than any EU hosting provider. (semi /s).

    I have some vps in some exotic locations just in case

    DM me which ones?

    Thanked by 1s0n1c
  • @ServerBachelor said:

    @gbzret4d said:

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @Neoon said:
    .ru domain is like 2$, cheapest russian machine is 0.75$/m.
    I doubt, he is gonna be able, to do anything against that.

    Just in case, he manages to get the domain taken down.

    Nothing that Host.charity has posted, said, or done is illegal in the United States. If we had to move, we'd go to the EU or somewhere else in non-Russian Europe.

    Besides, in this climate, Russia would be friendlier to US demands than any EU hosting provider. (semi /s).

    I have some vps in some exotic locations just in case

    DM me which ones?

    For example: pakistan, chile, colombia, iran, georgia, panama, island, ...

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • MumblyMumbly Member

    @s0n1c said: rats don't die so easily

    Thanks for proving my point.

  • @Mumbly said:

    @s0n1c said: rats don't die so easily

    Thanks for proving my point.

    If you really want this topic to die, you can choose not to bump this thread?

    Thanked by 1borkedascii
  • @gbzret4d said:

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @gbzret4d said:

    @ServerBachelor said:

    @Neoon said:
    .ru domain is like 2$, cheapest russian machine is 0.75$/m.
    I doubt, he is gonna be able, to do anything against that.

    Just in case, he manages to get the domain taken down.

    Nothing that Host.charity has posted, said, or done is illegal in the United States. If we had to move, we'd go to the EU or somewhere else in non-Russian Europe.

    Besides, in this climate, Russia would be friendlier to US demands than any EU hosting provider. (semi /s).

    I have some vps in some exotic locations just in case

    DM me which ones?

    For example: pakistan, chile, colombia, iran, georgia, panama, island, ...

    Iceland is interesting. DM specs?

  • MumblyMumbly Member

    @ServerBachelor said: If you really want this topic to die, you can choose not to bump this thread?

    I don't give a shit, really. I just expressed my thoughts. And since I'm smarter than you, I'm most likely correct. Goodnight.

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • @Mumbly said: And since I'm smarter than you

    Wow, ok good nigh

  • @Mumbly said:

    @ServerBachelor said: If you really want this topic to die, you can choose not to bump this thread?

    I don't give a shit, really. I just expressed my thoughts. And since I'm smarter than you, I'm most likely correct. Goodnight.

    You’re smarter than me? Dang it. I should have known.

    Pack up boys. We lost this round for real.

    Thanked by 2s0n1c PineappleM
  • nghialelenghialele Member
    edited May 2025

    @Mumbly said: I don't give a shit, really.

    proceed to argue express his own opinion in like 2 pages of thread

  • @nghialele said:

    @Mumbly said: I don't give a shit, really.

    proceed to argue express his own opinion in like 2 pages of thread

    “I definitely don’t care, but you’re wrong and I’m right” is straight out of the CharityHost playbook.

  • mwmw Member

    @ServerBachelor you should be fine with incognet but if you want to setup in south africa i'll spin you up

  • s0n1cs0n1c Member

    @Mumbly said:

    @ServerBachelor said: If you really want this topic to die, you can choose not to bump this thread?

    I don't give a shit, really. I just expressed my thoughts. And since I'm smarter than you, I'm most likely correct. Goodnight.

    idk man for a guy who doesn't give a shit, you sure talk a lot

  • @ServerBachelor said:

    @nghialele said:

    @Mumbly said: I don't give a shit, really.

    proceed to argue express his own opinion in like 2 pages of thread

    “I definitely don’t care, but you’re wrong and I’m right” is straight out of the CharityHost playbook.

    You're comment to much, please pay $25 commenting fee, to me.

  • HeinzHeinz Member
    edited May 2025

    @s0n1c said: idk man for a guy who doesn't give a shit, you sure talk a lot

    He's not wrong, though. The guy is done. If you would just stop pretending and admit that you're doing this for your own amusement.

  • edited May 2025

    @Heinz said:

    @s0n1c said: idk man for a guy who doesn't give a shit, you sure talk a lot

    He's not wrong, though. The guy is done. If you would just stop pretending and admit that you're doing this for your own amusement.

    I adhere to ethical standards that prevent me from going “all out” on CharityHost’s owner. If this were just for my entertainment, I wouldn’t hold back.

  • @Heinz said:

    @s0n1c said: idk man for a guy who doesn't give a shit, you sure talk a lot

    He's not wrong, though. The guy is done. If you would just stop pretending and admit that you're doing this for your own amusement.

    It's all his action that is archived. What else did @ServerBachelor do rather than archiving it that somehow .... feel offend to you two?

  • HeinzHeinz Member

    Spare me this crap. You're not fooling anyone :D

  • Again, like watching FailArmy and donate to the channel for the good works.

    :p

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • HeinzHeinz Member

    @nghialele said: It's all his action that is archived. What else did @ServerBachelor do rather than archiving it that somehow .... feel offend to you two?

    Offended? I just said that guy is correct, and you're beating a dead horse for your own amusement. What's so hard for you to understand here?

  • @Heinz said:
    Spare me this crap. You're not fooling anyone :D

    Don’t need to fool anyone because we’re not trying to. :)

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • @Heinz said:

    @nghialele said: It's all his action that is archived. What else did @ServerBachelor do rather than archiving it that somehow .... feel offend to you two?

    Offended? I just said that guy is correct, and you're beating a dead horse for your own amusement. What's so hard for you to understand here?

    I'm retarded so I cannot understand, my apologize for that. The other guy (Mumbly) sure smarter than all of us, he might understand your point better. Sorry I will stop talking to you Sir I feel dumb after just 2 comments.

  • HeinzHeinz Member

    Whatever you say.

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • @Heinz said:

    @nghialele said: It's all his action that is archived. What else did @ServerBachelor do rather than archiving it that somehow .... feel offend to you two?

    Offended? I just said that guy is correct, and you're beating a dead horse for your own amusement. What's so hard for you to understand here?

    The horse ain’t dead because he’s still screwing his customers and lying. People seem to mistake being banned from LET for being immune to criticism. This is a web hosting forum. We talk about web hosts. Not everyone discussed is an active member.

    Thanked by 1Marx
  • HeinzHeinz Member
    edited May 2025

    So what new will you tell us? I am all ears.

  • @Heinz said:
    So what new will you tell us? I am all ears.

    The guy CharityHost himself with some new action will tell the story, why would @ServerBachelor made up someting? xD

    Thanked by 2s0n1c borkedascii
  • @Heinz said:
    So what new will you tell us? I am all ears.

    Just keep tabs on the thread. I’ve already said my part :)

    Thanked by 1s0n1c
This discussion has been closed.