Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

EasyVM sold to LevelOneServers?

135

Comments

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate
    edited March 2025

    @Francisco said:

    @cybertech said: so which is accurate? if the company has been bought then liabilities should be transferred as well

    The assets of the company got bought. They aren't buying EasyVM LLC (or whatever it was called). That LLC is what holds the liabilities, not the hardware/IP's/etc.

    Francisco

    EasyVM LLC must have received money for selling the assets.
    Liabilities can be paid from this money before they go into owner's pocket.

    Thanked by 1ethanblake87
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @yoursunny said:

    @Francisco said:

    @cybertech said: so which is accurate? if the company has been bought then liabilities should be transferred as well

    The assets of the company got bought. They aren't buying EasyVM LLC (or whatever it was called). That LLC is what holds the liabilities, not the hardware/IP's/etc.

    Francisco

    EasyVM LLC must have received money for selling the assets.
    Liabilities can be paid from this money before they go into owner's pocket.

    Assuming they owned those assets under this LLC.

    Francisco

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    @labze said: For example, as fantastic as VirtFusion is, it does not have the feature to e-mail clients on X systems. You have to manually pull client e-mails from the database which is a chore. You might not always have the correct package assigned to the correct client due to custom setups and server migrations so contacting the affected clients through Blesta / WHMCS and so on is not always optimal either.

    I wrote a plugin for @crunchbits on that, not sure whether they have plan to resell it :D

  • VanessaVanessa Member, Patron Provider

    EasyVM was sold to LevelOneServers

  • neohneoh Member

    EasyVMoney

    Fixed!

    Thanked by 1ethanblake87
  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @FAT32 said:

    @labze said: For example, as fantastic as VirtFusion is, it does not have the feature to e-mail clients on X systems. You have to manually pull client e-mails from the database which is a chore. You might not always have the correct package assigned to the correct client due to custom setups and server migrations so contacting the affected clients through Blesta / WHMCS and so on is not always optimal either.

    I wrote a plugin for @crunchbits on that, not sure whether they have plan to resell it :D

    Never. That was a trade secret @FAT32 i think we have to engage that NDA protection clause

  • @crunchbits said:

    @FAT32 said:

    @labze said: For example, as fantastic as VirtFusion is, it does not have the feature to e-mail clients on X systems. You have to manually pull client e-mails from the database which is a chore. You might not always have the correct package assigned to the correct client due to custom setups and server migrations so contacting the affected clients through Blesta / WHMCS and so on is not always optimal either.

    I wrote a plugin for @crunchbits on that, not sure whether they have plan to resell it :D

    Never. That was a trade secret @FAT32 i think we have to engage that NDA protection clause

    @FAT32 has to do giveaways on LET for breaking the NDA now?

  • bdlbdl Member
    edited March 2025

    @emgh said:
    honestly I'm getting really fucking tired of LET hosts doing stuff like this over and over, sending out that email AFTER having started migrations? It's a competitive market and I hope you all make sure not to reward stuff like this, vote with your wallet

    @entrailz said: Service will go offline at some point this week (it could be as early as this evening).

    wow

    Reguards

    LowEndMigration

    i have become chainsaw

  • 1uu11uu1 Member

    It's a vicious cycle for new businesses. :/

    the price is cheap: cannot get back the principal
    the price is not competitive: fails to attract customers

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    Use code NDA for 10 % off and a lawsuit coming your way

  • @FAT32 said:

    @labze said: For example, as fantastic as VirtFusion is, it does not have the feature to e-mail clients on X systems. You have to manually pull client e-mails from the database which is a chore. You might not always have the correct package assigned to the correct client due to custom setups and server migrations so contacting the affected clients through Blesta / WHMCS and so on is not always optimal either.

    I wrote a plugin for @crunchbits on that, not sure whether they have plan to resell it :D

    That shows that it can easily be done, and it also shows that Crunchbits is one of the providers that actually spent the money/time to do it. Ten points for Crunchbits.

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @rcy026 said:

    @FAT32 said:

    @labze said: For example, as fantastic as VirtFusion is, it does not have the feature to e-mail clients on X systems. You have to manually pull client e-mails from the database which is a chore. You might not always have the correct package assigned to the correct client due to custom setups and server migrations so contacting the affected clients through Blesta / WHMCS and so on is not always optimal either.

    I wrote a plugin for @crunchbits on that, not sure whether they have plan to resell it :D

    That shows that it can easily be done, and it also shows that Crunchbits is one of the providers that actually spent the money/time to do it. Ten points for Crunchbits.

    Just one of those little things to make life easier. Can’t email blast everyone with X product because one server needs a reboot or short downtime. Plugin is used constantly for over a year now and no worries about missing someone manually (how we used to do it). If only @FAT32 still had time for little projects like this, so many little QOL tweaks we could make the @FAT32 SummerHost plugin pack for $199.

  • JordJord Moderator, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @crunchbits said:

    @rcy026 said:

    @FAT32 said:

    @labze said: For example, as fantastic as VirtFusion is, it does not have the feature to e-mail clients on X systems. You have to manually pull client e-mails from the database which is a chore. You might not always have the correct package assigned to the correct client due to custom setups and server migrations so contacting the affected clients through Blesta / WHMCS and so on is not always optimal either.

    I wrote a plugin for @crunchbits on that, not sure whether they have plan to resell it :D

    That shows that it can easily be done, and it also shows that Crunchbits is one of the providers that actually spent the money/time to do it. Ten points for Crunchbits.

    Just one of those little things to make life easier. Can’t email blast everyone with X product because one server needs a reboot or short downtime. Plugin is used constantly for over a year now and no worries about missing someone manually (how we used to do it). If only @FAT32 still had time for little projects like this, so many little QOL tweaks we could make the @FAT32 SummerHost plugin pack for $199.

    @FAT32 is prem

  • rabbyrabby Member

    Anybody know what's going on with EasyVM dedis?? Are they also getting moved to LevelOne?? All the notices have been about moving VPS's. No word on dedis.

  • what about parallax?

    Thanked by 2Xrmaddness admax
  • I saw a NYC VPS come back up this morning (which went down March 5th) - so 3 days to transfer ownership isn't bad. Dallas and Ashburn systems are still MIA though...

  • @zGato said:
    Well, no refunds seem to be getting issued. I guess I'll file a chargeback

    @aqua care to comment?

    I am curious. If they don't have a way to issue refund (due to change in ownership), that means anyone who is not happy with the service should be able to chargeback, get their money and yet continue to use their service with EasyVM, as the payment processor has changed right?

    And if they block the service, that means they had way to issue refund as well.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • aquaaqua Member, Host Rep

    Hi all,

    To address the elephant in the room, EasyVM was sold to the Purevoltage team. After numerous complaints and failed attempts to fix our support, our network, and overall service, I knew my days were up. EasyVM as a service was doing fine, it was just the upkeep that was tearing everything apart. Contract renewals were coming up for the space EasyVM was in and I felt the right move was to hand everything over to Jake and his team, as I have faith that they will provide better support and address any issues a lot better, and in a timely manner.

    Regarding refunds, this is a very rough topic as there is no clear definite on who should be processing them, but I will work with Jake and his team to address these so I am not getting a large amount of chargebacks.

    I felt that going this route would be a lot better than pulling what another blue colored service on these forums does, where we completely ignore issues and do not address them. I know everything was sudden and had no prior notification, but we simply wanted everything to be done all at once and not be dragging out everything.

    To everyone who supported me in the past few years, I want to thank you, and I trust that Jake and his team will handle everything a lot better than I could during my ownership.

  • @aqua said:
    Hi all,

    To address the elephant in the room, EasyVM was sold to the Purevoltage team. After numerous complaints and failed attempts to fix our support, our network, and overall service, I knew my days were up. EasyVM as a service was doing fine, it was just the upkeep that was tearing everything apart. Contract renewals were coming up for the space EasyVM was in and I felt the right move was to hand everything over to Jake and his team, as I have faith that they will provide better support and address any issues a lot better, and in a timely manner.

    Regarding refunds, this is a very rough topic as there is no clear definite on who should be processing them, but I will work with Jake and his team to address these so I am not getting a large amount of chargebacks.

    I felt that going this route would be a lot better than pulling what another blue colored service on these forums does, where we completely ignore issues and do not address them. I know everything was sudden and had no prior notification, but we simply wanted everything to be done all at once and not be dragging out everything.

    To everyone who supported me in the past few years, I want to thank you, and I trust that Jake and his team will handle everything a lot better than I could during my ownership.

    It seems like you took your time with such announcement.

  • ksoutarksoutar Member, Host Rep

    @rabby said:
    Anybody know what's going on with EasyVM dedis?? Are they also getting moved to LevelOne?? All the notices have been about moving VPS's. No word on dedis.

    From what I have been told, at least in regards to NY Dedi's, they are being moved to PureVoltage. Although ours, which we were just using for some backup stuff still has not been turned back on yet, and the DCI Manager appears to not be licensed properly.

    I submitted a ticket about this yesterday, however I still have not heard back.

    Thanked by 1rabby
  • edited March 2025

    This entire migration has been a massive clusterfuck with obviously false public statements from both sides. PureVoltage needs to stop blaming their incompetence on the "previous management" and get their shit together. I don't know what kind of "studying for my CCNA" network techs they have, but the equipment has been moved and racked for days already. It does NOT take this long to get the network fully back up. Going from GSL to heavy HE with a side of RCN (lmao) and Cogent is also hilarious.

    This is not to mention the 0 advanced notice for NY customers, the abrupt migration of Ashburn to NY, and whatever the hell is going on in Dallas. I don't buy the "extremely short timeframe" excuses for one second. And don't forget apparently refusing to give refunds after all of this!

    Both sides need to stop acting like 5-year-olds and work together to fix this mess already.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @aqua said:
    Regarding refunds, this is a very rough topic as there is no clear definite on who should be processing them, but I will work with Jake and his team to address these so I am not getting a large amount of chargebacks.

    Stall tactic detected.

    Thanked by 3admax Nyr Halo11
  • admaxadmax Member, Megathread Squad

    The Dallas VPS control panel is online, but it is still in a locked state! :neutral:

  • admaxadmax Member, Megathread Squad

    @yoursunny said:

    @aqua said:
    Regarding refunds, this is a very rough topic as there is no clear definite on who should be processing them, but I will work with Jake and his team to address these so I am not getting a large amount of chargebacks.

    Stall tactic detected.

    I don't want to use the Paypal refund policy for the first time either!

    Thanked by 1Halo11
  • @aqua said: Regarding refunds, this is a very rough topic as there is no clear definite on who should be processing them

    Who ever that is responsible for EasyVM LLC

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited March 2025

    @srch07 said:
    @zGato said:
    Well, no refunds seem to be getting issued. I guess I'll file a chargeback

    @aqua care to comment?

    I am curious. If they don't have a way to issue refund (due to change in ownership), that means anyone who is not happy with the service should be able to chargeback, get their money and yet continue to use their service with EasyVM, as the payment processor has changed right?

    And if they block the service, that means they had way to issue refund as well.

    You're describing fraud, on your part.

  • NanjaNanja Member

    Uhm, I paid via paypal...
    The first post said for N.Y. servers "The estimated time frame for full service restoration is 144 hours."

    I think it is past that time though, What method should I use to get money back???
    Should I just wait and see what happens?

  • ksoutarksoutar Member, Host Rep
    edited March 2025

    @Nanja said:
    Uhm, I paid via paypal...
    The first post said for N.Y. servers "The estimated time frame for full service restoration is 144 hours."

    I think it is past that time though, What method should I use to get money back???
    Should I just wait and see what happens?

    We are technically only at 84 hours so far, but I still think that 144 hours of downtime is ridiculous for a migration.

  • @TimboJones said:

    @srch07 said:
    @zGato said:
    Well, no refunds seem to be getting issued. I guess I'll file a chargeback

    @aqua care to comment?

    I am curious. If they don't have a way to issue refund (due to change in ownership), that means anyone who is not happy with the service should be able to chargeback, get their money and yet continue to use their service with EasyVM, as the payment processor has changed right?

    And if they block the service, that means they had way to issue refund as well.

    You're describing fraud, on your part.

    Oh damn.
    I didn't knew it's fraud if you keep tab to see if the service remains up or not.
    Heck you can chargeback for one and keep using other service.

    But then I am not a lawyer, maybe you are? 🤔

    Honestly, though I feel it will be stupid for anyone to keep using the service after 4 month of network issue, random downtime and multiple IP changes.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @ksoutar said:

    @Nanja said:
    Uhm, I paid via paypal...
    The first post said for N.Y. servers "The estimated time frame for full service restoration is 144 hours."

    I think it is past that time though, What method should I use to get money back???
    Should I just wait and see what happens?

    We are technically only at 84 hours so far, but I still think that 144 hours of downtime is ridiculous for a migration.

    For reference, VirmAche the teetering at the end provider, recently completed a migration in Los Angeles between two facilities within 48 hours including physically moving hardware and announcing IPs.

Sign In or Register to comment.