Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

yabs.sh - Single Digit IOPS..

kevindskevinds Member, LIR

Don't think I've seen a single-digit IOPS rating before.. Had to share..

curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -i
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-01-01                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat 24 Feb 2024 05:35:51 PM MST

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 7 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31220 @ 3.10GHz
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2137.335 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 15.6 GiB
Swap       : 977.0 MiB
Disk       : 57.6 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-18-amd64
VM Type    : NONE
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sdb2):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.02 MB/s      (255) | 5.43 MB/s       (84)
Write      | 1.05 MB/s      (264) | 5.76 MB/s       (90)
Total      | 2.07 MB/s      (519) | 11.19 MB/s     (174)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 8.68 MB/s       (16) | 9.23 MB/s        (9)
Write      | 9.34 MB/s       (18) | 10.40 MB/s      (10)
Total      | 18.02 MB/s      (34) | 19.64 MB/s      (19)

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 653
Multi Core      | 1980
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5057614

YABS completed in 18 min 26 sec

Don't try this at home folks..

Comments

  • sorry the cassette tapes are slower when being overwritten then fresh - the early bird catches the worm.

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR

    @BruhGamer12 said: sorry the cassette tapes are slower when being overwritten then fresh

    I wonder how many cassette tapes would be needed to get to 57GB.. Humm...

  • That CPU is 13 years old, so maybe they're using 13-year-old hard drives too :)

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR
    edited February 2024

    @Daniel15 said: That CPU is 13 years old, so maybe they're using 13-year-old hard drives too

    Haha

    Brand new Samsung flash drive actually.

    It is going to be an out-of-band recovery system... Trying to decide if I should try and find an E3-1270 v2 for it before it gets deployed. It doesn't need it but wouldn't hurt either..

    Then the decision to find a PCIe-M.2 adapter and use a NVMe drive instead of a traditional 3.5" HDD.. Flash drive OS is a backup in case the primary storage fails. Been there, done that..

  • Brand new Samsung flash drive actually.

    Why? I couldn't get it ... If that 'very old hard-drive type' (and also attached with DVD/BD rom as slave) then I would blame PSU thing :(

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR
    edited February 2024

    @0xC7 said: If that 'very old hard-drive type' (and also attached with DVD/BD rom as slave)

    IDE? Parallel ATA?

  • premium plans from https://mzunguhosting.ml/ ?

  • edited February 2024

    My thumb drive has almost the same 4k IOPS and far better 1m lol

  • Daniel15Daniel15 Veteran
    edited February 2024

    @kevinds said:

    @BruhGamer12 said: sorry the cassette tapes are slower when being overwritten then fresh

    I wonder how many cassette tapes would be needed to get to 57GB.. Humm...

    I know you were joking, but tape is still widely used today. These days you can store 45TB compressed / 18TB native on a single LTO-9 tape with transfer speeds up to 1GB/s and a ~20 year shelf life, for a cheaper price per TB compared to hard drives (the drive is expensive, but the tapes themselves are cheap).

    A lot of companies do offsite backups using tape, and AWS Glacier (at least its standard storage) is mostly tape storage which is why retrieval takes so long. For long-term storage (say 10+ years), it's more reliable than using a HDD or Blu-Rays. Hard drives demagnetize over time if you don't periodically use them, and blu-rays aren't rated for long-term archival.

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR

    @Daniel15 said: but tape is still widely used today.

    I know. I have a LTO-6 library at home I need to get tapes for that I want to start using.

  • BruhGamer12BruhGamer12 Member
    edited February 2024

    @Daniel15 said:

    @kevinds said:

    @BruhGamer12 said: sorry the cassette tapes are slower when being overwritten then fresh

    I wonder how many cassette tapes would be needed to get to 57GB.. Humm...

    I know you were joking, but tape is still widely used today. These days you can store 45TB compressed / 18TB native on a single LTO-9 tape with transfer speeds up to 1GB/s and a ~20 year shelf life. A lot of companies do offsite backups using tape, and AWS Glacier (at least its standard storage) is mostly tape storage which is why retrieval takes so long. For long-term storage (say 10+ years), it's more reliable than using a HDD or Blu-Rays. Hard drives demagnetize over time if you don't periodically use them, and blu-rays aren't rated for long-term archival.

    Oh yes I know - but if you overwrite data(it not being blank) in random IOP you gotta go to the specific points you wanna overwrite slowing it down even more(at least I think if I remember correctly) was my poor joke lol.

    Edit: oop thought you were responding to me bc I got pinged lol so ignore what I said.

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR

    I decided to max the system out, more or less before it gets deployed..

    Had a spare NVMe drive left over from a laptop upgrade and so acquired a PCIe-M.2 card for it.. Waiting for its new CPU (E3-1270 v2) and TPM now.

    IOPS went up considerably.. It still remains that I don't recall seeing single digit IOPS before though.. haha That Samsung flash drive will remain in the system though, never know when a backup drive will be needed..

    curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -i
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri 01 Mar 2024 10:37:50 PM MST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31220 @ 3.10GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 1713.586 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    Swap       : 976.0 MiB
    Disk       : 467.4 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-18-amd64
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/nvme0n1p2):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 93.79 MB/s   (23.4k) | 300.43 MB/s   (4.6k)
    Write      | 94.04 MB/s   (23.5k) | 302.01 MB/s   (4.7k)
    Total      | 187.84 MB/s  (46.9k) | 602.45 MB/s   (9.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 308.35 MB/s    (602) | 326.98 MB/s    (319)
    Write      | 324.74 MB/s    (634) | 348.75 MB/s    (340)
    Total      | 633.10 MB/s   (1.2k) | 675.73 MB/s    (659)
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 655
    Multi Core      | 1994
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5138659
    
    YABS completed in 15 min 38 sec
    
Sign In or Register to comment.