New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Calin iHostART.Com took our $22.5K and scamming us!
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
You’re just trying to derail things now to not have to answer the very clear statement I made
Not buying it, sorry
You don't get to decide when a thread closes. This is a forum. Romania is also a liberal-democratic state, so you must respect freedom of speech. If you do not like something on TV, simply change the channel.
How ironic btw
Calin accused me of not being able to communicate in english
>
The difference here is that there are many conspiracy theories and many people are misled.
And my real customers who started asking me questions and with whom some of them I have contracts and many other things are putting me in danger.
as long as you haven't seen all the conversations with GOSSDHosting you have no right to say anything!!!I'm still waiting for approval from @GoSSDHosting to post video of all our conversations , because at the moment there are only some screenshots that are taken out of context
@Calin you just shared a long video
Why would you need permission for the rest but not for that?
>
Because this it's a full one capther about what screenshot what send @GoSSDHosting
So we're gonna do GoSSDHosting vs Calin or wat? W548, GE bank? Winner takes all?
So why does another video of the same exact kind require permission?
How is Calin's english is a bit better these days?
AI babyyyyyyy
I guess 22K can buy you a lot of English
All of a sudden, the English verses are coming like a pot of gold instead of the awesome RO based English...
And this makes me think, is the RO provider really the one who claims to be? Or is it a smart person impersonating a small town RO guy to gain sympathy and claim innocence due to language barriers.
The quality of responses have greatly improved.
Lmao, no
Most likely after you refund him. Case is still open and for now you still owe him money.
Grammarly premium subscription
(a) why connecting two different factors as if they were dependent?
(b) and @Calin made it clear that the money will definitely (have to) go to the bank. So, both made something clear - now what?
(c) it wasn't so much Calin offering, but rather @GoSSDHosting needing such a service and, according to his own words, Calin was the only option.
And, if I'm not mistaken, it wasn't him who payed, it was his client, the "end customer", who has no contract with Calin but with gossd. No payment from contract party, bye, bye, contract broken. Btw, of course the other side has rights too e.g. the right to cancel and demand a refund. What gossd (if he really is the contract partner and not just an informal middle man) can not do however is to ask for his money back right now, because the decision over the money is at a (at least de facto) bigger entity to make.
You ignore the decisive factor: he can show papers to the bank and ask them to return the money all day long but it's the bank (and the laws I guess) who has the upper hand and who decides.
I think the real problem in this thing is simply greed. gossd knew that it might be risky but he wanted the deal or at least his cut. And Calin bit off more than he can chew comfortably because he wanted the deal too. IMO both created the situation, neither is really totally innocent.
But and that's an important 'but': neither you nor me nor 99% of the users here know enough and have all the relevant information. All we can offer is, at best, an educated opinion. That is not a base to judge someone and/or declare him criminal, evil, or malevolent or to harm anyone or their business.
He briefly mentioned it, yes, what his own plans for that crypto are, with the assurance that there wouldn’t be any problems. Throughout the whole conversation, he gave a lot of assurances, but let's ignore that part
You didn’t ask him this. You said clearly that KYC wasn’t needed and that there wouldn’t be any problems. Do you want me to quote you?
Only later, when you messed things up with your own bank and couldn’t prove the source of your money, you put the blame on him. Not to mention, you know well enough that he’s not from the EU, so he doesn’t have an IBAN, yet you’re using this against him.
No, let's not simply a possibly relevant factor. But your point opens yet another can of worms or at least unpleasant questions like, e.g. "what kind of a businessman simply ignores facts (like european and romanian rules and laws) and simply relies on an assurance from someone he himself describes as not exactly the business partner of excellent standing, especially in a matter where (a) he was told clearly that the money will have to go to the bank, and (b) every business I ever knew knows well that laws and regulations can be bitches"?
He even said it himself that he contacted Calin only because he was the only option he had.
And? How is that even an argument? Or anything you said above?
By the way, your standard alternate reality written in essays with zero essence is extremely tiresome. There’s hardly anyone as annoying on this forum as you.
Please do us a favor and express your thoughts in a sentence or two. It would be pretty much the same, just without the random strawman fillers.
BS! Any halfway experience businessman outside of Europe knows that in such a case they can and should offer their account number and international bank code. Even I know that and I'm absolutely not a businessman, let alone an experienced one. And the european bank would have accepted that.
As far as I can see, Calin did not holding 'not having an IBAN' against him but rather that the guy refused, slithered, and provided fake info - which Calins bank of course noted within seconds.
Typical. Seeing your projection falling apart you resort to personal attacks.
Nah, I am just honest with you.
Besides that, I know there's no way to have a reasonable and intelligent discussion with you because you always go in circles - huge circles filled with empty, meaningless essays.
So, instead of getting caught up in your hollow, rabbit hole strawman arguments, I prefer to maintain my own rhythm in the discussion.
We forgot what will be happening with GoSSD and their client?
if both GoSSD and their client are based in India, well, client can lodge cyber crime complaint and in most cases the police reverses (it take couple of years) the transaction but proof must be submitted and there is thorough investigation of duping cases.
This middleman GoSSD will be devasted for mere transferring crypto (also evading taxes) if their client really initiates legal proceeding.
I don't disagree to the KYC part because that's what the parties both agreed upon. Both parties agreed upon a sum of money as well, which isn't in the pocket of Calin, though. The details of the why are still misty ATM, but if the reason is that it is dirty money, it isn't Calin's fault alone.
That's not how KYC/AML works. That would be like "Hey, I have a piece of paper which I just printed, saying the money is okay". If it was that simply to launder money, KYC/AML wouldn't be worth anything.
sorry to say, but rightfully so. however you try to turn things here, you are either not able to run a business properly and be a reliable partner that keeps their agreements and promises or a gambler with your clients money because you are too lazy to do enough due diligence about laws and processes.
you try to be a smart arse and be able to handle anything easily while you aren't.
that you tell your client, that the money has to go to the bank is good, but he clearly stated multiple times, that he don't want KYC, it's even in your very same screenshot above in the upper left. why should he care about you giving the money to the bank? in best he would taken your statements as one you doing the structuring fuss exactly because that is your way to avoid it.
if he sends money via crypto, how could you think he even has a bank account for the refund to start with? bank accounts with direct transfers are not as common in lot parts of the world - how can you not be aware of this whilst running an international business?
you are clueless about this part of running a business. simple as that. makes you unreliable and your clients do right by start questioning exactly that.
there will be a day in the near future were you simply stop being interested in running this bottom-of-the-barrel business or something else will end in terms of regulations, power pricing or whatever makes your model just sustainable right now.
when that happens, you will walk away from it, without spending too much thought about what happens to your clients. this is who you are and how you deal with things. and yes, that is dangerous.
Someone has been Practicing their Duolingo.
Ol, simple question then:
If bank asks calins client for money source he then contacts his client, and then he contacts his client and then he contacts his client and then he contacts btc spinner services and then…
How far bank can go before calling police and money anti-laundering officers raiding calin for more personal conversation?
In some reality I envy that poor bastard who sent 20+k to reseller. Now he bought a ticket for a very nice drama from first row! He pushes reseller, reseller pushes calin. Human centipede and calin is last in the chain. Takko friday?
You cannot send it back using another payment method. This could be considered money laundering!