New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
US KVM ipv4 VPS $2/mo with recurring 50% OFF all orders for the life of the order!!
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
That's really pedantic though. public_html content is publicly resolvable with or without dns. However, directory listing is currently off to avoid attacks on listed assets.
Actually no. You are forgetting the other part of my statement. I can keep my files outside public_html but can list and give access to anyone via a script written in php or whatever language the panel allows.
According to your definition, these files are not in public. But they are IN public domain in reality.
This will create conflict because as a customer (hypothetically speaking), I would be very angry if my account gets suspended since I haven't broken the AUP (files are not in public_html and hence are not in public).
PHP is disallowed on FTP accounts. Read my comments please. Anything outside public_html is considered private to the account, they are not in public domain if they are not available on the public internet. I do not know why you insist this is a problem. It's the same as any full web hosting account in that sense, but no PHP, shell, db, etc available.
Heh? Why you need a cpanel then? Just make it a pure FTP server with users having their own space. This cyber panel is just a waste.
That is your opinion. It has use case.
Example:
I own a house. I decide to rent out my house that I own to someone.
I set a rules (read as AUP):
After that, the man who rented my house, and to whom I had read the rules before, KNOWINGLY broke one of the rules, let's say for example that he parked 2 cars in front of the house.
So I charge $1,000 as he previously knew.
After that, some people come and say, "Why are you looking at how many cars are parked in front of your house? A man has rented a house and has the right to do as he pleases, if he needs to bring in prostitutes and make a brothel".
As the owner of the house, I'm left feeling shitty by people because I was careful about the reputation and rules of my house.
How do you like this story?
why were you peeping through the windows?
To see if a person is following the rules in my house.
But said you rented the house out to someone? What if the tenant was doing something that deserved privacy, and fully complied with your rules?
Where I live in Canada, peeping through the windows, even as a landlord, could be considered voyeurism/peeping
https://justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/voy/part1_context.html
I believe this would fall under a privacy offence;
"With regard to accused persons, the section 7 liberty interest has been held to include a right to privacy. As Justice La Forest commented in R. v. Dyment[19], "privacy is at the heart of liberty in a modern state." From a constitutional perspective, it can be said that privacy surfaces as a constitutionally protected right in the context of both sections 7 and 8 of the Charter regarding accused persons. With regard to complainants and private individuals generally, there appears to be a constitutionally inspired recognition that a basic right to privacy is an element of living in a free and democratic society. Nonetheless, it cannot be said that the Charter provides citizens with a general, constitutionally protected right to privacy.
The right to privacy is expressly recognized by various international instruments[20] which extend to all persons the right to be protected from arbitrary or abusive interference with their privacy. The rights enshrined in these international instruments are expected to inform policy choices regarding the right to privacy in the domestic context.
In relationships between individuals, privacy rights are protected in the civil context in some jurisdictions through provincial legislation. To date, privacy legislation exists in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Newfoundland. The privacy rights of Quebec residents are protected through the Civil Code of Quebec and also by section 5 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms."
I'd imagine something similar in many other countries.
Then I have no right to say anything to that man, he followed the rules (AUP).
You have no right to say anything to that man, and now he has the right to call the police on you, and potentially even sue you for peeping and privacy offences - https://justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/voy/part1_context.html
Dude, you have the right to look out the window of your house, it's your window and your house. It's not against the law.
How would you know its prostitution without doing something like peeping in their windows
What if he just wanted to bring his friend over?
Before he rented the house, he signed a contract with me on behavior inside my house (read: AUP).
Yeah, and how would you know if the girl he had over was a prostitute or simply a friend without peeping?
Because I saw prostitutes coming in and out of my rented house (for example) and my neighbors told me about it. My neighbors and I saw them quite by chance, we didn't peek.
What if its the same prostitute. That could be a friend?? How would you know?
I said prostitutes in the plural (files). Everyone knows them from the city.
Your original AUP says the act of "prostitution" is prohibited
The definition of "prostitution" is "the practice or occupation of engaging in sexual activity with someone for payment"
It does not need to be multiple people in order to be considered prostitution.
You're right. In my case, we saw several prostitutes coming in and out of my rented house. They were in and out for several days, the whole city knew about them.
Watch this video, it's very educational:
I promised myself to stay out of this thread but I wanted you guys to know that I literally busted out laughing when I read this analogy crafted to show exactly what @CharityHost_org did wrong. Well done @jure12.
Yes, but that was in your case. If it was only one prostitute, and it was a prostitute from a neighboring city, you would never be able to enforce that part of your AUP without violating their privacy which is what exactly Charityhost did.
You'd be the last person I'd want as my landlord. Personally, I don't meddle in my tenants' affairs or snoop on their activities, such as who's coming in or out, what they're up to, etc. I only visit the property if they report an issue. So far, everything has been perfectly fine.
I heard and saw a lot of noise inside my rented house, there were about 100 people inside the house.
After that I saw that my rented house was full of prostitutes working for money.
In my case, there was a lot of noise, I came by my rented house and I saw 100 prostitutes inside. After that, I knocked on the door and told the person who rented my house that he had to get out of it because he did not follow the rules (AUP) that he had previously signed.
That's not the full serivice. Cyberpanel works great!
was there a noise complaint?
I heard it too.