Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

UK] - Ryzen 9 - DDR5 - NVME - 330TB Bandwidth - IPv4 & IPv6 - DDOS Protected

2

Comments

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @ElonBezos said:

    @xHosts said:

    This was the offer

    Ryzen 9 7900
    2GB DDR5 Ram
    35GB NVMe SSD
    1 IPv4 + /112 IPv6
    4TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
    Windows/linux
    Corero 200Gb/s Pro active ddos protection
    UK Servers

    £15 per year

    can the port speed be upgraded to 2Gbps like this offer?

    They are out of stock until I back (probably tomorrow) from my provider on the availability of hardware but I should be able to increase that for an extra £5 per year with the bandwidth remaining at 4TB.

  • @xHosts said:

    @ElonBezos said:

    @xHosts said:

    This was the offer

    Ryzen 9 7900
    2GB DDR5 Ram
    35GB NVMe SSD
    1 IPv4 + /112 IPv6
    4TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
    Windows/linux
    Corero 200Gb/s Pro active ddos protection
    UK Servers

    £15 per year

    can the port speed be upgraded to 2Gbps like this offer?

    They are out of stock until I back (probably tomorrow) from my provider on the availability of hardware but I should be able to increase that for an extra £5 per year with the bandwidth remaining at 4TB.

    any chance to upgrade to unlimited or 330TB traffic + 2gbps with extra fee annually?

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @machaiworld said:

    @xHosts said:

    @ElonBezos said:

    @xHosts said:

    This was the offer

    Ryzen 9 7900
    2GB DDR5 Ram
    35GB NVMe SSD
    1 IPv4 + /112 IPv6
    4TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
    Windows/linux
    Corero 200Gb/s Pro active ddos protection
    UK Servers

    £15 per year

    can the port speed be upgraded to 2Gbps like this offer?

    They are out of stock until I back (probably tomorrow) from my provider on the availability of hardware but I should be able to increase that for an extra £5 per year with the bandwidth remaining at 4TB.

    any chance to upgrade to unlimited or 330TB traffic + 2gbps with extra fee annually?

    Sorry I cannot really offer that on a sustainable package for the company.

    This package is £4 (£3.40) per month after discount which is £40.80 per year

    I could do these types of deals but within 2 months be closed and leave customers needing a new provider, I try to structure my packages at a fair price but sustainable for the company long term too.

  • @xHosts said:

    @machaiworld said:

    @xHosts said:

    @ElonBezos said:

    @xHosts said:

    This was the offer

    Ryzen 9 7900
    2GB DDR5 Ram
    35GB NVMe SSD
    1 IPv4 + /112 IPv6
    4TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
    Windows/linux
    Corero 200Gb/s Pro active ddos protection
    UK Servers

    £15 per year

    can the port speed be upgraded to 2Gbps like this offer?

    They are out of stock until I back (probably tomorrow) from my provider on the availability of hardware but I should be able to increase that for an extra £5 per year with the bandwidth remaining at 4TB.

    any chance to upgrade to unlimited or 330TB traffic + 2gbps with extra fee annually?

    Sorry I cannot really offer that on a sustainable package for the company.

    This package is £4 (£3.40) per month after discount which is £40.80 per year

    I could do these types of deals but within 2 months be closed and leave customers needing a new provider, I try to structure my packages at a fair price but sustainable for the company long term too.

    Does it mean the current offer (£4 (£3.40) per month) is permanent recurring cost? including double speed configuration

  • @xHosts said:
    Ryzen 9 7900
    2GB DDR5 Ram
    35GB NVMe SSD
    1 IPv4 + /112 IPv6
    4TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
    Windows/linux
    Corero 200Gb/s Pro active ddos protection
    UK Servers

    £15 per year

    Is this available @xHosts ?

  • @remy said:

    @Jack_SBE said:

    @remy said:
    You're right, it's impossible at this price.
    But all hosting providers have this kind of practice at different levels. A good customer at a low-cost host is one who doesn't consume all the allocated resources.
    Pushed that far, it's not reassuring, and I generally stay away from these providers, but they're not the first and not the last to offer a service that's only profitable if users don't use it much.

    Yeah I get a bunch of providers are guilty of it. That was the first thing I mentioned. Unfortunately xHost was just in the crosshair while I was reading through and getting my daily dose of LET.

    There should really be a push from admins to update the advertisement rules. Cause this is just straight up false advertisement.

    It's true that it would be a good idea.
    In this case, it's clearly not profitable. In other cases, it's harder to determine and prove that it's not.
    So I think it's hard to write a clear rule about this kind of marketing.

    A user who uses 330TB of traffic will quickly be banned. So I think it's fair to call it false advertising.

    which would have to be proven!

    the discussion is somewhat reminiscent of the vds (dedicated cores) discussion.

    i have a vps from a renowned provider here. it has unlimited traffic which means 330TB/month internally in the backend!

  • @beanman109 said:

    @xHosts said: 330 TB Monthly Bandwidth

    @xHosts said: Buy A vps and use 330TB at the 1Gb/s and as long as it is all legal under UK law thats fine.

    So looping a speedtest script 24/7 shouldn't be an issue?

    interesting what dubious ideas some people come up with.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    Someone sends me $7 and I'll test out the 330TB theory.
    I have multiple unlimited ingress servers that can sink the traffic.

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @yoursunny said:
    Someone sends me $7 and I'll test out the 330TB theory.
    I have multiple unlimited ingress servers that can sink the traffic.

    That could possibly be seen as abuse to simply sink the traffic, legitimate traffic use is fine but to just “sink the traffic” is just pointless abuse at the end of the day.

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @amaeva080 said:

    @xHosts said:
    Ryzen 9 7900
    2GB DDR5 Ram
    35GB NVMe SSD
    1 IPv4 + /112 IPv6
    4TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
    Windows/linux
    Corero 200Gb/s Pro active ddos protection
    UK Servers

    £15 per year

    Is this available @xHosts ?

    I am working to see if this can be restocked once I have spoken with my servers provider when their sales team returns to office tomorrow

  • remyremy Member

    @xHosts said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Someone sends me $7 and I'll test out the 330TB theory.
    I have multiple unlimited ingress servers that can sink the traffic.

    That could possibly be seen as abuse to simply sink the traffic, legitimate traffic use is fine but to just “sink the traffic” is just pointless abuse at the end of the day.

    No need to test ... the answer is here.
    Basically, if you use too much traffic your usage is considered abusive.

    Thanked by 2sasslik yoursunny
  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @remy said:

    @xHosts said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Someone sends me $7 and I'll test out the 330TB theory.
    I have multiple unlimited ingress servers that can sink the traffic.

    That could possibly be seen as abuse to simply sink the traffic, legitimate traffic use is fine but to just “sink the traffic” is just pointless abuse at the end of the day.

    No need to test ... the answer is here.
    Basically, if you use too much traffic your usage is considered abusive.

    I have not said that but please do interpret how you wish, that is your option to do so.

    By saying “sink the traffic” basically means abuse. Enjoy your sunday buddy

  • lukast__lukast__ Member, Megathread Squad

    @xHosts said:

    @remy said:

    @xHosts said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Someone sends me $7 and I'll test out the 330TB theory.
    I have multiple unlimited ingress servers that can sink the traffic.

    That could possibly be seen as abuse to simply sink the traffic, legitimate traffic use is fine but to just “sink the traffic” is just pointless abuse at the end of the day.

    No need to test ... the answer is here.
    Basically, if you use too much traffic your usage is considered abusive.

    I have not said that but please do interpret how you wish, that is your option to do so.

    By saying “sink the traffic” basically means abuse. Enjoy your sunday buddy

    I'd say using the specified resources/limits isn't abuse, and that the customer can use the traffic for whatever he likes (as long as it isn't forbidden by laws/TOS). If you can't cope with customers actually using the traffic, you shouldn't offer it.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • remyremy Member
    edited June 2024

    @xHosts said:

    @remy said:

    @xHosts said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Someone sends me $7 and I'll test out the 330TB theory.
    I have multiple unlimited ingress servers that can sink the traffic.

    That could possibly be seen as abuse to simply sink the traffic, legitimate traffic use is fine but to just “sink the traffic” is just pointless abuse at the end of the day.

    No need to test ... the answer is here.
    Basically, if you use too much traffic your usage is considered abusive.

    I have not said that but please do interpret how you wish, that is your option to do so.

    By saying “sink the traffic” basically means abuse. Enjoy your sunday buddy

    Yes, in my mind, the host shouldn't have to worry about what the traffic is being used for. He doesn't have to judge whether the user is using it in a way he thinks is relevant or not.
    As long as it's legal.

    Take it or leave it: make relevant offers that give the impression of dealing with a serious company.

    Have a nice Sunday.

    Thanked by 1lukast__
  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    I have already sent all required proof for this offer to show that I do have the required capability without issues to the site admins for private review over 12 hours ago, this proves I am able to provide what is offered without question.

    Have a nice day ahead. :smiley:

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @xHosts said:
    I have already sent all required proof for this offer to show that I do have the required capability without issues to the site admins for private review over 12 hours ago, this proves I am able to provide what is offered without question.

    Have a nice day ahead. :smiley:

    Does this mean you're not going to suspend users for excessive bandwidth usage if they don't go over 330TB? Because to offer 330TB per month then claim any form of abuse if the bandwidth is used legally really would sound quite clownish...

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @beanman109 said:

    @xHosts said:
    I have already sent all required proof for this offer to show that I do have the required capability without issues to the site admins for private review over 12 hours ago, this proves I am able to provide what is offered without question.

    Have a nice day ahead. :smiley:

    Does this mean you're not going to suspend users for excessive bandwidth usage if they don't go over 330TB? Because to offer 330TB per month then claim any form of abuse if the bandwidth is used legally really would sound quite clownish...

    Anyone can use the bandwidth upto 330TB as long as they are not abusing anything including CPU, their activity is legal and not being reported as abusive by any third party for example certain game currency mining which is breaking that games TOS if they make a report the client would be contacted to resolve the issue reported which is the same with any company but if you want to for example use it as VPN and use the full 330TB no issues if what you do is legal.

    As stated I have sent private proof to site admins and waiting for a reply on the open ticket.

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @xHosts said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @xHosts said:
    I have already sent all required proof for this offer to show that I do have the required capability without issues to the site admins for private review over 12 hours ago, this proves I am able to provide what is offered without question.

    Have a nice day ahead. :smiley:

    Does this mean you're not going to suspend users for excessive bandwidth usage if they don't go over 330TB? Because to offer 330TB per month then claim any form of abuse if the bandwidth is used legally really would sound quite clownish...

    Anyone can use the bandwidth upto 330TB as long as they are not abusing anything including CPU, their activity is legal and not being reported as abusive by any third party for example certain game currency mining which is breaking that games TOS if they make a report the client would be contacted to resolve the issue reported which is the same with any company but if you want to for example use it as VPN and use the full 330TB no issues if what you do is legal.

    As stated I have sent private proof to site admins and waiting for a reply on the open ticket.

    Thanks for a more definitive answer, I hope to see you hold up your end of this :)

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    Continuous iperf3 sender at 900 Mbps.
    Destination is an IPv6 address that I own (abuse-c is myself), so that there wouldn't be abuse reports.
    OK?

    Thanked by 1Jack_SBE
  • tanglutanglu Member

    @Jack_SBE said:
    I see a lot of providers on here do this, but unfortunately you caught my eye mostly here.

    £4/month for 330TB? So you’re saying if I pay you £4 I can use 1Gbps 95th %ile with no restrictions?
    As in the transit I’d go to Cogent for and pay £200+/month for you’re giving me for £4?

    If so great. I’d like to open a discussion about us routing all of our traffic through your network. That will turn my £X,XXX/month transit bill into a £XX one.

    If not and what you’re actually doing here is using “330TB” as an attention grab please specify the fair usage policy and extent I’m actually allowed to use that bandwidth.

    Compared to xhosts 5USD 2Gbps@330TB,
    I think @oplink 's traffic offer (5USD for 10Gbps@50TB)is more friendly to themselves and our consumers,
    I don't know Lumen traffic fee, if don't care about the vps hardware and IP, I think 5USD may just have 35TB, xhosts and oplink may both think we won't use all of the traffic and make money.

  • nohavpsnohavps Member, Host Rep
    edited June 2024

    We were offered this transfer in Coventry UK other provider, and I think they did it maybe because some client would not reach that transfer because I'm sure if someone keeps you in case of a few minutes the transfer limit they will cancel the server or tell you to tell the client that they can't continue like this, we all look for sales by offering a good service but sometimes some get carried away by false marketing good luck I think sometimes the sales of false marketing only last the first month then they cancel the service even the same day because they only want the yabs to move on to other websites

    I suggest you do a real transfer and you will see the difference

    :)

    Thanked by 2remy sasslik
  • With such offers my BilohGlass shows me threads like:
    "xHosts deadpooled"
    "XHosts not working"
    And many more like other providers here.

    Thanked by 2yoursunny sasslik
  • edited June 2024

    double storage invoice #5259

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider
    edited June 2024

    @beanman109 said:

    @xHosts said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @xHosts said:
    I have already sent all required proof for this offer to show that I do have the required capability without issues to the site admins for private review over 12 hours ago, this proves I am able to provide what is offered without question.

    Have a nice day ahead. :smiley:

    Does this mean you're not going to suspend users for excessive bandwidth usage if they don't go over 330TB? Because to offer 330TB per month then claim any form of abuse if the bandwidth is used legally really would sound quite clownish...

    Anyone can use the bandwidth upto 330TB as long as they are not abusing anything including CPU, their activity is legal and not being reported as abusive by any third party for example certain game currency mining which is breaking that games TOS if they make a report the client would be contacted to resolve the issue reported which is the same with any company but if you want to for example use it as VPN and use the full 330TB no issues if what you do is legal.

    As stated I have sent private proof to site admins and waiting for a reply on the open ticket.

    Thanks for a more definitive answer, I hope to see you hold up your end of this :)

    I sure will :smile: no issue here> @nohavps said:

    We were offered this transfer in Coventry UK other provider, and I think they did it maybe because some client would not reach that transfer because I'm sure if someone keeps you in case of a few minutes the transfer limit they will cancel the server or tell you to tell the client that they can't continue like this, we all look for sales by offering a good service but sometimes some get carried away by false marketing good luck I think sometimes the sales of false marketing only last the first month then they cancel the service even the same day because they only want the yabs to move on to other websites

    I suggest you do a real transfer and you will see the difference

    :)

    I have more than enough to cover the offer, the limited amount I sell on the offer.

    It is all calculated, the allowances I have in place remove 25% of for emergency use then divided by the amount of VPS on the offer I posted.

    As already stated, I have sent proof on the ticket to site admins of all this that I do in fact have the capability to provide what is offered on the thread wi the out question you still want to add your 2cents based on assumption not fact, but facts have already been provided to site admin and I assume the ticket is waiting for review.

    When you know my agreements factually not using assumptions that maybe a good starting point.

    @BilohBucks said:
    With such offers my BilohGlass shows me threads like:
    "xHosts deadpooled"
    "XHosts not working"
    And many more like other providers here.

    Proof it happened or it has not happened.

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @Cellularhacker said:
    double storage invoice #5259

    I have added your double storage. Power off your server and back on in the control panel to apply it.

  • what is this double storage?

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @tenpera said:
    what is this double storage?

    The offer from the original post

    “ Choose between double storage or double connection (Upgraded to 2Gb/s) - just post your invoice number and your chosen upgrade”

  • kaitkait Member

    @Jack_SBE said: So if I buy 10 VPS for £40/month and use the full 3300TB (10Gbps 95th) you’re not going to terminate any of my vms? Even though you’d be loosing hundreds if not thousands of pounds in transit costs?

    For only 400/m you can bankrupt this hosting provider :joy: sounds like a good deal to me :trollface:

  • My host is down, and can't be restarted, please check. Invoice 5325🫡

  • ShadeShade Member

    @sugarman said:
    My host is down, and can't be restarted, please check. Invoice 5325🫡

    Same here.

This discussion has been closed.