New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
What is your smallest VPS in 2024?
This discussion has been closed.

Comments
Where have get this VPS?
When it comes to the smallest disk (892MB):
...and I've got some great containers with 128MB from Gullo, all working (idling) fine:
Multiple 256MB FreeBSD VPS but with my own tight kernel. Also multiple old thin client boxes with 8 to 32 MB and one "print server" box with 4 MB running diverse (stripped down) linux distros like tinycore.
And hey if push comes to shove there's still DOS ...
(To be fair I should mention that when one is used to work with MCUs even 1 MB is insanely much RAM ...)
virmach, when they still crazy, also it has 1 IPv4
256MB nat vps from Gullo's hosting. Running some opensource stuff
They are always crazy
Btw, I just saw a provider calling 1 GB VPS "useless" and "crappy" in the thread list... (and thought "you must be either a clueless idiot or very desperate to generate sales")
I remember the days when dedicated servers with 256 MB memory and 6 GB SCSI disks were very expensive.
Wait, in 1990s? I remember my home computer was equipped with Pentium (i586) and 4.33GB HDD back in 1995.
With 4 MB RAM?
384MB VPS from tinykvm.com
I sure op wonder who link you mean
When I wrote that the thread of said provider was on the front page. But I did - and still do not intend to - name him; my point was about the statement in the context of this thread's topic, and not to shame someone.
well, my intention was to shame him.
256mb khanwebhosting vps
Anything under 16 GB RAM is basically a calculator with a kernel