New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Test the disk I/O of your VPS
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
crissic, 512MB box ($15/yr)
ftpit 512MB box ($20/yr)
vpsdime 6GB box ($7/mo)
cloudive 2GB box ($7/mo)
weloveservers 1GB box ($19/yr)
bandwagonhost 512MB box ($10/yr)
BuyVM (LV BuyVM-256MB) ($3.50/month)
mycustomhosting.net LET-NOV-256MB-10GB-250GB KVM ($15.00/year)
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -f test 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.2465 seconds, 81.1 MB/s new attempt: dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -f test 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.3706 seconds, 453 MB/s
Cloud3k (RockMyWeb) 1024MB NY private cloud server ($5.95/month)
RamHost TinyVZ ($15/year)
Inception Hosting Miami USA Xen VPS - FL2048 (€5.35/month)
BlueVM $12.00/year Plan - Illinois
Cloud3k (RockMyWeb) 1024MB Chicago private cloud server ($5.95/month)
ReverseHosts SDVPS 512 ($12/year)
highspeedweb.net V3 - VPS - OpenVZ-128 ($10/year)
123Systems.net Linux-4GB-SolusVM - Dallas ($35.00/year)
httpzoom OVM - 256B - UK (£6.00 quarterly)
crissic 1GB SPECIAL ($28.00/year)
@SemoWeb Budget VPS - LEB256
RamNode SSD
Green ValueHost
Host1Free
EduVPS
IPXCore (IPv6 Only Beta)
Home 512mb ubuntu vps: Hyper-V
I'm impressed as this machine is running on a single two year old sata drive, linux on Hyper-v used to absolutely suck, but obviously its much better now.
So does anyone know why I would get such good dd numbers on a single desktop sata drive with no raid on Hyper-V?
8 Disk Raid 10:
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.80276 s, 282 MB/s
Think the RAID card needs a swap
FtpIt NY ssd
Crissic ( 2gb KVM ):
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 17.3906 s, 61.7 MB/s
Fliphost ( 2GB KVM SSD ) :
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.18931 s, 903 MB/s
iwStack (2 GB KVM)
[root@vpsxx ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.5348 s, 700 MB/s
Chicago VPS
2GB RAM, 100GB HDD, 3TB Bandwidth
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 9.17661 s, 117 MB/s
Chicago VPS
2GB RAM, 50GB HDD, 2TB Bandwidth
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 8.87568 s, 121 MB/s
We just upgraded the storage 1 week ago. It outgrew the old one, we plan on offering a choice slow storage, fast storage and local SSD.
How will this effect pricing?
Well, the local ssd storage means there will be no failover and there will be downtime if maintenance is required so, it will be faster but will have disadvantages. It will probably go for the same price as now, the slower, old storage might go cheaper but this is not decided yet.
Weloveservvers.net , 1 GB plan , Germany
MyCusotomHosting KVM 4GM
Bad Result For KVM
RLT, Houston
Man, was this a fast machine when it was still called Urpad and located in Chicago!
But hey, at least they are honest and have a nice sense of humor: who else would name a vps node "toy" for host name and rDNS.... :-)
New KVM I have with KnownSRV.com -- No said specifically posting budget providers, these guys are worth every dollar i pay them :P
No SSD's, No Cache just straight 10x SATA or 12 x SATA
Anyone got any for our nodes?
Look's like LETS playing up....Sigh...
Prometeus US XEN VPS
Our own servers, KVM11 (CacheCade) under load:
Inside a VPS (512MB KVM) on KVM11...
123systems.net - VPS (2.5GB - OpenVZ)
[root@www ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 4.07649 s, 263 MB/s
Its decent for 25$/year - Guaranteed RAM: 2.5GB
vSwap: 2.5GB
Disk Space: 75GB
Bandwidth: 2TB/Month
3 CPU Cores
1 IP Address
SolusVM Control Panel
Liquid Solutions
Crissic
hear a lot of negative stuff about them. What is the uptime like?
don't even need to do a test, it's limited to 11MB/s
not a problem tho
Would not prefer anyone for production sever, i took this server for my application building, uptime really sucks ! Had a longest downtime for any of my VPS till now of 15 hours , xvmlab experimental server is way way better than 123systems,
[root@www ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.52108 s, 426 MB/s
Above result are for XVMlabs 2.99$ deal - 4 IP
ssd vps hostkey
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.90169 s, 370 MB/s
Crissic, OVZ LA, post-QuadraNet.
HVH, OVZ LA.
Aruba, DC3-CZ
Aruba, DC5-DE
Ohh, a necro thread. Anyway, decided to give @Incero's SpeedyKVM a shot. I'm impressed so far. I know people have had their problems with Wable, but I've always been a happy customer.
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.24017 s, 866 MB/s
Anyone has review for MooseVZ?
My old digitalocean vps slow 60-70MB/s.
I create now new doplet.