Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

AMD GENOA starting at (4c/16gb/200gb) @4,95€ VPS Deal at ph24 [...]

1212224262739

Comments

  • @dev_vps said:
    I included @ProHosting24 in top three providers in last year's LET provider vote

    I am sure, this year @ProHosting24 will get many more votes.

    As far as I have always noticed, the voting behavior is often based on the offers published shortly beforehand.> @egoror said:

    Just drop all miners' vps on the same separate node and stream on twitch how they fight for resources. Many will leave eventually, all you will have to do is just ban and refund the last one standing.

    And all the support tickets, crying here on LET and negative feedback?

  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @khadhafi1083 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @khadhafi1083 said:
    @RayRedd No email warning before?

    not at all

    Thats horrible...

    i can understand if they sent me warning first, or even the reason after they suspend my server.
    but this one, not at all, not even responded to my ticket or my post.
    and i still have 50€ there which idk if it's refundable or not.

    We always do refunds, regardless of what happened.
    There are a handful of cases where we put users on a whitelist for blockchain apps.

    But those have been mostly very experienced users that put their blockchain in a cgroup with very hard limits (eg. 1core) making it impossible to have constant 90-100% cpu bursts.

    In fact you haven't been suspended for a month because the blockchain you used doesn't seem to be as widely adopted in this user base, but we still have came up to blocking it because of those exact CPU bursts.

    Otherwise our system wouldn't have detected it.

    We in fact didn't implement any sort of notification system in our blockchain detection & suspension daemon and also don't plan to, users who get suspended see a message in our control panel asking them to contact our support.

    Feel free to choose between a whitelist if you are able to configure your app properly or just go with a refund.

    Scroll up if you need to read about why those CPU bursts are not tolerable.

    please show me, where/when did my servers do that burst.
    in fact, your monitoring kinda weird. in your panel, it will show constant 65% even without anything up inside the vm. then i login to the vm, it shows 1% only.
    it was mentioned previously by other user, then you responded with something like "kernel doesn't run for free". I was like, ok, i can live with that. but now i got suspended without knowing any reasons.
    If you're really concerned about CPU usage, maybe you need to ban those who keeps doing yabs every now and then, which will really use "100% burst CPU" while doing benchmark

    It seems like you are not getting it at this point:

    A yabs benchmark doesn't cause "bursts", a yabs benchmark causes high sustained cpu utilization on one thread and on all threads of a machine for a couple of minutes each.

    On a node full of Blockchain users it could appear like there is still plenty of space for customers while this is completely not the case.

    The reason behind that is that those blockchain applications need to interact with transactions. It also does that while you believe that this is only causing a static load of eg 20%. But every now and then there are very small CPU bursts that almost utilize all cores because of things happening in the chain.

    Another issue with those blockchains is that they mostly use CPU instructions like avx512 which causes very bad performance for other guest as the infinity fabric of genoa CPUs isn't able to handle this kind of extreme use very well (in a fair style).

    You can easily achieve that also while only having 4% cpu load on your machine.

    You will rather need tools like perf and pidstat to analyze whats going on exactly.

    Do you want me to start a detailed excessive analysis session on the exact blockchain you had been running because of what, a 4,95€ transaction being at stake?
    This will not happen unfortunately, please choose between the two options that i provided just recently.

    I don't really get this insane blockchain obsession people have with us anyway.
    If i would make money of it i certainly wouldn't use promo offers with shared resources for that.

    the answer is simple, please refund me.
    enough with all the charade and reasoning.

    Thanks for choosing one of the provided options, please state that in your ticket

    Ticket#207124

    Oh that's actually funny.

    I get why you aren't sharing your metrics but instead accuse us of anything that comes up to your mind...

    I just issued your refunds and now hereby exclude you permanently from doing business with us again.

    Thank you for the intense experience, wishing you all the best

    Why would i share my metric when you're not?
    and thanks anyway.
    please don't ever enable crypto payment option when you're not even supporting it :)

    We already accept crypto payment manually for years now.
    I don't get how a payment method influences the acceptable use policy of a service.

    As your account got blocked you still should be able to click on the screenshot in the mail our system sent you.

    You can post it if you like, but we don't think a lot of doing something like that without consent.

    I am not sure if i am still interested to answer your message but feel free to express yourself

    I'm not sure which screenshot are you referring to, if it's the one in the mail you sent, then maybe you better post it here, because i don't have access to that

    oh, and let me entertain your request a bit regarding metrics of my servers.

    these 4 servers which hosted in another provider, have similar setup with those i ran in your hosting service.
    you can see the spikes there, but never exceed 50% at all.
    and these 4 servers have even more apps installed compared to the one that was hosted in yours.
    been running for more than 200d and still no issue at all with the same price of yours ;)

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider
    edited October 2024

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @khadhafi1083 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @khadhafi1083 said:
    @RayRedd No email warning before?

    not at all

    Thats horrible...

    i can understand if they sent me warning first, or even the reason after they suspend my server.
    but this one, not at all, not even responded to my ticket or my post.
    and i still have 50€ there which idk if it's refundable or not.

    We always do refunds, regardless of what happened.
    There are a handful of cases where we put users on a whitelist for blockchain apps.

    But those have been mostly very experienced users that put their blockchain in a cgroup with very hard limits (eg. 1core) making it impossible to have constant 90-100% cpu bursts.

    In fact you haven't been suspended for a month because the blockchain you used doesn't seem to be as widely adopted in this user base, but we still have came up to blocking it because of those exact CPU bursts.

    Otherwise our system wouldn't have detected it.

    We in fact didn't implement any sort of notification system in our blockchain detection & suspension daemon and also don't plan to, users who get suspended see a message in our control panel asking them to contact our support.

    Feel free to choose between a whitelist if you are able to configure your app properly or just go with a refund.

    Scroll up if you need to read about why those CPU bursts are not tolerable.

    please show me, where/when did my servers do that burst.
    in fact, your monitoring kinda weird. in your panel, it will show constant 65% even without anything up inside the vm. then i login to the vm, it shows 1% only.
    it was mentioned previously by other user, then you responded with something like "kernel doesn't run for free". I was like, ok, i can live with that. but now i got suspended without knowing any reasons.
    If you're really concerned about CPU usage, maybe you need to ban those who keeps doing yabs every now and then, which will really use "100% burst CPU" while doing benchmark

    It seems like you are not getting it at this point:

    A yabs benchmark doesn't cause "bursts", a yabs benchmark causes high sustained cpu utilization on one thread and on all threads of a machine for a couple of minutes each.

    On a node full of Blockchain users it could appear like there is still plenty of space for customers while this is completely not the case.

    The reason behind that is that those blockchain applications need to interact with transactions. It also does that while you believe that this is only causing a static load of eg 20%. But every now and then there are very small CPU bursts that almost utilize all cores because of things happening in the chain.

    Another issue with those blockchains is that they mostly use CPU instructions like avx512 which causes very bad performance for other guest as the infinity fabric of genoa CPUs isn't able to handle this kind of extreme use very well (in a fair style).

    You can easily achieve that also while only having 4% cpu load on your machine.

    You will rather need tools like perf and pidstat to analyze whats going on exactly.

    Do you want me to start a detailed excessive analysis session on the exact blockchain you had been running because of what, a 4,95€ transaction being at stake?
    This will not happen unfortunately, please choose between the two options that i provided just recently.

    I don't really get this insane blockchain obsession people have with us anyway.
    If i would make money of it i certainly wouldn't use promo offers with shared resources for that.

    the answer is simple, please refund me.
    enough with all the charade and reasoning.

    Thanks for choosing one of the provided options, please state that in your ticket

    Ticket#207124

    Oh that's actually funny.

    I get why you aren't sharing your metrics but instead accuse us of anything that comes up to your mind...

    I just issued your refunds and now hereby exclude you permanently from doing business with us again.

    Thank you for the intense experience, wishing you all the best

    Why would i share my metric when you're not?
    and thanks anyway.
    please don't ever enable crypto payment option when you're not even supporting it :)

    We already accept crypto payment manually for years now.
    I don't get how a payment method influences the acceptable use policy of a service.

    As your account got blocked you still should be able to click on the screenshot in the mail our system sent you.

    You can post it if you like, but we don't think a lot of doing something like that without consent.

    I am not sure if i am still interested to answer your message but feel free to express yourself

    I'm not sure which screenshot are you referring to, if it's the one in the mail you sent, then maybe you better post it here, because i don't have access to that

    oh, and let me entertain your request a bit regarding metrics of my servers.

    these 4 servers which hosted in another provider, have similar setup with those i ran in your hosting service.
    you can see the spikes there, but never exceed 50% at all.
    and these 4 servers have even more apps installed compared to the one that was hosted in yours.
    been running for more than 200d and still no issue at all with the same price of yours ;)

    Thanked by 3Kris MaxTakeba maverick
  • khadhafi1083khadhafi1083 Member
    edited October 2024

    @ProHosting24
    Now i know why you should wipe those dust from your server...
    Looking at the picture you provided, I agree with your actions...
    2 weak full almost reach over 80-90%

  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @khadhafi1083 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @khadhafi1083 said:
    @RayRedd No email warning before?

    not at all

    Thats horrible...

    i can understand if they sent me warning first, or even the reason after they suspend my server.
    but this one, not at all, not even responded to my ticket or my post.
    and i still have 50€ there which idk if it's refundable or not.

    We always do refunds, regardless of what happened.
    There are a handful of cases where we put users on a whitelist for blockchain apps.

    But those have been mostly very experienced users that put their blockchain in a cgroup with very hard limits (eg. 1core) making it impossible to have constant 90-100% cpu bursts.

    In fact you haven't been suspended for a month because the blockchain you used doesn't seem to be as widely adopted in this user base, but we still have came up to blocking it because of those exact CPU bursts.

    Otherwise our system wouldn't have detected it.

    We in fact didn't implement any sort of notification system in our blockchain detection & suspension daemon and also don't plan to, users who get suspended see a message in our control panel asking them to contact our support.

    Feel free to choose between a whitelist if you are able to configure your app properly or just go with a refund.

    Scroll up if you need to read about why those CPU bursts are not tolerable.

    please show me, where/when did my servers do that burst.
    in fact, your monitoring kinda weird. in your panel, it will show constant 65% even without anything up inside the vm. then i login to the vm, it shows 1% only.
    it was mentioned previously by other user, then you responded with something like "kernel doesn't run for free". I was like, ok, i can live with that. but now i got suspended without knowing any reasons.
    If you're really concerned about CPU usage, maybe you need to ban those who keeps doing yabs every now and then, which will really use "100% burst CPU" while doing benchmark

    It seems like you are not getting it at this point:

    A yabs benchmark doesn't cause "bursts", a yabs benchmark causes high sustained cpu utilization on one thread and on all threads of a machine for a couple of minutes each.

    On a node full of Blockchain users it could appear like there is still plenty of space for customers while this is completely not the case.

    The reason behind that is that those blockchain applications need to interact with transactions. It also does that while you believe that this is only causing a static load of eg 20%. But every now and then there are very small CPU bursts that almost utilize all cores because of things happening in the chain.

    Another issue with those blockchains is that they mostly use CPU instructions like avx512 which causes very bad performance for other guest as the infinity fabric of genoa CPUs isn't able to handle this kind of extreme use very well (in a fair style).

    You can easily achieve that also while only having 4% cpu load on your machine.

    You will rather need tools like perf and pidstat to analyze whats going on exactly.

    Do you want me to start a detailed excessive analysis session on the exact blockchain you had been running because of what, a 4,95€ transaction being at stake?
    This will not happen unfortunately, please choose between the two options that i provided just recently.

    I don't really get this insane blockchain obsession people have with us anyway.
    If i would make money of it i certainly wouldn't use promo offers with shared resources for that.

    the answer is simple, please refund me.
    enough with all the charade and reasoning.

    Thanks for choosing one of the provided options, please state that in your ticket

    Ticket#207124

    Oh that's actually funny.

    I get why you aren't sharing your metrics but instead accuse us of anything that comes up to your mind...

    I just issued your refunds and now hereby exclude you permanently from doing business with us again.

    Thank you for the intense experience, wishing you all the best

    Why would i share my metric when you're not?
    and thanks anyway.
    please don't ever enable crypto payment option when you're not even supporting it :)

    We already accept crypto payment manually for years now.
    I don't get how a payment method influences the acceptable use policy of a service.

    As your account got blocked you still should be able to click on the screenshot in the mail our system sent you.

    You can post it if you like, but we don't think a lot of doing something like that without consent.

    I am not sure if i am still interested to answer your message but feel free to express yourself

    I'm not sure which screenshot are you referring to, if it's the one in the mail you sent, then maybe you better post it here, because i don't have access to that

    oh, and let me entertain your request a bit regarding metrics of my servers.

    these 4 servers which hosted in another provider, have similar setup with those i ran in your hosting service.
    you can see the spikes there, but never exceed 50% at all.
    and these 4 servers have even more apps installed compared to the one that was hosted in yours.
    been running for more than 200d and still no issue at all with the same price of yours ;)

    while the spike pattern is similar, yours showed higher percentage.
    maybe it's time for you to reevaluate your monitoring before it takes another victim of false monitoring.
    not sure how you did it, but even at idle, it shows 60%+

    for memory, i'm fully understand as you used proxmox, it will show the reserved capacity, buffer and all, instead of real time use.
    for CPU, i really don't understand

    @minence said:
    80% cpu already used.

    That's awesome, I haven't even logged in yet...

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @minence said:
    80% cpu already used.

    That's awesome, I haven't even logged in yet...

    Booting the kernel + fetching updates and upgrading system packages on boot is not for free. ;)

    Maybe it's not as simple as booting and fetching updates

  • KrisKris Member
    edited October 2024

    I love when receipts are brought.

    This is akin to "Sir, I own many houses that are not crack houses. Look at all the crack this house hasn't sold. Ergo, this house could not have been selling crack"

  • RayReddRayRedd Member
    edited October 2024

    @Kris said:
    I love when receipts are brought.

    This is akin to "Sir, I own many houses that are not crack houses. Look at all the crack this house hasn't sold. Ergo, this house could not have been selling crack"

    In this case, is more like

    • "Hey, i will lease you a house with 4 rooms, but you can't use it fully for each room"
    • "okay", then i use it not even half full, with proof
    • "hey, i saw your room is almost full all the time from the window, hereby i kick you out from the house"
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @Kris said:
    I love when receipts are brought.

    This is akin to "Sir, I own many houses that are not crack houses. Look at all the crack this house hasn't sold. Ergo, this house could not have been selling crack"

    I actually cant tell if i am starting to feel sorry for that guy, i hope he has some good friends in his life and a healthy self esteem.

    From my very personal experience rather people that got harmed in their past act the way he does.

    At this point it is getting hilarious that he keeps those comments up while being targeted everytime for doing that. For real what are you trying to achieve and what can we do for you? @RayRedd

    Thanked by 1Kris
  • MaxTakebaMaxTakeba Member
    edited October 2024

    @RayRedd said:
    I'm not sure which screenshot are you referring to, if it's the one in the mail you sent, then maybe you better post it here, because i don't have access to that

    oh, and let me entertain your request a bit regarding metrics of my servers.

    these 4 servers which hosted in another provider, have similar setup with those i ran in your hosting service.
    you can see the spikes there, but never exceed 50% at all.
    and these 4 servers have even more apps installed compared to the one that was hosted in yours.
    been running for more than 200d and still no issue at all with the same price of yours ;)

    You cannot bring receipts for another VPS in a completely different DC.
    Unless you have ansible and you are bulk deploying the same config or you have extremely good documentation these will not be 1:1. You absolutely could have accidentally let it rip and that's on you for not testing your setup, ProHosting has proven this.

    More so their policies might be different from ProHosting. Maybe they don't give a shit if you blast the threads of that other provider. We don't really know. But you took the refund and you've been told quite politely to leave.

    Thanked by 2ProHosting24 Kris
  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @Kris said:
    I love when receipts are brought.

    This is akin to "Sir, I own many houses that are not crack houses. Look at all the crack this house hasn't sold. Ergo, this house could not have been selling crack"

    I actually cant tell if i am starting to feel sorry for that guy, i hope he has some good friends in his life and a healthy self esteem.

    From my very personal experience rather people that got harmed in their past act the way he does.

    At this point it is getting hilarious that he keeps those comments up while being targeted everytime for doing that. For real what are you trying to achieve and what can we do for you? @RayRedd

    just want you to see if there's something wrong with your monitoring, that all..

  • RayReddRayRedd Member
    edited October 2024

    @MaxTakeba said:

    @RayRedd said:
    I'm not sure which screenshot are you referring to, if it's the one in the mail you sent, then maybe you better post it here, because i don't have access to that

    oh, and let me entertain your request a bit regarding metrics of my servers.

    these 4 servers which hosted in another provider, have similar setup with those i ran in your hosting service.
    you can see the spikes there, but never exceed 50% at all.
    and these 4 servers have even more apps installed compared to the one that was hosted in yours.
    been running for more than 200d and still no issue at all with the same price of yours ;)

    You cannot bring receipts for another VPS in a completely different DC.
    Unless you have ansible and you are bulk deploying the same config or you have extremely good documentation these will not be 1:1. You absolutely could have accidentally let it rip and that's on you for not testing your setup, ProHosting has proven this.

    More so their policies might be different from ProHosting. Maybe they don't give a shit if you blast the threads of that other provider. We don't really know. But you took the refund and you've been told quite politely to leave.

    like i said before, i usually never monitor this kind of servers as it's very low load. just for this case, to proof that i'm really only using very low resource, then i do the monitoring.
    the only thing i really monitor is my dedicated server which bear the most of workload.
    btw, this one 16cores, so cannot be used for comparison at all

    that's why i'm really curious, how come i can get into the same room as those retarded who blast the cpu all the time, stream videos, crypto bot automation and so on?

  • You've got your refund bro, what else do you want, live in peace... 😔

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @Kris said:
    I love when receipts are brought.

    This is akin to "Sir, I own many houses that are not crack houses. Look at all the crack this house hasn't sold. Ergo, this house could not have been selling crack"

    I actually cant tell if i am starting to feel sorry for that guy, i hope he has some good friends in his life and a healthy self esteem.

    From my very personal experience rather people that got harmed in their past act the way he does.

    At this point it is getting hilarious that he keeps those comments up while being targeted everytime for doing that. For real what are you trying to achieve and what can we do for you? @RayRedd

    just want you to see if there's something wrong with your monitoring, that all..

    I really don‘t want to insult you. But you are in fact questioning the acuracy of the metrics that proxmox reports. But i get that you are trying to prove that we are not competent enough to collect metrics.

    Just think of how other people will perceive that especially as you are actually questioning the competency of proxmox and not us.

    Maybe you should also consider what this makes of you. I don‘t know how old you are but i for my part certainly went through some shit and wont tolerate that you are making yourself a target like this in a thread that i moderate.

    Please do yourself and me the favor and touch some grass

    Thanked by 3MaxTakeba RayRedd loay
  • @ProHosting24 said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @ProHosting24 said:

    @Kris said:
    I love when receipts are brought.

    This is akin to "Sir, I own many houses that are not crack houses. Look at all the crack this house hasn't sold. Ergo, this house could not have been selling crack"

    I actually cant tell if i am starting to feel sorry for that guy, i hope he has some good friends in his life and a healthy self esteem.

    From my very personal experience rather people that got harmed in their past act the way he does.

    At this point it is getting hilarious that he keeps those comments up while being targeted everytime for doing that. For real what are you trying to achieve and what can we do for you? @RayRedd

    just want you to see if there's something wrong with your monitoring, that all..

    I really don‘t want to insult you. But you are in fact questioning the acuracy of the metrics that proxmox reports. But i get that you are trying to prove that we are not competent enough to collect metrics.

    Just think of how other people will perceive that especially as you are actually questioning the competency of proxmox and not us.

    Maybe you should also consider what this makes of you. I don‘t know how old you are but i for my part certainly went through some shit and wont tolerate that you are making yourself a target like this in a thread that i moderate.

    Please do yourself and me the favor and touch some grass

    Thank you for your advice.
    to be honest, I really wanted to see you thrive in this business.
    please treat all of my rant and post as input and not insult.
    hereby, I rest my case.

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited October 2024
    CPU Information
      Name                          AMD EPYC 9554
      Topology                      1 Processor, 4 Cores
      Identifier                    AuthenticAMD Family 25 Model 17 Stepping 1
      Base Frequency                3.10 GHz
      Maximum Frequency             3685 MHz
      Processor Codename            Genoa
      L1 Instruction Cache          64.0 KB x 4
      L1 Data Cache                 64.0 KB x 4
      L2 Cache                      512 KB x 4
      L3 Cache                      16.0 MB
    
    Memory Information
      Size                          16.0 GB
    
    Benchmark Summary
      Single-Core Score             1412
      Multi-Core Score              4451
    

    very solid values compared to this bergamo "beast":
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4043907/#Comment_4043907

    Thanked by 2loay ProHosting24
  • @hyperblast said: very solid values compared to this bergamo "beast":

    Yeah well but honestly speaking you've caught 'the beast' pants down during peak load, right now it's ~1650/7100.
    You can catch PH24 pants down too if you want to, but overall they are quite stable around 1400/4500.

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • teh bergamo beast is from @FameSystems ;)

    Thanked by 1ProHosting24
  • @RayRedd said:

    @MaxTakeba said:

    @RayRedd said:
    I'm not sure which screenshot are you referring to, if it's the one in the mail you sent, then maybe you better post it here, because i don't have access to that

    oh, and let me entertain your request a bit regarding metrics of my servers.

    these 4 servers which hosted in another provider, have similar setup with those i ran in your hosting service.
    you can see the spikes there, but never exceed 50% at all.
    and these 4 servers have even more apps installed compared to the one that was hosted in yours.
    been running for more than 200d and still no issue at all with the same price of yours ;)

    You cannot bring receipts for another VPS in a completely different DC.
    Unless you have ansible and you are bulk deploying the same config or you have extremely good documentation these will not be 1:1. You absolutely could have accidentally let it rip and that's on you for not testing your setup, ProHosting has proven this.

    More so their policies might be different from ProHosting. Maybe they don't give a shit if you blast the threads of that other provider. We don't really know. But you took the refund and you've been told quite politely to leave.

    like i said before, i usually never monitor this kind of servers as it's very low load. just for this case, to proof that i'm really only using very low resource, then i do the monitoring.
    the only thing i really monitor is my dedicated server which bear the most of workload.
    btw, this one 16cores, so cannot be used for comparison at all

    that's why i'm really curious, how come i can get into the same room as those retarded who blast the cpu all the time, stream videos, crypto bot automation and so on?

    At this point, it’s really time to let it go. You’ve already received a refund, so what more can you reasonably expect? The provider has made their position clear, and continuing this is only hurting your case. Most of what you’ve said has either been irrelevant or baseless accusations that have been disproven.

    Move on and stop wasting energy on this. You're acting like a retard.

  • @gupp said: You're acting like a retard.

    Oof desire to get 20 euro is strong in this padawan.

  • SilvestSilvest Member
    edited October 2024

    @gupp said:

    @RayRedd said:

    @MaxTakeba said:

    @RayRedd said:
    I'm not sure which screenshot are you referring to, if it's the one in the mail you sent, then maybe you better post it here, because i don't have access to that

    oh, and let me entertain your request a bit regarding metrics of my servers.

    these 4 servers which hosted in another provider, have similar setup with those i ran in your hosting service.
    you can see the spikes there, but never exceed 50% at all.
    and these 4 servers have even more apps installed compared to the one that was hosted in yours.
    been running for more than 200d and still no issue at all with the same price of yours ;)

    You cannot bring receipts for another VPS in a completely different DC.
    Unless you have ansible and you are bulk deploying the same config or you have extremely good documentation these will not be 1:1. You absolutely could have accidentally let it rip and that's on you for not testing your setup, ProHosting has proven this.

    More so their policies might be different from ProHosting. Maybe they don't give a shit if you blast the threads of that other provider. We don't really know. But you took the refund and you've been told quite politely to leave.

    like i said before, i usually never monitor this kind of servers as it's very low load. just for this case, to proof that i'm really only using very low resource, then i do the monitoring.
    the only thing i really monitor is my dedicated server which bear the most of workload.
    btw, this one 16cores, so cannot be used for comparison at all

    that's why i'm really curious, how come i can get into the same room as those retarded who blast the cpu all the time, stream videos, crypto bot automation and so on?

    At this point, it’s really time to let it go. You’ve already received a refund, so what more can you reasonably expect? The provider has made their position clear, and continuing this is only hurting your case. Most of what you’ve said has either been irrelevant or baseless accusations that have been disproven.

    Move on and stop wasting energy on this. You're acting like a retard.

    And you need to learn to read. He already said he is resting his case and moved on. You are the one reviving the issue. No need to start name calling....

  • guppgupp Member
    edited October 2024

    @egoror said:

    @gupp said: You're acting like a retard.

    Oof desire to get 20 euro is strong in this padawan.

    What lmfao

    @Silvest said:
    And you need to learn to read. He already said he is resting his case and moved on. You are the one reviving the issue. No need to start name calling....

    I can read perfectly fine. Move along

  • @egoror said:

    @hyperblast said: teh bergamo beast is from @FameSystems

    Yeah I know, exactly the one I was talking about.

    hmm... then i have noisy neighbours?

  • @hyperblast said: hmm... then i have noisy neighbours?

    It's getting worse at night.. better in the morning.. Probably they will "clean the house" after the promo deal is over.

  • Is there a way to automatically limit resources for users who are consuming excessively during high system load, without relying on the users' own programs to control their resource usage?

  • Is is possible to get 32GB/64GB one?

  • His proxmox has problem monitoring windows vps, memory & cpu are not accurate.
    Maybe because QEMU Guest Agent is not enabled?!

    my vps was wrongly judged, he suspended it with the reason of blackchain activity, but that's a lie.
    just because the proxmox graph shows high load, he thinks it's blackchain activity.

    I only use vps for bot game, cpu is only 50-70%

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @ServersHunter said:
    His proxmox has problem monitoring windows vps, memory & cpu are not accurate.
    Maybe because QEMU Guest Agent is not enabled?!

    my vps was wrongly judged, he suspended it with the reason of blackchain activity, but that's a lie.
    just because the proxmox graph shows high load, he thinks it's blackchain activity.

    I only use vps for bot game, cpu is only 50-70%

    You have been limited manually by an individual for high sustained load.
    I find it very hard to believe you without looking at your specific case considering how many users are being wrong thinking of them they knowing the best.

    Half of the buttons in our control panel wouldn‘t appear without the agent not being available. And i am very sure that we responded in your ticket with the information that you have been limited manually for high load or automatically because of blockchain activity.

    And the load reported by proxmox has absolutely nothing to do with the agent running or not.

    Considering that we must have done it manually you must have had a lot CPU load back then and therefore infringed our ToS.

    Please provide me your support pin so that we can cancel your service and terminate your account with us permanently. (remaining credit being refunded as well)

    We are fed up from such bullshit comments from users that don‘t have any techincal expertise and that expect everything from us while explaining us how we need to run things properly from their view of point.

    Tell that to the other 2000 happy running guests…

    Thanked by 3mijo MaxTakeba ariq01
  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @puper said:
    Is there a way to automatically limit resources for users who are consuming excessively during high system load, without relying on the users' own programs to control their resource usage?

    Are you referring to an implementation in proxmox?
    You could certainly do that but we never had the need for that as our user base had been more professional in the past. We are going to work on something like that as soon as we launched the openstack based ph24 public cloud.

  • ProHosting24ProHosting24 Member, Patron Provider

    @cgs3238 said:
    Is is possible to get 32GB/64GB one?

    Sure leave me a message to consult with us on available options.

Sign In or Register to comment.