Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › 2x iHostArt 9TB storage VPS for transfer (1EUR/TB)
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

2x iHostArt 9TB storage VPS for transfer (1EUR/TB)

mikewazarmikewazar Member
edited April 8 in Service Transfers

I'm letting two of these go:

iHostArt STOR-1 and STOR-2 KVM Storage Specials

2 vCPU
3GB RAM
20GB SSD (boot)
9TB HDD (storage)
Unlimited 200Mbps
Renewal 1st October 100.69 EURO annually each

Asking pro-rata on cost to transfer: 50 EUR each

Thanked by 1JerryHou

Comments

  • WhiteRoseGWhiteRoseG Member

    Is it usable ?

  • VoidVoid Member

    @WhiteRoseG said:
    Is it usable ?

    You think someone will just throw away such a deal if it was usable?

    Thanked by 4xvps COLBYLICIOUS nick_ commercial
  • mikewazarmikewazar Member

    @Void said:

    @WhiteRoseG said:
    Is it usable ?

    You think someone will just throw away such a deal if it was usable?

    Works fine, @host_c’s deal made these redundant

  • verl20verl20 Member
    edited April 8

    60% of the time it’s 100% useable.

    Thanked by 10mikewazar shruub Void COLBYLICIOUS dedicados nhocconan nick_ anrikaz ElonBezos commercial
  • CalinCalin Member, Patron Provider

    @verl20 said: 60% of the time it’s 100% useable.

    >

    Hello , sorry possible tell where?You have a Storage VPS with us? I don't thing , uptime in last months very great and more nodes reached at moment time 60+ days of uptime , single big problem what we meet now it's network speed what start improvement after we go to colocation

    Regards,
    Calin

  • mikewazarmikewazar Member

    @Calin said:

    @verl20 said: 60% of the time it’s 100% useable.

    >

    Hello , sorry possible tell where?You have a Storage VPS with us? I don't thing , uptime in last months very great and more nodes reached at moment time 60+ days of uptime , single big problem what we meet now it's network speed what start improvement after we go to colocation

    Regards,
    Calin

    Yeah uptime has been great. Might just keep these seeing as the move to better facilities is on the cards tbh

  • johndeo983johndeo983 Member
    edited April 8

    @Calin said:

    @verl20 said: 60% of the time it’s 100% useable.

    >

    Hello , sorry possible tell where?You have a Storage VPS with us? I don't thing , uptime in last months very great and more nodes reached at moment time 60+ days of uptime , single big problem what we meet now it's network speed what start improvement after we go to colocation

    Regards,
    Calin

    I think he's talking about the expiration not the shitty uptime. Stop being so insecure.
    Be proud of your 12% uptime.

    Thanked by 4Calin verl20 dedicados MateiSR
  • shruubshruub Member

    @mikewazar said:

    @Calin said:

    @verl20 said: 60% of the time it’s 100% useable.

    >

    Hello , sorry possible tell where?You have a Storage VPS with us? I don't thing , uptime in last months very great and more nodes reached at moment time 60+ days of uptime , single big problem what we meet now it's network speed what start improvement after we go to colocation

    Regards,
    Calin

    Yeah uptime has been great. Might just keep these seeing as the move to better facilities is on the cards tbh

    I mean you could probably even monetize with storj or chia or whatever, I'd guess they are allowed.

  • CalinCalin Member, Patron Provider

    @shruub said: I mean you could probably even monetize with storj or chia or whatever, I'd guess they are allowed.

    >

    Storj it's fine , Chia no because I/O it's limited but we don't possible view if customer make or no Chia mining because VPS it's secure and not possible monitorizing what happened inside of this :)

    Regards

    Thanked by 1shruub
  • WhiteRoseGWhiteRoseG Member

    @mikewazar said:

    @Void said:

    @WhiteRoseG said:
    Is it usable ?

    You think someone will just throw away such a deal if it was usable?

    Works fine, @host_c’s deal made these redundant

    I also have Host C, wich one is better ?

  • ZyraZyra Member

    I also have Host C, wich one is better ?

    I have services with both and I would say Host C is a bit more stable, Calin's service was a mess at the start but he is getting there, I'm going to keep my boxes with both for a while and see how it turns out.

  • shruubshruub Member

    @Calin said:

    @shruub said: I mean you could probably even monetize with storj or chia or whatever, I'd guess they are allowed.

    >

    Storj it's fine , Chia no because I/O it's limited but we don't possible view if customer make or no Chia mining because VPS it's secure and not possible monitorizing what happened inside of this :)

    Regards

    Alright, makes sense, thanks!

  • host_chost_c Member, Patron Provider

    Guys, might wanna keep both, as we ( host-c) and @calin have different TOS, just bare in mind that. :)

    Thanked by 2Calin 10thHouse
  • mikewazarmikewazar Member

    @host_c said:
    Guys, might wanna keep both, as we ( host-c) and @calin have different TOS, just bare in mind that. :)

    Store is storage :--)

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • kuticonkuticon Member

    Still available?

  • 10thHouse10thHouse Member

    Still available?

  • mikewazarmikewazar Member

    Yip

  • mikewazarmikewazar Member 
    mikewazar@ihostart-a:~$ curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-04-22                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat 18 May 2024 07:05:55 SAST

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2197.454 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 2.9 GiB
Swap       : 975.0 MiB
Disk       : 18.6 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-21-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Orange Romania Communication S.A
ASN        : AS9050 ORANGE ROMANIA COMMUNICATION S.A
Host       : RCS Technologies FZE LLC
Location   : Bucharest, București (B)
Country    : Romania

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 66.40 MB/s   (16.6k) | 93.97 MB/s    (1.4k)
Write      | 66.55 MB/s   (16.6k) | 94.46 MB/s    (1.4k)
Total      | 132.96 MB/s  (33.2k) | 188.43 MB/s   (2.9k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 101.89 MB/s    (199) | 107.59 MB/s    (105)
Write      | 107.31 MB/s    (209) | 114.76 MB/s    (112)
Total      | 209.21 MB/s    (408) | 222.35 MB/s    (217)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 42.2 Mbits/sec  | 402 Mbits/sec   | 81.7 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 38.2 Mbits/sec  | 369 Mbits/sec   | 36.7 ms        
Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 50.8 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 33.2 Mbits/sec  | 379 Mbits/sec   | 130 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 61.9 Mbits/sec  | 219 Mbits/sec   | 306 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 36.0 Mbits/sec  | 324 Mbits/sec   | 187 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 28.3 Mbits/sec  | 310 Mbits/sec   | 139 ms         
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 5.63 Mbits/sec  | 322 Mbits/sec   | 230 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 727                           
Multi Core      | 1323                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/6154202

YABS completed in 18 min 32 sec
  • Michal212Michal212 Member

    Still available? Payment method ?

Sign In or Register to comment.