Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Layer.ae | Annual Fest | Freebies | Giveaways | Discounts!

1303133353661

Comments

  • Can I request to unblock mail ports? I'm planning to purchase DA Personal plus license. Currently I'm hosting mailcow server on an other provider, but I want to cancel it and move my personal e-mail hosting here to save costs. I don't send any spam or marketing mail. It's all personal use, I even barely send emails and If I need to, I'm using mailchannels relay.

  • @FrankCastle said:

    @MrEd said:
    On the other hand, in this community it would be hard to distinguish no-lifers vs real time zone. And, it might have been possible to do something like that in RN thread, where activity was much greater, but not here. It is impossible to determine the user timezone from 5 messages :)

    That's never stopped data brokers before. Collect all the information you can, bundle it up as something useful and resell it to everyone that is willing to pay!

    How much would you pay for the data? :D

  • @rsk
    The threads seem quiet despite it's nearly 15. Bring some heat please

    Thanked by 2rsk Franzkafka
  • rskrsk Member, Host Rep

    @jcolideles said:
    Can I request to unblock mail ports? I'm planning to purchase DA Personal plus license. Currently I'm hosting mailcow server on an other provider, but I want to cancel it and move my personal e-mail hosting here to save costs. I don't send any spam or marketing mail. It's all personal use, I even barely send emails and If I need to, I'm using mailchannels relay.

    Yes, we can unblock it towards mailchannels relay and you can use it that way. No problem at all :)

  • Need another coupon hunt to 🔥 things up

    Thanked by 2Franzkafka rsk
  • @rsk said:

    @jcolideles said:
    Can I request to unblock mail ports? I'm planning to purchase DA Personal plus license. Currently I'm hosting mailcow server on an other provider, but I want to cancel it and move my personal e-mail hosting here to save costs. I don't send any spam or marketing mail. It's all personal use, I even barely send emails and If I need to, I'm using mailchannels relay.

    Yes, we can unblock it towards mailchannels relay and you can use it that way. No problem at all :)

    And port 25 for incoming mails?

  • rskrsk Member, Host Rep

    @jcolideles said:

    @rsk said:

    @jcolideles said:
    Can I request to unblock mail ports? I'm planning to purchase DA Personal plus license. Currently I'm hosting mailcow server on an other provider, but I want to cancel it and move my personal e-mail hosting here to save costs. I don't send any spam or marketing mail. It's all personal use, I even barely send emails and If I need to, I'm using mailchannels relay.

    Yes, we can unblock it towards mailchannels relay and you can use it that way. No problem at all :)

    And port 25 for incoming mails?

    Incoming is always open, for all ports :)

  • rskrsk Member, Host Rep
    edited September 2024

    @Void said:
    Need another coupon hunt to 🔥 things up

    Need to find another way to finance the payments/bills/giveaways/gifts :) 🔥

    Thanked by 3harris1111 Void sh97
  • @rsk said:

    @jcolideles said:

    @rsk said:

    @jcolideles said:
    Can I request to unblock mail ports? I'm planning to purchase DA Personal plus license. Currently I'm hosting mailcow server on an other provider, but I want to cancel it and move my personal e-mail hosting here to save costs. I don't send any spam or marketing mail. It's all personal use, I even barely send emails and If I need to, I'm using mailchannels relay.

    Yes, we can unblock it towards mailchannels relay and you can use it that way. No problem at all :)

    And port 25 for incoming mails?

    Incoming is always open, for all ports :)

    Thanks, I'll open a ticket

  • FranzkafkaFranzkafka Member
    edited September 2024

    Finaly,I got it :)

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed 11 Sep 2024 01:44:41 PM HKT
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 27 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 4499.948 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 437.5 MiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 10.0 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-20-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : IPvX.Solutions LLC
    ASN        : AS216382 LAYER MARKETING SERVICES L.L.C
    Host       : Layer
    Location   : Singapore, North West (03)
    Country    : Singapore
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 225.51 MB/s  (56.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Write      | 226.11 MB/s  (56.5k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.5k)
    Total      | 451.63 MB/s (112.9k) | 3.90 GB/s    (60.9k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.82 GB/s     (3.5k) | 1.85 GB/s     (1.8k)
    Write      | 1.92 GB/s     (3.7k) | 1.97 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Total      | 3.74 GB/s     (7.3k) | 3.83 GB/s     (3.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 596 Mbits/sec   | 551 Mbits/sec   | 154 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 718 Mbits/sec   | 540 Mbits/sec   | 175 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 695 Mbits/sec   | 788 Mbits/sec   | 186 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 6.03 Gbits/sec  | 7.42 Gbits/sec  | 1.50 ms        
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 647 Mbits/sec   | 467 Mbits/sec   | 181 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 484 Mbits/sec   | 383 Mbits/sec   | 236 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 233 Mbits/sec   | 329 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 750 Mbits/sec   | 595 Mbits/sec   | 154 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 770 Mbits/sec   | 590 Mbits/sec   | 175 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 517 Mbits/sec   | 487 Mbits/sec   | 186 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 6.38 Gbits/sec  | 6.96 Gbits/sec  | 1.51 ms        
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 573 Mbits/sec   | 449 Mbits/sec   | 180 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 410 Mbits/sec   | 325 Mbits/sec   | 236 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 233 Mbits/sec   | 329 ms         
    
    Geekbench test failed and low memory was detected. Add at least 1GB of SWAP or use GB4 instead (higher compatibility with low memory systems).
    
    YABS completed in 9 min 0 sec
    
    Thanked by 1rsk
  • MrEdMrEd Member
    edited September 2024

    @Franzkafka said: Finaly,I got it

    Congrats! ;) Sometimes waiting is key :)

    Thanked by 1rsk
  • @rsk said:

    @Void said:
    Need another coupon hunt to 🔥 things up

    Need to find another way to finance the payments/bills/giveaways/gifts :) 🔥

    Hope you don't find a way to oversell your node 🤣

    Thanked by 1rsk
  • I also got my server - 4C4G UK:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 09:04:18 EEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 4491.544 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-41-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Layer Marketing Services L.L.C
    ASN        : AS216382 LAYER MARKETING SERVICES L.L.C
    Location   : Coventry, England (ENG)
    Country    : United Kingdom
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 501.04 MB/s (125.2k) | 3.67 GB/s    (57.4k)
    Write      | 502.37 MB/s (125.5k) | 3.69 GB/s    (57.7k)
    Total      | 1.00 GB/s   (250.8k) | 7.37 GB/s   (115.1k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 3.33 GB/s     (6.5k) | 3.65 GB/s     (3.5k)
    Write      | 3.50 GB/s     (6.8k) | 3.90 GB/s     (3.8k)
    Total      | 6.84 GB/s    (13.3k) | 7.55 GB/s     (7.3k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 4.62 Gbits/sec  | 5.76 Gbits/sec  | 4.41 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.24 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 10.6 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 97.2 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | busy            | busy            | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | busy            | 128 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.53 Gbits/sec  | 1.32 Gbits/sec  | 73.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 708 Mbits/sec   | 253 Mbits/sec   | 200 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 8.32 Gbits/sec  | 4.31 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.19 Gbits/sec  | 8.43 Gbits/sec  | 10.4 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 2.01 Gbits/sec  | 97.0 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 1.46 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.26 Gbits/sec  | 1.43 Gbits/sec  | 128 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.47 Gbits/sec  | 3.32 Gbits/sec  | 73.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 750 Mbits/sec   | 305 Mbits/sec   | 204 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2759
    Multi Core      | 8405
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7713403
    
    YABS completed in 10 min 45 sec
    

    Looks really good! :)

    Thanked by 3rsk Franzkafka Void
  • @Franzkafka said:
    Finaly,I got it :)

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed 11 Sep 2024 01:44:41 PM HKT
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 27 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 4499.948 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 437.5 MiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 10.0 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-20-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : IPvX.Solutions LLC
    ASN        : AS216382 LAYER MARKETING SERVICES L.L.C
    Host       : Layer
    Location   : Singapore, North West (03)
    Country    : Singapore
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 225.51 MB/s  (56.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Write      | 226.11 MB/s  (56.5k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.5k)
    Total      | 451.63 MB/s (112.9k) | 3.90 GB/s    (60.9k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.82 GB/s     (3.5k) | 1.85 GB/s     (1.8k)
    Write      | 1.92 GB/s     (3.7k) | 1.97 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Total      | 3.74 GB/s     (7.3k) | 3.83 GB/s     (3.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 596 Mbits/sec   | 551 Mbits/sec   | 154 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 718 Mbits/sec   | 540 Mbits/sec   | 175 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 695 Mbits/sec   | 788 Mbits/sec   | 186 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 6.03 Gbits/sec  | 7.42 Gbits/sec  | 1.50 ms        
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 647 Mbits/sec   | 467 Mbits/sec   | 181 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 484 Mbits/sec   | 383 Mbits/sec   | 236 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 233 Mbits/sec   | 329 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 750 Mbits/sec   | 595 Mbits/sec   | 154 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 770 Mbits/sec   | 590 Mbits/sec   | 175 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 517 Mbits/sec   | 487 Mbits/sec   | 186 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 6.38 Gbits/sec  | 6.96 Gbits/sec  | 1.51 ms        
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 573 Mbits/sec   | 449 Mbits/sec   | 180 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 410 Mbits/sec   | 325 Mbits/sec   | 236 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 233 Mbits/sec   | 329 ms         
    
    Geekbench test failed and low memory was detected. Add at least 1GB of SWAP or use GB4 instead (higher compatibility with low memory systems).
    
    YABS completed in 9 min 0 sec
    

    Congrats! You finally have it.

  • @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

  • rskrsk Member, Host Rep

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

  • @rsk said:

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

    Thanks for the answer ;) I guess, nested virtualization could be interesting for users that take like 32G VMs and making their lab VM to test something, but not for the smaller VMs.

  • @rsk said:

    @Void said:
    Need another coupon hunt to 🔥 things up

    Need to find another way to finance the payments/bills/giveaways/gifts :) 🔥

    Ah yes, that’s true too

  • @MrEd said:
    I also got my server - 4C4G UK:

    > # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    > #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    > #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    > # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    > # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    > 
    > Wed Sep 11 09:04:18 EEST 2024
    > 
    > Basic System Information:
    > ---------------------------------
    > Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    > Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
    > CPU cores  : 4 @ 4491.544 MHz
    > AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    > VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    > RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    > Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    > Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    > Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    > Kernel     : 6.8.0-41-generic
    > VM Type    : KVM
    > IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    > 
    > IPv6 Network Information:
    > ---------------------------------
    > ISP        : Layer Marketing Services L.L.C
    > ASN        : AS216382 LAYER MARKETING SERVICES L.L.C
    > Location   : Coventry, England (ENG)
    > Country    : United Kingdom
    > 
    > fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    > ---------------------------------
    > Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
    >   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    > Read       | 501.04 MB/s (125.2k) | 3.67 GB/s    (57.4k)
    > Write      | 502.37 MB/s (125.5k) | 3.69 GB/s    (57.7k)
    > Total      | 1.00 GB/s   (250.8k) | 7.37 GB/s   (115.1k)
    >            |                      |
    > Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
    >   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    > Read       | 3.33 GB/s     (6.5k) | 3.65 GB/s     (3.5k)
    > Write      | 3.50 GB/s     (6.8k) | 3.90 GB/s     (3.8k)
    > Total      | 6.84 GB/s    (13.3k) | 7.55 GB/s     (7.3k)
    > 
    > iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    > ---------------------------------
    > Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    > -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    > Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 4.62 Gbits/sec  | 5.76 Gbits/sec  | 4.41 ms
    > Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.24 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 10.6 ms
    > Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 97.2 ms
    > Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | busy            | busy            | 157 ms
    > Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | busy            | 128 ms
    > Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.53 Gbits/sec  | 1.32 Gbits/sec  | 73.0 ms
    > Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 708 Mbits/sec   | 253 Mbits/sec   | 200 ms
    > 
    > iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    > ---------------------------------
    > Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    > -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    > Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 8.32 Gbits/sec  | 4.31 ms
    > Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.19 Gbits/sec  | 8.43 Gbits/sec  | 10.4 ms
    > Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 2.01 Gbits/sec  | 97.0 ms
    > Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 1.46 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms
    > Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.26 Gbits/sec  | 1.43 Gbits/sec  | 128 ms
    > Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.47 Gbits/sec  | 3.32 Gbits/sec  | 73.0 ms
    > Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 750 Mbits/sec   | 305 Mbits/sec   | 204 ms
    > 
    > Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    > ---------------------------------
    > Test            | Value
    >                 |
    > Single Core     | 2759
    > Multi Core      | 8405
    > Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7713403
    > 
    > YABS completed in 10 min 45 sec
    > 

    Looks really good! :)

    Looks great

  • @rsk said:

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

    Just curious, but if someone want to run nested Virt, so this node will have a chance to reboot randomly, right?

  • rskrsk Member, Host Rep

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

    Just curious, but if someone want to run nested Virt, so this node will have a chance to reboot randomly, right?

    To be completely honest, we haven't seen these random reboots come up for a while now, even on nodes that we have it enabled on for other dedi clients. Our motherboard firmwares are updated, and kernels too. The random reboots happen under very specific circumstances, and we don't anticipate any issues. As always, we constantly monitor all our nodes and infra and keep a close eye on this :)

    Thanked by 1harris1111
  • @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

    Just curious, but if someone want to run nested Virt, so this node will have a chance to reboot randomly, right?

    To be completely honest, we haven't seen these random reboots come up for a while now, even on nodes that we have it enabled on for other dedi clients. Our motherboard firmwares are updated, and kernels too. The random reboots happen under very specific circumstances, and we don't anticipate any issues. As always, we constantly monitor all our nodes and infra and keep a close eye on this :)

    Glad to hear that it rarely happens. I'm waiting for BF if I can get some Dedi/VDS from you :) because I maybe want one to idle and remote docker build hehe

    Thanked by 1rsk
  • @MrEd said:
    I also got my server - 4C4G UK:

    > # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    > #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    > #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    > # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    > # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    > 
    > Wed Sep 11 09:04:18 EEST 2024
    > 
    > Basic System Information:
    > ---------------------------------
    > Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    > Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
    > CPU cores  : 4 @ 4491.544 MHz
    > AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    > VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    > RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    > Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    > Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    > Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    > Kernel     : 6.8.0-41-generic
    > VM Type    : KVM
    > IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    > 
    > IPv6 Network Information:
    > ---------------------------------
    > ISP        : Layer Marketing Services L.L.C
    > ASN        : AS216382 LAYER MARKETING SERVICES L.L.C
    > Location   : Coventry, England (ENG)
    > Country    : United Kingdom
    > 
    > fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    > ---------------------------------
    > Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
    >   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    > Read       | 501.04 MB/s (125.2k) | 3.67 GB/s    (57.4k)
    > Write      | 502.37 MB/s (125.5k) | 3.69 GB/s    (57.7k)
    > Total      | 1.00 GB/s   (250.8k) | 7.37 GB/s   (115.1k)
    >            |                      |
    > Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
    >   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    > Read       | 3.33 GB/s     (6.5k) | 3.65 GB/s     (3.5k)
    > Write      | 3.50 GB/s     (6.8k) | 3.90 GB/s     (3.8k)
    > Total      | 6.84 GB/s    (13.3k) | 7.55 GB/s     (7.3k)
    > 
    > iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    > ---------------------------------
    > Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    > -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    > Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 4.62 Gbits/sec  | 5.76 Gbits/sec  | 4.41 ms
    > Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.24 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 10.6 ms
    > Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 97.2 ms
    > Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | busy            | busy            | 157 ms
    > Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | busy            | 128 ms
    > Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.53 Gbits/sec  | 1.32 Gbits/sec  | 73.0 ms
    > Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 708 Mbits/sec   | 253 Mbits/sec   | 200 ms
    > 
    > iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    > ---------------------------------
    > Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    > -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    > Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 8.32 Gbits/sec  | 4.31 ms
    > Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.19 Gbits/sec  | 8.43 Gbits/sec  | 10.4 ms
    > Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 2.01 Gbits/sec  | 97.0 ms
    > Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 1.46 Gbits/sec  | 157 ms
    > Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.26 Gbits/sec  | 1.43 Gbits/sec  | 128 ms
    > Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.47 Gbits/sec  | 3.32 Gbits/sec  | 73.0 ms
    > Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 750 Mbits/sec   | 305 Mbits/sec   | 204 ms
    > 
    > Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    > ---------------------------------
    > Test            | Value
    >                 |
    > Single Core     | 2759
    > Multi Core      | 8405
    > Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7713403
    > 
    > YABS completed in 10 min 45 sec
    > 

    Looks really good! :)

    Definitely GOOD.

    Thanked by 1rsk
  • rskrsk Member, Host Rep

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

    Just curious, but if someone want to run nested Virt, so this node will have a chance to reboot randomly, right?

    To be completely honest, we haven't seen these random reboots come up for a while now, even on nodes that we have it enabled on for other dedi clients. Our motherboard firmwares are updated, and kernels too. The random reboots happen under very specific circumstances, and we don't anticipate any issues. As always, we constantly monitor all our nodes and infra and keep a close eye on this :)

    Glad to hear that it rarely happens. I'm waiting for BF if I can get some Dedi/VDS from you :) because I maybe want one to idle and remote docker build hehe

    We can't wait for BF either :)

  • @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

    Just curious, but if someone want to run nested Virt, so this node will have a chance to reboot randomly, right?

    To be completely honest, we haven't seen these random reboots come up for a while now, even on nodes that we have it enabled on for other dedi clients. Our motherboard firmwares are updated, and kernels too. The random reboots happen under very specific circumstances, and we don't anticipate any issues. As always, we constantly monitor all our nodes and infra and keep a close eye on this :)

    Glad to hear that it rarely happens. I'm waiting for BF if I can get some Dedi/VDS from you :) because I maybe want one to idle and remote docker build hehe

    We can't wait for BF either :)

    I'm very happy with your 4c4g+2gb+1TB now :) just wait for BF to get an idle dedi hehe

    Thanked by 1rsk
  • @MrEd said:

    @FrankCastle said:

    @MrEd said:
    On the other hand, in this community it would be hard to distinguish no-lifers vs real time zone. And, it might have been possible to do something like that in RN thread, where activity was much greater, but not here. It is impossible to determine the user timezone from 5 messages :)

    That's never stopped data brokers before. Collect all the information you can, bundle it up as something useful and resell it to everyone that is willing to pay!

    How much would you pay for the data? :D

    What all are you collecting? Do you include a recent picture of their identification cards, social security numbers, IP address, home address and times when they are not at home, religious/political affiliations (kind of one in the same these days), sexual preference, how often they call their mother and so on. I want it all.

  • Hey, how much would it cost to upgrade the RAM?

  • @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

    Just curious, but if someone want to run nested Virt, so this node will have a chance to reboot randomly, right?

    To be completely honest, we haven't seen these random reboots come up for a while now, even on nodes that we have it enabled on for other dedi clients. Our motherboard firmwares are updated, and kernels too. The random reboots happen under very specific circumstances, and we don't anticipate any issues. As always, we constantly monitor all our nodes and infra and keep a close eye on this :)

    Glad to hear that it rarely happens. I'm waiting for BF if I can get some Dedi/VDS from you :) because I maybe want one to idle and remote docker build hehe

    We can't wait for BF either :)

    Really? That surprises me a little. I asssumed most BF deals for providers were loss leaders or at least less profitiable than normal deals but it is kind of a marketing write off because of all the people it draws in. I've actaully been considering starting a Black Friday thread about expectations for us end users about potential upcoming BF deals.

  • @FrankCastle said:

    @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

    Just curious, but if someone want to run nested Virt, so this node will have a chance to reboot randomly, right?

    To be completely honest, we haven't seen these random reboots come up for a while now, even on nodes that we have it enabled on for other dedi clients. Our motherboard firmwares are updated, and kernels too. The random reboots happen under very specific circumstances, and we don't anticipate any issues. As always, we constantly monitor all our nodes and infra and keep a close eye on this :)

    Glad to hear that it rarely happens. I'm waiting for BF if I can get some Dedi/VDS from you :) because I maybe want one to idle and remote docker build hehe

    We can't wait for BF either :)

    Really? That surprises me a little. I asssumed most BF deals for providers were loss leaders or at least less profitiable than normal deals but it is kind of a marketing write off because of all the people it draws in. I've actaully been considering starting a Black Friday thread about expectations for us end users about potential upcoming BF deals.

    I Think that if you managed to set a deal and have strict ToS, you will ideally in profit. Many people got a server just because it's cheap, and have it idiling 7 80% all of the time (including me).

  • @FrankCastle said:

    @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @harris1111 said:

    @rsk said:

    @MrEd said:
    @rsk I noticed one difference in YABS by @Franzkafka and my - VM-x/AMD-V is enabled on SG node and disabled on UK node. Is it on purpose or why?

    Not that it makes any difference since I have no plans to run nested virtualization, but why are VMs different? :)

    Actually, I just noticed this due to the YABS being shared. By default we disable amd-v as we use AMD Ryzen 7950X and we did see some stability issues with random reboots and our mobo combination. I have gone ahead and disabled it on the nodes that were not updated with this change.

    Again, like you said, it won't make a difference as you don't plan to run nested virt :)

    Just curious, but if someone want to run nested Virt, so this node will have a chance to reboot randomly, right?

    To be completely honest, we haven't seen these random reboots come up for a while now, even on nodes that we have it enabled on for other dedi clients. Our motherboard firmwares are updated, and kernels too. The random reboots happen under very specific circumstances, and we don't anticipate any issues. As always, we constantly monitor all our nodes and infra and keep a close eye on this :)

    Glad to hear that it rarely happens. I'm waiting for BF if I can get some Dedi/VDS from you :) because I maybe want one to idle and remote docker build hehe

    We can't wait for BF either :)

    Really? That surprises me a little. I asssumed most BF deals for providers were loss leaders or at least less profitiable than normal deals but it is kind of a marketing write off because of all the people it draws in. I've actaully been considering starting a Black Friday thread about expectations for us end users about potential upcoming BF deals.

    Let's do it.

Sign In or Register to comment.