Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Offers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

DeluxHost.net | High Performance | Network Improved | BF OFFERS | START 0,50€ | DE

1…1617192122…27

Comments

  • btselembtselem Member

    My bf-4 is still pending, Invoice #1827

  • tenperatenpera Member

    it won't be me.

  • aleks7aleks7 Member

    Took bf-2 to test the network.
    0-50 Mbps, sometimes 198 Mbps of 1Gbit. Ping to cloudflare up to 40ms. Timeout is a usual thing. 3 of 7 times, failed to connect via ssh

  • AlteredParadoxAlteredParadox Member

    seeing roughly 50% packet loss on my two vms on the epyc nodes for the last half hour or so... seems like something's going on.

  • realPierrerealPierre Member

    @tfgp99 said:
    Here is is the networking problem that i was facing, and this situation continues.
    Using my old IP or a neighbor IP does the same:

    It seems when we use the LG announced IP, everything seems fine.
    Also, i've realized after my VM was destroyed, my old IP kept replying ping without any other VM already with the IP assigned back again, unfortunately i didn't saved a screenshot.

    yeah, the network performance is so bad. It only has a few Mb/s with a high network delay.

  • djwyzdjwyz Member

    Can you open port 25？

    Thanks.

  • scarscar Member

    really annoying that people are abusing the BF deals, really need to ban people abusing the network

  • RsssssRsssss Member
    edited November 2024

    https://imgur.com/a/38skm4l

    I can't get that information right now. now packet loss is 20-50 percent.and I have opened a ticket for issue 10 hours ago.If that helps.

  • redartredart Member

    @scar said:
    really annoying that people are abusing the BF deals, really need to ban people abusing the network

    agreed. If you are gonna be evil, at least target oracle or something, so you can look like a robinhood stealing from rich corporations. Exploiting a low end provider makes you look like a cockroach/leech with no honor.

  • Erick545Erick545 Barred

    @redart said:

    @scar said:
    really annoying that people are abusing the BF deals, really need to ban people abusing the network

    agreed. If you are gonna be evil, at least target oracle or something, so you can look like a robinhood stealing from rich corporations. Exploiting a low end provider makes you look like a cockroach/leech with no honor.

    It mostly anti ddos ​​protection cuts packages. I'm facing these problems almost a week now. Small improvements but not fully fixed.

  • ReroRero Member

    @djwyz said:
    Can you open port 25？

    Thanks.

    I checked their TOS there aren't the blocked ports stated. Here too.

    @DeluxHost The port 25 is really blocked?

  • simwikisimwiki Member

    The vps has been unable to connect, and no one has responded to the two tickets I opened. The efficiency of solving the problem is toooooooo low :(

  • itsTomHarperitsTomHarper Member, Megathread Squad

    @Rero said:

    @djwyz said:
    Can you open port 25？

    Thanks.

    I checked their TOS there aren't the blocked ports stated. Here too.

    @DeluxHost The port 25 is really blocked?

    It's not blocked but don't abuse it. I am already running a small personal mails server. I don't want them to block the ports for everyone due to abuse

    Thanked by 1Rero
  • ReroRero Member
    edited November 2024

    @itsTomHarper said: I don't want them to block the ports for everyone due to abuse

    Sure.

  • szymonpszymonp Member

    Disk and network are OK now but CPU is still getting abused

    top - 06:08:56 up 2 days, 15:32,  1 user,  load average: 1.05, 0.44, 0.60
Tasks:  89 total,   5 running,  84 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 75.2 us,  1.3 sy,  0.0 ni,  0.2 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.2 si, 23.2 st

    root@de3:~# curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-06-09                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Thu Nov 28 05:28:40 AM EST 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 2 days, 14 hours, 51 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2199.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 39.3 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Matteo Martelloni trading as DELUXHOST
ASN        : AS214677 Matteo Martelloni trading as DELUXHOST
Host       : DELUXHOST
Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 24.27 MB/s    (6.0k) | 362.69 MB/s   (5.6k)
Write      | 24.29 MB/s    (6.0k) | 364.60 MB/s   (5.6k)
Total      | 48.57 MB/s   (12.1k) | 727.29 MB/s  (11.3k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.48 GB/s     (2.8k) | 1.44 GB/s     (1.4k)
Write      | 1.56 GB/s     (3.0k) | 1.54 GB/s     (1.5k)
Total      | 3.04 GB/s     (5.9k) | 2.98 GB/s     (2.9k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 681 Mbits/sec   | 13.2 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 873 Mbits/sec   | 11.9 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 892 Mbits/sec   | 82.5 Mbits/sec  | 93.7 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 386 Mbits/sec   | 558 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 659 Mbits/sec   | 289 Mbits/sec   | 164 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 730 Mbits/sec   | 469 Mbits/sec   | 82.5 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 643 Mbits/sec   | 444 Mbits/sec   | 224 ms

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.43 Gbits/sec  | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 15.2 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.69 Gbits/sec  | 3.12 Gbits/sec  | 8.05 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.58 Gbits/sec  | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 93.0 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 830 Mbits/sec   | 161 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.03 Gbits/sec  | 625 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.41 Gbits/sec  | 666 Mbits/sec   | --
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 667 Mbits/sec   | 434 Mbits/sec   | 227 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 399
Multi Core      | 663
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9117120

YABS completed in 27 min 17 sec
  • RsssssRsssss Member
    edited November 2024

    @szymonp said:

    Disk and network are OK now but CPU is still getting abused

    top - 06:08:56 up 2 days, 15:32,  1 user,  load average: 1.05, 0.44, 0.60
Tasks:  89 total,   5 running,  84 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 75.2 us,  1.3 sy,  0.0 ni,  0.2 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.2 si, 23.2 st

    root@de3:~# curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-06-09                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Thu Nov 28 05:28:40 AM EST 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 2 days, 14 hours, 51 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2199.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 39.3 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Matteo Martelloni trading as DELUXHOST
ASN        : AS214677 Matteo Martelloni trading as DELUXHOST
Host       : DELUXHOST
Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 24.27 MB/s    (6.0k) | 362.69 MB/s   (5.6k)
Write      | 24.29 MB/s    (6.0k) | 364.60 MB/s   (5.6k)
Total      | 48.57 MB/s   (12.1k) | 727.29 MB/s  (11.3k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.48 GB/s     (2.8k) | 1.44 GB/s     (1.4k)
Write      | 1.56 GB/s     (3.0k) | 1.54 GB/s     (1.5k)
Total      | 3.04 GB/s     (5.9k) | 2.98 GB/s     (2.9k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 681 Mbits/sec   | 13.2 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 873 Mbits/sec   | 11.9 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 892 Mbits/sec   | 82.5 Mbits/sec  | 93.7 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 386 Mbits/sec   | 558 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 659 Mbits/sec   | 289 Mbits/sec   | 164 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 730 Mbits/sec   | 469 Mbits/sec   | 82.5 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 643 Mbits/sec   | 444 Mbits/sec   | 224 ms

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.43 Gbits/sec  | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 15.2 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.69 Gbits/sec  | 3.12 Gbits/sec  | 8.05 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.58 Gbits/sec  | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 93.0 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 830 Mbits/sec   | 161 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.03 Gbits/sec  | 625 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.41 Gbits/sec  | 666 Mbits/sec   | --
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 667 Mbits/sec   | 434 Mbits/sec   | 227 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 399
Multi Core      | 663
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9117120

YABS completed in 27 min 17 sec

    something wrong with EYPC nodes. not E5 nodes.

  • jndjnd Member

    Network is super laggy on the new EPYC node. And the virtual CPU seems misconfigured:

    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
CPU cores  : 2 @ 1999.994 MHz

cpuid:
(uarch synth) = AMD K8, 65nm
(synth) = AMD Athlon 64 (unknown type) (Brisbane/Sparta BH-G1) [K8], 65nm
    Thanked by 1Rsssss
  • DeluxHostDeluxHost Member, Patron Provider

    We are aware of these issues, we are taking all customer VPS down that are reporting CPU and bandwidth abuse, We apologize and we are sure we can solve everything in a few hours, the days will be recovered.

    For the problem on the wrong CPU EPYC node just open a ticket and it will be solved, it is just a visual problem.

    We do our best, sorry again.

    Thanked by 1xaoc
  • jndjnd Member

    @DeluxHost said:
    We are aware of these issues, we are taking all customer VPS down that are reporting CPU and bandwidth abuse, We apologize and we are sure we can solve everything in a few hours, the days will be recovered.

    For the problem on the wrong CPU EPYC node just open a ticket and it will be solved, it is just a visual problem.

    We do our best, sorry again.

    Ok, I opened a ticket but the CPU problem isn't just visual, AVX instructions aren't working at all. I had the same problem with other provider offering Ryzen VPS and got the same poor result, so it can happen.

  • adef_1adef_1 Member

    @DeluxHost I can't open a new ticket.
    1.png

  • DeluxHostDeluxHost Member, Patron Provider

    @adef_1 said:
    @DeluxHost I can't open a new ticket.
    1.png

    Hello, please send RayID via email, or via DM.

  • adef_1adef_1 Member

    @DeluxHost said:

    @adef_1 said:
    @DeluxHost I can't open a new ticket.
    1.png

    Hello, please send RayID via email, or via DM.

    DMed

  • itsTomHarperitsTomHarper Member, Megathread Squad

    @DeluxHost said:
    We are aware of these issues, we are taking all customer VPS down that are reporting CPU and bandwidth abuse, We apologize and we are sure we can solve everything in a few hours, the days will be recovered.

    For the problem on the wrong CPU EPYC node just open a ticket and it will be solved, it is just a visual problem.

    We do our best, sorry again.

    Already did, you said it's not possible

  • DeluxHostDeluxHost Member, Patron Provider

    @itsTomHarper said:

    @DeluxHost said:
    We are aware of these issues, we are taking all customer VPS down that are reporting CPU and bandwidth abuse, We apologize and we are sure we can solve everything in a few hours, the days will be recovered.

    For the problem on the wrong CPU EPYC node just open a ticket and it will be solved, it is just a visual problem.

    We do our best, sorry again.

    Already did, you said it's not possible

    Ticket id?

  • chris477chormierchris477chormier Member
    edited November 2024

    ~~PayPal please
    Invoice #2289
    Ticket Created #ISB-657466~~

    It has been resolved. Your customer service responded to my ticket within 2 minutes and added Paypal as a payment method for me.

    Thanked by 1DeluxHost
  • DeluxHostDeluxHost Member, Patron Provider

    the packet loss problem should be solved on BF nodes, please let us know.

    We will continue to monitor it until we are certain that it is working 100% and without any problems.

    Thanked by 3jnd fafad550 dav848
  • itsTomHarperitsTomHarper Member, Megathread Squad

    @DeluxHost said:

    @itsTomHarper said:

    @DeluxHost said:
    We are aware of these issues, we are taking all customer VPS down that are reporting CPU and bandwidth abuse, We apologize and we are sure we can solve everything in a few hours, the days will be recovered.

    For the problem on the wrong CPU EPYC node just open a ticket and it will be solved, it is just a visual problem.

    We do our best, sorry again.

    Already did, you said it's not possible

    Ticket id?

    Man oh man. It's already mentioned multiple times here, you responded "the node is full you cannot move me there"

    Thanked by 1koczo
  • DeluxHostDeluxHost Member, Patron Provider

    @itsTomHarper said:

    @DeluxHost said:

    @itsTomHarper said:

    @DeluxHost said:
    We are aware of these issues, we are taking all customer VPS down that are reporting CPU and bandwidth abuse, We apologize and we are sure we can solve everything in a few hours, the days will be recovered.

    For the problem on the wrong CPU EPYC node just open a ticket and it will be solved, it is just a visual problem.

    We do our best, sorry again.

    Already did, you said it's not possible

    Ticket id?

    Man oh man. It's already mentioned multiple times here, you responded "the node is full you cannot move me there"

    I think we are talking about different issues.

  • ajaibdigitalajaibdigital Member

    no more left?

  • tangdinotangdino Member

    @DeluxHost How is the progress of the activity of giving away BF2?

This discussion has been closed.