New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Calin iHostART.Com took our $22.5K and scamming us!
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
ok albaman
feel free to
PayPal locked our account.
Therefore, we are no longer obligated to pay colo fees to our upstream.
The upstream must not disconnect our servers.
23 Pages of let drama. It's a pleasure to stay here.
TOS is a part of the agreement with your customers, but fell free to ask your upstream to write a clause into the agreement.
(I think I will take a long break from LET because you can't write anything serious here anymore without it getting drowned in derailing troll posts.)
I mean, we’re 23 pages deep now. I think most points have been made by now.
Mods likely won’t do anything else until Calin gets new information from the bank, and that could be weeks, months, or never.
PayPal locked our account.
Therefore, we are no longer able to pay transit fees to our upstream, so that servers are disconnected.
Customers cannot access their servers but we will not refund customers.
Does PayPal offer the possibility of paying using crypto-squats?
No, but on OnlyFans you can pay to recieve them
I have nothing to add and derailing it seems like a quick way to get the thread locked (like Calin wanted lol)
Therefore, I’m out of here until new information comes up. It was fun while it lasted. Thanks everyone🥰
So after @cociu, @Calin will be remembered for ages to come.
I should pick this content as a case study for my students in business school.
Please do so. Society evolves by learning from one another, so we don't repeat the same mistakes in future.
Did someone say OnlyFans? You can have my money!
Oh boy 23 pages of.......
I asked Chat GPT to run a summary of all pages, he replayed: Rather let's reinvent the wheel
Please stir the drama pot once more. Shake it, so it will be sweet again.
@GoSSDHosting and @Calin any news?
Questions for gossd:
Question for calin:
Dear customer
We process push-up / squat payments in-house, not through third-party.
We don't have fancy systems like incogpay, just an FTP upload link.
We don't have money transmitter licenses so we cannot provide payment processing service to others.
OnlyFans is owned by cociu perfume company and unrelated to us.
Is it ?
I thought it was frozen by the bank and likely marked as suspect. Where the 'money' ends up is not certain.
How didn't i think of this! Copy and pasting long articles and have ChatGPT summarize everything for me in short paragraphs.. Genious!
I read the whole thing...
I might be wrong but I'm not so sure that @GoSSDHosting is both the customer and the party who transferred crypto-"currency". I'm under the impression (again, I may be wrong) that gossd is the customer but their customer is the one who transferred the crypto-"currency". If that is the case or if there is anything that isn't or doesn't look 100% clean and proper it wouldn't be surprising at all if a bank flagged it as suspicious.
Well, the crypto he got paid with was with him. What he did with it later is solely on him.
Wouldn't it be funny if he tried to convert earnings from several clients, not just this one?
"Sorry, guys, I did something with the crypto I got from you for the service I didn't deliver, and now the bank froze my funds, so there won't be either a service or a refund."
I did - and all in all I'm happy enough with the deal I got (a normal promo) that just a week ago I paid to keep it. No regrets so far.
Btw, the only good solution to end dcma related schemes is to have the country of origin understand that their laws and agencies mean nothing to/in other countries. The problem isn't an irritating law. The problem is that a certain country seriously thinks and acts like it's the king and the policeman of almost the whole world - with "almost" being the only detail that irritates them.
I'm glad and grateful that now there are two players on the field who say "Nyet!" to the bully.
"Banks are very cautious about crypto payments, and I really don't understand why @Calin would accept large crypto payments from clients or why the clients would receive crypto from their clients. Crypto is just digital money, with nothing backing it except 'trust.' Technically, banks will audit the funds before you receive them from your crypto exchange. Since we know that many people use crypto as a means for money laundering, thorough verification is essential."
Everything fits except Romanians racks. They kinda keep stealing too much money with wallet, but thank you for the offer.
Have a nice day!
literally every currency is backed by trust of the government that issues it
Squats are backed by the oversized muscles that pump them.
You, and some others, keep repeating this, but if the crypto is dirty, smeared with tomato juice, for example, it is worthless. So, it isn't as binary as you think it is.
The reason this keeps repeating is because of people like you who blame the client who paid without issue (crypto was in Calin's wallet, no one is touching it - just as they agreed), instead of the person who messed up his personal transactions between his own accounts and refuses to take accountability.
No matter what argument is used, you deny the fact that frozen money was Calin's as he made a transaction from crypto to his bank that caused the funds to be frozen. He's the one who needs to prove source of this money to his bank, not people who paid him in crypto.
Not to mention that he explicitly said to the client that KYC isn't needed and that if something went wrong, he would refund the money. This turned out to be a blatant lie.
What you’re doing here is justifying a scam that paves the way for Calin to get away without refunding money to the person he’s about to screw over for 20k and that just sucks.
I think it is. While everyone is going back and forth about crypto being this or that and why someone using it per se is a criminal and so on I'd rather look at the timeline and the thing that really matters:
@Calin entered an agreement/contract willingly without knowing about the customer or the origin of that large amount.
He knowingly admitted BEFORE the transfer to not needing that information nor caring about it.
He even guarantued, that it would not matter or else he'd be responsible for a refund.
The other side fulfilled their part of the deal. @Calin does not keep his end of the bargain, despite having promised otherwise.
End of story. Binary.