Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

CHAT - HOST-C Xeon V4, 5TB Storage Deal, 12.5 USD / Quarter, 45 USD / YR

14648505152

Comments

  • when will you restock? been a while I check the site.

    Thanked by 1harris1111
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @OHIOXOIHO said:
    when will you restock? been a while I check the site.

    O know, we will run something this month.

    Thanked by 1OHIOXOIHO
  • @OHIOXOIHO said:
    when will you restock? been a while I check the site.

    This plan is EOL. but just wait for BF or christmas, new year, maybe new deals are coming

    Thanked by 2host_c OHIOXOIHO
  • @host_c said:

    @itachikonoha said:
    @host_c I bought a 5 tb Dyson one.

    If required, can I increase storage size via ticket in future?

    Yap,

    Hit us with a ticket when you need moarrrrrrrr :D

    I'll be honest. The performance of the vps is amazing. Way more than I expected. Cheers to the service.

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • This is a test to showcase VPS excellent computing power.

    Many LET VPS fail in this 4k video test. Here is a storage VPS that is a clear winner

    Thanked by 2host_c lala_th
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    THX @dev_vps - and now everyone will stream 4K from our storage VPS, Bye-Bye idler's :D :D :D

    So, even though the GB6 score isn't higher than that of a 2.6 GHz Xeon V4, you can definitely feel the performance boost thanks to the increased bandwidth of the newer generation CPU.

    Hmmmmm, damn we need more servers......... and drives....... memory........

    We need some $$$, but where from? A promo might help... :D

    PS: Does Windows make use of AVX-512? ( I know that it does for AVX2 )

    Thanked by 3Freek Calin Xrmaddness
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @dev_vps , just realized this, we might introduce CPU Power billing soon :D :D :D

    Nahhhh, just messing around, still ~680 W/hour, damn that thing is hungry.....

    Fell free to continue <3

    Thanked by 2maverick symbx
  • @host_c said:
    THX @dev_vps - and now everyone will stream 4K from our storage VPS, Bye-Bye idler's :D :D :D

    So, even though the GB6 score isn't higher than that of a 2.6 GHz Xeon V4, you can definitely feel the performance boost thanks to the increased bandwidth of the newer generation CPU.

    Hmmmmm, damn we need more servers......... and drives....... memory........

    We need some $$$, but where from? A promo might help... :D

    PS: Does Windows make use of AVX-512? ( I know that it does for AVX2 )

    That is why I wrote clearly

    This is a test to showcase VPS excellent computing power

    Using VPN with iPad/iPhone is a better solution to watch 4k video

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @dev_vps said: Using VPN with iPad/iPhone is a better solution to watch 4k video

    Thank you, guys you heard the man, stream 4k from your handheld. :+1:

    Idlers welcome back. <3

  • @host_c said:

    Does Windows make use of AVX-512?

    Yes, that is the case

    The VPS had kinda ok playback with 2k video test with Gold 6130, but with 6148 ... 2k playback is much better better and lot smoother even at full screen (around 50-60% cpu usage) and 4k while it plays smoothly goes into 100% cpu usage

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • @host_c How long does your dyson stock last does it go faster each time? Its fun checking it then poof out of stock again.

  • @host_c

    Here is more info why AX-512 helps with overall vps performance.

    In VPS environments, the CPU might be doing more than just decoding the video. AVX-512 allows for better overall CPU efficiency by speeding up background tasks like encryption/decryption, networking, and other virtualization overhead, freeing more resources for the VPS to dedicate to other active tasks.

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @Ike117 said:
    @host_c How long does your dyson stock last does it go faster each time? Its fun checking it then poof out of stock again.

    There’s a fixed amount available, as we can't offer unlimited—where would we store it all? :)

    When services get canceled or terminated, that stock becomes available again.

    Usually, it doesn’t stay available for long, maybe just a few minutes sometimes seconds.

    Somebody/some are definitely pushing F5 ( refresh ) all day..... :)

  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad
    edited October 2024

    @dev_vps said:
    @host_c

    Here is more info why AX-512 helps with overall vps performance.

    In VPS environments, the CPU might be doing more than just decoding the video. AVX-512 allows for better overall CPU efficiency by speeding up background tasks like encryption/decryption, networking, and other virtualization overhead, freeing more resources for the VPS to dedicate to other active tasks.

    Yep, we gambled on that, and while it wasn’t as obvious with the 6130 at 2.1GHz, the extra 300MHz on the 6148 definitely makes a noticeable difference.

    I will underline, to some and in some applications. :) , but yes, the whole node itself feels better.

    Time to plug in the next-one soon.

    680W/hour :'( damn......

  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited October 2024

    @dev_vps said:

    @host_c said:

    Does Windows make use of AVX-512?

    Yes, that is the case

    The VPS had kinda ok playback with 2k video test with Gold 6130, but with 6148 ... 2k playback is much better better and lot smoother even at full screen (around 50-60% cpu usage) and 4k while it plays smoothly goes into 100% cpu usage

    I tried to transcode a 7gb video ffmpeg with x265 codec with quality set at 24 (just for testing). The CPU usage shoot up and had to end the process because it made the vps a bit unstable.

    What was your config of the vps?

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @host_c said:

    Does Windows make use of AVX-512?

    Yes, that is the case

    The VPS had kinda ok playback with 2k video test with Gold 6130, but with 6148 ... 2k playback is much better better and lot smoother even at full screen (around 50-60% cpu usage) and 4k while it plays smoothly goes into 100% cpu usage

    I tried to transcode a 7gb video ffmpeg with x265 codec with quality set at 24 (just for testing). The CPU usage shoot up and had to end the process because it made the vps a bit unstable.

    What was your config of the vps?

    I do NOT use storage vps for video transcoding. I use VDS for that use case.

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • @dev_vps said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @host_c said:

    Does Windows make use of AVX-512?

    Yes, that is the case

    The VPS had kinda ok playback with 2k video test with Gold 6130, but with 6148 ... 2k playback is much better better and lot smoother even at full screen (around 50-60% cpu usage) and 4k while it plays smoothly goes into 100% cpu usage

    I tried to transcode a 7gb video ffmpeg with x265 codec with quality set at 24 (just for testing). The CPU usage shoot up and had to end the process because it made the vps a bit unstable.

    What was your config of the vps?

    I do NOT use storage vps for video transcoding. I use VDS for that use case.

    I was just checking.

    I do too but it's too much of a round trip to copy files from storage to performance vps, then transcode, then again sync back to storage. Totally wastage of bandwidth.

    I wish if there was a simpler solution.

  • @host_c said:

    @Ike117 said:
    @host_c How long does your dyson stock last does it go faster each time? Its fun checking it then poof out of stock again.

    There’s a fixed amount available, as we can't offer unlimited—where would we store it all? :)

    >

    Haha i got one thankfully I just like hearing about the stats of it all.

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited October 2024

    @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @host_c said:

    Does Windows make use of AVX-512?

    Yes, that is the case

    The VPS had kinda ok playback with 2k video test with Gold 6130, but with 6148 ... 2k playback is much better better and lot smoother even at full screen (around 50-60% cpu usage) and 4k while it plays smoothly goes into 100% cpu usage

    I tried to transcode a 7gb video ffmpeg with x265 codec with quality set at 24 (just for testing). The CPU usage shoot up and had to end the process because it made the vps a bit unstable.

    What was your config of the vps?

    I do NOT use storage vps for video transcoding. I use VDS for that use case.

    I was just checking.

    I do too but it's too much of a round trip to copy files from storage to performance vps, then transcode, then again sync back to storage. Totally wastage of bandwidth.

    I wish if there was a simpler solution.

    Have a storage block attached to the VDS

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @host_c said:

    Does Windows make use of AVX-512?

    Yes, that is the case

    The VPS had kinda ok playback with 2k video test with Gold 6130, but with 6148 ... 2k playback is much better better and lot smoother even at full screen (around 50-60% cpu usage) and 4k while it plays smoothly goes into 100% cpu usage

    I tried to transcode a 7gb video ffmpeg with x265 codec with quality set at 24 (just for testing). The CPU usage shoot up and had to end the process because it made the vps a bit unstable.

    What was your config of the vps?

    x265 encoding happily uses 10 or more cores, so it's definitely not suitable for low end VPS. And as others have already pointed out, not really for any shared environment where the CPU is not 100% dedicated to you (VDS).

    But, ever since I learned how GB6 is really useless for multicore server benchmarking, and even more so as the number of cores grow, actually I also have a small 3 min video fragment used specifically to benchmark VPS CPU score. :) But I only ever run it on VPS with 4 or more CPU cores, makes no sense to punish smaller brethren. :#

    Thanked by 2loay host_c
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @maverick

    The smaller brethren thank you for not punishing them. :D

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • ehabehab Member
    edited October 2024

    @host_c said:

    @lening5202 said:
    啥时候能出活动呀,天天再等呢

    we will do an official announcement here before the next promo sale. :)

    متي تخلع البنطلون

    Thanked by 2sh97 loay
  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    @ehab said:

    @host_c said:

    @lening5202 said:
    啥时候能出活动呀,天天再等呢

    we will do an official announcement here before the next promo sale. :)

    متي تخلع البنطلون

    Abadan yakhi

    Thanked by 1ehab
  • Thanked by 1tjn
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad
    edited October 2024

    @ehab said: متي تخلع البنطلون

    :D :D :D - hope google translate did not mess this one up :D :D :D

    Thanked by 2ehab sh97
  • almost weekend

  • @maverick said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @host_c said:

    Does Windows make use of AVX-512?

    Yes, that is the case

    The VPS had kinda ok playback with 2k video test with Gold 6130, but with 6148 ... 2k playback is much better better and lot smoother even at full screen (around 50-60% cpu usage) and 4k while it plays smoothly goes into 100% cpu usage

    I tried to transcode a 7gb video ffmpeg with x265 codec with quality set at 24 (just for testing). The CPU usage shoot up and had to end the process because it made the vps a bit unstable.

    What was your config of the vps?

    x265 encoding happily uses 10 or more cores, so it's definitely not suitable for low end VPS. And as others have already pointed out, not really for any shared environment where the CPU is not 100% dedicated to you (VDS).

    But, ever since I learned how GB6 is really useless for multicore server benchmarking, and even more so as the number of cores grow, actually I also have a small 3 min video fragment used specifically to benchmark VPS CPU score. :) But I only ever run it on VPS with 4 or more CPU cores, makes no sense to punish smaller brethren. :#

    Can you give me the video link and the ffmpeg profile which you use for testing?

    I want to test mine in comparision to others to see if I can go for higher with justified price (if costlier).

  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad
    edited October 2024

    @ehab said: almost weekend

    A bit soon, but it depends on the timezone :D :D

    Time in Hong Kong - 00:42 - Friday, October 4, 2024 (GMT+8)

    Redacted. :)

    Thanked by 1ehab
  • it never grows old.
    feeling from the guts

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • @itachikonoha said:

    @maverick said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @host_c said:

    Does Windows make use of AVX-512?

    Yes, that is the case

    The VPS had kinda ok playback with 2k video test with Gold 6130, but with 6148 ... 2k playback is much better better and lot smoother even at full screen (around 50-60% cpu usage) and 4k while it plays smoothly goes into 100% cpu usage

    I tried to transcode a 7gb video ffmpeg with x265 codec with quality set at 24 (just for testing). The CPU usage shoot up and had to end the process because it made the vps a bit unstable.

    What was your config of the vps?

    x265 encoding happily uses 10 or more cores, so it's definitely not suitable for low end VPS. And as others have already pointed out, not really for any shared environment where the CPU is not 100% dedicated to you (VDS).

    But, ever since I learned how GB6 is really useless for multicore server benchmarking, and even more so as the number of cores grow, actually I also have a small 3 min video fragment used specifically to benchmark VPS CPU score. :) But I only ever run it on VPS with 4 or more CPU cores, makes no sense to punish smaller brethren. :#

    Can you give me the video link and the ffmpeg profile which you use for testing?

    I want to test mine in comparision to others to see if I can go for higher with justified price (if costlier).

    #!/bin/bash
    
    # Define input and output file variables
    INPUT_FILE="$1"
    OUTPUT_FILE="$2"
    
    # Check if input and output files are provided
    if [ -z "$INPUT_FILE" ] || [ -z "$OUTPUT_FILE" ]; then
        echo "Usage: $0 <input_file> <output_file>"
        exit 1
    fi
    
    # ffmpeg command with x265 encoding and limited CPU usage
    ffmpeg -i "$INPUT_FILE" \
        -c:v libx265 \               # Use the x265 codec for encoding the video
        -crf 28 \                    # Set Constant Rate Factor (CRF), which adjusts quality (lower is better, default is 28 for x265)
        -preset slow \               # Use 'slow' preset for better compression efficiency
        -c:a aac \                   # Use AAC codec for audio encoding
        -b:a 128k \                  # Set audio bitrate to 128k
        -threads 1 \                 # Limit encoding to a single thread
        "$OUTPUT_FILE" &             # Run the encoding process in the background
    
    # Get the Process ID (PID) of the background ffmpeg process
    FFMPEG_PID=$!
    
    # Limit CPU usage to 20% of a single thread using cpulimit
    cpulimit -p $FFMPEG_PID -l 20   # Restrict the CPU usage of the ffmpeg process to 20%
    
    # Wait for the ffmpeg process to complete
    wait $FFMPEG_PID
    
    
This discussion has been closed.