Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

[Best Deals] | 9.99$/yr VPS | 20.99$/yr 4vCPU/8GB RAM/50GB | Dedicated Servers | Pre Black Friday

1555658606177

Comments

  • @Kuma said:

    @Calypso said:
    BTW, my VPS (reported on node6 but also mentioned as "offline" in the client area) is working correctly, also on IPv6.

    Also in node6. Everything was fine, but about three days ago, ipv6 suddenly stopped working.

    Haven't got a clue if I'm still on node6 at this time since during the issues some time back vpses were moved to other nodes. And because the client area is mentioning that the VPS appears to be offline (which it isn't) and console access isn't working, I suspect that the VPS is on another node.

    Thanked by 1JohnnySac
  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider

    @Calypso said:

    @Kuma said:

    @Calypso said:
    BTW, my VPS (reported on node6 but also mentioned as "offline" in the client area) is working correctly, also on IPv6.

    Also in node6. Everything was fine, but about three days ago, ipv6 suddenly stopped working.

    Haven't got a clue if I'm still on node6 at this time since during the issues some time back vpses were moved to other nodes. And because the client area is mentioning that the VPS appears to be offline (which it isn't) and console access isn't working, I suspect that the VPS is on another node.

    Yes! I'll check the virtualizor side once again.

    Regarding IPv6, we didn't see any issues directly on the node, nor the prefixes (they are announced and gateways, that we monitor, reachable). I just got pcap for couple of customers and fixing it now! (problem can be present on couple of services, not global). Will inform everyone on the ticket once we have proper solution!

    Thanked by 1Kuma
  • i have the same problem with IPV6 suddenly stopped working and tickets are also ignored

  • my ticket responded
    stop and start again from panel

    Thanked by 1Kuma
  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider

    @cold said:
    i have the same problem with IPV6 suddenly stopped working and tickets are also ignored

    We responded to all tickets - shoot me ticket ID on dm please :)

  • lowendclientlowendclient Member
    edited February 2025

    Check ARP issue, it may leads to broadcast storm and reboot.
    Have you configured Layer 3 Switching or Vxlan?
    All these can not be solved by Virtualizor only.

  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider

    @lowendclient said:
    Check ARP issue, it may leads to broadcast storm and reboot.
    Have you configured Layer 3 Switching or Vxlan?
    All these can not be solved by Virtualizor only.

    What do You mean "Layer 3 switching"? Switching is L2, L3 -> routing. Regarding the IPv6 issue that couple of customers experienced, it was filtering issue :) But always happy to hear any suggestions!

    Thanked by 1lowendclient
  • Any chance of restock? @Chunkserve

    Thanked by 1CloudHopper
  • Here we go again... had a couple of days without issues, but rebooting, unreachable, all the fun starts again. 1,5 months going, and everytime I think "I might get to use this one" it fails again.

  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider
    edited February 2025

    @Calypso said:
    Here we go again... had a couple of days without issues, but rebooting, unreachable, all the fun starts again. 1,5 months going, and everytime I think "I might get to use this one" it fails again.

    Hi!
    As replied on the ticket. One of our upstreams and us got heavily DDoS'ed (carpet-bombing). After we noticed that, we started working on a solution. We rerouted the traffic via another, and are monitoring the situation! (see the graph below).

    We got confirmation that the entire attack scale was nearly 1Tbit/s in peak. This was more then our upstream capacity could handle, and since it was carpet bomb, nullrouting was also not a good enough option to fully mitigate the impact.

    Thanked by 1tenji
  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider

    @ImWaqas said:
    Any chance of restock? @Chunkserve

    There will be probably some servers back in stock, but in limited amount. Maybe even today :) We racked new nodes, including gold ones. There will be separate offer for that, but before, we wanted to do some small restock ;)

  • Always some excuse - if it was the 1st or 2nd one, I could go along. But it's one after another. Start proving that you are a trustworthy provider, not by words but by stability.

    BTW: 13th of february: "Yes! I'll check the virtualizor side once again." - nothing changed and basically the VPS is reported to be offline (while being online) and I'm still reported on node6 but I don't know at all if that's really so. And the console still doesn't work (cannot connect), so as said: nothing changed.

  • CalypsoCalypso Member
    edited February 2025

    OK, you're getting me pissed now by your answer on the ticket.

    On your offer: "Thanks to our cooperation with @BackboneDirect @ AS50917, we can offer reliable services"

    On your reply: "Plese keep in mind, that it's 11.99E (<1E/mo service) - we didn't offer any SLA on that".

    I don't expect an SLA. I realise that low cost comes at a price (pun intended). However, you're going the C1V route here. I only expect a reliable service (your words in the offer), not one with every couple of days severe outage in one way or another. And I've invested in that, not only by money, but with working with @backbonedirect to them with enough information to be able to pinpoint an issue in your infrastructure.

    If what's we as customers have experienced the last 1,5 month is what you consider to be expected from it, please openly confirm that. As a warning to others that this is just a Polish variant of doing business like that Italian guy - with the difference that he was hosting from a garage.

  • It is interesting but my Amsterdam server is working without any issues.

    Thanked by 1cmeerw
  • Out of stock. When it will be in stock

  • @JohnFilch123 said:
    It is interesting but my Amsterdam server is working without any issues.

    Same here. Sure, there were network issues for almost an hour today, but I'd guess it would still be around 99.8 % uptime over the past month.

    Thanked by 1JohnFilch123
  • @cmeerw said:

    @JohnFilch123 said:
    It is interesting but my Amsterdam server is working without any issues.

    Same here. Sure, there were network issues for almost an hour today, but I'd guess it would still be around 99.8 % uptime over the past month.

    Would probably be that big ddos attack. Hope all the issues for Calypso are fixed now.

    Thanked by 1Chunkserve
  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider
    edited February 2025

    @Calypso said:
    Always some excuse - if it was the 1st or 2nd one, I could go along. But it's one after another. Start proving that you are a trustworthy provider, not by words but by stability.

    BTW: 13th of february: "Yes! I'll check the virtualizor side once again." - nothing changed and basically the VPS is reported to be offline (while being online) and I'm still reported on node6 but I don't know at all if that's really so. And the console still doesn't work (cannot connect), so as said: nothing changed.

    Regarding virtualizor, can You please check it again as I asked You on a ticket? I reloaded the vm record. It's not an easy task to mitigate such big attack - please keep it in mind.

    @Calypso said: OK, you're getting me pissed now by your answer on the ticket.

    Totally understand it, but it's not my intention.

    @Calypso said: If what's we as customers have experienced the last 1,5 month is what you consider to be expected from it, please openly confirm that. As a warning to others that this is just a Polish variant of doing business like that Italian guy - with the difference that he was hosting from a garage.

    You got me wrong - I'm sorry. I can confirm that we experienced some launch issues, that resulted in some outages in the past. We took a valuable lesson from it and upgraded our infrastructure (ie. backup lines, new routing stack etc). Of course, it should not be like that - and that's why we compensated it to the customers. We want to offer the best services possible, and I totally understand Your concern. I also didn't get that part: "As a warning to others that this is just a Polish variant of doing business like that Italian guy - with the difference that he was hosting from a garage.". We want to take the matter as serious as possible - so I'll be happy to work with ANYONE that encountered any issues in regards of fixing them, and compensating for the downtime. As I replied to You previously on the ticket: "Didn't want to mean that 11.99E/yr services CAN be unreliable or anything like that. It was mainly indicating, that ie. getting transit with 100% DDOS SLA or anything like that is really hard for such services. But of course, my previous respond sound really bad. Again - as I mentioned earlier, it's not reflecting of course that such services CAN be down or customers should expect it. If I get more informations, I'll let You know."

    Today's situation wasn't ie. hardware fail or anything like that. One of the upstreams + us got carped bombed. As soon, as we noticed that, we started working on a solution. We also rerouted to our other upstream temporarily. The upstrem provider is adding additional capacity and appliances will be ordered to deal with this.

    @Calypso said: I don't expect an SLA. I realise that low cost comes at a price (pun intended). However, you're going the C1V route here. I only expect a reliable service (your words in the offer), not one with every couple of days severe outage in one way or another.

    Okay. We wanted to reply to everything as fast as possible, and maybe such response can sound not really well. 11.99Eur/mo service does not mean, that it can be poor quality/experience notorial issues - and I totally agree with You. We had some issues indeed in the past, however this one is a DDoS which is outside our influence sphere. You have to agree a extremely large attack like this one is also quite unusual. Especially since we do not host any high-risk services. We would love to elevate the services and we're upgrading everything - factors, that caused issues at past are already fixed. Can you perhaps, if you're willing to, make a list of issues you've had and send it to us on ticket? We will formulate a plan to address them all accordingly.

    To summarize: I totally got Your point. I explained what caused the outage (attack) and that we're planning to elevate the mitigation. I'm more than happy to have You as customer, and I hope that You'll see the progress.

    Thanked by 2JohnnySac Kuma
  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider

    @cmeerw said:

    @JohnFilch123 said:
    It is interesting but my Amsterdam server is working without any issues.

    Same here. Sure, there were network issues for almost an hour today, but I'd guess it would still be around 99.8 % uptime over the past month.

    Yes, and @Calypso is totally right. It shouldn't happen. I didn't mean that offered promo vms should work like that. Factors of previous issues were fixed and we made a lot of upgrades since beginning of this year. It's the first time we experenced DDoS attack on such large scale. We're however discussing now next upgrades, including capacity and automation.

    Thanked by 1cmeerw
  • @Chunkserve said: We racked new nodes, including gold ones. There will be separate offer for that

    Been checking here almost daily for updates. Hoping for some good offers ;)
    Are you considering any plans with a bit more storage (with a little less compute if needed) like ~100GB?

    Thanked by 1Chunkserve
  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider

    @RichEagle said:

    @Chunkserve said: We racked new nodes, including gold ones. There will be separate offer for that

    Been checking here almost daily for updates. Hoping for some good offers ;)
    Are you considering any plans with a bit more storage (with a little less compute if needed) like ~100GB?

    SSD/HDD? I think we can think about some offer :) "Less compute" - what are Your requirements?

  • @Chunkserve said:

    @RichEagle said:

    @Chunkserve said: We racked new nodes, including gold ones. There will be separate offer for that

    Been checking here almost daily for updates. Hoping for some good offers ;)
    Are you considering any plans with a bit more storage (with a little less compute if needed) like ~100GB?

    SSD/HDD? I think we can think about some offer :) "Less compute" - what are Your requirements?

    SSD :)
    Personally, something with at minimum 2-3 cores, 4GB RAM, and 10TB BW meets my needs reasonably well.

  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider

    @RichEagle said:

    @Chunkserve said:

    @RichEagle said:

    @Chunkserve said: We racked new nodes, including gold ones. There will be separate offer for that

    Been checking here almost daily for updates. Hoping for some good offers ;)
    Are you considering any plans with a bit more storage (with a little less compute if needed) like ~100GB?

    SSD/HDD? I think we can think about some offer :) "Less compute" - what are Your requirements?

    SSD :)
    Personally, something with at minimum 2-3 cores, 4GB RAM, and 10TB BW meets my needs reasonably well.

    Can we hop to DM?

    Thanked by 1RichEagle
  • @Chunkserve said:
    Regarding virtualizor, can You please check it again as I asked You on a ticket? I reloaded the vm record.

    I've just checked it and now it's showing the correct status and node, also VNC is working. Thanks.

    BTW: a remark made to you by others in the past: your config of sending out mails through the ticketing system is not correct. "changeme example.com" is still present and it's one of the reasons that mail from your system (i.e. ticketmail) is regarded spam.

    It's not an easy task to mitigate such big attack - please keep it in mind.

    O yes, I can totally understand that. My issue is that it's always something happening, and it's very frustrating that, when being cautious of introducing new hosts to my VPS pool and waiting until things appear stable before doing so, thing go wrong within 24 hours after adding - and that happened several times already.

    I can understand people who say "only 1 hour of downtime" and/or "99.8% uptime", but I have other VPSes, likewise priced or even cheaper, that don't have an issue every week and have uptimes without network interruptions of months. Also I don't look at a weekly uptime, I look at the bigger picture. One week it's serverload, then hardware failure, one week further it's network issues, the week after that a DDoS attack... In my days we reported both uptime in percentage as number of incidents. Usually our customers would "prefer" 1 outage of 30 minutes over 5 outages of 1 minute, and for my use of the VPS it's exactly the same.

    I also didn't get that part: "As a warning to others that this is just a Polish variant of doing business like that Italian guy - with the difference that he was hosting from a garage."

    Look into some threads about C1V - a textbook example of how you shouldn't treat customers ;-)

    It was mainly indicating, that ie. getting transit with 100% DDOS SLA or anything like that is really hard for such services. But of course, my previous respond sound really bad.

    No problem - it was the wrong comment to the wrong customer at the wrong time. Can happen. I don't expect 100% uptime, 2 minute reply time and 24/7 reachability of servicedesk. If you get 100% uptime, you're lucky. On the other hand, I don't expect an issue every week. And "issue" for me is not (although it "hurts" me) a few-second-network-outage due to some rerouting or things like that.

    To be totally clear: I love small hosters that try to set up a business. I can be grumpy sometimes when something happens, but as long as I"m grumpy instead of sarcastic or silent, it's still a sign that I want to proceed. Otherwise I'll just ignore a host, demand a refund or let the subscription expire and won't renew.

    Thanked by 2Chunkserve JohnnySac
  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider

    @Calypso said: BTW: a remark made to you by others in the past: your config of sending out mails through the ticketing system is not correct. "changeme example.com" is still present and it's one of the reasons that mail from your system (i.e. ticketmail) is regarded spam.

    Thank YOu so much for feedback. My friend configured the SMTP side, forwarding it ASAP.

    @Calypso said: O yes, I can totally understand that. My issue is that it's always something happening, and it's very frustrating that, when being cautious of introducing new hosts to my VPS pool and waiting until things appear stable before doing so, thing go wrong within 24 hours after adding - and that happened several times already.

    I can understand people who say "only 1 hour of downtime" and/or "99.8% uptime", but I have other VPSes, likewise priced or even cheaper, that don't have an issue every week and have uptimes without network interruptions of months. Also I don't look at a weekly uptime, I look at the bigger picture. One week it's serverload, then hardware failure, one week further it's network issues, the week after that a DDoS attack... In my days we reported both uptime in percentage as number of incidents. Usually our customers would "prefer" 1 outage of 30 minutes over 5 outages of 1 minute, and for my use of the VPS it's exactly the same.

    Thank You for broader point of view. I can totally understand it, and will do everything as I can to elevate the network / service quality. We're heavily talking also with @BackboneDirect - Their commitment in networking aspect is really valuable :)

    @Calypso said: No problem - it was the wrong comment to the wrong customer at the wrong time. Can happen. I don't expect 100% uptime, 2 minute reply time and 24/7 reachability of servicedesk. If you get 100% uptime, you're lucky. On the other hand, I don't expect an issue every week. And "issue" for me is not (although it "hurts" me) a few-second-network-outage due to some rerouting or things like that.

    Totally understandable, and regardless if it's issue directly with our networking stack, or it's hardware/upstream fail - customers are still experiencing issue and that's the provider responsibility.

    We're happy for the opportunity to cooperate with a lot of amazing customers, and we're hoping for it in the future! I totally understand Your frustration regarding my reply and thank You so much for Your understanding!

  • ChunkserveChunkserve Member, Patron Provider

    @LOVEME830 said:
    Out of stock. When it will be in stock

    Couple of servers are back in stock (and are provisioned on Xeon Gold node by default ;))

  • @Chunkserve said:

    @LOVEME830 said:
    Out of stock. When it will be in stock

    Couple of servers are back in stock (and are provisioned on Xeon Gold node by default ;))

    HDD offers?

  • Seems nice

    Yabs

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Feb 15 05:14:02 PM EST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 3 @ 1995.311 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 2.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 24.5 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-9-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Wojciech Czapkowicz
    ASN        : AS214481 Wojciech Czapkowicz
    Host       : Wojciech Czapkowicz
    Location   : Warsaw, Mazovia (14)
    Country    : Poland
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 176.93 MB/s  (44.2k) | 307.86 MB/s   (4.8k)
    Write      | 177.40 MB/s  (44.3k) | 309.48 MB/s   (4.8k)
    Total      | 354.33 MB/s  (88.5k) | 617.35 MB/s   (9.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 435.11 MB/s    (849) | 427.36 MB/s    (417)
    Write      | 458.23 MB/s    (894) | 455.82 MB/s    (445)
    Total      | 893.35 MB/s   (1.7k) | 883.19 MB/s    (862)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 1.92 Gbits/sec  | 8.49 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.01 Gbits/sec  | 1.92 Gbits/sec  | 0.819 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 480 Mbits/sec   | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 115 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 307 Mbits/sec   | 811 Mbits/sec   | 162 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 273 Mbits/sec   | 212 Mbits/sec   | 130 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 383 Mbits/sec   | 1.43 Gbits/sec  | 73.9 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 170 Mbits/sec   | 148 Mbits/sec   | 141 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.89 Gbits/sec  | 1.90 Gbits/sec  | 8.32 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 1.91 Gbits/sec  | 1.72 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 406 Mbits/sec   | 782 Mbits/sec   | 95.1 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 311 Mbits/sec   | 938 Mbits/sec   | 162 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 176 Mbits/sec   | 112 Mbits/sec   | 130 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 297 Mbits/sec   | 1.43 Gbits/sec  | 72.5 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 236 Mbits/sec   | 359 Mbits/sec   | 141 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1153
    Multi Core      | 2967
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10563081
    
    YABS completed in 13 min 39 sec
    
    Thanked by 1Chunkserve
  • If free resources still applicable,

    Order Number: 6540247800

    Additional vCPU if possible.

    Thank you.

  • order no: 5291833135

    add anything you want mate, thanks

Sign In or Register to comment.