Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

KVM Windows Server VPS in Los Angeles + Strong DDoS Protection

atilaatila Member
edited August 2024 in Requests

VZ Type:

KVM

Number of Cores:

2 cores

RAM:

6-8GB

Disk Space:

~150GB

Disk Type:

SSD

Bandwidth:

Not specified, but should be sufficient for MMORPG hosting.

Port Speed:

1Gbps preferred

DDoS Protection:

Yes, strong DDoS protection required. Preferred solutions are Path.net or CosmicGuard.

Number of IPs:

1

Location:

Los Angeles, USA. The server needs to maintain low latency, ideally 100-150ms between the Americas and Europe, and no more than 200ms to Asia, particularly Malaysia and Thailand.

Budget:

$40/month

Billing period:

Monthly

Additional Information:

  • VibeGames doesn't offer Los Angeles as a location.
  • RoyaleHosting doesn't offer Los Angeles as a location.
  • I’ve previously used BuyVM with Path.net protection, but they don’t have a Los Angeles location.
  • Tempest.net is too costly without a KVM option.
  • bloom.host would be ideal, but they’re out of stock.
  • Sharktech doesn’t meet my needs, as I prefer to configure my firewall rules like I could with BuyVM.

If anyone can provide a VPS that meets these requirements or has suggestions on a reliable provider, I would appreciate it.

Thank you!

Comments

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @atila said: I’ve previously used BuyVM with Path.net protection, but they don’t have a Los Angeles location.

    LV isn't that far away from LA and you should still be able to get sub 200ms from SEA.

    Thanked by 1atila
  • @DP Thank you for the input! I agree that Las Vegas isn't far from Los Angeles, and it could potentially meet the latency requirements.

    However, I believe that Los Angeles might offer better overall connectivity, especially for my target regions.

    That said, I'm open to exploring solutions in LV if they can maintain a ping between 180-200ms to those areas. I appreciate your suggestion and would welcome any further recommendations you might have!

    Thanked by 1DP
  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy
    edited August 2024

    @atila said:
    @DP Thank you for the input! I agree that Las Vegas isn't far from Los Angeles, and it could potentially meet the latency requirements.

    However, I believe that Los Angeles might offer better overall connectivity, especially for my target regions.

    That said, I'm open to exploring solutions in LV if they can maintain a ping between 180-200ms to those areas. I appreciate your suggestion and would welcome any further recommendations you might have!

    There's not going to be much of a difference in ping from SEA (particularly SG and MY) to LA, compared to LV :smiley:

    From Singapore to Las Vegas:
    penumbra# ping -n -4 -c 5 speedtest.lv.buyvm.net
    PING  (209.141.56.135) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=179 ms
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=180 ms
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=180 ms
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=180 ms
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=180 ms
    

    From Singapore to Los Angeles:
    penumbra# ping -n -4 -c 5 lax.lg.extravm.com
    PING lax.lg.extravm.com (216.73.156.87) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=186 ms
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=186 ms
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=186 ms
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=186 ms
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=186 ms
    

    From Malaysia to Las Vegas:
    basilisk# ping -n -4 -c 5 speedtest.lv.buyvm.net
    PING  (209.141.56.135) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=193 ms
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=187 ms
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=187 ms
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=187 ms
    64 bytes from 209.141.56.135: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=187 ms
    

    From Malaysia to Los Angeles:
    basilisk# ping -n -4 -c 5 lax.lg.extravm.com
    PING lax.lg.extravm.com (216.73.156.87) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=184 ms
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=183 ms
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=184 ms
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=184 ms
    64 bytes from 216.73.156.87: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=184 ms
    

    But if you are keen on looking for something within LA, reach out to @MikeA, or check out ExtraVM.

  • Thank you, @DP , for the detailed analysis and ping tests. It’s clear from the results that the difference in latency between Las Vegas and Los Angeles is minimal, which is reassuring.

    I appreciate your help and will wait to hear from @MikeA for any potential solutions in Los Angeles.

    Thanks again!

    Thanked by 1DP
  • MikeAMikeA Member, Patron Provider

    Based on the companies you list, I probably wouldn't be able to help compared to the companies that boast about having specialized or custom mitigation. My VPS are general purpose protection won't be suitable if you're attracting attacks that only big names like Path can prevent.

    Thanked by 2atila DP
  • Hi @MikeA and @DP,

    First, I want to thank both of you for your insights and support throughout this discussion.

    @MikeA, I appreciate your response and the clarification regarding the DDoS protection capabilities of your services. I understand that your general-purpose protection might not be sufficient for the specialized needs I have, especially considering the potential for significant DDoS attacks. I’ll keep your services in mind for other needs that might fit within that scope.

    @DP, thank you once again for the detailed analysis and the ping tests you provided. It's clear that the latency difference between Las Vegas and Los Angeles is minimal, which is reassuring. Given this, would it be possible for you to help edit my original post and title to include Las Vegas as a potential location? This adjustment will allow me to explore a broader range of options and see if any providers can meet my needs in Las Vegas as well.

    I truly appreciate the help from both of you!

    Best regards,

    Thanked by 1DP
  • Check out @speedypage
    They use Datapacket/CDN77 so you should have excellent connectivity to Asia.
    4 Cores Ryzen 7950x
    10 GB DDR5
    150 GB NVMe
    14 TB @ 10 Gbps
    $23.99

    LG: https://la.lg.speedypage.com/

    Thanked by 3atila DP dev_vps
  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    +1 for @speedypage!

    Thanked by 1atila
  • atilaatila Member
    edited August 2024

    @concept, thank you for recommending @speedypage! Their offer looks promising, especially with the excellent connectivity to Asia.

    @speedypage, could you please confirm if your DDoS protection is as robust as Path.net or CosmicGuard?

    Additionally, would I be able to configure specific firewall rules, such as only allowing certain TCP ports, through your control panel or via ticket, similar to what I used to do with BuyVM?

    I appreciate any details you can provide!

    Thank you!

  • @atila said:
    @speedypage, could you please confirm if your DDoS protection is as robust as Path.net or CosmicGuard?

    Additionally, would I be able to configure specific firewall rules, such as only allowing certain TCP ports, through your control panel or via ticket, similar to what I used to do with BuyVM?

    I appreciate any details you can provide!

    Thank you!

    Although, I don't have experiences with their DDoS protection. They do state this "Protected by DataPacket's Advanced DDoS Shield, as well as an in-house, in-line XDP filter for game specific protection" on their previous offer threads.

    Thanked by 1atila
  • MikeAMikeA Member, Patron Provider
    edited August 2024

    @concept said:

    @atila said:
    @speedypage, could you please confirm if your DDoS protection is as robust as Path.net or CosmicGuard?

    Additionally, would I be able to configure specific firewall rules, such as only allowing certain TCP ports, through your control panel or via ticket, similar to what I used to do with BuyVM?

    I appreciate any details you can provide!

    Thank you!

    Although, I don't have experiences with their DDoS protection. They do state this "Protected by DataPacket's Advanced DDoS Shield, as well as an in-house, in-line XDP filter for game specific protection" on their previous offer threads.

    Datapacket probably won't be suitable. They mostly just handle volumetric L4, anything DDoS related their network team takes >24h to respond and they generally don't do custom filtering unless you pay them a lot. I use them in Singapore, host a few MMO game servers, it "works ok generally" but you need your own rules setup to block stuff.

    Really just need a higher budget. Something on GSL is probably ideal for the use case. @atila If Dallas would work let me know and I could help. But I don't know anyone in LA that you didn't list that wouldn't be more suitable.

    Thanked by 1atila
  • +1 for @speedypage

    Thanked by 1atila
  • If GSL works, then there is StreamlineServers

    Thanked by 1atila
  • @concept, @MikeA, thank you both for the additional insights!

    @concept, I appreciate the information regarding @speedypage and their DDoS protection setup. I'll definitely wait for their response to my question about the robustness of their DDoS protection and the possibility of configuring specific firewall rules.

    @MikeA, thanks for the detailed explanation about Datapacket. It seems that they might not be the ideal solution for my needs given the response times and limitations on custom filtering. I understand that a higher budget might open up more suitable options. If Dallas could work as an alternative, I'd be open to discussing further possibilities with you.

    Regarding DDoS protection, I believe that providers using GCore, Path.net, CosmicGuard, or GSL would likely meet my requirements. If anyone here on LowEndTalk knows of providers offering KVM servers with these protections in place, I would greatly appreciate your recommendations!

    Thank you all for your continued support.

    Best regards,
    atila

  • speedypagespeedypage Member, Host Rep

    Thanks for the mentions!

    @atila - our Los Angeles location has both DataPacket and an XDP filter that runs behind it for anything that leaks through. We have profiles for specific games, so depending on what you're running, it will work for what you require.

    Feel free to open a support ticket if you need further specifics!

    Thanked by 1atila
  • Hi @speedypage,

    I’ve just sent you a private message regarding a few questions I have. Whenever you have a moment, could you please take a look?

    Thanks in advance!

    Best regards,

Sign In or Register to comment.