Finding Bulletproof Webhosting & Domain Registrartion

SirFoxy · June 2024

@sillycat said:

@MikeA said: And CloudFlare definitely won't keep you anonymous if there's any actual legal concern.

But there would be also nothing valuable for them to give to law enforcement if you don't give Cloudflare anything in the first place.

@MikeA said: Every company has to follow legitimate legal requests within their jurisdiction.

Bulletproof doesen't exactly mean that. In my opinion, a hoster that gives you a notice that law enforcement has come over and delays shit with them so that you can move out is "bulletproof", everything else is just children with UK LTDs and Neterra IPs.

@syldra said: All registrars seem to apply domain privacy services to all customer domains whether they ask for it or not these days. NameSilo seems to not even store your name and simply gives your account the default name of "Domain Administrator", though they do save your address, but you could probably use a PO box or something else that won't identify you easily.

This is literally the worse advise ever. Namesilo plainly sucks, and not only that, giving them a PO box would lead them straight to your house since you need to provide ID for a PO box. A god damn PO box would identify you more than your home address.

@totally_not_banned said: You can get some abuse resistance but you simply won't find a keep-online-no-matter-what offer (which is what bulletproof means).

Kinda. Nicenic will ignore everything if you have enough balance (from experience). > @SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@10thHouse said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:
No legitimate business is advertising as bulletproof. That sort of hosting is for the worst people on the internet. CP, botnets, spam, etc. If that's what you want, look for some no name business registered in Seychelles that only accepts Monero and has servers in some damp eastern European warehouse or basement or something.

If you just want privacy, no one does it better than us. We still have a strict TOS we enforce though because we're a privacy host that supports free speech, not a privacy host that allows you to do whatever you want.

We require no KYC. Just an email address. Order from Tor, VPN, or whatever. Just follow the TOS and you're fine.

Do you support free speech or grift to sell commodities? Last I checked you're a reseller of a reseller. How is your Washington lawsuit going?

I really don't get the vitriol toward @MannDude. I use his services for my main website with no problems. Most customers of his are normal, legitimate users, not the strawmen used to erode online privacy and security.

And for anyone new to the party, IncogNET is the real deal. I recommend them before any other privacy-focused provider, granted that your goal is not to evade DMCA (that's why we have @Calin , @alexhost, and @AvaHosting )

I think its stemmed from our support of awful but lawful speech.

Not sure what lawsuit or reselling a reseller comment is about, but I try not to understand the delusions of others.

Your attempt at actually being competent at anything instead of a reseller:

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/188074/win-a-10gbps-blade-server-in-kansas-city-with-cosmicguard-ddos-protection-plus-pre-order-special#latest

LOL - I thought you were calling us a 'reseller' because we lease hardware from @crunchbits in two US locations, hardware that isn't their normal stock and typically custom built configs for IncogNET specifically. Same with Worldstream, our servers are not publicly available and instead built for us and deployed on our network.

But instead you call us a reseller because of the one location where we... actually own all of our hardware?

I mean, you're right. We don't own the transit lines, the datacenter building, the generators outside, we don't pay the security staff and it's not our problem if a toilet gets clogged in the staff restroom in Kansas City.

You're such a grifter lmao, is there anything authentic within you, or are you constantly playing a character for money?

Your one experience trying to do anything on your own was an absolute failure.

@MannDude said:

@mrclown said:
@MannDude DMed you regarding this server as I received so many notifications email suddenly after 3-4 months. I hope you are still around.

Of course. I just rarely check my DMs.

We'll likely be discontinuing this location or moving hardware elsewhere. Our direct upstream (NOT Nocix) has been basically MIA and after many months of trying to get stuff fixed and our network production ready they're just ghosting us despite still posting on LET.

Sorry.

How does that prove anything?

And what I said then still holds true. Our upstream there turned out to be incredibly disappointing to the point where I DID considering pulling the plug. I had drafted up a 60 day notice to clients and everything. Those immediate issues have since been fixed and we're still moving to our own space within KC, especially now that Terrahost has left the market.

We still own the hardware. It's still ours. Probably what will happen is I or someone else physically goes there and moves equipment from the current rack it is in, which belongs to another provider that we're leasing the rackspace from, and then move it to our own rack space.

Ignoring the issues we've had with them, this setup is pretty common. A larger provider has rackspace in an established datacenter with excess transit and capacity and can offer it to end-users at a rate that is more favorable than going direct. It's literally what a ton of businesses on LET do.

TLDR: I am a reseller and did not follow through on the freedom of speech lawsuit threats against the state of Washington that I advertised. I definitely support your cause and not just the money, though.

Filing a complaint with the Attorney General is not the same as fling a lawsuit.

Feel free to write an article on LowEndBox about it after you've done more than two seconds of research.

...oh, wait.

💗 look, I get it, you quit your job and need a grift to appeal to the kids. Best of luck!

Go back to your Queer BLM Discord. No one wants you here.

Your hatred is showing. Fitting.

syldra · June 2024

@sillycat said:

@syldra said: All registrars seem to apply domain privacy services to all customer domains whether they ask for it or not these days. NameSilo seems to not even store your name and simply gives your account the default name of "Domain Administrator", though they do save your address, but you could probably use a PO box or something else that won't identify you easily.

This is literally the worse advise ever. Namesilo plainly sucks, and not only that, giving them a PO box would lead them straight to your house since you need to provide ID for a PO box. A god damn PO box would identify you more than your home address.

Namesilo wasn't a recommendation, just an example, and not using a PO box would come under "something else" -- though if the "them" you're worried about coming after you is someone you think will obtain your address information from a domain registrar's customer database and then look you up as the owner of a PO box, chances are you're looking to try openly commit crimes or get away with copyright infringement, and your domain is not going to survive that anyway.

If someone is not looking to break the law, is just looking for anonymity from people other than law enforcement, and wants their domain to exist for more than a few days/weeks/months -- then yes, using an accredited registrar is advice. Don't pay extra to some third-party company service to own your domain for you, who will simply drag out support issues and will want to charge you surprise support fees because dealing with your domain constantly getting suspended wastes hours of their time arguing with a registrar on your behalf -- a registrar who can still decide to just never reinstate your domain and force you to convince your reseller to let you transfer your domain away from them anyway.

@MannDude said:
If you just want privacy, no one does it better than us. We still have a strict TOS we enforce though because we're a privacy host that supports free speech, not a privacy host that allows you to do whatever you want.

We require no KYC. Just an email address. Order from Tor, VPN, or whatever. Just follow the TOS and you're fine.

Your ToS puts restrictions on what can be "depicted" in artwork even though your company is based in a country where they are not illegal, zzz. Good to know its basically worthless for anyone interested in hosting something like federated social media, who doesn't want to have to moderate non-illegal content based on some domain reseller's morality.

ahnlak · June 2024

@10thHouse said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@10thHouse said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:
No legitimate business is advertising as bulletproof. That sort of hosting is for the worst people on the internet. CP, botnets, spam, etc. If that's what you want, look for some no name business registered in Seychelles that only accepts Monero and has servers in some damp eastern European warehouse or basement or something.

If you just want privacy, no one does it better than us. We still have a strict TOS we enforce though because we're a privacy host that supports free speech, not a privacy host that allows you to do whatever you want.

We require no KYC. Just an email address. Order from Tor, VPN, or whatever. Just follow the TOS and you're fine.

Do you support free speech or grift to sell commodities? Last I checked you're a reseller of a reseller. How is your Washington lawsuit going?

I really don't get the vitriol toward @MannDude. I use his services for my main website with no problems. Most customers of his are normal, legitimate users, not the strawmen used to erode online privacy and security.

And for anyone new to the party, IncogNET is the real deal. I recommend them before any other privacy-focused provider, granted that your goal is not to evade DMCA (that's why we have @Calin , @alexhost, and @AvaHosting )

I think its stemmed from our support of awful but lawful speech.

Not sure what lawsuit or reselling a reseller comment is about, but I try not to understand the delusions of others.

Your attempt at actually being competent at anything instead of a reseller:

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/188074/win-a-10gbps-blade-server-in-kansas-city-with-cosmicguard-ddos-protection-plus-pre-order-special#latest

LOL - I thought you were calling us a 'reseller' because we lease hardware from @crunchbits in two US locations, hardware that isn't their normal stock and typically custom built configs for IncogNET specifically. Same with Worldstream, our servers are not publicly available and instead built for us and deployed on our network.

But instead you call us a reseller because of the one location where we... actually own all of our hardware?

I mean, you're right. We don't own the transit lines, the datacenter building, the generators outside, we don't pay the security staff and it's not our problem if a toilet gets clogged in the staff restroom in Kansas City.

You're such a grifter lmao, is there anything authentic within you, or are you constantly playing a character for money?

Your one experience trying to do anything on your own was an absolute failure.

@MannDude said:

@mrclown said:
@MannDude DMed you regarding this server as I received so many notifications email suddenly after 3-4 months. I hope you are still around.

Of course. I just rarely check my DMs.

We'll likely be discontinuing this location or moving hardware elsewhere. Our direct upstream (NOT Nocix) has been basically MIA and after many months of trying to get stuff fixed and our network production ready they're just ghosting us despite still posting on LET.

Sorry.

How does that prove anything?

And what I said then still holds true. Our upstream there turned out to be incredibly disappointing to the point where I DID considering pulling the plug. I had drafted up a 60 day notice to clients and everything. Those immediate issues have since been fixed and we're still moving to our own space within KC, especially now that Terrahost has left the market.

We still own the hardware. It's still ours. Probably what will happen is I or someone else physically goes there and moves equipment from the current rack it is in, which belongs to another provider that we're leasing the rackspace from, and then move it to our own rack space.

Ignoring the issues we've had with them, this setup is pretty common. A larger provider has rackspace in an established datacenter with excess transit and capacity and can offer it to end-users at a rate that is more favorable than going direct. It's literally what a ton of businesses on LET do.

TLDR: I am a reseller and did not follow through on the freedom of speech lawsuit threats against the state of Washington that I advertised. I definitely support your cause and not just the money, though.

Filing a complaint with the Attorney General is not the same as fling a lawsuit.

Feel free to write an article on LowEndBox about it after you've done more than two seconds of research.

...oh, wait.

Writing for LEB is tiring because it's "too toxic" but slandering random providers with 0 evidence is perfectly adult behavior, it seems. Not at all like "a kid who just showed up"!

It's almost like the toxic has a common factor, isn't it?

SirFoxy · June 2024

@ahnlak said:

@10thHouse said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@10thHouse said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:
No legitimate business is advertising as bulletproof. That sort of hosting is for the worst people on the internet. CP, botnets, spam, etc. If that's what you want, look for some no name business registered in Seychelles that only accepts Monero and has servers in some damp eastern European warehouse or basement or something.

If you just want privacy, no one does it better than us. We still have a strict TOS we enforce though because we're a privacy host that supports free speech, not a privacy host that allows you to do whatever you want.

We require no KYC. Just an email address. Order from Tor, VPN, or whatever. Just follow the TOS and you're fine.

Do you support free speech or grift to sell commodities? Last I checked you're a reseller of a reseller. How is your Washington lawsuit going?

I really don't get the vitriol toward @MannDude. I use his services for my main website with no problems. Most customers of his are normal, legitimate users, not the strawmen used to erode online privacy and security.

And for anyone new to the party, IncogNET is the real deal. I recommend them before any other privacy-focused provider, granted that your goal is not to evade DMCA (that's why we have @Calin , @alexhost, and @AvaHosting )

I think its stemmed from our support of awful but lawful speech.

Not sure what lawsuit or reselling a reseller comment is about, but I try not to understand the delusions of others.

Your attempt at actually being competent at anything instead of a reseller:

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/188074/win-a-10gbps-blade-server-in-kansas-city-with-cosmicguard-ddos-protection-plus-pre-order-special#latest

LOL - I thought you were calling us a 'reseller' because we lease hardware from @crunchbits in two US locations, hardware that isn't their normal stock and typically custom built configs for IncogNET specifically. Same with Worldstream, our servers are not publicly available and instead built for us and deployed on our network.

But instead you call us a reseller because of the one location where we... actually own all of our hardware?

I mean, you're right. We don't own the transit lines, the datacenter building, the generators outside, we don't pay the security staff and it's not our problem if a toilet gets clogged in the staff restroom in Kansas City.

You're such a grifter lmao, is there anything authentic within you, or are you constantly playing a character for money?

Your one experience trying to do anything on your own was an absolute failure.

@MannDude said:

@mrclown said:
@MannDude DMed you regarding this server as I received so many notifications email suddenly after 3-4 months. I hope you are still around.

Of course. I just rarely check my DMs.

We'll likely be discontinuing this location or moving hardware elsewhere. Our direct upstream (NOT Nocix) has been basically MIA and after many months of trying to get stuff fixed and our network production ready they're just ghosting us despite still posting on LET.

Sorry.

How does that prove anything?

And what I said then still holds true. Our upstream there turned out to be incredibly disappointing to the point where I DID considering pulling the plug. I had drafted up a 60 day notice to clients and everything. Those immediate issues have since been fixed and we're still moving to our own space within KC, especially now that Terrahost has left the market.

We still own the hardware. It's still ours. Probably what will happen is I or someone else physically goes there and moves equipment from the current rack it is in, which belongs to another provider that we're leasing the rackspace from, and then move it to our own rack space.

Ignoring the issues we've had with them, this setup is pretty common. A larger provider has rackspace in an established datacenter with excess transit and capacity and can offer it to end-users at a rate that is more favorable than going direct. It's literally what a ton of businesses on LET do.

TLDR: I am a reseller and did not follow through on the freedom of speech lawsuit threats against the state of Washington that I advertised. I definitely support your cause and not just the money, though.

Filing a complaint with the Attorney General is not the same as fling a lawsuit.

Feel free to write an article on LowEndBox about it after you've done more than two seconds of research.

...oh, wait.

Writing for LEB is tiring because it's "too toxic" but slandering random providers with 0 evidence is perfectly adult behavior, it seems. Not at all like "a kid who just showed up"!

It's almost like the toxic has a common factor, isn't it?

How mad are you right now?

ahnlak · June 2024

@SirFoxy said:

@ahnlak said:

@10thHouse said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@10thHouse said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:
No legitimate business is advertising as bulletproof. That sort of hosting is for the worst people on the internet. CP, botnets, spam, etc. If that's what you want, look for some no name business registered in Seychelles that only accepts Monero and has servers in some damp eastern European warehouse or basement or something.

If you just want privacy, no one does it better than us. We still have a strict TOS we enforce though because we're a privacy host that supports free speech, not a privacy host that allows you to do whatever you want.

We require no KYC. Just an email address. Order from Tor, VPN, or whatever. Just follow the TOS and you're fine.

Do you support free speech or grift to sell commodities? Last I checked you're a reseller of a reseller. How is your Washington lawsuit going?

I really don't get the vitriol toward @MannDude. I use his services for my main website with no problems. Most customers of his are normal, legitimate users, not the strawmen used to erode online privacy and security.

And for anyone new to the party, IncogNET is the real deal. I recommend them before any other privacy-focused provider, granted that your goal is not to evade DMCA (that's why we have @Calin , @alexhost, and @AvaHosting )

I think its stemmed from our support of awful but lawful speech.

Not sure what lawsuit or reselling a reseller comment is about, but I try not to understand the delusions of others.

Your attempt at actually being competent at anything instead of a reseller:

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/188074/win-a-10gbps-blade-server-in-kansas-city-with-cosmicguard-ddos-protection-plus-pre-order-special#latest

LOL - I thought you were calling us a 'reseller' because we lease hardware from @crunchbits in two US locations, hardware that isn't their normal stock and typically custom built configs for IncogNET specifically. Same with Worldstream, our servers are not publicly available and instead built for us and deployed on our network.

But instead you call us a reseller because of the one location where we... actually own all of our hardware?

I mean, you're right. We don't own the transit lines, the datacenter building, the generators outside, we don't pay the security staff and it's not our problem if a toilet gets clogged in the staff restroom in Kansas City.

You're such a grifter lmao, is there anything authentic within you, or are you constantly playing a character for money?

Your one experience trying to do anything on your own was an absolute failure.

@MannDude said:

@mrclown said:
@MannDude DMed you regarding this server as I received so many notifications email suddenly after 3-4 months. I hope you are still around.

Of course. I just rarely check my DMs.

We'll likely be discontinuing this location or moving hardware elsewhere. Our direct upstream (NOT Nocix) has been basically MIA and after many months of trying to get stuff fixed and our network production ready they're just ghosting us despite still posting on LET.

Sorry.

How does that prove anything?

And what I said then still holds true. Our upstream there turned out to be incredibly disappointing to the point where I DID considering pulling the plug. I had drafted up a 60 day notice to clients and everything. Those immediate issues have since been fixed and we're still moving to our own space within KC, especially now that Terrahost has left the market.

We still own the hardware. It's still ours. Probably what will happen is I or someone else physically goes there and moves equipment from the current rack it is in, which belongs to another provider that we're leasing the rackspace from, and then move it to our own rack space.

Ignoring the issues we've had with them, this setup is pretty common. A larger provider has rackspace in an established datacenter with excess transit and capacity and can offer it to end-users at a rate that is more favorable than going direct. It's literally what a ton of businesses on LET do.

TLDR: I am a reseller and did not follow through on the freedom of speech lawsuit threats against the state of Washington that I advertised. I definitely support your cause and not just the money, though.

Filing a complaint with the Attorney General is not the same as fling a lawsuit.

Feel free to write an article on LowEndBox about it after you've done more than two seconds of research.

...oh, wait.

Writing for LEB is tiring because it's "too toxic" but slandering random providers with 0 evidence is perfectly adult behavior, it seems. Not at all like "a kid who just showed up"!

It's almost like the toxic has a common factor, isn't it?

How mad are you right now?

Not at all? Why would I be mad?

Or do you just need the last word?

10thHouse · June 2024

@SirFoxy said:

@ahnlak said:

@10thHouse said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@10thHouse said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:
No legitimate business is advertising as bulletproof. That sort of hosting is for the worst people on the internet. CP, botnets, spam, etc. If that's what you want, look for some no name business registered in Seychelles that only accepts Monero and has servers in some damp eastern European warehouse or basement or something.

If you just want privacy, no one does it better than us. We still have a strict TOS we enforce though because we're a privacy host that supports free speech, not a privacy host that allows you to do whatever you want.

We require no KYC. Just an email address. Order from Tor, VPN, or whatever. Just follow the TOS and you're fine.

Do you support free speech or grift to sell commodities? Last I checked you're a reseller of a reseller. How is your Washington lawsuit going?

I really don't get the vitriol toward @MannDude. I use his services for my main website with no problems. Most customers of his are normal, legitimate users, not the strawmen used to erode online privacy and security.

And for anyone new to the party, IncogNET is the real deal. I recommend them before any other privacy-focused provider, granted that your goal is not to evade DMCA (that's why we have @Calin , @alexhost, and @AvaHosting )

I think its stemmed from our support of awful but lawful speech.

Not sure what lawsuit or reselling a reseller comment is about, but I try not to understand the delusions of others.

Your attempt at actually being competent at anything instead of a reseller:

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/188074/win-a-10gbps-blade-server-in-kansas-city-with-cosmicguard-ddos-protection-plus-pre-order-special#latest

LOL - I thought you were calling us a 'reseller' because we lease hardware from @crunchbits in two US locations, hardware that isn't their normal stock and typically custom built configs for IncogNET specifically. Same with Worldstream, our servers are not publicly available and instead built for us and deployed on our network.

But instead you call us a reseller because of the one location where we... actually own all of our hardware?

I mean, you're right. We don't own the transit lines, the datacenter building, the generators outside, we don't pay the security staff and it's not our problem if a toilet gets clogged in the staff restroom in Kansas City.

You're such a grifter lmao, is there anything authentic within you, or are you constantly playing a character for money?

Your one experience trying to do anything on your own was an absolute failure.

@MannDude said:

@mrclown said:
@MannDude DMed you regarding this server as I received so many notifications email suddenly after 3-4 months. I hope you are still around.

Of course. I just rarely check my DMs.

We'll likely be discontinuing this location or moving hardware elsewhere. Our direct upstream (NOT Nocix) has been basically MIA and after many months of trying to get stuff fixed and our network production ready they're just ghosting us despite still posting on LET.

Sorry.

How does that prove anything?

And what I said then still holds true. Our upstream there turned out to be incredibly disappointing to the point where I DID considering pulling the plug. I had drafted up a 60 day notice to clients and everything. Those immediate issues have since been fixed and we're still moving to our own space within KC, especially now that Terrahost has left the market.

We still own the hardware. It's still ours. Probably what will happen is I or someone else physically goes there and moves equipment from the current rack it is in, which belongs to another provider that we're leasing the rackspace from, and then move it to our own rack space.

Ignoring the issues we've had with them, this setup is pretty common. A larger provider has rackspace in an established datacenter with excess transit and capacity and can offer it to end-users at a rate that is more favorable than going direct. It's literally what a ton of businesses on LET do.

TLDR: I am a reseller and did not follow through on the freedom of speech lawsuit threats against the state of Washington that I advertised. I definitely support your cause and not just the money, though.

Filing a complaint with the Attorney General is not the same as fling a lawsuit.

Feel free to write an article on LowEndBox about it after you've done more than two seconds of research.

...oh, wait.

Writing for LEB is tiring because it's "too toxic" but slandering random providers with 0 evidence is perfectly adult behavior, it seems. Not at all like "a kid who just showed up"!

It's almost like the toxic has a common factor, isn't it?

How mad are you right now?

@ahnlak said:

@SirFoxy said:

@ahnlak said:

@10thHouse said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@10thHouse said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:
No legitimate business is advertising as bulletproof. That sort of hosting is for the worst people on the internet. CP, botnets, spam, etc. If that's what you want, look for some no name business registered in Seychelles that only accepts Monero and has servers in some damp eastern European warehouse or basement or something.

If you just want privacy, no one does it better than us. We still have a strict TOS we enforce though because we're a privacy host that supports free speech, not a privacy host that allows you to do whatever you want.

We require no KYC. Just an email address. Order from Tor, VPN, or whatever. Just follow the TOS and you're fine.

Do you support free speech or grift to sell commodities? Last I checked you're a reseller of a reseller. How is your Washington lawsuit going?

I really don't get the vitriol toward @MannDude. I use his services for my main website with no problems. Most customers of his are normal, legitimate users, not the strawmen used to erode online privacy and security.

And for anyone new to the party, IncogNET is the real deal. I recommend them before any other privacy-focused provider, granted that your goal is not to evade DMCA (that's why we have @Calin , @alexhost, and @AvaHosting )

I think its stemmed from our support of awful but lawful speech.

Not sure what lawsuit or reselling a reseller comment is about, but I try not to understand the delusions of others.

Your attempt at actually being competent at anything instead of a reseller:

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/188074/win-a-10gbps-blade-server-in-kansas-city-with-cosmicguard-ddos-protection-plus-pre-order-special#latest

LOL - I thought you were calling us a 'reseller' because we lease hardware from @crunchbits in two US locations, hardware that isn't their normal stock and typically custom built configs for IncogNET specifically. Same with Worldstream, our servers are not publicly available and instead built for us and deployed on our network.

But instead you call us a reseller because of the one location where we... actually own all of our hardware?

I mean, you're right. We don't own the transit lines, the datacenter building, the generators outside, we don't pay the security staff and it's not our problem if a toilet gets clogged in the staff restroom in Kansas City.

You're such a grifter lmao, is there anything authentic within you, or are you constantly playing a character for money?

Your one experience trying to do anything on your own was an absolute failure.

@MannDude said:

@mrclown said:
@MannDude DMed you regarding this server as I received so many notifications email suddenly after 3-4 months. I hope you are still around.

Of course. I just rarely check my DMs.

We'll likely be discontinuing this location or moving hardware elsewhere. Our direct upstream (NOT Nocix) has been basically MIA and after many months of trying to get stuff fixed and our network production ready they're just ghosting us despite still posting on LET.

Sorry.

How does that prove anything?

And what I said then still holds true. Our upstream there turned out to be incredibly disappointing to the point where I DID considering pulling the plug. I had drafted up a 60 day notice to clients and everything. Those immediate issues have since been fixed and we're still moving to our own space within KC, especially now that Terrahost has left the market.

We still own the hardware. It's still ours. Probably what will happen is I or someone else physically goes there and moves equipment from the current rack it is in, which belongs to another provider that we're leasing the rackspace from, and then move it to our own rack space.

Ignoring the issues we've had with them, this setup is pretty common. A larger provider has rackspace in an established datacenter with excess transit and capacity and can offer it to end-users at a rate that is more favorable than going direct. It's literally what a ton of businesses on LET do.

TLDR: I am a reseller and did not follow through on the freedom of speech lawsuit threats against the state of Washington that I advertised. I definitely support your cause and not just the money, though.

Filing a complaint with the Attorney General is not the same as fling a lawsuit.

Feel free to write an article on LowEndBox about it after you've done more than two seconds of research.

...oh, wait.

Writing for LEB is tiring because it's "too toxic" but slandering random providers with 0 evidence is perfectly adult behavior, it seems. Not at all like "a kid who just showed up"!

It's almost like the toxic has a common factor, isn't it?

How mad are you right now?

Not at all? Why would I be mad?

Or do you just need the last word?

Nah, he just says that to anyone he can't beat (which is most people).

siemens · June 2024

I personally use incognet for domains and have been happy with them. They have practically no alternative in what they offer.

I'd be happy if he was more responsive in PMs but I guess he doesn't check them.

10thHouse · June 2024

@siemens said:
I personally use incognet for domains and have been happy with them. They have practically no alternative in what they offer.

I'd be happy if he was more responsive in PMs but I guess he doesn't check them.

Second IncogNET. As of now, you can even activate free (15 MB) hosting with any domain purchase, good enough for a very basic static site.

WebProject · June 2024

@dhmo said:

PHP 8.x allowed

No KYC

Paypal Supported
. - BULLETPROOF (Happy to keep me anonymous to host)
Any idea? let me know.

How did you managed to get PayPal account without any name on it? PayPal is not anonymous payment method! Just dumb request

emgh · June 2024

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:

@10thHouse said:

@SirFoxy said:

@MannDude said:
No legitimate business is advertising as bulletproof. That sort of hosting is for the worst people on the internet. CP, botnets, spam, etc. If that's what you want, look for some no name business registered in Seychelles that only accepts Monero and has servers in some damp eastern European warehouse or basement or something.

If you just want privacy, no one does it better than us. We still have a strict TOS we enforce though because we're a privacy host that supports free speech, not a privacy host that allows you to do whatever you want.

We require no KYC. Just an email address. Order from Tor, VPN, or whatever. Just follow the TOS and you're fine.

Do you support free speech or grift to sell commodities? Last I checked you're a reseller of a reseller. How is your Washington lawsuit going?

I really don't get the vitriol toward @MannDude. I use his services for my main website with no problems. Most customers of his are normal, legitimate users, not the strawmen used to erode online privacy and security.

And for anyone new to the party, IncogNET is the real deal. I recommend them before any other privacy-focused provider, granted that your goal is not to evade DMCA (that's why we have @Calin , @alexhost, and @AvaHosting )

I think its stemmed from our support of awful but lawful speech.

Not sure what lawsuit or reselling a reseller comment is about, but I try not to understand the delusions of others.

Your attempt at actually being competent at anything instead of a reseller:

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/188074/win-a-10gbps-blade-server-in-kansas-city-with-cosmicguard-ddos-protection-plus-pre-order-special#latest

LOL - I thought you were calling us a 'reseller' because we lease hardware from @crunchbits in two US locations, hardware that isn't their normal stock and typically custom built configs for IncogNET specifically. Same with Worldstream, our servers are not publicly available and instead built for us and deployed on our network.

But instead you call us a reseller because of the one location where we... actually own all of our hardware?

I mean, you're right. We don't own the transit lines, the datacenter building, the generators outside, we don't pay the security staff and it's not our problem if a toilet gets clogged in the staff restroom in Kansas City.

You're such a grifter lmao, is there anything authentic within you, or are you constantly playing a character for money?

Your one experience trying to do anything on your own was an absolute failure.

@MannDude said:

@mrclown said:
@MannDude DMed you regarding this server as I received so many notifications email suddenly after 3-4 months. I hope you are still around.

Of course. I just rarely check my DMs.

We'll likely be discontinuing this location or moving hardware elsewhere. Our direct upstream (NOT Nocix) has been basically MIA and after many months of trying to get stuff fixed and our network production ready they're just ghosting us despite still posting on LET.

Sorry.

How does that prove anything?

And what I said then still holds true. Our upstream there turned out to be incredibly disappointing to the point where I DID considering pulling the plug. I had drafted up a 60 day notice to clients and everything. Those immediate issues have since been fixed and we're still moving to our own space within KC, especially now that Terrahost has left the market.

We still own the hardware. It's still ours. Probably what will happen is I or someone else physically goes there and moves equipment from the current rack it is in, which belongs to another provider that we're leasing the rackspace from, and then move it to our own rack space.

Ignoring the issues we've had with them, this setup is pretty common. A larger provider has rackspace in an established datacenter with excess transit and capacity and can offer it to end-users at a rate that is more favorable than going direct. It's literally what a ton of businesses on LET do.

TLDR: I am a reseller and did not follow through on the freedom of speech lawsuit threats against the state of Washington that I advertised. I definitely support your cause and not just the money, though.

Filing a complaint with the Attorney General is not the same as fling a lawsuit.

Feel free to write an article on LowEndBox about it after you've done more than two seconds of research.

...oh, wait.

💗 look, I get it, you quit your job and need a grift to appeal to the kids. Best of luck!

Actually, you were the one who quit…

dhmo · June 2024

@WebProject said:

@dhmo said:

PHP 8.x allowed

No KYC

Paypal Supported
. - BULLETPROOF (Happy to keep me anonymous to host)
Any idea? let me know.

How did you managed to get PayPal account without any name on it? PayPal is not anonymous payment method! Just dumb request

if provider dont provide my info (to law-enforcement), then they(any law-enforcement) will not caught my paypal, No?

FatGrizzly · June 2024

@dhmo said:

@WebProject said:

@dhmo said:

PHP 8.x allowed

No KYC

Paypal Supported
. - BULLETPROOF (Happy to keep me anonymous to host)
Any idea? let me know.

How did you managed to get PayPal account without any name on it? PayPal is not anonymous payment method! Just dumb request

if provider dont provide my info (to law-enforcement), then they(any law-enforcement) will not caught my paypal, No?

Most providers will just provide back the info to LEA. Worst case, they might be sub-poena'd.

Go for someone like MannDude, Njalla, Shinjiru, VikHost, Cockbox

totally_not_banned · June 2024

@sillycat said:
Kinda. Nicenic will ignore everything if you have enough balance (from experience).

Yeah Nicenic actually quite resilient. It's pretty much the exception that proves the norm though. Especially since registrars have it way easier to distance themselves from the content than actual hosts. The "AUP" of the Seychelles operation @FatGrizzly linked is almost comical when you think about how 10-15 years ago the whole list was pretty much the bread and butter of an infamous Dutch ISP with actual offshore outfits pushing up the do-not-give-a-fuck meter up even further.

totally_not_banned · June 2024

@FatGrizzly said:

@dhmo said:

@WebProject said:

@dhmo said:

PHP 8.x allowed

No KYC

Paypal Supported
. - BULLETPROOF (Happy to keep me anonymous to host)
Any idea? let me know.

How did you managed to get PayPal account without any name on it? PayPal is not anonymous payment method! Just dumb request

if provider dont provide my info (to law-enforcement), then they(any law-enforcement) will not caught my paypal, No?

Most providers will just provide back the info to LEA. Worst case, they might be sub-poena'd.

Exactly. Short of the straight up criminal operations (which won't talk to OP in some random hosting forum, let alone take him on as a client for $20/y) that's just how it goes. Once court orders of the respective jurisdiction roll in there's nothing left any host operating legally could do to shield the client.

Go for someone like MannDude, Njalla, Shinjiru, VikHost, Cockbox

Yeah, there's quite a bunch that would fit the not-too-keen-on-cooperating bill. The reliable ones don't tend to be exactly cheap though. I'd guess if OP's content is politically unproblematic he could maybe find a bargain in Russia (i'm too lazy to dig up what's the go to hosts for this type of stuff these days but i'm sure there is a couple) as the incentive over there to comply with requests coming from the western hemisphere is probably at an all time low (not like it ever was that big to begin with), so as long as he doesn't piss of Russian authorities (maybe just firewall off Russian IP space if that isn't the target audience anyways) he'd be pretty safe in most situations.

SnowStylez · October 2024

i knw old out no god reply
https://bpname.com/ => Bulletproof Domain Registrartion(NiceNic & Cnobin)

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

Finding Bulletproof Webhosting & Domain Registrartion

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

Finding Bulletproof Webhosting & Domain Registrartion

Comments