New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Why not use a service designed for this use case, like Amazon SES? It offers better deliverability and won’t block you just for sending an email with 'test smtp'.
Sales department destroyed.
@jar has just completely ruined TICKTOCK tockticker on NUSDACK.
@DataRecovery TICKTOCK on NUSDACK
YOTUBE
You forgot the A before NUSDACK.
People here complained that lately it's not that easy to get out of sandbox
I’m one of them. Paying client in good standing since many years as well.
Probably would have gotten approved if I kept on replying to get ’another look at it’ etc but I won’t be spending days to please be allowed to give them more money..
I completely agree... @Hernan you have done the lowendtalk community a valiant service, by showing that @Francisco and @NameCrane will proactively protects its email delivery reputation, to ensure that their customers get the reliable service they paid for... By forsaking a quick buck.
@Hernan this whole thread is only going to result in the opposite happening. You have only improved @Francisco and @NameCrane reputation.
sir i thought you were into men sir... kind reguards
ihos tart
Amazon is becoming a company where customers are no longer able to communicate with people that can solve their problems, but only communicate with outsourced script readers.
You just need a 20+ year old prime account. That changes things, when you have problems...
That would be an improvement over the 'support chat bot' that seems to have taken over customer support everywhere..
What exactly does "considered direct clients" mean?
Excellent for you and other people that like to pay to a company that disrespects you, doesn't answer your enquires, and makes fun of your questions. On my side I have purchased such service from the provider BlueHost. One question, one answer with full explanation, service purchased. No jeopardize at all, no TICK TOCK comparison.
Well you found happiness and all is well in the end. Btw you never told us which MLM you are associated with.
This meme has saved all the customers whose life was jeopardized by NameCrane
Name dropping BlueHost = not helping your case.
I do not understand how some questions would "jeopardize" anyone on a 15k email list.
By your previous statements...
You come off like you have woken up from a coma and are trying to explain the newfangled "email marketing" as if you were back in the late 1990's.
Things are a little fishy...
TICK TOCK
ok sir
live laugh ihos tart
reguards
Rubben
it is not MLM. Our customer produces and distributes aromatic candles, aromatic essences, essential oils, machinery for processing grape seeds, ideas and patents for devices, stoves, and aroma spraying elements.
Nobody has 15 thousand distributors and partners, not even Apple or Google. Red flags triggered
wrong number, that is the average number of subscribed members for each product line
Thanks to @NameCrane @Francisco for ensuring my personal email keeps landing into inboxes instead of SPAM thanks to these 'marketeers'.
Yes 100% gay confirmed, he tried to touch me somewhere private and encrypted.
Quote from: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4183650/#Comment_4183650
They went real technical...
In the future, to prove you're not a Spammer, you just have to say it's an opt-in newsletter and you have a record of every single opt-in confirmation. That's been the minimum requirements for at least a decade to be within most country's anti-spam laws.
That's five different products/interests. Red flags triggered.
Err...
So on average 15k for each product line...
How many product lines?
By including the definitions of the words in a business context.
So, "I do not understand how some questions would "jeopardize" anyone on a 75k email list."
Still valid question. I don't think "jeopardize" means what you think it means.