Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Happening Now: My SAD EXPERIENCE with CloudCone!!!!!!!

2»

Comments

  • angstromangstrom Moderator
    edited July 2024

    @icase said: When I opened a ticket to inquire with customer service, they transferred my ticket to the abuse group and informed me that their TOS does not allow one person to have more than one account.

    As others have pointed out, this is a common condition in the ToS of a hosting provider

    It's a bit surprising that it never occurred to you that your having/maintaining two accounts would be problematic from the provider's perspective

    Your friend was also at fault for not reading the ToS because he wasn't allowed to share his account with others

    I still don't quite understand why it was so hard for your friend to pay his own bills if the VPS was so important to him

    Probably the best strategy in this situation would have been for you to purchase another VPS in your name and for you and your friend to migrate his VPS to your VPS. Following this, you could have paid the bills for your friend to your heart's content without violating the provider's ToS

    Congrats on your first post since February 2017

    Thanked by 1Cloudcone
  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited July 2024

    @angstrom said:

    @icase said: When I opened a ticket to inquire with customer service, they transferred my ticket to the abuse group and informed me that their TOS does not allow one person to have more than one account.

    Congrats on your first post since [...]

  • edited July 2024

    @angstrom said:
    Your friend was also at fault for not reading the ToS because he wasn't allowed to share his account with others

    Good point. I wonder how common such a provision really is though since i figure in business environments there'll be a lot of cases where an account isn't managed by the actual owner.

    Besides, given that OP seems to be a long time client with no abusive history i don't get why it would be needed to come down on him that hard. It's a revenue generating client that paid his bills (on time i guess) and didn't cause any trouble. If i were in the providers shoes i'd have probably just informed OP that his setup isn't in line with the companies ToS and either merged the accounts or offered an exception. It really doesn't seem like doing so would cause any harm or pose any risk to the provider. That obviously all assumes that there really is no bad history or any fishy stuff like an affiliate connection or whatever.

    Thanked by 3angstrom icase default
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @totally_not_banned said:

    @angstrom said:
    Your friend was also at fault for not reading the ToS because he wasn't allowed to share his account with others

    Good point. I wonder how common such a provision really is though since i figure in business environments there'll be a lot of cases where an account isn't managed by the actual owner.

    Well, in such cases there's probably a single "business account" that more than one person can access

    Recall that the present case involves two different accounts that the same person is accessing (as opposed to a single account that more than one person is accessing)

    Besides, given that OP seems to be a long time client with no abusive history i don't get why it would be needed to come down on him that hard. It's a revenue generating client that paid his bills (on time i guess) and didn't cause any trouble. If i were in the providers shoes i'd have probably just informed OP that his setup isn't in line with the companies ToS and either merged the accounts or offered an exception. It really doesn't seem like doing so would cause any harm or pose any risk to the provider. That obviously all assumes that there really is no bad history or any fishy stuff like an affiliate connection or whatever.

    Indeed, all of this may depend on the histories of the two accounts

  • icaseicase Member

    This has nothing to do with personal payment capability, as everyone's way of interacting or handling things is different; you can't assess the "importance" someone places on something based on appearances, nor is there a unified standard. Discussing this further would be too complicated. I believe it's better to focus on the actual circumstances of the matter itself. The core point is that I mentioned what actually happened.

    @angstrom said: I still don't quite understand why it was so hard for your friend to pay his own bills if the VPS was so important to him

    I’ve been lurking in the forum, quietly learning. LOL

    @angstrom said: Congrats on your first post since February 2017

  • edited July 2024

    @angstrom said:

    @totally_not_banned said:

    @angstrom said:
    Your friend was also at fault for not reading the ToS because he wasn't allowed to share his account with others

    Good point. I wonder how common such a provision really is though since i figure in business environments there'll be a lot of cases where an account isn't managed by the actual owner.

    Well, in such cases there's probably a single "business account" that more than one person can access

    Recall that the present case involves two different accounts that the same person is accessing (as opposed to a single account that more than one person is accessing)

    Well, as long as the company handles their IT matters internally that's probably the case. If they are hiring some external support i could also see a single person accessing multiple accounts (belonging to clients of theirs) though.

    Besides, given that OP seems to be a long time client with no abusive history i don't get why it would be needed to come down on him that hard. It's a revenue generating client that paid his bills (on time i guess) and didn't cause any trouble. If i were in the providers shoes i'd have probably just informed OP that his setup isn't in line with the companies ToS and either merged the accounts or offered an exception. It really doesn't seem like doing so would cause any harm or pose any risk to the provider. That obviously all assumes that there really is no bad history or any fishy stuff like an affiliate connection or whatever.

    Indeed, all of this may depend on the histories of the two accounts

    Yeah, actually it makes me wonder a little why a provider would basically kick a paying customer but then the refund request might also have given them seconds thoughts relating to the paying part i guess.

  • icaseicase Member

    Regarding the issue of account ownership, regardless of their final judgment on my violations, I can say with 100% certainty that during the actual use of the service, I have no abuse records, including spam, illegal copyrighted content, etc., because it is all personal private use. They can conduct any review on this through their system.

    @angstrom said: Indeed, all of this may depend on the histories of the two accounts

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @icase said:
    This has nothing to do with personal payment capability, as everyone's way of interacting or handling things is different; you can't assess the "importance" someone places on something based on appearances, nor is there a unified standard. Discussing this further would be too complicated. I believe it's better to focus on the actual circumstances of the matter itself. The core point is that I mentioned what actually happened.

    Fair enough

    I was just trying to hint at the possibility of other solutions, like (e.g.) switching to yearly billing (so your friend would need to visit his account only once a year)

  • icaseicase Member

    I can only say that in the future, I will "sadder but wiser."

    @angstrom said:

    @icase said:
    This has nothing to do with personal payment capability, as everyone's way of interacting or handling things is different; you can't assess the "importance" someone places on something based on appearances, nor is there a unified standard. Discussing this further would be too complicated. I believe it's better to focus on the actual circumstances of the matter itself. The core point is that I mentioned what actually happened.

    Fair enough

    I was just trying to hint at the possibility of other solutions, like (e.g.) switching to yearly billing (so your friend would need to visit his account only once a year)

  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @icase said:
    Regarding the issue of account ownership, regardless of their final judgment on my violations, I can say with 100% certainty that during the actual use of the service, I have no abuse records, including spam, illegal copyrighted content, etc., because it is all personal private use. They can conduct any review on this through their system.

    @angstrom said: Indeed, all of this may depend on the histories of the two accounts

    This should help your case

    (I suspect that learning to top-quote would also help your case!)

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    I have been in similar situation with another host. Simply explaining them the use case (separation of business vs personal in my case) was sufficient.

    Yes the provider is very much active and provides top notch services and support for peanuts.

    What I have believed is not being aggressive and having patience is the key. Usually it's a cultural issue where one may not understand how the other person would react to one's statement in this global economy....

  • CloudconeCloudcone Member, Patron Provider

    @icase could you share your ticket number with us, and I'd be happy to summarise the conversation here.

    Thanked by 1icase
  • icaseicase Member
    edited July 2024

    The issue has been resolved through calm communication. Despite a few days of anxiety, I am grateful to the customer service staff at @Cloudcone . I hope that non-malicious users will continue to be treated well in the future. Although misuse is common, there are many complex situations in reality, and we cannot presume guilt for everyone. Although after careful review, misunderstandings can be cleared and appropriate corrections made. However, when an issue arises, for customers who unintentionally violate the TOS and trustingly place their data on your servers, a simple action on your part can cause great fear. I hope the review mechanism can be made more humane. For instance, when a risk is triggered, the system could first issue a warning or reminder and allow time for correction, rather than immediately suspending the account and then reviewing it. Wouldn't this be better? After all, data is extremely important.

    @Cloudcone said:
    @icase could you share your ticket number with us, and I'd be happy to summarise the conversation here.

    Thanked by 1JadenW
  • hope cloudcone overhauls their hardware while they are at it

  • CloudconeCloudcone Member, Patron Provider

    @icase said:
    The issue has been resolved through calm communication. Despite a few days of anxiety, I am grateful to the customer service staff at @Cloudcone . I hope that non-malicious users will continue to be treated well in the future. Although misuse is common, there are many complex situations in reality, and we cannot presume guilt for everyone. Although after careful review, misunderstandings can be cleared and appropriate corrections made. However, when an issue arises, for customers who unintentionally violate the TOS and trustingly place their data on your servers, a simple action on your part can cause great fear. I hope the review mechanism can be made more humane. For instance, when a risk is triggered, the system could first issue a warning or reminder and allow time for correction, rather than immediately suspending the account and then reviewing it. Wouldn't this be better? After all, data is extremely important.

    First off, I want to apologize for any frustration this has caused. To recap on what happened, your account was flagged for having multiple accounts, which is strictly against our Terms of Service. To clarify, this does not affect your active services but it will restrict your account from doing anything else.
    This is a measure we have in place to ensure the security and integrity of our services. We understand it can be a hassle, but it is a necessary step.

    This is why we urge all users to read through our Terms of Service before continuing (as you should) to avoid complications such as these.

    When your account is flagged, it is sent to our compliance team who handles these cases separately from our usual 24/7 support team, and due to a high volume of similar cases, there could be delays in processing, specially if you consider the weekend as well. However, if you are a non-malicious user there is no need to worry as your account will most likely be verified in due time.
    We had also communicated with you during this time and asked for patience as we reviewed the situation.

    Additionally, if a client contacts us and requests to use multiple accounts, we may allow it if their use-case is valid and verified.

    I'm happy to report that we've now resolved the issue, consolidated all of your services into one main account, marked it as verified and safe from other administrative checks and ensured everything is up and running smoothly.

    We really appreciate your patience and feedback, and we're always striving to improve our processes.

    If anyone else has similar concerns or needs assistance, please don't hesitate to reach out. We're here to help :smiley:

  • nice one @Cloudcone

    Thanked by 2JadenW Cloudcone
  • Drama queen ;p
    Never had a problem with @Cloudcone . Or rather, I've always had the support and assistance I needed, with civilized exchanges. Everything can be resolved with dialogue.

    Thanked by 2JadenW Cloudcone
Sign In or Register to comment.