Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


yabs.sh - Single Digit IOPS..
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

yabs.sh - Single Digit IOPS..

kevindskevinds Member, LIR

Don't think I've seen a single-digit IOPS rating before.. Had to share..

curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -i
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-01-01                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat 24 Feb 2024 05:35:51 PM MST

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 7 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31220 @ 3.10GHz
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2137.335 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 15.6 GiB
Swap       : 977.0 MiB
Disk       : 57.6 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-18-amd64
VM Type    : NONE
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sdb2):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.02 MB/s      (255) | 5.43 MB/s       (84)
Write      | 1.05 MB/s      (264) | 5.76 MB/s       (90)
Total      | 2.07 MB/s      (519) | 11.19 MB/s     (174)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 8.68 MB/s       (16) | 9.23 MB/s        (9)
Write      | 9.34 MB/s       (18) | 10.40 MB/s      (10)
Total      | 18.02 MB/s      (34) | 19.64 MB/s      (19)

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 653
Multi Core      | 1980
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5057614

YABS completed in 18 min 26 sec

Don't try this at home folks..

Comments

  • sorry the cassette tapes are slower when being overwritten then fresh - the early bird catches the worm.

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR

    @BruhGamer12 said: sorry the cassette tapes are slower when being overwritten then fresh

    I wonder how many cassette tapes would be needed to get to 57GB.. Humm...

  • That CPU is 13 years old, so maybe they're using 13-year-old hard drives too :)

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR
    edited February 25

    @Daniel15 said: That CPU is 13 years old, so maybe they're using 13-year-old hard drives too

    Haha

    Brand new Samsung flash drive actually.

    It is going to be an out-of-band recovery system... Trying to decide if I should try and find an E3-1270 v2 for it before it gets deployed. It doesn't need it but wouldn't hurt either..

    Then the decision to find a PCIe-M.2 adapter and use a NVMe drive instead of a traditional 3.5" HDD.. Flash drive OS is a backup in case the primary storage fails. Been there, done that..

  • 0xC70xC7 Member

    Brand new Samsung flash drive actually.

    Why? I couldn't get it ... If that 'very old hard-drive type' (and also attached with DVD/BD rom as slave) then I would blame PSU thing :(

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR
    edited February 25

    @0xC7 said: If that 'very old hard-drive type' (and also attached with DVD/BD rom as slave)

    IDE? Parallel ATA?

  • premium plans from https://mzunguhosting.ml/ ?

  • edited February 25

    My thumb drive has almost the same 4k IOPS and far better 1m lol

  • Daniel15Daniel15 Veteran
    edited February 25

    @kevinds said:

    @BruhGamer12 said: sorry the cassette tapes are slower when being overwritten then fresh

    I wonder how many cassette tapes would be needed to get to 57GB.. Humm...

    I know you were joking, but tape is still widely used today. These days you can store 45TB compressed / 18TB native on a single LTO-9 tape with transfer speeds up to 1GB/s and a ~20 year shelf life, for a cheaper price per TB compared to hard drives (the drive is expensive, but the tapes themselves are cheap).

    A lot of companies do offsite backups using tape, and AWS Glacier (at least its standard storage) is mostly tape storage which is why retrieval takes so long. For long-term storage (say 10+ years), it's more reliable than using a HDD or Blu-Rays. Hard drives demagnetize over time if you don't periodically use them, and blu-rays aren't rated for long-term archival.

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR

    @Daniel15 said: but tape is still widely used today.

    I know. I have a LTO-6 library at home I need to get tapes for that I want to start using.

  • BruhGamer12BruhGamer12 Member
    edited February 25

    @Daniel15 said:

    @kevinds said:

    @BruhGamer12 said: sorry the cassette tapes are slower when being overwritten then fresh

    I wonder how many cassette tapes would be needed to get to 57GB.. Humm...

    I know you were joking, but tape is still widely used today. These days you can store 45TB compressed / 18TB native on a single LTO-9 tape with transfer speeds up to 1GB/s and a ~20 year shelf life. A lot of companies do offsite backups using tape, and AWS Glacier (at least its standard storage) is mostly tape storage which is why retrieval takes so long. For long-term storage (say 10+ years), it's more reliable than using a HDD or Blu-Rays. Hard drives demagnetize over time if you don't periodically use them, and blu-rays aren't rated for long-term archival.

    Oh yes I know - but if you overwrite data(it not being blank) in random IOP you gotta go to the specific points you wanna overwrite slowing it down even more(at least I think if I remember correctly) was my poor joke lol.

    Edit: oop thought you were responding to me bc I got pinged lol so ignore what I said.

  • kevindskevinds Member, LIR

    I decided to max the system out, more or less before it gets deployed..

    Had a spare NVMe drive left over from a laptop upgrade and so acquired a PCIe-M.2 card for it.. Waiting for its new CPU (E3-1270 v2) and TPM now.

    IOPS went up considerably.. It still remains that I don't recall seeing single digit IOPS before though.. haha That Samsung flash drive will remain in the system though, never know when a backup drive will be needed..

    curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -i
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri 01 Mar 2024 10:37:50 PM MST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31220 @ 3.10GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 1713.586 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    Swap       : 976.0 MiB
    Disk       : 467.4 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-18-amd64
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/nvme0n1p2):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 93.79 MB/s   (23.4k) | 300.43 MB/s   (4.6k)
    Write      | 94.04 MB/s   (23.5k) | 302.01 MB/s   (4.7k)
    Total      | 187.84 MB/s  (46.9k) | 602.45 MB/s   (9.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 308.35 MB/s    (602) | 326.98 MB/s    (319)
    Write      | 324.74 MB/s    (634) | 348.75 MB/s    (340)
    Total      | 633.10 MB/s   (1.2k) | 675.73 MB/s    (659)
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 655
    Multi Core      | 1994
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5138659
    
    YABS completed in 15 min 38 sec
    
Sign In or Register to comment.